科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (8): 109-118.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

机构投资者“分心”与企业研发操纵

王攀1,郭晓冬2,吴晓晖3   

  1. 1.台州学院 商学院,浙江 台州318000;
    2.贵州财经大学 会计学院,贵州 贵阳550025;
    3.厦门大学 管理学院,福建 厦门361005

  • 收稿日期:2021-11-03 修回日期:2022-04-26 出版日期:2023-08-20 发布日期:2023-08-09
  • 通讯作者: 郭晓冬
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区项目:“机构投资者派系对基金期末业绩拉升行为的影响研究”(72162005,2022.01.01—2025.12.31)。

Institutional investors′ "distraction" and enterprises′ R&D manipulation

Wang Pan1, Guo Xiaodong2, Wu Xiaohui3   

  1. 1. School of Business, Taizhou University, Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China; 
    2. School of Accounting, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang 550025, Guizhou, China; 
    3. School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, China
  • Received:2021-11-03 Revised:2022-04-26 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-08-09
  • Contact: Guo XiaoDong

摘要: 本文考察了机构投资者在其投资组合公司中的注意力分配差异,而引起的不同“分心”程度对企业研发操纵行为的影响效应。研究发现,机构投资者“分心”导致企业研发操纵现象更加严重。经内生性检验后,结论依然成立。在机制分析中,本文进一步从治理效应与信息效应视角检验了机构投资者“分心”对企业研发操纵的影响。研究表明,机构投资者“分心”减弱了其对上市公司施加积极治理的效应,减少了公司股价信息含量,使得上市公司更有可能为了降低企业税收成本、攫取更多的政府补贴,而通过实施研发操纵来迎合税收优惠与政府补贴对企业研发投入水平的要求,却导致企业未来研发绩效与市场绩效降低。此外,机构投资者的持股比例与持股市值权重越大,越有助于抑制机构投资者“分心”对企业研发操纵行为的加剧作用。本研究拓展了机构投资者“分心”的经济后果研究,也为监管部门强化对企业研发行为的监管提供参考。

关键词: 机构投资者, “分心”程度, 企业研发操纵

Abstract:    On the one hand, since R&D activities have the characteristics of high risk and income uncertainty, it is difficult for external users to directly acquire enterprises′ R&D information; and the R&D activities are highly professional, which prevents non-professionals from having good use of the enterprises′ R&D information and making accurate judgments about the rationality of R&D spending. Thus, the characteristics of R&D activities provide space for enterprises′ R&D manipulation. On the other hand, there is a policy of additional deduction of R&D expenses and accelerated depreciation of related assets in Chinese Tax Law, in accordance with which, when any companies are identified as high-tech enterprises, they can enjoy 15% income tax preference. In addition, these innovative companies can also enjoy different levels of subsidy and policy benefits given by local governments. Therefore, how to skillfully manipulate R&D expenditure to obtain more tax incentives and government subsidies has become a great temptation for listed companies. When the portfolios of institutional investors are impacted by extreme events, institutional investors will be prompted to pay more attention to the portfolios that have been hit, and thereby the attention of the companies that have not been hit will be reduced. This makes it possible for companies to take advantage of the distraction of institutional investors and weak supervision to adjust R&D spending by means of R&D manipulation, so that tax incentives will be enhanced, corporate tax costs reduced and higher government subsidies sought. But in fact, the R&D manipulation of listed companies is not conducive to corporate innovation.Therefore, this paper examined the effect of institutional investors distraction caused by different attention distribution in the portfolio companies on enterprises′ R&D manipulation. The study found that institutional investors′ "distraction" weakens their effects on listed companies to impose positive governance, reduces the corporate share price information content, and listed companies will more likely reduce their tax costs, and capture more government subsidies. Therefore, listed companies conduct R&D manipulation to meet the requirements of tax incentives and government subsidies on the level of enterprise R&D investment, thus leading to the reduction of enterprises′ R&D performance and market performance. In addition, the shareholding ratio of institutional investors and their shareholding proportion helps to suppress the intensification of institutional investors′ "distraction" to the enterprises′ R&D manipulation behavior.The research contributions of this paper are as follows: First, the research of this paper will help to expand the influence of different regulatory intensities caused by the attention distribution of institutional investors on corporate behavior. However, existing studies mainly take institutional investors′ field survey and shareholding ratio as the intensity of attention to listed companies, and they are unable to distinguish the difference in attention distribution of institutional investors in different portfolios. Secondly, the study of this paper will be helpful to enrich the literature on influencing factors of enterprises′ R&D manipulation, while existing studies have explored the influence of independent directors, tax incentives, financing constraints and other factors on enterprises′ R&D manipulation. However, few scholars have focused on the effects of the difference in attention distribution of institutional investors on corporate behavior. Finally, this paper used the degree of distraction of institutional investors as a means of identifying supervision, and verified its important impact on R&D manipulation, and it will not only provide new empirical evidence from Chinese capital market, but also provide a reference for government departments to strengthen the supervision of enterprises′ R&D manipulation behavior.The research of this paper has the following important implications: First of all, for listed companies, they should fully realize the adverse impact and potential unknown risks of R&D manipulation on enterprises, and reasonably increase the R&D investment of enterprises, from "quality" and "quantity" to improve the innovation ability and R&D performance of enterprises. Secondly, for institutional investors, they should give full play to their various advantages, adhere to the concept of long-term value investment, configure reasonably their attention in investment portfolios, and actively play the role of supervision and governance of listed companies in innovation activities, so as to strengthen the effective monitoring of the portfolio company. Finally, for the regulatory authorities, they should improve relevant innovation policies to increase the supervision penalties for the R&D manipulation behavior of listed companies, thus making up for the insufficient supervision of institutional investors′ "distraction".

Key words:  institutional investor, degree of "distraction", enterprises′ R&D manipulation