企业突破性创新的组态路径研究

张征, 谢佳, 李冉

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 21-28.

PDF(1056 KB)
PDF(1056 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (7) : 21-28. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.003

企业突破性创新的组态路径研究

作者信息 +

Research on the configuration path of the radical innovation of enterprises

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

突破性创新作为企业突破关键核心技术的重要手段,受到多层次多因素的协同影响,但现有单个因素的净效应研究无法揭示其复杂因果机制。本文从组态视角出发,基于社会生态系统理论,构建企业突破性创新的多重并发机制模型,并采用fsQCA方法对影响企业高与非高突破性创新的前因组态进行分析。研究结果表明:(1)不存在引致企业高或非高突破性创新的单个必要条件,即企业突破性创新受到多个因素的协同影响;(2)存在四条导致高突破性创新产生的组态路径,根据核心条件的分布特征,可归纳为能力主导型、动机驱动型、内外资源耦合型;(3)存在三条导致非高突破性创新产生的组态路径,根据核心条件的分布特征,可归纳为能力制约型和资源缺失型;(4)技术能力作为核心条件在导致企业高或非高突破性创新的多条路径中发挥着重要作用。研究结论为企业实现高突破性创新或规避非高突破性创新提供了一定的理论依据和实践启示。

Abstract

Radical innovation, an essential means to make breakthroughs in the key and core technologies, is affected by synergies gained from multiple factors. However, existing studies that explored the net effect of single factor cannot explain the complex causations and diverse paths leading to the radical innovation in enterprises. Based on the society ecosystems theory, this study constructed a configuration analysis framework for radical innovation, and used the fsQCA method to analyze the antecedent configuration that affect the high and non-high radical innovation. The research found that: (1) there is no single necessary condition for high or non-high radical innovation, that is, the radical innovation of enterprises is affected by the synergy of multiple factors; (2) there are four configuration paths leading to high radical innovation, which can be summarized as capability-driven path, motivation-driven path, internal resource coupling path and external resource coupling path according to the distribution characteristics of core conditions; (3) there are three configuration paths that lead to non-high radical innovation, which can be summarized as capacity-constrained path and resource-deficient path according to the distribution characteristics of core conditions; (4) technical competence as a core condition plays an important role in the multiple paths that lead to high or non-high radical innovation. The conclusions of this study can provide many theoretical implications and practical enlightenments for enterprises to achieve high radical innovation or to ameliorate non-high radical innovation.

关键词

企业突破性创新 / 社会生态系统理论 / 组态路径 / fsQCA

Key words

enterprise radical innovation / society ecosystems theory / configuration path / fsQCA

引用本文

导出引用
张征, 谢佳, 李冉. 企业突破性创新的组态路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(7): 21-28 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.003
Zhang Zheng, Xie Jia, Li Ran. Research on the configuration path of the radical innovation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(7): 21-28 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.07.003
中图分类号: F273.1   

参考文献

[1]
CHANDY R K, TELLIS G J. Organizing for radical product innovation: The overlooked role of willingness to cannibalize[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1998, 35(4): 474-487.
[2]
SHEN H, MEI N, GAO Y. Improving radical innovation in China's manufacturing firms[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2019, 30(7): 1034-1054.
[3]
BICEN P, JOHNSON W. Radical innovation with limited resources in high-turbulent markets: The role of lean innovation capability[J]. Creativity and Innovation Management, 2015, 24(2): 278-299.
[4]
李晓梅, 武梦欣. 突破性创新驱动因素元分析[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(18): 1-6.
LI Xiaomei, WU Mengxin. Meta-analysis of factors effecting on radical innovation[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(18): 1-6.
[5]
CHEN H, YAO Y, ZAN A, et al. How does coopetition affect radical innovation? The roles of internal knowledge structure and external knowledge integration[J]. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2021, 36(11): 1975-1987.
[6]
伍勇, 魏泽龙. 知识探索,资源整合方式与突破性创新[J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(12): 11-19.
WU Yong, WEI Zelong. Dual knowledge exploration, dynamic resource bundling and radical innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(12): 11-19.
[7]
张洪石, 付玉秀. 影响突破性创新的环境因素分析和实证研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2005(S1): 255-263.
ZHANG Hongshi, FU Yuxiu. Theory analysis and demonstration study on the environment factors of radical innovation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2005(S1): 255-263.
[8]
ZASTROW C, KIRST-ASHMAN K K. Understanding human behavior and the social envionment[M]. (Sixth ed.)Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2004.
[9]
宋春艳. 社会生态系统理论框架下我国社会企业发展的困境及对策[J]. 求索, 2015(3): 24-27.
SONG Chunyan. The dilemma and countermeasures of the development of social enterprises in China under the framework of social ecosystem theory[J]. Seeker, 2015(3): 24-27.
[10]
ACEMOGLU D, AKCIGIT U, CELIK M A. Radical and incremental innovation: The roles of firms, managers, and innovators[J]. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2022, 14(3): 199-249.
[11]
SUBRAMANIAM M, YOUNDT M. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(3): 450-463.
[12]
董豪, 曾剑秋, 沈孟如. 产业创新复合系统构建与协同度分析:以信息通信产业为例[J]. 科学学研究, 2016, 34(8): 1152-1160.
DONG Hao, ZENG Jianqiu, SHEN Mengru. Research on construction and synergy degree of composite system of industrial innovation: Base on ICT industry[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2016, 34(8): 1152-1160.
[13]
AYDIN H. Market orientation and product innovation: The mediating role of technological capability[J]. European Journal of Innovation Management, 2021, 24(4): 1233-1267.
[14]
彭灿, 奚雷, 张学伟. 高度动态与竞争环境下突破性创新对企业持续竞争优势的影响研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2018, 38(24): 10-17.
PENG Can, XI Lei, ZHANG Xuewei. Breakthrough innovation to the enterprise continuous competitive advantage on high turbulence and competitive environment[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2018, 38(24): 10-17.
[15]
李金生, 朱蔓菱. 高新技术企业研发人员跨界行为何以激励探索式创新?:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J]. 科技管理研究, 2023, 43(3): 111-121.
LI Jinsheng, ZHU Manling. How does the cross-border behavior of high-tech enterprise R&D personnel stimulate exploratory innovation? A moderated mediating effect model[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2023, 43(3): 111-121.
[16]
辛本禄, 代佳琳. 组织创新氛围对员工创新意愿的作用机制:以知识密集型服务企业为样本[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(9): 109-116.
XIN Benlu, DAI Jialin. Research on the mechanism of innovation climate to employees' innovative intention: Evidence from knowledge intensive business service industry[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(9): 109-116.
[17]
MALIK M A R, CHOI J N, BUTT A N. Distinct effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic rewards on radical and incremental creativity: The moderating role of goal orientations[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2019, 40(9-10): 1013-1026.
[18]
刘业鑫, 吴伟伟, 于渤. 技术管理能力对突破性技术创新行为的影响:并行多重中介机制[J]. 管理科学, 2022, 35(1): 67-78.
LIU Yexin, WU Weiwei, YU Bo. Impact of technology management capability on radical technological innovation bechavior: Multiple parallel mediation mechanism[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2022, 35(1): 67-78.
[19]
TRIPSAS M, GAVETTI G. Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1147-1161.
[20]
DELGADO-VERDE M, MARTíN-DE CASTRO G, AMORES-SALVADó J. Intellectual capital and radical innovation: Exploring the quadratic effects in technology-based manufacturing firms[J]. Technovation, 2016, 54: 35-47.
[21]
郭晓玲, 李凯, 石俊国. 买方市场势力、市场竞争环境与研发投入:基于高新技术上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(11): 129-136.
GUO Xiaoling, LI Kai, SHI Junguo. Buyer's market power, market competition environment and enterprise's R&D investment: The empirical evidence based on high-tech listed companies in China[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(11): 129-136.
[22]
MCKINLEY W, LATHAM S, BRAUN M. Organizational decline and innovation: Turnarounds and downward spirals[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2014, 39(1): 88-110.
[23]
曲小瑜. 制度环境、动态能力与高管认知影响中小企业朴素式创新的组态效应[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(11): 103-110.
QU Xiaoyu. The configuration effect of instituntional environment, dynamic capabilities and top managers' cognition on the frugal innovation of SMEs[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(11): 103-110.
[24]
廉思秋, 高山行, 肖振鑫. 企业政治行为驱动突破性创新的权变影响研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2023, 41(7): 1316-1326.
LIAN Siqiu, GAO Shanxing, XIAO Zhenxin. The contingent influence of corporate political activities on driving radical innovation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2023, 41(7): 1316-1326.
[25]
杜运周, 贾良定. 组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J]. 管理世界, 2017(6): 155-167.
DU Yunzhou, JIA Liangding. Configuration perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): A new path in management research[J]. Journal of Management World, 2017(6): 155-167.
[26]
GRASHOF N, HESSE K, FORNAHL D. Radical or not? The role of clusters in the emergence of radical innovations[J]. European Planning Studies, 2019, 27(10): 1904-1923.
[27]
黄永春, 晁一方, 彭荣. 高管团队薪酬差距、企业战略变革与突破性创新:内部控制的调节作用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(5): 161-177.
HUANG Yongchun, CHAO Yifang, PENG Rong. Executive team pay gap, enterprise strategic change and breakthrough innovation:The regulating role of internal control[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2022, 43(5): 161-177.
[28]
张玉磊, 张光宇, 马文聪, 等. 什么样的新型研发机构更具有高创新绩效?:基于TOE框架的组态分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2022, 40(4): 758-768.
ZHANG Yulei, ZHANG Guangyu, MA Wencong, et al. What kind of new R&D institutions have higher innovation performance? Configuration analysis based on TOE framework[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2022, 40(4): 758-768.
[29]
COOMBS J E, PAUL P E. Measuring technological capability and performance[J]. R&D Management, 2006, 36(4): 421-438.
[30]
吴建祖, 华欣意. 企业双元创新驱动机制:基于高新技术企业的定性比较分析[J]. 科技管理研究, 2021, 41(8): 1-10.
WU Jianzu, HUA Xinyi. Enterprise ambidextrous innovation driving mechanism: Qualitative comparative analysis based on high-tech enterprises[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2021, 41(8): 1-10.
[31]
张明, 杜运周. 组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J]. 管理学报, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
ZHANG Ming, DU Yunzhou. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) in management and organization research: Position, tactics, and directions[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16(9): 1312-1323.
[32]
APPELBAUM E, BAILEY T, BERG P, et al. Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off[M]. Tthaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.

基金

国家社会科学基金项目:“新生代员工担当作为的结构维度、前因组态及提升策略研究”(22BGL133)
国家社会科学基金项目:“新生代员工担当作为的结构维度、前因组态及提升策略研究”(2022.09—2025.09)

PDF(1056 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/