设计思维创新:发展演化、过程机制与实践原则

陶金元; 陈劲

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.05.005

PDF(1955 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (5) : 43-55. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.05.005

设计思维创新:发展演化、过程机制与实践原则

陶金元 ¹ ,
陈劲 ²^,³

作者信息 +

Innovation of design thinking: Its development, process mechanism and practice rules

Tao Jinyuan ¹ ,
Chen Jin ²^,³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

对复杂问题高效求解并达成创新性解决方案是组织打造核心竞争力的关键,这必然要以科学规范的方法论作为依据。设计思维创新致力于问题导向的创新而不断发展演化,但因其分散的实践而呈现出碎片化和经验化特征。系统梳理设计思维创新的发展脉络,夯实其哲学基础并深入阐释理论框架、过程机制和实践原则,对推进理论发展和提高创新绩效具有重要意义。本文通过文献可视化对比分析刻画了设计思维理论研究的趋势、重点及其脉络关系,进而遵循辩证唯物主义方法论的内涵结构和因果过程逻辑构建了设计思维创新的分析框架,并结合重点文献就其核心要素及过程机制进行了系统剖析。研究发现:(1)设计思维创新致力于复杂问题的求解并因实践需要而发展演化;(2)设计思维创新秉承人本主义的价值导向和实用主义的效果逻辑;(3)设计思维创新强调非线性迭代机制、综合性实践工具和跨学科领域的系统融合;(4)适用于整体创新流程和主题环节的实践原则为设计思维创新效率提供保障。本研究为推动问题导向的创新提供了系统的理论依据和丰富的工具方法,有助于组织提升创新绩效和打造核心竞争力;研究结论为在发挥制度优势基础上推动中国式创新理论发展和加速中国创新发展战略提供了参考借鉴。

Abstract

The key to cultivating an organization's core competitiveness lies in the adept resolution of intricate problems and the pursuit of innovative solutions, which demands a foundation built upon a scientific and standardized methodology.The innovation of design thinking, offers a dynamic approach to problem-solving, but its decentralized application can lead to fragmentation and empiricism. It is significant to systematically explore the development of design thinking, consolidate its philosophical underpinnings, and provide a comprehensive elucidation of its theoretical framework, process mechanisms and practical principles.This paper employed literature visualization, comparative analysis to delineate the trajectory, focal points, and research network concerning design thinking theory, constructed an analytical framework rooted in the connotation structure of dialectical materialism methodology and its logic of causality process.Through this framework, the paper systematically dissected the core elements and process mechanisms to the innovation of design thinking.

The research findings are: (1) Innovation of design thinking is dedicated to addressing intricate problems and evolves continuously in response to practical needs. (2)Innovation of design thinking adheres to the value orientation of humanism and the effectuation logic of pragmatism. (3) Innovation of design thinking advocates for the systematic integration of the nonlinear iterative mechanism, comprehensive practical tools, and interdisciplinary fields. (4) Practical principles, applicable to the overall innovation process and each thematic step, play a crucial role in ensuring the efficiency of innovation.

The study has furnished organizations with a systematic theoretical foundation and equipped them with ample tools to foster problem-oriented innovation, and then enhanced overall innovation performance and cultivated core competitiveness. Simultaneously, the conclusions offer valuable insights for advancing the development of Chinese innovation theory. It serves as a guide for accelerating China's innovation development strategy, leveraging the strengths inherent in the Chinese political system.

导出引用

陶金元, 陈劲. 设计思维创新:发展演化、过程机制与实践原则[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(5): 43-55 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.05.005

Tao Jinyuan, Chen Jin. Innovation of design thinking: Its development, process mechanism and practice rules[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(5): 43-55 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.05.005

中图分类号： F270.7

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	张治河, 高中一, 檀润华, 等. 突破“卡脖子”技术的思维模式:基于TRIZ的设计[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(12): 54-68. ZHANG Zhihe, GAO Zhongyi, TAN Runhua, et al. A mindset intending to break through "bottleneck" technologies:A design based on TRIZ[J]. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(12):54-68. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	MATTHEWSA B, DOHERTYB S, WORTHYA P, et al. Design thinking, wicked problems and institutioning change:A case study[J]. Codesign, 2023, 19(3):177-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2022.2034885 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15710882.2022.2034885 本文引用 [1]

[3]	DELL'ERA C, MAGISTRETTI S, CAUTELA C, et al. Four kinds of design thinking: From ideating to making, engaging, and criticizing[J]. Creativity & Innovation Management, 2020, 29(2):324-344. 本文引用 [1]

[4]	MCKIM R H. Experiences in visual thinking[M]. Monterey: Cole Publishing Company, 1980. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	VON THIENEN J P A, CLANCEY W J, MEINEL C. MEINEL C, LEIFER L. Theoretical foundations of design thinking[A]. MEINEL C, LEIFER L. Design thinking research, understanding innovation[C].Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2019,13-38. 本文引用 [1]

[6]	BUCHANAN R. Wicked problems in design thinking[J]. Design Issues, 1992, 8(2): 5-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1511637?origin=crossref 本文引用 [1]

[7]	CONKLIN J. Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems[M]. New York: Wiley, 2006. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	BROWN T, KATZ B. Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation[M]. New York: Harper Business, 2009. 本文引用 [2]

[9]	CARLGREN L, ELMQUIST M, RAUTH I. The challenges of using design thinking in industry:Experiences from five large firms[J]. Creativity & Innovation Management, 2016, 25(3):344-362. 本文引用 [3]

[10]	VERGANTI R, DELL'ERA C, SWAN K S. Design thinking: Critical analysis and future evolution[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2021, 38(6):603-622. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.v38.6 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15405885/38/6 本文引用 [1]

[11]	NORMAN D A. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition[M]. New York: Basic Books, 2013 本文引用 [2]

[12]	KOLKO JON. Design thinking comes of age[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2015, 93(9): 66-71. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	VERGANTI R. Overcrowded: Designing meaningful products in a world awash with ideas[M]. Boston: MIT Press, 2017. 本文引用 [1]

[14]

陈劲, 曲冠楠, 王璐瑶. 有意义的创新:源起、内涵辨析与启示[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(11): 2054-2063.

摘要

创新活动向人类命运总体意义的回归，是习近平“构建人类命运共同体”理念在经济社会领域引领重大理论与实践转向的具体体现。批判性回顾了关注社会需求的经典创新范式，提出有意义的创新（Meaningful innovation, MI）范式，强调企业应当主动关注创新意义，以之作为创新过程的先决变量，建立创新意义管理与创新要素组合并行的理论框架。回溯了理论源流，划定了理论边界，构建了理论基础，辨析了相关概念，阐述了内涵结构。回顾了改革开放以来，我国管理创新领域主流的创新理论范式的产生、发展与迭代，为有意义的创新之建立与未来发展提供启示。

CHEN

Jin

, QU

Guannan

, WANG

Luyao

. Meaningful innovation: Origin, connotation and enlightenment[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(11):261-270.

本文引用 [2]

[15]	陶金元, 陈劲. 设计驱动型创新理论述评与演化趋势:基于有意义的创新框架[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2022, 43(7): 3-20. TAO Jinyuan, CHEN Jin. Review and evolution of design driven innovation theory: Based on the meaningful innovation framework[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.&T., 2022, 43(7): 3-20. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	REUBER A R, FISCHER E, COVIELLO N. Deepening the dialogue: New directions for the evolution of effectuation theory[J]. Academy of Management Review, 2016, 41(3):536-40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0217 http://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/amr.2015.0217 本文引用 [1]

[17]	邹旸, 崔连广, 闫旭. 效果逻辑形成机制研究:自我效能的中介作用[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(7):224-234. ZOU Yang, CUI Lianguang, YAN Xu. A research on the entrepreneurs' effectuation logic formation mechanism:The mediating effect of self-efficacy[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(7):224-234. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	READ S, SARASVATHY S, DEW N, et al. Effectual entrepreneurship[M]. New York: Routledge, 2016. 本文引用 [1]

[19]	DALSGAARD P. Pragmatism and design thinking[J]. International Journal of Design, 2014, 8(1): 143-55. 本文引用 [1]

[20]

KLENNER

N F

, GEMSER

, KARPEN

I O

. Entrepreneurial ways of designing and designerly ways of entrepreneuring: Exploring the relationship between design thinking and effectuation theory[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2022, 39(1):66-94.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.v39.1

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/15405885/39/1

本文引用 [1]

[21]	MATTHEWS J, WRIGLEY C. Design and design thinking in business and management higher education[J]. Journal of Learning Design, 2017, 10(1):41-54. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v9i3.294 https://www.jld.edu.au/article/view/294 本文引用 [1]

[22]

BALL

. History of the double diamond: A universally accepted depiction of the design process[J/OL]. 2024. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/history-of-the-double-diamond/.

https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-resources/the-double-diamond/history-of-the-double-diamond/

本文引用 [1]

[23]	SENAPATHI M, DRURY-GROGAN M L. Systems thinking approach to implementing kanban: A case study[J]. Journal of Software: Evolution & Process, 2021, 33(4):1-16. 本文引用 [1]

[24]	YASHAR M, MARTIN L. Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking[J]. Small Business Economics, 2020, 54(3):791-818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00153-w 本文引用 [1]

[25]	LEWRICK M, LINK P, LEIFER L. The design thinking playbook: Mindful ditital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2018. 本文引用 [1]

[26]	SCHUMACHER T, MAYER S. Preparing managers for turbulent contexts: Teaching the principles of design thinking[J]. Journal of Management Education, 2018, 42(4):496-523. 本文引用 [2]

[27]	LIEDTKA J. Why design thinking works[J]. Harvard Business Review, 2018, 96(5): 72-79. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	SCHARMER C O. Theory U: Leading from the future as it emerges[M]. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2016. 本文引用 [1]

[29]	CASULA C C, ERICKSON S I M. Stimulating unconscious processes with metaphors and narrative[J]. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 2022, 64(4):339-354. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029157.2021.2019670 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00029157.2021.2019670 本文引用 [1]

[30]	ROAM D. The back of the napkin: Solving problems and selling ideas with pictures[M]. New York: Penguin, 2008. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	BRESCIANI S. Visual design thinking: A collaborative dimensions framework to profile visualisations[J]. Design Studies, 2019, 63:92-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.04.001 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0142694X1930016X 本文引用 [1]

[32]	GOLD J, JONES O. Finding innovation opportunities in SMEs through futures and foresight learning: An action learning approach[J]. Action Learning: Research & Practice, 2023, 20(2):132-148. 本文引用 [1]

[33]	LEWRICK M, LINK P, LEIFER L. The design thinking toolbox: A guide to mastering the most popular and valuable innovation methods[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2020. 本文引用 [1]

[34]	陶金元. 设计思维理念与创新创业实践[M]. 北京: 企业管理出版社, 2021. TAO Jinyuan. Design thinking and practice of innovation and entrepreneurship[M]. Beijing: Enterprise Management Publishing House, 2021. 本文引用 [1]

[35]	GOULD J M.Are “U” ready for the future: Design thinking as a critical educational leadership skill[A]. MARQUESJ,DHIMAN S. Engaged leadership transforming through future-oriented design thinking[C]. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018:281-296. 本文引用 [1]

[36]

KLOECKNER

A P

, SCHERER

J O

, RIBEIRO

J L D

. A game to teach and apply design thinking for innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation, 2021, 9(3): 557-587.

https://doi.org/10.5585/iji.v9i3.20286

https://periodicos.uninove.br/innovation/article/view/20286

本文引用 [1] 摘要

Objective: Develop and apply a game to facilitate the use of design thinking for innovation.Method: The construction of the game was based upon the Constructivism Theory. The game was developed following the steps of: (i) understanding the target audience and the context; (ii) defining learning objectives; (iii) structuring the experience; (iv) identifying resources and applying gamification elements; (v) evaluation. Originality/Relevance: Design Thinking emerges as an alternative to improve the innovation process in companies. To facilitate this innovation process, this paper presents a game, through its development and application, based on the principles and stages of Design Thinking, focusing on difficulties of its implementation.Results: The game provides an iterative passage through all stages of the design thinking, giving a holistic view of the process, starting with a deep understanding of the problem, and coming to a design solution.Social / management contributions: The results of the game application have shown its potential to: (i) ease teamwork, avoiding negative discussions and providing active participation from all students; (ii) lead to insight generation in a comprehensible way, making clear the difference between insights and ideas; (iii) simplify the use of inspiring methods and techniques (such as Persona, Empathy Map and Napkin Pitch); (iv) develop creative confidence; (v) provide a pleasant and motivating learning environment for collaborative multidisciplinary work.Theoretical/Methodological contributions: The game provides a method for building serious games and the game as a method of applying Design Thinking for Innovation.