混合所有制改革与企业ESG表现:国企与民企的比较研究

李井林, 阳镇, 陈劲, 甘小梅

科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1) : 164-173.

PDF(1058 KB)
PDF(1058 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1) : 164-173. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.01.017  CSTR: 32148.14.kygl.2025.01.017

混合所有制改革与企业ESG表现:国企与民企的比较研究

作者信息 +

Mixed ownership reform and the ESG performance of enterprises: A comparative study of the difference between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

混合所有制改革是推动企业实现高质量发展的重要方式,但不同所有制企业混合所有制改革的ESG表现分化效应有待深入研究。本文基于中国沪深A股上市公司2013—2020年的数据,使用OLS回归模型以及中介效应模型考察了企业混合所有制改革能否以及如何影响企业ESG表现。研究发现:第一,企业实施混合所有制改革能够显著促进ESG表现;区分企业ESG表现各维度后,企业混合所有制改革能够显著促进企业的环境责任表现、社会责任表现以及公司治理表现;区分企业产权性质后,混合所有制改革对国企和民企ESG表现均具有显著的促进效应。第二,作用机制检验结果表明,混合所有制改革在提升国企ESG表现中主要发挥了治理效应,而在提升民企ESG表现中主要发挥了资源效应。第三,进一步研究发现,混合所有制改革对ESG表现的促进效应存在地区市场化进程、行业环保敏感度以及企业高管激励强度的异质性;ESG表现在企业混合所有制改革的绿色技术创新促进效应中存在部分中介作用。本文突破了既有研究仅关注国企混改或民企混改的局限,不仅有效扩展了混合所有制改革与企业ESG表现文献的研究内容,而且从产权性质视角揭示了混合所有制改革对企业ESG表现作用机制的异质性,为高质量发展导向下系统化分类推动各种不同类型企业实施混合所有制改革以提升企业ESG表现提供了经验借鉴。

Abstract

Mixed ownership reform is an important way to promote enterprise high-quality development, but the ESG differentiation effect of mixed ownership reform in different ownership enterprises needs to be further studied. This paper, based on the data from Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2013 to 2020, used the OLS regression model and mediation effect model to examine whether and how mixed ownership reform can affect enterprise ESG performance. The research results indicated that: firstly, mixed ownership reform has a significant promoting effect on enterprise ESG performance; After distinguishing the various dimensions of enterprise ESG performance, mixed ownership reform has a significant promoting effect on enterprise environmental responsibility performance, social responsibility performance and corporate governance performance; After distinguishing the nature of enterprise property rights, mixed ownership reform has a significant promoting influence on the ESG performance of both state-owned and private enterprises. Secondly, the internal mechanism test results indicated that mixed ownership reform has mainly played a governance effect in improving the ESG performance of state-owned enterprises, while it has mainly played a resource effect in improving the ESG performance of private enterprises. Thirdly, further research found that the promotion effect of enterprise mixed ownership reform on ESG performance exhibits heterogeneity in regional marketization, industry environmental sensitivity and executive incentive intensity; ESG performance plays a partial mediating role in the green technology innovation promotion effect of enterprise mixed ownership reform. This paper has broken through the limitations of existing research that only focuses on mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises or private enterprises. It has not only effectively expanded the research content of mixed ownership reform and enterprise ESG performance literature, but also revealed the heterogeneity of the mechanism of mixed ownership reform on enterprise ESG performance from the perspective of property rights, thus providing some experiences and reference for systematically promoting mixed ownership reform of different types of enterprises to improve enterprise ESG performance under the guidance of high-quality development.

关键词

混合所有制改革 / 企业ESG表现 / 公司治理效应 / 资源获取效应

Key words

mixed ownership reform / enterprise ESG performance / corporate governance effect / resource acquisition effect

引用本文

导出引用
李井林, 阳镇, 陈劲, . 混合所有制改革与企业ESG表现:国企与民企的比较研究[J]. 科研管理. 2025, 46(1): 164-173 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.01.017
Li Jinglin, Yang Zhen, Chen Jin, et al. Mixed ownership reform and the ESG performance of enterprises: A comparative study of the difference between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2025, 46(1): 164-173 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2025.01.017
中图分类号: F276.1;F275.5   

参考文献

[1]
何瑛, 杨琳. 改革开放以来国有企业混合所有制改革:历程、成效与展望[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(7): 44-60+4.
HE Ying, YANG Lin. Mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises since reform and opening-up: Course, effect and prospect[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(7): 44-60+4.
[2]
何德旭, 曾敏, 张硕楠. 国有资本参股如何影响民营企业?:基于债务融资视角的研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(11):189-207.
HE Dexu, ZENG Min, ZHANG Shuonan. How do state-owned capital shareholders affect private enterprises? Research from the perspective of debt financing[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(11):189-207.
[3]
姚梅洁, 宋增基, 张宗益. 制度负外部性与市场主体的应对:来自中国民营企业的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(11): 158-173.
YAO Meijie, SONG Zengji, ZHANG Zongyi. Negative externality of system and the response of market players: Empirical evidence from Chinese private enterprises[J]. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(11): 158-173.
[4]
肖红军, 阳镇, 凌鸿程. 企业社会责任具有绿色创新效应吗[J]. 经济学动态, 2022(8):117-132.
XIAO Hongjun, YANG Zhen, LING Hongcheng. Is corporate social responsibility conducive to green innovation?[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2022(8):117-132.
[5]
任乐, 王倩雯, 陈炎. 混合所有制改革对国有企业数字化转型的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(5): 153-162.
REN Le, WANG Qianwen, CHEN Yan. Research on the impact of mixed ownership reform on digital transformation of state-owned enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(5): 153-162.
[6]
罗宏, 黄婉. 多个大股东并存对高管机会主义减持的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(8):163-178.
LUO Hong, HUANG Wan. Research on the impact of multiple large shareholders coexistence on the opportunistic stock selling behaviors of executives[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(8):163-178.
[7]
于瑶, 祁怀锦. 混合所有制改革对民营企业高层次人才配置的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(10): 141-151.
YU Yao, QI Huaijin. Research on the influence of mixed ownership reform on the staffing of high-level talents in private enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(10): 141-151.
[8]
于瑶, 祁怀锦. 混合所有制与民营经济健康发展:基于企业违规视角的研究[J]. 财经研究, 2022, 48(3):33-47.
YU Yao, QI Huaijin. Mixed ownership and healthy development of private economy: Based on the perspective of enterprise violations[J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2022, 48(3):33-47.
[9]
潘玉坤, 郭萌萌. 空气污染压力下的企业ESG表现[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(7):112-132.
PAN Yukun, GUO Mengmeng. Air pollution and corporate ESG performance[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(7):112-132.
[10]
杨兴全, 尹兴强. 国企混改如何影响公司现金持有?[J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(11): 93-107.
YANG Xingquan, YIN Xingqiang. How does the mixed ownership reform of state-owned enterprises affect the company's cash holdings?[J]. Journal of Management World, 2018, 34(11): 93-107.
[11]
赵璨, 宿莉莎, 曹伟. 混合所有制改革:治理效应还是资源效应?:基于不同产权性质下企业投资效率的研究[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2021(1):75-90.
ZHAO Can, SU Lisha, CAO Wei. Mixed ownership reform: Governance effect or resource effect? Research on enterprise investment efficiency based on different property rights[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2021(1):75-90.
[12]
雷雷, 张大永, 姬强. 共同机构持股与企业ESG表现[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(4): 133-151.
LEI Lei, ZHANG Dayong, JI Qiang. Common institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(4): 133-151.
[13]
毛其淋, 王玥清. ESG的就业效应研究:来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2023, 58(7):86-103.
MAO Qilin, WANG Yueqing. Employment effects of ESG: Evidence from Chinese listed companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2023, 58(7):86-103.
[14]
王小鲁, 胡李鹏, 樊纲. 中国分省份市场化指数报告(2021)[M]. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2021.
WANG Xiaolu, HU Lipeng, FAN Gang. Marketization index of China's provinces: NERI Report 2021[M]. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2021.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“国企混合所有制改革的实现路径选择研究”(20&ZD073,2020—2025)
国家社会科学基金重点项目:“支撑企业新质生产力形成的创新模式与创新政策研究”(24AGL018,2024—2027)
中国社会科学院学科登峰战略企业管理优势学科建设项目(DF2023YS25,2024—2025)

PDF(1058 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/