数字化转型背景下商业模式创新抗拒路径研究

王炳成, 孙玉馨, 黄瑶

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4) : 42-51.

PDF(1188 KB)
PDF(1188 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4) : 42-51. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.005

数字化转型背景下商业模式创新抗拒路径研究

作者信息 +

Research on the resistance path of business model innovation under the background of digital transformation

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

商业模式创新是企业数字化转型的关键一环,但实践中却存在诸多商业模式创新抗拒的现象。然而,当前关于创新抗拒的研究多以消费者为主体,企业在转型过程中存在的商业模式创新抗拒问题却鲜有学者涉及,其作用路径与内在机理仍缺乏充分的理论关注。基于此,论文运用程序化扎根理论,对8家典型的商业模式创新抗拒企业进行了深入剖析,构建了数字化转型背景下企业商业模式创新抗拒的理论模型。研究发现,商业模式创新抗拒不同于产品创新抗拒,其涵盖了企业对改变整体商业模式要素综合逻辑的抗拒。根据情境与主导因素的差异,数字化转型背景下企业的商业模式创新抗拒主要可以分为“抱头缩项型”“画地自限型”“力不从心型”与“安于现状型”四类,并可分别采用风险决策理论、路径依赖理论、资源基础理论与绩效反馈理论予以解释。本研究拓展了商业模式创新的研究视角,并为减少企业在数字化转型背景下的创新抗拒提供了实践启示。

Abstract

The digital transformation of enterprises not only requires the completion of digital technology updates and iterations, but also the use of digital technology to disrupt the underlying logic of value creation and acquisition, and to change or create new business models. However, in practice, many enterprises still adhere to their existing organizational structure and management model, and are more inclined to maintain the status quo, resist business model innovation, leading to a decline in market share, declining performance, and even being eliminated, such as Kodak's bankruptcy, Nokia's decline, and Yahoo's decline. It can be seen that in the context of a transitional economy, enterprises need to constantly change their business models, and resisting business model innovation is the key to losing competitive advantage. Therefore, how to weaken the resistance to business model innovation in enterprises has become an important issue. It is necessary to clarify the formation path and internal mechanism of business model innovation resistance, and provide corresponding theoretical guidance for solving the problem of business model innovation resistance in the context of digital transformation.
At present, few scholars reverse study the problem of business model innovation, and the research on innovation resistance mainly focuses on consumers. Few scholars have dealt with the problem of business model innovation resistance in the process of enterprise transformation, and its action path and internal mechanism still lack sufficient theoretical attention. Based on this, this paper uses the procedural grounded theory approach to conduct an in-depth analysis of 8 typical enterprises that are resistant to business model innovation, and builds a theoretical model of business model innovation resistance under the background of digital transformation.
The study found that, the resistance to business model innovation is different from the resistance to product innovation, which covers the resistance of enterprises to changing the comprehensive logic of the overall business model elements. According to the differences in context and dominant factors, the business model innovation resistance of enterprises in the context of digital transformation can be divided into four categories, namely, the "hanging back" type of business model innovation resistance arising from the fact that enterprises are afraid to innovate, the "self-limiting" type of business model innovation resistance due to the multiple constraints on enterprises, the "powerless" type of business model innovation resistance due to the lack of enterprise capabilities, and the "self-contented" business model innovation resistance arising from enterprises being satisfied with the stable business status. The four types of business model innovation resistance can be explained by risk decision theory, path dependence theory, resource-based theory and performance feedback theory.
The contribution of this study is mainly reflected in the following aspects: (1) In terms of theoretical value, firstly, this study proposes the concept of resistance to business model innovation, which not only enriches the research system of business model innovation and expands the scope of previous research on innovation resistance that was mostly consumer centered, but also helps to distinguish it from related variables such as product innovation resistance, deepening the understanding of business model innovation resistance in existing research. Secondly, this study explores the classification model and mechanism of enterprise business model innovation resistance under the background of digital transformation, which helps to reveal the heterogeneity process of different types of business model innovation resistance, and provides a theoretical basis for understanding why enterprises resist business model innovation and how to better promote business model innovation. (2) In terms of practical value, this study has deepened the industry's understanding of the resistance of enterprises to business model innovation in the context of a transitional economy, providing reference for enterprises to overcome obstacles to business model innovation and promoting business model innovation practices in the context of digital transformation.

关键词

数字化转型 / 商业模式创新 / 商业模式创新抗拒 / 扎根理论

Key words

digital transformation / business model innovation / resistance to business model innovation / grounded theory

引用本文

导出引用
王炳成, 孙玉馨, 黄瑶. 数字化转型背景下商业模式创新抗拒路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(4): 42-51 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.005
Wang Bingcheng, Sun Yuxin, Huang Yao. Research on the resistance path of business model innovation under the background of digital transformation[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(4): 42-51 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.04.005
中图分类号: F270.7   

参考文献

[1]
钱雨, 孙新波. 数字商业模式设计:企业数字化转型与商业模式创新案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2021, 33(11): 67-83.
QIAN Yu, SUN Xinbo. Digital business model design: Multiple case studies of enterprise's digital transformation and business model innovation[J]. Management Review, 2021, 33(11): 67-83.
[2]
MAGNUSSON T, WERNER V. Conceptualisations of incumbent firms in sustainability transitions: Insights from organisation theory and a systematic literature review[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(2): 903-919.
[3]
长青, 郭松明, 马萍, 等. 主导逻辑对商业模式创新的作用机理: 基于动态资源管理视角[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(12): 45-55.
CHANG Qing, GUO Songming, MA Ping, et al. The mechanism of action of dominant logic on business model innovation: A perspective based on dynamic resource management[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(12): 45-55.
[4]
CIAMPI F, DEMI S, MAGRINI A, et al. Exploring the impact of big data analytics capabilities on business model innovation: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2021, 123: 1-13.
[5]
ZHAO W H, YANG T, HUGJES K D, et al. Entrepreneurial alertness and business model innovation: The role of entrepreneurial learning and risk perception[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management journal, 2020, 17(2): 839-864.
[6]
FRANZO S, NATALICCHIO A, FRATTINI F, et al. How digital technologies enable business model innovation in the energy sector: An empirical study of Italian energy service companies[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2023: 1-14.
[7]
MARTINS L L, RINDOVA V P, GREENBAUM B E. Unlocking the hidden value of concepts: A cognitive approach to business model innovation[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2015, 9(1): 99-117.
[8]
CLAUSS T, ABEBE M, TANGPONG C, et al. Strategic agility, business model innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2021, 38(3): 767-784.
[9]
BEREZNOY A. Changing competitive landscape through business model innovation: The new imperative for corporate market strategy[J]. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2019, 10(4): 1362-1383.
[10]
李志刚, 刘金, 李兴旺, 等. 双元创新视角下老字号企业商业模式创新内在机理: 基于德州扒鸡的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理学报, 2021, 18(10): 1512-1523.
摘要
选取中华老字号企业德州扒鸡公司为对象,对其商业模式创新的成功规律进行深度挖掘。在双元创新理论视角下,归纳得出老字号双元情境、发现传承价值、识别创新阻力、稳固传承基础、突破创新禁锢、实现完善型创新、实现开拓型创新和维持双元平衡8个理论维度,进而基于这些维度刻画了老字号企业商业模式创新的三阶段模型,系统总结了老字号企业借助商业模式创新有效化解传承与创新悖论的成功经验。
LI Zhigang, LIU Jin, LI Xingwang, et al. Internal mechanism of business model innovation of time-honored enterprises from the perspective of dual innovation: Based on a longitudinal case study of Dezhou braised chicken[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2021, 18(10): 1512-1523.
This study selects the Chinese time-honored company Dezhou Braised Chicken Company as the object, and conducts in-depth exploration of the successful law of its business model innovation. From the perspective of dual innovation theory, 8 theoretical dimensions are summarized, including time-honored dual context, discovery of inheritance value, identification of innovation resistance, stabilize the foundation of inheritance, breakthrough of innovation barriers, realization of perfect innovation, realization of pioneering innovation, and maintenance of dual balance. Based on these dimensions, it describes the three-stage model of the business model innovation of time-honored enterprises, and systematically summarizes the successful experience of time-honored enterprises in effectively resolving the paradox of inheritance and innovation through business model innovation.
[11]
AUTIO E, NAMBISAN S, THOMAS L D W, et al. Digital affordances, spatial affordances, and the genesis of entrepreneurial ecosystems[J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2018, 12(1): 72-95.
[12]
史亚雅, 杨德明. 商业模式创新会引发股价崩盘风险吗[J]. 财贸经济, 2020, 41(6): 80-94.
SHI Yaya, YANG Deming. Does business model innovation trigger stock price crash risk?[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2020, 41(6): 80-94.
[13]
CASIDY R, CLAUDY M, HEIDENREICH S, et al. The role of brand in overcoming consumer resistance to autonomous vehicles[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2021, 38(7): 1101-1121.
[14]
LEONG L Y, HEW T S, OOI K B, et al. Predicting mobile wallet resistance: A two-staged structural equation modeling-artificial neural network approach[J]. International Journal of Information Management, 2020: 102047.
[15]
MATSUO M, MINAMI C, MATSUYAMA T. Social influence on innovation resistance in internet banking services[J]. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2018, 45: 42-51.
[16]
RAM S, SHETH J N. Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and itssolutions[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1989, 6(2): 50-14.
[17]
TEECE D J. Business models, business strategy and innovation[J]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43(2-3): 172-194.
[18]
KAHNEMAN D, TVERSKY A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[19]
余传鹏, 林春培, 张振刚, 等. 专业化知识搜寻、管理创新与企业绩效:认知评价的调节作用[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(1): 146-166+240.
YU Chuanpeng, LIN Chunpei, ZHANG Zhengang, et al. Specialized knowledge search, management innovation and firm performance: The moderating effect of cognitive appraisal[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(1): 146-166+240.
[20]
KRETSCHMER T, KHASHABI P. Digital transformation and organization design: An integrated approach[J]. California Management Review, 2020, 62(4): 86-104.
[21]
PELLETIER C, CLOUTIER L M. Conceptualising digital transformation in SMEs: An ecosystemic perspective[J]. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 2019, 26(6): 855-876.
Supported by a service ecosystem that is increasingly immersed into digital transformation, small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) have access to turnkey information technology (IT) applications, which may come free of charge but not free of concerns. The purpose of this paper is to explore a group conceptualisation and associated perceptions of IT issues within an ecosystem that includes three subgroup profiles: entrepreneurs, IT professionals and socioeconomic support professionals.
[22]
DAVID P A. Clio and the economics of QWERTY[J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75(2): 332-337.
[23]
郁培丽, 刘沐洋, 潘培尧. 颠覆性创新合法性与企业家战略行动: 研究述评与展望[J]. 外国经济与管理, 2019, 41(3): 111-125+152.
YU Peili, LIU Muyang, PAN Peiyao. The legitimacy of disruptive innovation and entrepreneurs' strategic actions: A literature review and prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41(3): 111-125+152.
[24]
BARNEY J B. How marketing scholars might help address issues in resource-based theory[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2014, 42(1): 24-26.
[25]
COKUN A, TANRIKULU Z. Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model[J]. Technology in Society, 2021, 64: 101461.
[26]
石俊国, 陆子群, 陈彬. 政府补助、 市场势力与企业创新[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(11): 53-58.
SHI Junguo, LU Ziqun, CHEN Bin. Government subsidy, market power and enterprise innovation[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(11): 53-58.
[27]
DANIEL K, AMOS T. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2): 263-291.
[28]
SCHUMACHER C, KECK S, TANG W. Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2020, 41(6): 1139-1165.
[29]
TEOVANOVICA P, KNEEVICB G, STANKOVC L. Individual differences in cognitive biases: Evidence against one-factor theory of rationality[J]. Intelligence, 2015, 50: 75-86.

基金

山东省自然科学基金项目:“‘数字强省’背景下山东省‘专精特新’企业数字化商业模式创新抗拒的形成机理与突破策略研究”(ZR2023MG055)
:国家社会科学基金项目:“数字化商业模式创新赋能国有企业改革的路径与对策研究”(2023—2026)
:国家社会科学基金项目:“数字化商业模式创新赋能国有企业改革的路径与对策研究”(23BGL072)
山东省统计科研课题:“山东数字经济与实体经济融合发展研究”(KT23013)
山东省统计科研课题:“山东数字经济与实体经济融合发展研究”(2023—2023)

PDF(1188 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/