企业数绿转型协同对可持续发展绩效的影响及作用机制研究——地方低碳政策的调节效应分析

余菲菲; 毛佳怡; 蒋庆

doi:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.11.009

PDF(1028 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (11) : 89-98. DOI: 10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.11.009

企业数绿转型协同对可持续发展绩效的影响及作用机制研究——地方低碳政策的调节效应分析

作者信息 +

Research on the impact and action mechanism of enterprises' digital and green transformation synergy on their sustainable development performance: An analysis of the moderating effect of local low-carbon policies

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在“双碳”背景下,企业数字化和绿色化转型协同显得至关重要,它不仅有助于推动经济社会全面绿色转型,而且有利于促成企业实现可持续发展。本文首先通过运用熵值法和耦合协调度模型,对企业数字化与绿色化转型协同度进行测算。接着,基于2010—2021年1659家A股上市公司的面板数据,构建双向固定效应模型,探究企业数字化与绿色化转型协同对可持续发展绩效的影响作用与内在作用机制,以及地方“低碳”政策力度对上述关系的调节效应。研究发现:(1)企业数字化和绿色化转型协同是一种相辅相成、相互支撑与协作的战略协同关系;(2)企业数绿转型协同对可持续发展绩效具有显著的促进作用;(3)企业数绿转型协同通过提高资源配置效率,进而提升企业的可持续发展绩效;(4)我国地方低碳政策力度显著增强了企业数绿转型协同对可持续发展绩效的促进作用。本研究可为企业可持续发展以及地方政府关于低碳政策的设计及实施提供意见参考。

Abstract

In the context of "carbon peaking and carbon neutrality", enterprise digital and green transformations are crucial. Not only do they help drive comprehensive green transformation in economic and social sectors, but they are also key for enterprises to achieve sustainable development. This paper first calculated the level of enterprise digital and green transformations by using the entropy method and coupling coordination model. Subsequently, based on the panel data from 1659 A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2021, a two-way fixed effects model was constructed to explore the impact and underlying mechanisms of enterprise digital and green transformations on sustainable development performance, as well as the moderating effect of local low-carbon policies. This study found that: firstly, the concept of enterprise digital and green transformations should be redefined, which is a strategic synergy relationship characterized by mutual complementarity, support, and collaboration. Secondly, enterprise digital and green transformations significantly enhance sustainable development performance. Thirdly, these twin transformations improve sustainable development performance by optimizing resource allocation efficiency. Fourthly, the intensity of local low-carbon policies significantly strengthens the above relationship. This study will provide valuable insights for the sustainable development of enterprises, as well as for the implementation of low-carbon policies by local governments.

导出引用

余菲菲, 毛佳怡, 蒋庆. 企业数绿转型协同对可持续发展绩效的影响及作用机制研究——地方低碳政策的调节效应分析[J]. 科研管理. 2024, 45(11): 89-98 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.11.009

Yu Feifei, Mao Jiayi, Jiang Qing. Research on the impact and action mechanism of enterprises' digital and green transformation synergy on their sustainable development performance: An analysis of the moderating effect of local low-carbon policies[J]. Science Research Management. 2024, 45(11): 89-98 https://doi.org/10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2024.11.009

中图分类号： F272.3

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	SHANG Y, RAZA S A, HUO Z, et al. Does enterprise digital transformation contribute to the carbon emission reduction? Micro-level evidence from China[J]. International Review of Economics & Finance, 2023, 86: 1-13. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	刘海曼, 龙建成, 申尊焕. 数字化转型对企业绿色创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(10): 22-34. LIU Haiman, LONG Jiancheng, SHEN Zunhuan. Research on the impact of digital transformation on the green innovation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(10): 22-34. 本文引用 [1]

[3]	MONTRESOR S, VEZZANI A. Digital technologies and eco-innovation: Evidence of the twin transition from Italian firms[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2023: 1-35. 本文引用 [2]

[4]

PÉRÉA

, GÉRARD

, DE BENEDITTIS

. Digital sobriety: From awareness of the negative impacts of IT usages to degrowth technology at work[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 194: 122670.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122670

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162523003554

本文引用 [1]

[5]

FERREIRA

J J

, FERNANDES

C I

, VEIGA

P M

, et al. The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach[J]. Technology in Society, 2022, 71: 102121.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102121

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160791X22002627

本文引用 [1]

[6]

LUO

, YIMAMU

, LI

, et al. Digitalization and sustainable development: How could digital economy development improve green innovation in China?[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2023, 32(4): 1847-1871.

https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.v32.4

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10990836/32/4

本文引用 [1]

[7]

李金昌, 连港慧, 徐蔼婷. “双碳”愿景下企业绿色转型的破局之道:数字化驱动绿色化的实证研究[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2023, 40(9): 27-49.

Jinchang

, LIAN

Ganghui

, XU

Aiting

. Study on the path of enterprise green transformation underthe carbon peaking and carbon neutrality Goals: An empirical study on digitalization driving greenization[J]. Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics, 2023, 40(9): 27-49.

本文引用 [1]

[8]	王博, 康琦. 数字化转型与企业可持续发展绩效[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(6): 161-176. WANG Bo, KANG Qi. Digital transformation and enterprise sustainable development performance[J]. Economics Management, 2023, 45(6): 161-176. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	LI L. Digital transformation and sustainable performance: The moderating role of market turbulence[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2022, 104: 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.04.007 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0019850122000785 本文引用 [1]

[10]	解学梅, 朱琪玮. 企业绿色创新实践如何破解“和谐共生”难题?[J]. 管理世界, 2021, 37(1): 128-149+9. XIE Xuemei, ZHU Qiwei. How can green innovation solve the dilemmas of “harmonious coexistence”?[J]. Journal of Management World, 2021, 37(1): 128-149+9. 本文引用 [3]

[11]	CHATURVEDI K, CHATAWAY J, WIELD D. Policy, markets and knowledge: Strategic synergies in Indian pharmaceutical firms[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2007, 19(5): 565-588. 本文引用 [1]

[12]	戴翔, 杨双至. 数字赋能、数字投入来源与制造业绿色化转型[J]. 中国工业经济, 2022(9): 83-101. DAI Xiang, YANG Shuangzhi. Digital empowerment, source of digital input and green manufacturing[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2022(9): 83-101. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	CHEN J, GAO M, MA K, et al. Different effects of technological progress on China's carbon emissions based on sustainable development[J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2020, 29(2): 481-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.v29.2 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/10990836/29/2 本文引用 [1]

[14]	HUSTAD E, OLSEN D H. Creating a sustainable digital infrastructure: The role of service-oriented architecture[J]. Procedia Computer Science, 2021, 181: 597-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.210 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877050921002532 本文引用 [1]

[15]	陈剑, 黄朔, 刘运辉. 从赋能到使能:数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(2): 117-128+222. CHEN Jian, HUANG Shuo, LIU Yunhui. Operations management in the digitization era:From empowering to enabling[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(2): 117-128+222. 本文引用 [1]

[16]

DUNN

, KENDALL

, SLATTERY

. Electric vehicle lithium-ion battery recycled content standards for the US-targets, costs, and environmental impacts[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 185: 106488.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106488

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0921344922003317

本文引用 [1]

[17]	戚聿东, 肖旭. 数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(6): 135-152+250. QI Yudong, XIAO Xu. Transformation of enterprise management in the era of digital economy[J]. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(6): 135-152+250. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	HAN Y. Impact of environmental regulation policy on environmental regulation level: A quasi-natural experiment based on carbon emission trading pilot[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27: 23602-23615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08658-8 本文引用 [1]

[19]	骆嘉琪, 匡海波, 沈思祎. 企业社会责任对财务绩效的影响研究:以交通运输行业为例[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(2): 199-208. LUO Jiaqi, KUANG Haibo, SHEN Siyi. Impact of corporate social responsibility on financial performance by taking the transportation industry as an example[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(2): 199-208. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	吴育辉, 田亚男, 陈韫妍, 等. 绿色债券发行的溢出效应、作用机理及绩效研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(6): 176-193. WU Yuhui, TIAN Yanan, CHEN Yunyan, et al. The spillover effect, mechanism and performance of green bond issuance[J]. Journal of Management World, 2022, 38(6): 176-193. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	陶锋, 王欣然, 徐扬, 等. 数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J]. 中国工业经济, 2023(5): 118-136. TAO Feng, WANG Xinran, XU Yang, et al. Digital transformation, resilience of industrial chain and supply chain, and enterprise productivity[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2023(5): 118-136. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	ZHOU H, WANG S, ZHAO T. Digital technology patents in China: An integrated analysis of patent distribution and transactions[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2023: 1-17. 本文引用 [1]

[23]

张琦, 郑瑶, 孔东民. 地区环境治理压力、高管经历与企业环保投资:一项基于《环境空气质量标准(2012)》的准自然实验[J]. 经济研究, 2019, 54(6): 183-198.

ZHANG

, ZHENG

Yao

, KONG

Dongmin

. Local environmental governance pressure, executive's working experience and enterprise investment in environmental protection: A quasi-natural experiment based on China's "ambient air quality standards 2012"[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(6): 183-198.

本文引用 [1]

[24]

尹建华, 王森, 弓丽栋. 重污染企业环境绩效与财务绩效关系研究:企业特征与环境信息披露的联合调节效应[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(5): 202-212.

YIN

Jianhua

, WANG

Sen

, GONG

Lidong

. Research on the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance of heavily polluting firms: The joint moderating effects of firm characteristics and environmental information disclosure[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(5): 202-212.

本文引用 [1]

[25]	刘祎, 尹云龙, 杨旭. 数量或质量:环境信息披露对绿色创新的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2024, 45(4): 166-174. LIU Yi, YIN Yunlong, YANG Xu. Quantity or quality: The impact of environmental information disclosure on green innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2024, 45(4): 166-174. 本文引用 [1]

[26]

CHENG

, LONG

, CHEN

, et al. Coupling coordination degree and spatial dynamic evolution of a regional green competitiveness system-A case study from China[J]. Ecological indicators, 2019, 104: 489-500.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.003

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1470160X19302420

本文引用 [1]

[27]	张国兴, 叶亚琼, 管欣, 等. 京津冀节能减排政策措施的差异与协同研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2018, 21(5): 111-126. ZHANG Guoxing, YE Yaqiong, GUAN Xin, et al. Difference and collaboration in Jing-Jin-Ji's energy saving and emission reduction policy measurers[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(5): 111-126. 本文引用 [1]

[28]	罗瑾琏, 王象路, 耿新. 数字化转型对企业创新产出的非线性影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(8): 1-10. LUO Jinlian, WANG Xianglu, GENG Xin. Research on the nonlinear impact of digital transformation on innovation output of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(8): 1-10. 本文引用 [1]

[29]

REHMAN

S U

, GIORDINO

, ZHANG

, et al. Twin transitions & industry 4.0: Unpacking the relationship between digital and green factors to determine green competitive advantage[J]. Technology in Society, 2023, 73: 102227.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102227

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0160791X23000325

本文引用 [1]

[30]

BIANCHINI

, DAMIOLI

, GHISETTI

. The environmental effects of the “twin” green and digital transition in European regions[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2023, 84(4): 877-918.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7

本文引用 [1] 摘要

This study explores the nexus between digital and green transformations—the so-called “twin” transition—in European regions in an effort to identify the impact of digital and environmental technologies on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions originating from industrial production. We conduct an empirical analysis based on an original dataset that combines information on environmental and digital patent applications with information on GHG emissions from highly polluting plants for the period 2007–2016 at the metropolitan region level in the European Union and the UK. Results show that the local development of environmental technologies reduces GHG emissions, while the local development of digital technologies increases them, albeit in the latter case different technologies seem to have different impacts on the environment, with big data and computing infrastructures being the most detrimental. We also find differential impacts across regions depending on local endowment levels of the respective technologies: the beneficial effect of environmental technologies is stronger in regions with large digital technology endowments and, conversely, the detrimental effect of digital technologies is weaker in regions with large green technology endowments. Policy actions promoting the “twin” transition should take this evidence into account, in light of the potential downside of the digital transformation when not combined with the green transformation.

[31]

, KANG

, ZHANG

. China's efforts towards carbon neutrality: Does energy-saving and emission-reduction policy mitigate carbon emissions?[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 316: 115286.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115286

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301479722008593

本文引用 [1]

[32]

, RAMANATHAN

, NATH

. Environmental pressures and performance: An analysis of the roles of environmental innovation strategy and marketing capability[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 117: 160-169.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.12.005

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0040162516308253

本文引用 [1]

[33]	王双进, 田原, 党莉莉. 工业企业ESG责任履行、竞争战略与财务绩效[J]. 会计研究, 2022(3): 77-92. WANG Shuangjin, TIAN Yuan, DANG Lili. ESG implementation, competition strategy and financial performance of industrial enterprises[J]. Accounting Research, 2022(3): 77-92. 本文引用 [1]

[34]

黄继承, 朱光顺. 绿色发展的中国模式:政府采购与企业绿色创新[J]. 世界经济, 2023, 46(11): 54-78.

摘要

绿色创新是推动绿色发展、加速经济结构绿色转型的核心力量。本文利用2015-2020年上市公司获得的政府采购订单和绿色专利数据,研究政府采购对企业绿色创新的影响和作用机制。研究发现,政府采购显著提高了获得采购订单企业的绿色创新水平。作用机制上,政府采购强调绿色消费与绿色生产,通过中断采购威胁、提高政府督查和提高政府支持力度促进了企业绿色创新。进一步研究表明,政府采购主要促进了企业绿色发明类创新,并且绿色创新有助于提高企业的社会绩效。本文的研究结论提供了政府采购通过引导绿色创新来推动绿色发展的中国证据,对政府采购政策制定具有重要的参考价值。

HUANG

Jicheng

, ZHU

Guangshun

. The Chinese green development model: Public procurement and corporate green innovation[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2023, 46(11): 54-78.

本文引用 [1] 摘要

Green innovation is the core driving force behind development that accelerates the transformation of the economic structure towards sustainability. As the largest single consumer in the market, can the government effectively promote green innovation at the corporate level from the demand side? Drawing on data from public procurement orders and green patents of listed firms from between 2015 and 2020, this paper empirically studies the actual impact and mechanism of public procurement on corporate green innovation. The results indicate that public procurement significantly triggers green innovation in firms. In terms of the action mechanism, public procurement emphasises green consumption and production and promotes green innovation through threats of procurement disruption and improved government oversight and support. Patent-type evidence suggests that public procurement primarily promotes substantive innovation and can significantly improve corporate social performance in the form of environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria. This paper provides Chinese evidence of green development through public procurement aimed at promoting green innovation. The findings of this paper are an important reference point for the formulation of public procurement policies.

[35]	张虎, 张毅. 数字经济如何影响中国产业链现代化:理论依据与经验事实[J]. 经济管理, 2023, 45(7): 5-21. ZHANG Hu, ZHANG Yi. How digital economy affects modernization of China's industrial chain:Internal mechanism and empirical evidence[J]. Business and Management Journal, 2023, 45(7): 5-21. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	石大千, 丁海, 卫平, 等. 智慧城市建设能否降低环境污染[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018(6): 117-135. SHI Daqian, DING Hai, WEI Ping, et al. Can smart city construction reduce environmental pollution[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(6): 117-135. 本文引用 [1]