多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效——基于网络演化视角

刘微微; 金英哲; 毕克新

PDF(1496 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8) : 162-172.

论文

多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效——基于网络演化视角

刘微微，金英哲，毕克新

作者信息 +

Multidimensional proximity, innovation openness and cooperative innovation performance: A study from the perspective of network evolution

Liu Weiwei, Jin Yingzhe, Bi Kexin

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

论文利用2004-2018年中国新能源汽车产业联合申请专利数据，基于网络演化视角，将新能源汽车产业合作创新网络演化过程划分为孕育期、萌芽期和发展期，考察了在合作创新网络演化的不同阶段中地理邻近性、技术邻近性和制度邻近性对合作创新绩效的影响，并进一步探讨了创新开放度的调节作用。实证结果表明：地理邻近性和技术邻近性对合作创新绩效具有显著正向影响，而制度邻近性对合作创新绩效则具有显著负向影响。随着新能源汽车产业合作创新网络演化依次经历孕育期、萌芽期和发展期，地理邻近性的影响程度先减少后增加，技术邻近性的影响程度逐渐增加，制度邻近性的影响程度先增加后减少。此外，创新开放度对多维邻近性与合作创新绩效之间的关系存在部分调节作用。

Abstract

With the improvement of industrial technology complexity, innovation is becoming more and more difficult. Organizations acquire complementary innovation resources and improve their innovation ability through cooperation with external innovation subjects. Cooperative innovation has become an important form of organizational innovation activities. The relationship between organizational characteristics is one of the most important factors which affect organization cooperative innovation performance. For example, geographical distance, technology composition and organization type can influence the cooperative innovation performance. Therefore, it can better guide the organization selection object of cooperative innovation and cooperative innovation activities to explore how multidimensional proximity affects collaborative innovation performance. Innovation openness index reflects the degree of organizational openness to the outside world, and is an important factor for organizations to search for cooperative partners and develop cooperative innovation. The analysis of the moderating effect of innovation openness can further improve the influence mechanism of multidimensional proximity on cooperative innovation performance.Based on the perspective of network evolution, this paper explored the dynamic impact of multidimensional proximity on cooperative innovation and revealed the moderating effect of innovation openness. Based on the data of joint application for patent of Chinese new energy vehicle industry from 2004 to 2018, this paper divided the evolution stage of Chinese new energy vehicle industry cooperation innovation network into breeding phase, germination phase and growth phase. The effect of multidimensional proximity on collaborative innovation performance and the moderating effect of innovation openness in three stages were investigated. The empirical results showed that geographic proximity and technological proximity have significant positive effects on cooperative innovation performance, while organizational proximity has significant negative effects on cooperative innovation performance. With the evolution of the cooperative innovation network of the new energy vehicle industry, the influence of geographical proximity decreases first and then increases, the influence of technological proximity increases gradually, and the influence of organizational proximity first increases and then decreases. In addition, innovation openness partially moderates the relationship between multidimensional proximity and cooperative innovation performance (innovation openness breadth positively moderates the relationship between technological proximity and cooperative innovation performance and innovation openness depth positively moderates the impact of geographic proximity and technological proximity on collaborative innovation performance).From the perspective of network evolution, this study analyzed the impact of multidimensional proximity between cooperative innovation organizations on cooperative innovation performance, and further discussed the moderating effect of innovation openness. It will provide scientific guidance and reference for innovation organizations to choose partners in different network evolution stages, improve their cooperative innovation performance by taking advantage of proximity, and give full play to proximity advantage by formulating appropriate innovation openness degree. According to the research results, first of all, organizations can improve the performance of cooperative innovation by improving logistics and transportation, strengthening communication, and cooperating with geographically close organizations. Secondly, innovation organizations should constantly increase innovation input, strengthen innovation personnel training, and choose organizations with similar technical structure for cooperation. Thirdly, innovation organizations should cooperate with innovation subjects of different organization types to realize resource exchange and advantage complementation so as to improve cooperative innovation performance. Finally, organizations should pay attention to the moderating effect of innovation openness. Extensive cooperation between innovation subjects and external organizations is conducive to enhancing the positive impact of technological proximity on cooperative innovation performance, while close cooperation with external organizations is conducive to strengthening the positive impact of geographic proximity and technological proximity on cooperative innovation performance.

导出引用

刘微微金英哲毕克新. 多维邻近性、创新开放度与合作创新绩效——基于网络演化视角[J]. 科研管理. 2023, 44(8): 162-172

Liu Weiwei, Jin Yingzhe, Bi Kexin. Multidimensional proximity, innovation openness and cooperative innovation performance: A study from the perspective of network evolution[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(8): 162-172

参考文献

[1]吕一博,施萧萧,冀若楠. 开放式创新对企业渐进性创新能力的影响研究[J]. 科学学研究,2017,35(02):289-301. Lv Yibo,Shi Xiaoxiao,Yi Ruonan. The impact of open innovation on incremental innovation capability [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2017,35(02):289-301.
[2]Sebastian Kobarg,Jutta Stumpf-Wollersheim,Isabell M. Welpe. More is not always better: Effects of collaboration breadth and depth on radical and incremental innovation performance at the project level[J]. Research Policy,2018,48(1):
[3]宋晶,孙永磊. 合作创新网络能力的形成机理研究——影响因素探索和实证分析[J]. 管理评论,2016,28(03):67-75. Song Jing,Sun Yonglei. Research on the Formation Mechanism of Cooperation Innovation Network Competence: Influence Factors Exploration and Empirical Analysis [J]. Management Review,2016,28(03):67-75.
[4]陈文婕,曾德明. 低碳技术合作创新网络中的多维邻近性演化[J]. 科研管理,2019,40(03):30-40. Chen Wenjie,Zeng Deming. Multidimensional proximity evolution in the low-carbon technology collaborative innovation network [J]. Science Research Management,2019,40(03):30-40.
[5]党兴华,弓志刚.多维邻近性对跨区域技术创新合作的影响——基于中国共同专利数据的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2013,31(10):1590-1600. Dang Xinghua,Gong Zhigang. Impact of multidimensional proximities on cross region technology innovation cooperation: experical analysis based on Chinese coinvent patent data [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2013,31(10):1590-1600.
[6] Liu Yunqiang,Shao Xiaoyu,Tang Manping,Lan Hongxing. Spatio-temporal evolution of green innovation network and its multidimensional proximity analysis: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production,2021,283:
[7]夏丽娟,谢富纪,付丙海.邻近性视角下的跨区域产学协同创新网络及影响因素分析[J].管理学报,2017,14(12):1795-1803. Xia Lijuan,Xie Fuji,Fu Binghai. The Network Evolution of China Cross Region Industry-University Collaborative Innovation and the Analysis of Influencing Factors: Based on the Perspective of Proximity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management,2017,14(12):1795-1803.
[8]杨博旭,王玉荣,李兴光.多维邻近与合作创新[J].科学学研究,2019,37(01):154-164. Yang Boxu,Wang Yurong,Li Xingguang. The impact of multidimensional proximity on cooperative innovation [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2019,37(01):154-164.
[9]余谦,白梦平,覃一冬.多维邻近性能促进中国新能源汽车企业的合作创新吗?[J].研究与发展管理,2018,30(06):67-74. Yu Qian,Bai Mengping,Qin Yidong. Does Multi-dimensional Proximity Promote Innovation Cooperation Between New Energy Automobile Enterprises in China? [J]. R&D Management,2018,30(06):67-74.
[10]陈静,曾德明,欧阳晓平.知识重组能力与高新技术企业绩效——冗余资源与创新开放度的调节效应分析[J].管理工程学报,2021,35(03):23-33. Chen Jing,Zeng Deming,Ouyang Xiaoping. Knowledge recombination capability and high-tech firm performance: The contingent role of slack resources and innovation openness [J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2021,35(03):23-33.
[11]张辽,黄蕾琼.技术多元化、创新开放度与企业绩效——来自我国制造业上市公司的证据[J].科技进步与对策,2020,37(05):104-113. Zhang Liao,Huang Leiqiong. Technology Diversification, Innovation Openness and Enterprise Performance——Evidence from listed Manufacturing Companies in China [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2020,37(05):104-113.
[12]高俊光,陈劲,孙雪薇.创新开放度对新创小企业创新绩效影响研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(04):729-738. Gao Junguang,Chen Jin,Sun Xuewei. Research on the openness contributing to the innovation performance of new ventures [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2019,37(04):729-738.
[13]郭尉.创新开放度对企业创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科研管理,2016,37(10):43-50. Guo Wei. An empirical study of the influence of innovation openness to innovation performance of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management,2016,37(10):43-50.
[14]毛磊,谢富纪,凌峰.多维邻近视角下跨区域协同创新影响因素实证研究[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(08):37-44. Mao Lei,Xie Fuji,Ling Feng. An Empirical Study on the Influencing Factors of Cross-regional Collaborative Innovation from the Perspective of Multi-dimensional Proximity [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2017,34(08):37-44.
[15]Rune Dahl Fitjar,Martin Gjelsvik. Why do firms collaborate with local universities?[J]. Regional Studies,2018,52(11):
[16]Chris Forman,Nicolas van Zeebroeck. Digital technology adoption and knowledge flows within firms: Can the Internet overcome geographic and technological distance?[J]. Research Policy,2018,48(8):
[17]Pierre-Alexandre Balland,Ron Boschma,Koen Frenken. Proximity and Innovation: From Statics to Dynamics[J]. Regional Studies,2015,49(6):
[18]Teis Hansen. Substitution or Overlap? The Relations between Geographical and Non-spatial Proximity Dimensions in Collaborative Innovation Projects[J]. Regional Studies,2015,49(10):
[19]张洁瑶.创业企业多维邻近性对协同创新关系影响研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(09):78-85. Zheng Jieyao. A research on the impact of multi － proximity of entrepreneurial firms
on synergetic innovation relationship [J]. Science Research Management,2018,39(09):78-85.
[20]Luciana Lazzeretti,Francesco Capone. How proximity matters in innovation networks dynamics along the cluster evolution. A study of the high technology applied to cultural goods[J]. Journal of Business Research,2016,69(12):
[21]高长元,张晓星,张树臣.多维邻近性对跨界联盟协同创新的影响研究——基于人工智能合作专利的数据分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2021,42(05):100-117. Gao Changyuan,Zhang Xiaoxing,Zhang Shuchen. Research on the Impact of Multi-dimensional Proximities on Collaborative Innovation Ability of Cross-border Alliances: Empirical Analysis Based on Cooperative Patent Data of Artificial Intelligence [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T.,2021,42(05):100-117.
[22]曹兴,宋长江.认知邻近性、地理邻近性对双元创新影响的实证研究[J].中国软科学,2017(04):120-131. Cao Xing,Song Changjiang. Impact of Geographical Proximity and Cognitive Proximity on Ambidextrous Innovation of Technological Innovation Network [J]. China Soft Science,2017(04):120-131.
[23]Olof Ejermo,Charlie Karlsson. Interregional inventor networks as studied by patent coinventorships[J]. Research Policy,2006,35(3):
[24]Santamaría Luis,Nieto María Jesús,Rodríguez Alicia. Failed and successful innovations: The role of geographic proximity and international diversity of partners in technological collaboration[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change,2021,166:
[25]Elisa Giuliani. Network dynamics in regional clusters: Evidence from Chile[J]. Research Policy,2013,42(8):
[26]谢其军,宋伟.地理邻近性影响合作网络及区域创新绩效的机理研究[J].管理学报,2020,17(07):1016-1023. Xie Qijun,Song Wei. Research on the Mechanism of Geographical Proximity Affecting Inter-Regional Collaboration Networks and Regional Innovation Performance [J]. Chinese Journal of Management,2020,17(07):1016-1023.
[27]James J. Sempsey. The death of distance: How the communications revolution will change our lives[J]. Journal of the American Society for Information Science,1998,49(11):
[28]刘凤朝,邬德林,马荣康.专利技术许可对企业创新产出的影响研究——三种邻近性的调节作用[J].科研管理,2015,36(04):91-100. Liu Fengchao,Wu Delin,Ma Rongkang. Patent technology licensing and innovation performance of licensee firms: The moderating effects of three different types of proximity [J]. Science Research Management,2015,36(04):91-100.
[29]Jian Cheng Guan,Yan Yan. Technological proximity and recombinative innovation in the alternative energy field[J]. Research Policy,2016,45(7):
[30]Aranja Müller,Alexandra K. Zaby. Research joint ventures and technological proximity[J]. Research Policy,2019,48(5):
[31]Bart Nooteboom,Wim Van Haverbeke,Geert Duysters,Victor Gilsing,Ad van den Oord. Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity[J]. Research Policy,2007,36(7):
[32]刘凤朝,肖站旗,马荣康.多维邻近性对技术交易网络的动态影响研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36(12):2205-2214. Liu Fengchao,Xiao Zhanqi,Ma Rongkang. The dynamic impact of multidimensional proximities on technology transaction network [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2018,36(12):2205-2214.
[33]Hung Shiu Wan,Cheng Min Jhih,Hou Chen En,Chen Nai Rong. Inclusion in global virtual teams: Exploring non-spatial proximity and knowledge sharing on innovation[J]. Journal of Business Research,2020(prepublish):
[34]Wei Hong,Yu-Sung Su. The effect of institutional proximity in non-local university–industry collaborations: An analysis based on Chinese patent data[J]. Research Policy,2013,42(2):
[35]刘晓燕,李金鹏,单晓红,杨娟.多维邻近性对集成电路产业专利技术交易的影响[J].科学学研究,2020,38(05):834-842+960. Liu Xiaoyan,Li Jinpeng,Shan Xiaohong,Yang Juan. The influence of multidimensional proximity on patent technology transaction in integrated circuit industry [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2020,38(05):834-842+960.
[36]于永达,闫盛枫.邻近性与自主合作创新网络演进:以集成电路产业链为例[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(14):66-76. Yu Yongda,Yan Shengfeng. Proximity and Evolution of Independent Collaboration Innovation Network: Evidence from IC Industry Chain [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2017,34(14):66-76.
[37]刘志迎,单洁含.技术距离、地理距离与大学-企业协同创新效应——基于联合专利数据的研究[J].科学学研究,2013,31(09):1331-1337. Liu Zhiying,Shan Jiehan. The impact of technological distance and geographical distance on university-industry collaborative innovation: an analysis of joint-patent [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2013,31(09):1331-1337.
[38]王萧萧,朱桂龙.产学合作提升专利质量了吗?[J].科学学研究,2019,37(08):1461-1470+1516. Wang Xiaoxiao,Zhu Guilong. Does university－industry collaboration promote the quality of patents? [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2019,37(08):1461-1470+1516.
[39]闫春,黄绍升,黄正萧.创新开放度与创新绩效关系的元分析[J].研究与发展管理,2020,32(06):177-190. Yan Chun,Huang Shaosheng,Huang Zhengxiao. Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Innovation Openness and Innovation Performance [J]. R&D Management,2020,32(06):177-190.
[40]李玲.技术创新网络中企业间依赖、企业开放度对合作绩效的影响[J].南开管理评论,2011,14(04):16-24. Li Ling. Research on the Influence of Enterprises Dependence and Openness to Cooperation Performance in Technological Innovation Network [J]. Nankai Business Review,2011,14(04):16-24.
[41]马艳艳,刘凤朝,姜滨滨,王元地.企业跨组织研发合作广度和深度对创新绩效的影响——基于中国工业企业数据的实证[J].科研管理,2014,35(06):33-40. Ma Yanyan,Liu Fengchao,Jiang Binbin,Wang Yuandi. The influence of scope and depth of firms’inter － organizational R&D collaboration on enterprise innovation performance: An empirical analysis based on Chinese industrial enterprises database [J]. Science Research Management,2014,35(06):33-40.
[42]张炜,赵娟,童欣欣.动态知识管理能力与创新绩效关系研究:创新开放度调节效应[J].科技进步与对策,2015,32(05):131-135. Zhang Wei,Zhao Juan,Tong Xinxin. Study of the Relationship between Dynamic Knowledge Management Capability and Innovation Performance: the Moderating Effect of Innovation Openness [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2015,32(05):131-135.
[43]高霞,其格其,曹洁琼.产学研合作创新网络开放度对企业创新绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2019,40(09):231-240. Gao Xia,Qi Geqi,Cao Jieqiong. Influence of openness on the innovation performance in the industry－university－research cooperation innovation networks [J]. Science Research Management,2019,40(09):231-240.
[44]周燕,潘遥.财政补贴与税收减免——交易费用视角下的新能源汽车产业政策分析[J].管理世界,2019,35(10):133-149. Zhou Yan,Pan Yao. Fiscal subsidies and tax relief -- Policy analysis of new energy vehicle industry from the perspective of transaction costs [J]. Management World,2019,35(10):133-149.
[45]池仁勇,阮鸿鹏,於珺.新能源汽车产业政府补助与市场融资的创新激励效应[J].科研管理,2021,42(05):170-181. Chi Renyong,Ruan Hongpeng,Yu Jun. A research on the innovation incentive effect of government subsidies and market financing in the new energy vehicle industry [J]. Science Research Management,2021,42(05):170-181.
[46]周全,顾新,曾莉,吴绍波.新能源汽车产业的专利实施协同机制[J].科学学研究,2020,38(07):1236-1243+1259. Zhou Quan,Gu Xin,Zeng Li,Wu Shaobo. The collaboration mechanism of patent implementation in new energy automobile industry [J]. Studies in Science of Science,2020,38(07):1236-1243+1259.
[47]谢志明,张媛,贺正楚,张蜜.新能源汽车产业专利趋势分析[J].中国软科学,2015(09):127-141. Xie Zhiming,Zhang Yuan,He Zhengchu,Zhang Mi. Research on Patent Trend of New Energy Vehicles Industry [J]. China Soft Science,2015(09):127-141.
[48]陈芳,眭纪刚.新兴产业协同创新与演化研究:新能源汽车为例[J].科研管理,2015,36(01):26-33. Chen Fang,Sui Jigang. The research on Synergetic Innovation and its Evolution of Emerging Industries:a case of the new energy automobile industry [J]. Science Research Management,2015,36(01):26-33.
[49]Adam B. Jaffe. Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R & D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value[J]. The American Economic Review,1986,76(5):
[50]向希尧,蔡虹,裴云龙.跨国专利合作网络中3种接近性的作用[J].管理科学,2010,23(05):43-52. Xiang Xiyao,Cai Hong,Pei Yunlong. Effect of Three Kinds of Proximity in International Patent Co-application Network [J].管理科学,2010,23(05):43-52.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目：“多维邻近性视角下绿色技术协同创新超网络研究：形成机理、演化路径及鲁棒性”（72272042,2023.01—2026.12)；国家自然科学基金项目：“不同主导权下战略性新兴产业协同创新网络竞合机制与演化路径研究”（71872056,2019.01—2022.12）；黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目：“黑龙江省绿色技术协同创新网络：形成机理、格局动态与演化路径”（21GLB062,2021.07—2024.07）；黑龙江省自然科学基金联合引导项目：“黑龙江省现代能源体系建设的多维政策协同：机制、效应与路径”（LH2023G011,2023.07—2026.07）。