随着新一轮科技革命和产业革命的浪潮席卷而来,数字化已成为引领全球经济社会变革、推动我国经济高质量发展的重要引擎。本文以2007-2019年沪深A股非金融类上市公司为研究样本,实证检验数字化转型对全要素生产率的影响,研究发现:数字化转型是一种重要的价值创造方式,能够显著提高企业全要素生产率;该结果在经过工具变量法、倾向得分匹配、替换变量等检验后依然保持稳健。异质性检验发现,数据生产要素的信息收集和处理优势,可以帮助与供应商和客户距离较远的企业以及业务复杂程度较高的企业提高资源配置效率;并且数字化是成长型企业或中小企业塑造竞争优势、实现“弯道超车”重要支撑,能够迅速帮助他们脱颖而出。机制检验发现,企业数字化转型通过提高投资效率、降低外部交易成本、拓展客户资源、增加创新能力的方式提高企业全要素生产率。最后经济后果检验发现,当企业全要素生产率随着数字化转型而增加时,可以帮助企业提升竞争地位。本文研究不仅为学术界、实务界理解企业数字化转型如何作用于资源配置效率提供了经验证据,而且丰富了全要素生产率在随着数字化转型而提高后会产生何种经济后果的相关研究。
Abstract
With the wave of a new round of scientific and industrial revolution, digitalization has become an important engine for leading global economic and social changes and promoting high-quality development of China′s economy. This paper focuses on the following questions: Can digital transformation of enterprises improve total factor productivity? If so, what is the mechanism of action? The empirical test on this issue, on the one hand, has provided a new perspective for theoretical researchers to understand the consequences and mechanism of enterprises′ digital transformation; On the other hand, it has also provided unique empirical evidence for practitioners to promote the digital transformation of enterprises and the high-quality development of economy.This paper has taken Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share non-financial listed companies from 2007 to 2019 as research samples, and the study found that: (1) when enterprises pay more attention to digitization, their total factor productivity will be improved significantly. The results remained robust after the test of instrumental variable method, propensity score matching and substitution variable. (2) The heterogeneity test found that the information collection and processing advantages of data production factors can help enterprises with farther distances from suppliers and customers and enterprises with higher business complexity to improve the efficiency of resource allocation. In addition, when the enterprise is a growing one or a small and medium-sized one, strengthening the construction of its own digitization level is more conducive to improve its total factor productivity. (3) The mechanism test found that the digital transformation of enterprises improves the total factor productivity by improving investment efficiency, reducing external transaction costs, expanding customer resources and increasing innovation ability. (4) The economic consequence test found that when the total factor productivity of enterprises increases with the digital transformation, it can help enterprises improve their competitive position.The possible theoretical contribution and practical significance of this paper are as follows: firstly, this paper has enriched the relevant research on the consequences of digital transformation. The existing literature mainly studies the impact of digital transformation on the survival and development of traditional industries, internal organizational change and enterprise investment. There is still no empirical discussion on how digital transformation affects the resource allocation efficiency and even the competitive position of non-financial enterprises. This paper found that enterprise digitization does improve the efficiency of enterprise resource allocation, and will eventually help enterprises obtain competitive advantage, which provides a new perspective for academia to understand the value creation results of digitization. Secondly, this paper tested and found the path of digitization on the efficiency of enterprise resource allocation from four ways: investment efficiency, transaction cost, customer channel and innovation ability, which provides a new perspective and verified basis for the theoretical and practical circles to understand the mechanism of digital transformation. Thirdly, this paper introduced four scenarios: the distance between enterprises and suppliers and customers, business complexity, enterprise size and growth. On the one hand, it verified that the information collection and processing advantages of data production factors can promote enterprises to improve the efficiency of resource allocation. On the other hand, it found that digitization is an important support for small and medium-sized enterprises or growing enterprises to shape their competitive advantage.This paper has the following important policy suggestions and implications: firstly, this paper proves the driving effect of digital transformation on enterprise total factor productivity through empirical evidence, indicating that the advantages of enterprise digital transformation outweigh the disadvantages, which is consistent with the policy guidance direction in the era of digital economy. Government should continue to facilitate the integration of digital technology with the real economy, guide and support enterprises to empower traditional industries with information technology. Secondly, for enterprises that are far away from suppliers and customers and face information asymmetry with upstream and downstream members of the supply chain, as well as enterprises with high business complexity, they should make full use of information collection and processing advantages of emerging information technology to realize optimal allocation of resources. For growing enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises, they should realize that digitalization plays a stronger role in optimizing the efficiency of resource allocation, and actively participate in and realize digital transformation. Finally, in the process of digital transformation, enterprises should focus on using digital and internet platforms to gain insight into market information and explore investment opportunities, reduce external transaction costs by using the characteristics of digital technology, accurately identify the diversified needs of customers and expand their own customer resources when efficiently dealing with massive data information, and strengthen the innovation driving role of digital change.
关键词
数字化转型 /
全要素生产率 /
外部交易成本 /
创新能力 /
投资效率 /
竞争地位
Key words
digital transformation /
total factor productivity /
external transaction cost /
innovation ability /
investment efficiency /
competitive position
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]徐翔,赵墨非.数据资本与经济增长路径[J].经济研究,2020,55(10):38-54.
[2]谢康,夏正豪,肖静华.大数据成为现实生产要素的企业实现机制:产品创新视角[J].中国工业经济,2020(05):42-60.
[3]Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A. Prediction machines: the simple economics of artificial intelligence[M]. Harvard Business Press, 2018.
[4]Adner R, Puranam P, Zhu F. What is different about digital strategy? From quantitative to qualitative change[J]. Strategy Science, 2019, 4(4): 253-261.
[5]杨德明,毕建琴.“互联网+”、企业家对外投资与公司估值[J].中国工业经济,2019(06):136-153.
[6]Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda[J]. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2019, 28(2): 118-144.
[7]许恒,张一林,曹雨佳.数字经济、技术溢出与动态竞合政策[J].管理世界,2020,36(11):63-84.
[8]孙新波,张媛,王永霞,孙浩博.数字价值创造:研究框架与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2021,43(10):35-49.
[9]Dotzel T, Shankar V. The relative effects of business-to-business (vs. business-to-consumer) service innovations on firm value and firm risk: An empirical analysis[J]. Journal of marketing, 2019, 83(5): 133-152.
[10]Nambisan S. Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship[J]. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 2017, 41(6): 1029-1055.
[11]Wu L, Lou B, Hitt L. Data analytics supports decentralized innovation[J]. Management Science, 2019, 65(10): 4863-4877.
[12]Wu L, Hitt L, Lou B. Data analytics, innovation, and firm productivity[J]. Management Science, 2020, 66(5): 2017-2039.
[13]刘政,姚雨秀,张国胜,匡慧姝.企业数字化、专用知识与组织授权[J].中国工业经济,2020(09):156-174.
[14]许恒,张一林,曹雨佳.数字经济、技术溢出与动态竞合政策[J].管理世界,2020,36(11):63-84.
[15]Ferracuti E, Stubben S R. The Role of Financial Reporting in Resolving Uncertainty about Corporate Investment Opportunities[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2019, 68(2-3): 101248.
[16]李海舰,田跃新,李文杰.互联网思维与传统企业再造[J].中国工业经济,2014(10):135-146.
[17]谭松涛,阚铄,崔小勇.互联网沟通能够改善市场信息效率吗?——基于深交所 “互动易”网络平台的研究[J].金融研究,2016(3):174-188.
[18]王海军,冯乾.互联网金融的演进轨迹:学术论争与当下实践[J].改革,2015(9):142-150.
[19]杨德明,夏小燕,金淞宇,林丹滢,马晴.大数据、区块链与上市公司审计费用[J].审计研究,2020(04):68-79.
[20]Shapiro C, Carl S, Varian H R. Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy[M]. Harvard Business Press, 1998.
[21]Borenstein S, Saloner G. Economics and electronic commerce[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2001, 15(1): 3-12.
[22]Yoo Y, Boland Jr R J, Lyytinen K, et al. Organizing for innovation in the digitized world[J]. Organization science, 2012, 23(5): 1398-1408.
[23]鲁晓东,连玉君.中国工业企业全要素生产率估计:1999—2007[J].经济学(季刊),2012,11(02):541-558.
[24]陈茹,张金若,王成龙.国家审计改革提高了地方国有企业全要素生产率吗?[J].经济管理,2020,42(11):5-22.
[25]Levinsohn J, Petrin A. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables[J]. The review of economic studies, 2003, 70(2): 317-341.
[26]杨德明,刘泳文.“互联网+”为什么加出了业绩[J].中国工业经济,2018(05):80-98.
[27]廖冠民,宋蕾蕾.劳动保护、人力资本密集度与全要素生产率[J].经济管理,2020,42(08):17-33.
[28]李双燕,苗进.差异化股权制衡度、行业异质性与全要素生产率——基于混合所有制企业的证据[J].经济管理,2020,42(01):5-24.
[29]仓勇涛,储一昀,范振宇.多元化经营复杂度、股权绝对集中与资源运营效益[J].会计研究,2020(06):24-35.
[30]Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W.. Digital Transformation by SME Entrepreneurs: A Capability Perspective. Information Systems Journal, 2018, 28(6): 1129-1157.
[31]王雄元,谭建华.国家物流服务标准化促进了企业投资吗[J].会计研究,2019(12):46-51.
[32]袁振超,饶品贵.会计信息可比性与投资效率[J].会计研究,2018(06):39-46.
[33]吴超鹏,金溪.社会资本、企业创新与会计绩效[J].会计研究,2020(04):45-57.
[34]王彦超,郭小敏,余应敏.反垄断与债务市场竞争中性[J].会计研究,2020(07):144-166.
基金
国家自然科学基金面上项目:“IPO市场机制异化的定价后果研究”(71672057,2017.01—2020.12);国家自然科学基金青年项目:“衍生工具的使用、风险信息披露与投资者的风险感知和投资决策——基于心理和行为视角的研究”(71702104,2018.01—2020.12)。