PDF(1141 KB)
PDF(1141 KB)
PDF(1141 KB)
中国政府创新补助对双元创新绩效的影响研究
Research on the influence of Chinese government innovation subsidies on dual innovation performance
装备制造业是事关国家安全和国民经济发展的重要战略性产业,探究政府如何更好地帮助装备制造企业取得技术创新突破具有重要的理论和实践价值,本文以中国沪深A股装备制造业上市公司为样本,基于外部性理论和双元理论,实证检验了2010-2020年间,政府创新补助对装备制造业双元创新绩效的影响机制和作用机理。研究发现:(1)政府创新补助明显增强装备制造企业双元创新绩效;(2)政府创新补助对装备制造企业独立和合作创新都有显著正向促进作用;(3)独立创新和合作创新模式对装备制造企业双元创新绩效都具有正向影响,但独立创新模式对装备制造业双元创新绩效的影响强于合作创新模式;(4)独立创新模式与合作创新模式在政府创新补助促进双元创新绩效过程中发挥显著中介效应。本研究在理论上,有助于深入理解政府创新补助影响企业创新行为的内在机制;在管理实践上,为我国政府制定装备制造业的创新发展政策,提供理论参考。
The equipment manufacturing industry is an important strategic industry related to national security and economic development. It is of great theoretical and practical value to explore how the government can better help equipment manufacturing enterprises to achieve technological innovation breakthroughs. This paper took the listed companies of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share equipment manufacturing industry in China as samples and empirical tested the influence mechanism and action mechanism of government innovation subsidy on the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing industry from 2010 to 2020, based on the externality theory and dual theory. The findings are as follows: (1) Government innovation subsidies significantly enhance the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing enterprises; (2) Government innovation subsidies have a significant positive effect on the independent and cooperative innovation of equipment manufacturing enterprises; (3) Both independent innovation and cooperative innovation mode have a positive impact on the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing enterprises, but the independent innovation mode has a stronger impact on the dual innovation performance of equipment manufacturing enterprises than the cooperative innovation mode. (4) Independent innovation model and cooperative innovation model play a significant mediating effect in the process of government innovation subsidies in promoting dual innovation performance. In theory, this study is helpful to deeply understand the internal mechanism of government innovation subsidy affecting enterprise innovation behavior. In terms of management practice, it will provide some theoretical reference for Chinese government to formulate innovative development policies for the equipment manufacturing industry.
政府创新补助 / 独立创新模式 / 合作创新模式 / 双元创新绩效
government innovation subsidy / independent innovation model / cooperative innovation model / dual innovation performance
| [1] |
徐宇辰. 中国装备制造业创新发展与国际借鉴的思考[J]. 中国发展观察, 2022(1): 39-45.
|
| [2] |
唐孝文, 缪应爽, 孙悦, 等. 高端装备制造企业数字化成熟度测度及影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(9):10-19.
|
| [3] |
徐东华. 智能制造构筑竞争新优势[J]. 经济, 2022(2): 22-25.
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
陈强远, 林思彤, 张醒. 中国技术创新激励政策: 激励了数量还是质量[J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(4): 79-96.
|
| [6] |
马永军, 李毅凡. 政府研发补贴、制度环境与战略性新兴产业创新绩效[J]. 技术经济, 2021, 40(8): 1-8.
|
| [7] |
刘友金, 黄鲁成. 技术创新与产业的跨越式发展:A-U模型的改进及其应用[J]. 中国软科学, 2001(2): 38-42, 47.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
刘岩, 蔡虹, 裴云龙. 企业技术知识基础多元度对独立创新与合作创新平衡互补效应的影响[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2022, 39(2): 111-120.
整合独立创新与合作创新的协同作用对企业生存和发展具有重要意义。基于知识基础理论，构建技术知识基础相关与非相关多元度、知识整合能力对企业独立创新和合作创新协同性（互补性与平衡性两个维度）的影响效应模型，利用2009—2018年中国生物制药行业80家企业发明专利数据进行实证检验。结果表明，技术知识基础相关多元度对企业独立创新与合作创新互补性具有正向影响，对两类创新活动平衡性具有负向影响；技术知识基础非相关多元度对独立与合作创新互补性具有倒U型影响，对两类创新活动平衡性具有负向影响。企业知识整合能力负向调节技术知识基础相关多元度对独立创新和合作创新互补性的正向影响，削弱技术知识基础相关多元度与独立创新和合作创新平衡性之间的负向关系。同时，企业知识整合能力在技术知识基础非相关多元度与独立创新和合作创新互补性间起负向调节作用。
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
余泳泽, 张先轸. 要素禀赋、适宜性创新模式选择与全要素生产率提升[J]. 管理世界, 2015, 264(9): 13-31, 187.
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
张志元, 马永凡, 张梁. 供给侧改革视角的政府补助与企业创新[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(8): 85-94.
|
| [15] |
任曙明, 吕镯. 融资约束、政府补贴与全要素生产率:来自中国装备制造企业的实证研究[J]. 管理世界, 2014(11): 10-23+187.
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
石宇飞. 以制造业发展促进中国国家竞争力提升:基于波特钻石模型的分析[J]. 税务与经济, 2020(4): 20-26.
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
Organizational research advocates that firms balance exploration and exploitation, yet it acknowledges inherent challenges in reconciling these opposing activities. To overcome these challenges, such research suggests that firms establish organizational separation between exploring and exploiting units or engage in temporal separation whereby they oscillate between exploration and exploitation over time. Nevertheless, these approaches entail resource allocation trade-offs and conflicting organizational routines, which may undermine organizational performance as firms seek to balance exploration and exploitation within a discrete field of organizational activity (i.e., domain). We posit that firms can overcome such impediments and enhance their performance if they explore in one domain while exploiting in another. Studying the alliance portfolios of software firms, we demonstrate that firms do not typically benefit from balancing exploration and exploitation within the function domain (technology versus marketing and production alliances) and structure domain (new versus prior partners). Nevertheless, firms that balance exploration and exploitation across these domains by engaging in research and development alliances while collaborating with their prior partners, or alternatively, by forming marketing and production alliances while seeking new partners, gain in profits and market value. Moreover, we reveal that increases in firm size that exacerbate resource allocation trade-offs and routine rigidity reinforce the benefits of balance across domains and the costs of balance within domains. Our domain separation approach offers new insights into how firms can benefit from balancing exploration and exploitation. What matters is not simply whether firms balance exploration and exploitation in their alliance formation decisions but the means by which they achieve such balance.
|
| [21] |
路风. 走向自主创新: 寻求中国力量的源泉[J]. 教学与研究, 2019(10): 2.
|
| [22] |
王刚刚, 谢富纪, 贾友. R&D补贴政策激励机制的重新审视:基于外部融资激励机制的考察[J]. 中国工业经济, 2017(2): 60-78.
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
郭玥. 政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(9): 98-116.
|
| [26] |
袁胜军, 俞立平, 钟昌标, 等. 创新政策促进了创新数量还是创新质量?:以高技术产业为例[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(3): 32-45.
|
| [27] |
宋砚秋, 齐永欣, 高婷, 等. 政府创新补贴、企业创新活力与创新绩效[J]. 经济学家, 2021(6): 111-120.
|
| [28] |
黄菁菁, 原毅军. 基于倾向得分匹配模型的产学研合作与企业创新绩效研究[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2018, 30(2): 1-9.
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
吴育辉, 田亚男, 陈韫妍, 等. 绿色债券发行的溢出效应、作用机理及绩效研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(6): 176-193.
|
| [31] |
崔兆财, 张志新, 李成. 政府资助与企业创新:缓解匮缺还是滋长惰性?[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 140-148.
|
| [32] |
We examine the effect of combining internal and external R&D loci on innovation performance in family firms (FF) and nonfamily firms (non-FFs). Our longitudinal analysis of 27,438 firm-year observations of Spanish manufacturing firms from 1990 to 2016 shows that FFs can better exploit the benefits of simultaneously engaging in internal and external R&D activities, leading to a positive effect on innovation performance. Moreover, the relationship between combined internal and external R&D and innovation performance in FFs is contingent upon firm economic performance. By pointing to the importance of taking into account the combination of internal and external R&D loci to foster innovation in FFs, we challenge current family business innovation research.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |
