PDF(1115 KB)
PDF(1115 KB)
PDF(1115 KB)
财务弹性政策对企业绿色技术创新的影响研究
Research on the impact of financial flexibility policy and the green technological innovation of enterprises
财务弹性是微观企业财务政策选择的体现和核心问题,企业财务弹性政策如何影响企业绿色技术创新,是现阶段企业政策制定者和学界共同关注的重要问题。现有研究忽略了财务因素即企业财务资源获取与配置等对企业绿色技术创新的影响。本文将财务弹性理论、资源依赖理论与企业创新理论相融合,通过整理并构造独特的企业绿色技术创新数据库,从微观层面反映企业财务弹性政策对企业绿色技术创新的影响机制。本文选取沪深两市2012—2021年A股制造业上市公司数据为样本,考察财务弹性政策对企业绿色技术创新的影响。研究发现,企业财务弹性与企业绿色技术创新显著正相关,财务资源弹性和财务协调弹性正向影响企业绿色技术创新,相较于现金弹性和负债融资弹性,综合财务弹性可以更显著地提升企业绿色技术创新水平。进一步发现,财务弹性与融资约束之间存在交互作用,随着企业财务弹性水平的提高,将会弱化融资约束对企业绿色技术创新的负面影响。财务弹性可以通过缓解融资约束对企业绿色技术创新形成部分中介效应。财务弹性具有“自适应效应”,当环境不确定性增加时,企业能够利用储备的财务弹性来维持企业绿色技术创新活动。企业财务弹性对企业竞争力获取有促进作用,能够保证企业合理配置创新资源,确保企业绿色技术创新价值链的完整和持续,使得企业绿色技术创新对企业竞争力创造发挥更大的促进作用。本文探索了企业绿色技术创新的影响因素,对企业增强财务弹性意识、借助财务弹性政策提高绿色技术创新、促进高质量发展具有重要启示。
In recent years, green innovation and green transformation and development have increasingly attracted widespread attention at the practice level at home and abroad. The research on the influencing factors of enterprise green technology innovation mostly analyzes the impact on green technology innovation from the macro-industry level, mainly from the non-financial factors such as strategy, technology, market and government intervention, financial subsidies, and industrial clusters (Tao Feng et al., 2021; Shao Shuai et al., 2022). However, the impact of corporate financial system factors such as the acquisition and effective allocation of financial resources on green technology innovation is ignored. Green technology innovation is an important investment behavior of enterprises, which is different from traditional technology innovation and has unique risk and benefit characteristics. The green technology innovation activities of enterprises are inseparable from the support of continuous and large R&D funds (Brown and Petersen, 2011). How to flexibly allocate corporate financial resources to improve the level of corporate green technology innovation has become the focus of attention at the theoretical and practical levels. Financial flexibility is the embodiment and core issue of micro-enterprise financial policy choice. As an important institutional factor supporting enterprise innovation, it reflects the degree of strategic adjustment and flexibility of the company's “change-to-change” strategy.
In the context of realizing the “dual goals of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality” and “two-wheeled driving of S&T innovation and institutional innovation”, according to the data obtained at the micro-enterprise level, this paper intends to found out whether different corporate financial flexibility policies will help enterprises to carry out green technology innovation and effectively solve the dilemma of their green technology innovation, and the impact mechanism of financial flexibility policies on corporate green technology innovation.
This paper selected the data of A-share listed manufacturing companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2012 to 2021 as a sample to investigate the effect of financial flexibility policy on corporate green technology innovation. The study found that corporate financial flexibility is significantly positively correlated to corporate green technology innovation, and financial resource flexibility and financial coordination flexibility have a positive impact on corporate green technology innovation. Compared with cash flexibility and debt financing flexibility, comprehensive financial flexibility can significantly improve companies. It was further found that there is an interaction between financial flexibility and financing constraints. With the improvement of corporate financial flexibility, the negative impact of financing constraints on corporate green technology innovation will be weakened. Financial flexibility can form a partial intermediary effect on corporate green technology innovation by easing financing constraints. Financial flexibility has a “self-adaption effect”. Corporate financial flexibility can promote the acquisition of corporate competitiveness and can ensure that enterprises rationally allocate innovation resources, ensure the integrity and continuity of the value chain of corporate green technology innovation, and make corporate green technological innovation play a greater role in promoting the creation of enterprise competitiveness.
The possible marginal contributions were presented in the following aspects: Firstly, this study has expanded and enriched the literature on financial flexibility policies and corporate green technology innovation, by collecting a unique corporate green technology innovation database, and verified the transformation of corporate green development and green technology progress from the micro level influencing factors. Secondly, the study is helpful for relevant researchers to understand the impact mechanism of corporate financial flexibility policy on corporate green technology innovation at the micro level. This paper turned to a more micro-level enterprise level to verify the impact mechanism of corporate financial flexibility policies to induce green technology innovation. Finally, this paper also explored the impact mechanism of the financial flexibility policy of manufacturing enterprises on enterprise green technology innovation, and the efforts will provide experiences and reference in promoting the overall green transformation and upgrading of China's manufacturing industry. On the one hand, it will provide experience and reference for manufacturing enterprises to achieve “gorgeous transformation” in green technology innovation, and on the other hand, it will also provide suitable suggestions for capital allocation and transformation and upgrading of Chinese enterprises under the guidance of the strategic policy of “innovation-driven, green development”.
财务弹性 / 绿色技术创新 / 资源创新效应 / 协调创新效应 / 自适应效应
financial flexibility / green technology innovation / resource innovation effect / coordinated innovation effect / self-adaption effect
| [1] |
陶锋, 赵锦瑜, 周浩. 环境规制实现了绿色技术创新的“增量提质”吗:来自环保目标责任制的证据[J]. 中国工业经济, 2021(2):136-154.
|
| [2] |
邵帅, 范美婷, 杨莉莉. 经济结构调整、绿色技术进步与中国低碳转型发展:基于总体技术前沿和空间溢出效应视角的经验考察[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(2):46-69.
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
曾爱民, 张纯, 魏志华. 金融危机冲击、财务柔性储备与企业投资行为:来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J]. 管理世界, 2013(4):107-120.
|
| [5] |
肖忠意, 林琳, 陈志英, 等. 财务柔性能力与中国上市公司持续性创新:兼论协调创新效应与自适应效应[J]. 统计研究, 2020, 37(5):82-93.
|
| [6] |
周开国, 卢允之, 杨海生. 融资约束、创新能力与企业协同创新[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(7):94-108.
|
| [7] |
徐玲, 冯巧根. 财务柔性政策选择与研发投资:基于创业板上市公司的研究[J]. 当代财经, 2015(9):108-118.
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
张永安, 张瑜筱丹. 外部资源获取、内部创新投入与企业经济绩效关系:以新一代信息技术企业为例[J]. 华东经济管理, 2018, 32(10):168-173.
|
| [10] |
范圣然, 陈志斌, 沈磊. 企业财务柔性政策对创新效率的影响:来自经济新常态背景下的经验证据[J]. 东北大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(1):36-43.
采用2012—2015年沪深A股上市公司面板数据,通过优化后的OPSW模型分析了财务柔性政策对企业创新效率的影响。研究表明:财务柔性政策可利用其既有的诸如低成本获取财务资金等能力的发挥,显著地提升了企业的创新效率;区分具体财务柔性政策后,发现综合财务柔性政策相较于现金和负债柔性政策而言,更为显著地提升了企业创新效率;在市场化程度因素作用下,高(低)市场化程度地区企业采用“高现高负(高现低负)”配比型综合柔性政策更具提升优势。
Using the panel data of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies from 2012 to 2015, the effect of enterprises' financial flexible policies on innovation efficiency is analyzed with the optimized OPSW model. The results show that financial flexible policies could make use of the existing low-cost access to financial capitals so as to promote the efficiency of innovation. By further distinguishing different financial flexible policies, it is found that the comprehensive financial flexible policy improves enterprises' innovation efficiency more significantly compared with cash and indebted flexible policies. Under the influence of marketization factors, enterprises in the regions of high (low) degree of marketization that adopt “high cash high debt (high cash low debt)” ratio have more advantage than taking comprehensive flexible policies.
|
| [11] |
崔志霞, 孟祥瑞. 内部资本市场、融资约束与现金持有水平的动态调整[J]. 管理科学, 2021, 34(2):114-128.
|
| [12] |
王馨, 王营. 环境信息公开的绿色创新效应研究:基于《环境空气质量标准》的准自然实验[J]. 金融研究, 2021(10):134-152.
|
| [13] |
黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新?:宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(4):60-73.
|
| [14] |
周煊, 程立茹, 王皓. 技术创新水平越高企业财务绩效越好吗?[J]. 金融研究, 2012(8):166-179.
|
| [15] |
齐绍洲, 林屾, 崔静波. 环境权益交易市场能否诱发绿色创新?:基于我国上市公司绿色专利数据的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2018, 53(12):129-143.
|
| [16] |
王锋正, 陈方圆. 董事会治理、环境规制与绿色技术创新:基于我国重污染行业上市公司的实证检验[J]. 科学学研究, 2018, 36(2):361-369.
面对资源与环境的双重约束,有效整合内部治理和外部规制,直接关系到企业绿色技术创新的积极性。基于制度规制理论与技术创新理论,以2009-2014年45家重污染行业沪深两市A股上市公司为样本,实证检验了公司董事会治理在环境规制对企业绿色技术创新影响中的作用机制。研究发现:环境规制本身对企业绿色技术创新呈正向影响,董事会治理对企业绿色技术创新呈正向显著影响,且董事会治理在环境规制对企业绿色技术创新影响中呈显著正向调节作用。研究结论表明:面对我国环境承载能力已达到或接近上限的客观现实,并举外部环境政策落实和提高董事会治理水平,对促进企业绿色技术创新,实现提质增效和减污排污具有重要意义。
|
| [17] |
马春爱, 易彩. 管理者过度自信对财务弹性的影响研究[J]. 会计研究, 2017(7):75-81.
|
| [18] |
李庆华, 郭飞, 刘坤鹏. 使用衍生品的公司创新水平更高吗:基于融资约束和高管风险承担意愿的视角[J]. 会计研究, 2021(2):149-163.
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
叶德珠, 王梓峰, 李鑫. 经济政策不确定性与企业多元化程度选择[J]. 产经评论, 2020, 11(2):34-54.
|
| [22] |
苏媛, 李广培. 绿色技术创新能力、产品差异化与企业竞争力:基于节能环保产业上市公司的分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4):46-56.
本文以2011-2016年间我国节能环保产业上市公司为研究样本,实证检验绿色技术创新能力、产品差异化与企业竞争力的关系,同时分析企业规模对绿色技术创新能力与企业竞争力关系的调节作用。研究发现,绿色技术创新能力对企业竞争力有显著的正向影响,绿色技术创新能力的各个组分对企业竞争力的影响存在差异。产品差异化在绿色技术创新能力与企业竞争力的关系中发挥中介作用,产品差异化在绿色技术创新能力的四个组分与企业竞争力的关系中的作用存在差异,此外,企业规模在绿色技术创新能力与企业竞争力关系中具有正向的调节作用,产品差异化在企业规模的调节作用中起中介作用。本文的研究为解读绿色技术创新能力影响企业竞争力的内在机理提供了一个有价值的新角度。
Can an enterprise's green technological innovation ability enhance its competitiveness? This topic has not been studied extensively, there is no consensus in the existing literature, and there is no clear indication of the underlying mechanism and processes. In this research, a conceptual framework is established to describe the effect of an enterprise's green technological innovation ability on enterprise competitivenes. This model uses product differentiation as the mediating variable and the enterprise scale as the moderating variable. This study is based on a hierarchical regression analysis of the energy conservation and environmental protection data from enterprises listed in China from 2011-2016. Our findings show that, in general, the green technological innovation ability of an enterprise has a significant positive effect on the enterprise's competitiveness, but different components have different effects on enterprise competitiveness. Product differentiation has a mediating effect on the relationship between an enterprise's green technological innovation ability and competitiveness, and its mediating effect differs depending on the components of the green technological innovation ability. The enterprise scale positively moderates the relationship between the enterprise's green technological innovation ability and enterprise competitiveness through product differentiation. A new analytical framework is provided to understand the mechanism underlying the effect of an enterprise's green technological innovation ability on enterprise competitiveness, and useful insights are provided into the development of green technological innovation competitiveness and the establishment of new policies by the government is presented to improve the regulatory framework for green development.
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |