PDF(1077 KB)
PDF(1077 KB)
PDF(1077 KB)
行业协会关联对企业绿色创新影响机制研究
Research on the influence mechanism of industry associations connection on the green innovation of enterprises
绿色创新在创造经济价值的同时降低了资源消耗和环境成本,将价值创造和绿色倡议融入战略决策是日益流行的企业管理实践。行业协会在这一实践中扮演着中介机构的角色,但其影响机制仍有待进一步洞察。本文基于行业协会的组织属性并结合制度逻辑和利益相关者理论构建全面的研究框架,考察了行业协会关联影响企业绿色创新的情境机制和传导路径。研究表明:(1)行业协会关联对企业绿色创新具有促进作用;(2)基于内外部协同治理的调节效应分析表明,董事会独立性、分析师关注和外部审计质量强化了行业协会关联对企业绿色创新的积极效应,从而证实了利益相关者的合法性压力感知机制;(3)作用机制分析表明,行业协会关联通过提高企业ESG表现和吸收能力进而促进企业绿色创新,且行业协会关联对企业绿色创新的驱动效果在不同类型的行业协会关联因素中存在系统性差异。研究成果拓展了绿色创新的前因研究,深化了对中国行业协会性质和治理职能的认知,并从行业协会、市场服务机构以及董事会多边治理推动企业亲社会决策和绿色创新提供了实践启示。
Green innovation creates economic value while reducing resource consumption and environmental costs. It is an increasingly popular practice in management of enterprises to integrate value creation and green initiatives into strategic decision-making. Industry associations play an intermediary role in this practice, but its influence mechanism remains to be further understood. This paper built up a comprehensive research framework based on the organizational attributes of industry associations, as well as institutional logic and stakeholder theory, and examined the contextual mechanisms and transmission paths through which industry associations connection affects green innovation of enterprises. The results showed that: (1) Industry associations connection has a promoting effect on green innovation of enterprises; (2) The moderating effect analysis based on internal and external collaborative governance showed that the independence of the board, analysts' attention and the quality of external audit strengthen the positive effect of industry associations connection on green innovation of enterprises, thus confirming the legitimacy pressure perception mechanism of stakeholders; (3) The mechanism analysis showed that industry associations connection can promote green innovation by improving ESG performance and absorption capacity of enterprises. And there are systematic differences in this driving effect among different types of industry associations connection. The research results have expanded the antecedents of green innovation and deepened the understanding of the nature and governance functions of China industry associations, and will provide practical enlightenment from the multilateral governance of industry associations, market service agencies and boards to promote pro-social decision-making and green innovation of enterprises.
行业协会关联 / 企业绿色创新 / 董事会独立性 / 分析师关注 / 外部审计质量
industry associations connection / green innovation of enterprise / board independence / analysts' attention / external audit quality
| [1] |
A growing body of scholarship studies the emergence of moral markets—sectors offering market-based solutions to social and environmental issues. To date, researchers have largely focused on the drivers of firm entry into these values-laden sectors. However, we know comparatively little about postentry dynamics or the determinants of firm survival in moral markets. This study examines how regional institutional logics—spatially bound, socially constructed meaning systems that legitimize specific practices and goals within a community—shape firm survival in emerging moral markets. Using a unique panel of firms entering the first eight years of the U.S. green building supply industry, we find that (1) a regional market logic amplifies the impacts of market forces by increasing the positive impact of market adoption and the negative impact of localized competition on firm survival, (2) a regional proenvironmental logic dampens the impacts of adoption and competition on firm survival, and (3) institutional complexity—the co-occurrence of both market and proenvironmental logics in a region—negates the traditional advantages of de alio (diversifying incumbent) firms, creating an opportunity for de novo (entrepreneurial entrant) firms to compete more effectively. Our study integrates research on industry emergence, institutional logics, and firm survival to address important gaps in our knowledge regarding the evolution and growth of environmental entrepreneurship in moral markets.
|
| [2] |
李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励:来自上市企业绿色专利的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9):192-208.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
王性玉, 赵辉. 环境保护税改革对企业绿色发展的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8):139-151.
|
| [5] |
王旭, 褚旭. 制造业企业绿色技术创新的同群效应研究:基于多层次情境的参照作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2022, 25(2):68-81.
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
谭凌波, 占悠雅, 黄文茵. 后脱钩时代行业协会自主性生成机制研究:基于组织身份理论的多案例分析[J]. 管理学报, 2023, 20(5):643-654.
采用案例研究复制逻辑对长三角区域8家典型行业协会进行分析，从组织身份视角探析行业协会自主性的生成机制。研究发现：①行业协会面临控制型、规范型与培育型3种监管制度逻辑，分别影响依附型、功能型与共益型组织身份的意义建构；②组织身份影响利益相关者工具式资源互换关系、二元式伙伴互动关系与整合式网络联盟关系的意义赋予；③行业协会对利益相关者互动关系的意义赋予推动其市场接触型、市场专注型与市场发展型自主性的形成。
In order to study the generating mechanism of the autonomy of industry associations from the perspective of organizational identity, this study selects eight industry associations in the Yangtze River Delta region and adopts a multi-case comparative study of replication logic. The results show that, industry associations are faced with three types of regulatory logic in institution: control, normative and nurturing logic, which respectively affect the meaning construction of dependent, functional and beneficial organizational identity. Secondly, organizational identity affects the meaning ascriptions of stakeholders’ instrumental resource exchange relationship, dualistic partnership interaction relationship and integrated network alliance relationship. Lastly, the meaning ascriptions of interaction relationship between industry association and stakeholder promotes the formation of market contact, market focus and market development autonomy.
|
| [13] |
郁建兴, 吴昊岱, 沈永东, 等. 脱钩改革如何影响行业协会商会政策参与?:基于795家全国性商协会的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(9):145-157.
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
罗劲博, 李小荣. 高管的“行业协会”任职与企业过度投资:资源汲取还是资源诅咒[J]. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(5):64-78.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
陈德球, 胡晴. 数字经济时代下的公司治理研究:范式创新与实践前沿[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(6):213-240.
|
| [19] |
We start this article with the exploration of similarities between the resource-based view of the firm (RBV) and stakeholder theory at the time of their origination and then proceed with the conversation on what led to distinct developmental trajectories of the two theories. Though RBV has become a leading paradigm in the strategic management field, we argue that in its current form, RBV is yet incomplete. We suggest there are four aspects that stakeholder theory can offer to inform RBV: normativity, sustainability, people, and cooperation. Reconciling stakeholder theory and RBV is a promising path to advancing our understanding of management, and we provide a two-part guideline to management scholars and practitioners who would be willing to take this path.
|
| [20] |
Although increased board independence is a commonly offered solution to curbing corporate misconduct, scholars have expressed skepticism about its effectiveness, and empirical evidence is mixed. We argue that the relationship between board independence and corporate misconduct is likely nuanced—and may vary by the type of independence (e.g., independence on the whole board or on the audit committee) and by national context. We conducted a meta-analysis of 135 studies spanning more than 20 countries. We find that the board independence–corporate misconduct relationship (a) is generally negative, (b) varies based on the implementation form that independence takes on (i.e., independence of the whole board, on the audit committee, or between the roles of CEO and board chair), and (c) is more strongly negative in countries with less corruption. We advance corporate governance theory and research by demonstrating that the popular governance practice of increasing board independence must both account for the manner in which independence is implemented and consider the powerful influence of firms’ broader societal context to clearly understand its effect. Further, based on our review of the literature, we uncover opportunities for the advancement of corporate governance and corporate misconduct research.
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
魏志华, 王孝华, 蔡伟毅. 税收征管数字化与企业内部薪酬差距[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(3):152-170.
|
| [24] |
胡楠, 薛付婧, 王昊楠. 管理者短视主义影响企业长期投资吗?:基于文本分析和机器学习[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(5):139-156.
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
Responsible management competences are the skills of managers to deal with the triple bottom line, stakeholder value and moral dilemmas. In this paper, we analyse how managers develop responsible management competences and how the competences interact with capabilities at the organisational level. The paper contributes to the responsible management literature by integrating research on absorptive capacity and organisational learning. By creating intersections between these disparate research streams, this study enables a better understanding of the development of responsible management competences. The paper is a systematic literature review on environmental competences, which are a type of responsible management competences referring to the managerial skills aimed at improving environmental sustainability. The findings demonstrate that managers who are able to recognize and acquire external knowledge develop environmental competences, and organisations capable of assimilating, transforming and exploiting knowledge develop environmental capabilities. The paper establishes that a dynamic and recursive relation exists between environmental competences and capabilities. Antecedents and contextual conditions specific to a sustainability context, such as eco-centric values and stakeholder pressures, influence the development of environmental competences. The study shows that environmental competences have a positive direct effect on environmental performance, and an indirect effect as a mediator between environmental capabilities and performance.
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
Integrating new institutional economics and resource dependence theory, this study investigates whether in transition economies, characterized by shifting from centrally commanded to more market-oriented economies, there are performance differences among family firms (FFs), nonfamily firms (non-FFs), and former state-owned enterprises (former SOEs), and whether political connections affect these differences. Our findings suggest that FFs outperform non-FFs and former SOEs, unless non-FFs have politically connected CEOs. The performance gap in favor of FFs increases at high levels of board political connection intensity. Among FFs, the top-performing ones either promote nonfamily leadership or combine family leadership with politically connected boards of directors.
|
| [30] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
