绿色技术融合对后发企业非对称赶超的影响研究——基于动态竞合视角

刘微微; 李昀泽; 毕克新

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.08.010

PDF(1368 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (8) : 95-105. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.08.010

绿色技术融合对后发企业非对称赶超的影响研究——基于动态竞合视角

作者信息 +

Research on the impact of green technology convergence on the asymmetric catch-up of latecomer firms: A study based on the perspective of dynamic co-opetition

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

以往技术赶超研究聚焦于企业如何借助后发优势并结合企业间动态竞争关系实施创新策略。本文从企业绿色转型角度出发,对这一赶超路径进行两方面延伸:第一,提出绿色技术融合既能为关键技术“添绿”补齐短板,又会形成差异化竞争力扬其长处。第二,将动态竞合领域中的绿色技术融合与环境不确定性相关联,预测绿色技术融合的赶超效应取决于环境不确定性下的市场动荡程度。本文以 2012—2021年中国重污染行业 679家上市公司为研究对象,基于生态位理论测算竞合视角下绿色技术融合度,运用回归分析方法考察了绿色技术融合对非对称赶超的影响。实证结果表明,动态竞合领域中的绿色技术融合能够显著提高经济和环境维度的企业追赶绩效,环境不确定性下的市场动荡会强化绿色技术融合与企业追赶绩效之间的正向关系。具体而言,竞合视角下的绿色技术融合能够充分利用后发优势,通过跨领域差异化战略加速非对称技术赶超。研究结论丰富了竞合相关理论,对推动绿色与非绿色技术融合,促进后发企业非对称赶超提供经验证据和实践启示。

Abstract

Previous studies on technology catch-up focused on how to implement innovation strategies by taking advantage of latecomer advantages and combining the dynamic competitive relationships between enterprises. From the perspective of enterprise green transformation, this paper extended this catch-up path in two aspects. First, it was proposed that green technology integration can not only "add green" to key technologies to make up for shortcomings, but also form differentiated competitiveness and promote their strengths. Secondly, the integration of green technology in the field of dynamic co-opetition was associated with environmental uncertainty, and the catch-up effect of green technology integration was predicted to depend on the degree of market turbulence under environmental uncertainty. This paper took 679 listed companies in China's heavily polluting industries from 2012 to 2021 as the research objects, calculated the degree of green technology integration from the perspective of co-opetition based on the ecological niche theory, and used regression analysis method to explore the impact of green technology integration on asymmetric catch-up. The empirical results showed that green technology integration in the field of dynamic co-opetition can significantly improve the catch-up performance of latecomer firms in economic and environmental dimensions, market turbulence under environmental uncertainty will strengthen the positive relationship between green technology integration and firm catch-up performance. Specifically, the integration of green technologies from the perspective of co-opetition can make full use of the advantages of latecomers and accelerate the catch-up of asymmetric technologies through cross-field differentiation strategy.

导出引用

刘微微, 李昀泽, 毕克新. 绿色技术融合对后发企业非对称赶超的影响研究——基于动态竞合视角[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(8): 95-105 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.08.010

Liu Weiwei, Li Yunze, Bi Kexin. Research on the impact of green technology convergence on the asymmetric catch-up of latecomer firms: A study based on the perspective of dynamic co-opetition[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(8): 95-105 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.08.010

中图分类号： F062.4

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	俞荣建, 王雅萍, 项丽瑶. 后发技术非对称赶超策略及其情境依赖机制研究[J]. 社会科学战线, 2022(9):61-73. YU Rongjian, WANG Yaping, XIANG Liyao. Research on asymmetric catch-up strategies of late technology and context-dependent mechanism[J]. Social Science Front, 2022(9):61-73. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	COLOMBELLI A, QUATRARO F. Green start-ups and local knowledge spillovers from clean and dirty technologies[J]. Small Business Economics, 2019, 52(4):773-792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9934-y 本文引用 [1]

[3]

孙早, 许薛璐. 前沿技术差距与科学研究的创新效应:基础研究与应用研究谁扮演了更重要的角色[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017(3):5-23.

SUN

Zao

, XU

Xuelu

. Technology distance to frontier and the innovative effect of scientific research:Which one plays more important role, basic research or applied research[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2017(3): 5-23.

本文引用 [1]

[4]	SHIN J S. Catching up, technology transfer and institutions: A Gerschenkronian study of late industrialisation from the experience of Germany, Japan and South Korea with special reference to the iron & steel industry & semiconductor industry[D]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 1995. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	李梦柯, 王芳. 产业创新的科学知识特征对中国技术追赶的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(3):10-19. LI Mengke, WANG Fang. Impact of scientific knowledge characteristics of industrial innovation on China's technological catch-up[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(3):10-19. 本文引用 [1]

[6]

周麟, 贺俊, 兰宗敏, 等. 后发企业如何利用全球生产网络构建自主产品开发平台?:对长城汽车氢能技术产品开发的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(11):152-173.

ZHOU

Lin

, HE

Jun

, LAN

Zongmin

, et al. How can latecomer enterprises utilize global production network to build independent product development platform? A longitudinal case study based on Great Wall Motor's hydrogen technology product development[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(11):152-173.

本文引用 [1]

[7]	孙玉涛, 王茜, 陈灵芝. 新能源汽车行业知识流动的技术竞合机制研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(12):79-88. SUN Yutao, WANG Xi, CHEN Lingzhi. A study of the technical co-opetition mechanism on inter-organizational knowledge flow in the new energy vehicles industry[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(12):79-88. 本文引用 [3]

[8]	PRANGE C, ENG T, LI J. Collaborative new product alliances: A review of the literature and research perspectives[J]. Strategic Change, 2015, 24(4):351-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2015.24.issue-4 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10991697/24/4 本文引用 [1]

[9]

ALDIERI

, BRAHMI

, CHEN

, et al. Knowledge spillovers and technical efficiency for cleaner production: An economic analysis from agriculture innovation[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 320:128830.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128830

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959652621030274

本文引用 [1]

[10]	ROMA P, PERRONE G. Cooperation among competitors: A comparison of cost-sharing mechanisms[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 180:172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.002 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0925527316301815 本文引用 [1]

[11]	GUO S, CHOI T, SHEN B. Green product development under competition: A study of the fashion apparel industry[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2020, 280(2):523-538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.07.050 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0377221719306290 本文引用 [1]

[12]	HAFEZI M, ZHAO X, ZOLFAGHARINIA H. Together we stand? Co-opetition for the development of green products[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023, 306(3):1417-1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.07.027 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S037722172200580X 本文引用 [1]

[13]

吴晓波, 程心仪, 刘潭飞, 等. 知识耦合与企业技术追赶:环境动荡性的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(9):71-88.

Xiaobo

, CHENG

Xinyi

, LIU

Tanfei

, et al. Knowledge coupling and corporate technological catch-up: Considering the moderating effect of environmental turbulence[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2022, 43(9):71-88.

本文引用 [1]

[14]	樊纲. 比较优势与后发优势[J]. 管理世界, 2023, 39(2):13-21. FAN Gang. Comparative advantages and latecomer advantages[J]. Journal of Management World, 2023, 39(2):13-21. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励:来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9):192-208. LI Qingyuan, XIAO Zehua. Heterogeneous environmental regulation tools and green innovation incentives: Evidence from green patents of listed companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(9):192-208. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	FUSILLO F. Green technologies and diversity in the knowledge search and output phases: Evidence from European patents[J]. Research Policy, 2023, 52(4):104727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104727 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048733323000112 本文引用 [2]

[17]	BARBIERI N, MARZUCCHI A, RIZZO U. Green technologies, interdependencies, and policy[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2023, 118:102791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2023.102791 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0095069623000098 本文引用 [1]

[18]	王媛, 曾德明, 文金艳. 跨领域技术融合对企业新产品开发绩效的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8):114-122. WANG Yuan, ZENG Deming, WEN Jinyan. Influence of cross-domain technology convergence on firms'new product development performance[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(8):114-122. 本文引用 [2]

[19]

ALQERSHI

, SAUFI

R B A

, ISMAIL

N A

, et al. The moderating role of market turbulence beyond the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia-Ukraine crisis on the relationship between intellectual capital and business sustainability[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 186:122081.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122081

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162522006023

本文引用 [1]

[20]	于文超, 梁平汉. 不确定性、营商环境与民营企业经营活力[J]. 中国工业经济, 2019(11):136-154. YU Wenchao, LIANG Pinghan. Uncertainty,business environment and private enterprises' vitality[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(11):136-154. 本文引用 [1]

[21]

彭新敏, 祝学伟. 机会窗口、联盟组合与后发企业的技术赶超:舜宇1984-2018年纵向案例研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(4):70-78.

PENG

Xinmin

, ZHU

Xuewei

. Window of opportunity, alliance portfolio and beyond technological catching-up of latecomer firms: The longitudinal case study of SUNNY from 1984 to 2018[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2022, 25(4):70-78.

本文引用 [1]

[22]

DEMUYNCK

, ZHANG

, CASET

, et al. Urban co-opetition in megaregions: Measuring competition and cooperation within and beyond the Pearl River Delta[J]. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 2023, 101:101951.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101951

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0198971523000145

本文引用 [1]

[23]	张卫国, 青雪梅. 竞合战略趋势、稳定性机理与中国企业选择[J]. 改革, 2012(7):34-45. ZHANG Weiguo, QING Xuemei. Tendency of coopetition strategies, mechanism of stability and choice of Chinese enterprises[J]. Reform, 2012(7):34-45. 本文引用 [1]

[24]

朱正浩, 戚聿东, 赵志栋. 技术生态位对企业绩效的影响研究:技术宽度和技术重叠度整合视角[J]. 南方经济, 2021(4):86-105.

ZHU

Zhenghao

, QI

Yudong

, ZHAO

Zhidong

. The impact of technological niches on firms'performance: An integrated perspective of technological breadth and technological overlap[J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2021(4):86-105.

本文引用 [1]

[25]	DIESTRE L, RAJAGOPALAN N. Are all “sharks” dangerous? New biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012, 33(3):1115-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.v33.10 https://sms.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10970266/33/10 本文引用 [1]

[26]

ALHIHI

, ALMHEIDAT

. Estimation of Pianka overlapping coefficient for two exponential distributions[J]. Mathematics, 2023, 11(19):4152.

https://doi.org/10.3390/math11194152

https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/19/4152

本文引用 [1] 摘要

Overlapping coefficients (OVL) are commonly used to estimate the similarity between populations in terms of their density functions. In this paper, we consider Pianka’s overlap coefficient for two exponential populations. The methods for statistical inference of Pianka’s coefficient are presented. The bias and mean square error (MSE) of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and the Bayes estimator of Pianka’s overlap coefficient are investigated by simulation. Confidence intervals for Pianka’s overlap measure are constructed.

[27]	李佳楠. 机会窗口、技术创新与后发企业超越追赶[J]. 生产力研究, 2022(11):103-107. LI Jianan. Window of opportunity, technological innovation and catch-up of latecomer firms[J]. Productivity Research, 2022(11):103-107. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	HE C, SHI F, TAN R. A synthetical analysis method of measuring technology convergence[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2022, 209:118262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118262 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S095741742201404X 本文引用 [1]

[29]

ZUO

, GUO

, CHENG

, et al. How to achieve new progress in ecological civilization construction? Based on cloud model and coupling coordination degree model[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2021, 127:107789.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107789

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X21004544

本文引用 [1]

[30]

FARAZI

M S

, GOPALAKRISHNAN

, PEREZ-LUNO

. Depth and breadth of knowledge and the governance of technology alliances[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2019, 54:28-40.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2019.08.002

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0923474818301279

本文引用 [1]

[31]	WU Z, SALOMON R. Does imitation reduce the liability of foreignness? Linking distance, isomorphism, and performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2016, 37(12):2441-2462. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2016.37.issue-12 https://sms.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10970266/37/12 本文引用 [1]

[32]

王赐之, 冯佳林, 孙忠娟, 等. 市场动荡驱动企业智能化转型的门槛效应研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2023, 40(9):84-94.

https://doi.org/10.6049/kjjbydc.2021120249

摘要

面对VUCA时代的市场动荡，企业如何顺利实现智能化转型成为重要议题。基于技术创新理论与战略柔性理论，采用面板门槛回归模型，以2010—2020年518家制造业上市公司为样本进行实证研究，结果发现：当企业技术创新能力累积跨过门槛后，市场动荡对企业智能化转型具有正向驱动作用；当企业战略柔性能力累积跨过门槛后，市场动荡对企业智能化转型同样具有正向驱动作用。通过探讨市场动荡对企业智能化转型的驱动机制，拓展技术创新理论与战略柔性理论在中国智造情境下的应用边界，为企业智能化转型路径选择提供实践启示。

WANG

Cizhi

, FENG

Jialin

, SUN

Zhongjuan

, et al. Market turbulence driving enterprise intelligent transformation: A threshold effect study[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2023, 40(9):84-94.

本文引用 [1]

[33]	娄岩, 杨培培, 黄鲁成. 基于专利的技术融合测度方法及实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(11):134-145. LOU Yan, YANG Peipei, HUANG Lucheng. Method of measurement and an empirical research of technology convergence based on patents[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(11):134-145. 本文引用 [1]