基于知识图谱的我国绿色信贷研究综述

田利辉, 聂艳明

科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7) : 97-104.

PDF(440 KB)
PDF(440 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7) : 97-104.
论文

基于知识图谱的我国绿色信贷研究综述

  • 田利辉1,2,聂艳明2,3
作者信息 +

A literature review of the development of green credit in China based on the knowledge map

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

    中国经济需要绿色可持续发展,而绿色信贷是节能减排、保护环境、优化产业结构的重要金融手段。那么,我国绿色信贷研究现状如何?前景何在?以CNKI中CSSCI来源期刊和全国中文核心期刊在2007年至2020年发表的相关文献为研究对象,本文运用CiteSpace软件绘制知识图谱进行可视化分析,总结绿色信贷研究概况,借助关键词综述评析绿色信贷的研究主题和研究趋势。研究发现:(1)前期研究聚焦在绿色信贷的概念、发展必要性以及制约绿色信贷发展的因素,绿色信贷政策发布实施后,则从微观层面探究绿色信贷实施效果;(2)绿色信贷从定性研究为主发展到定量研究为主,但数据可得性限制了微观实证研究的进展;(3)绿色信贷实施效果评估性的研究较少,难以判断政策有效性。目前,需要从多角度完善绿色信贷政策体系和统计体系,从多层面丰富绿色信贷政策实施效果定量研究,从多方位拓展绿色信贷激励约束政策研究,进而推动中国绿色信贷的学术研究、政策优化和业界实践。

Abstract

China needs sustainable green development and green credit is an important market means for energy conservation, emission reduction, environmental protection and industrial structure optimization. How is the current research status and development prospect of the Chinese green credits? In order to understand the current development of green credit research in China, we selected the relevant literature from 2007 to 2020 as research object that has been published by the CSSCI source journals and the Chinese core journals in the database of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). As a side note, non-academic literature among them, such as news reports, book reviews and so on.Finally, we got 263 domestic documents in the database of CNKI.As quantitative research can reflect the research hotspots and research status in a certain field more objectively, the CiteSpace software was used in this paper to draw knowledge maps, which was more simple and effective. The visual and quantitative analysis on those full literature samples were conducted in this way.Then the maps were utilized to analyze the literature,and the current research topics were to be grasped and the research trends were also to be judged,which may provide a useful reference for the in-depth study of green credit.
   The main research conclusions in this paper are as follows: (1) The research objects of green credit have been shifted from macroscopic research to microscopic research. The early research focused on the concept and necessity of developing green credit in China and the factors affecting the implementation of green credit. After the green credit policy was issued and implemented, academia began to analyze the effects of green credit implementation from a micro level such as commercial bank performance, investment and financing of heavy pollution firms. (2) The research methods of green credit have been evolved from a predominantly qualitative to a predominantly quantitative study, but the availability of data limits the progress of micro-empirical research. However, the samples are often too small with limited data in the research on green credit and commercial bank performance, which significantly reduces the accuracy of empirical research. As for the empirical research on green credit and heavy-polluting companies, most studies can only use dummy variables to represent green credit policies, and there are short of data to support further empirical research. (3) The relationship between research and practice of green credit is in need of further work. There are few evaluative studies on the effect of green credit implementation, which makes it hard to judge the effectiveness of green credit policies.〖JP〗
Our work not only brings about systemic references for new researchers,but also suggests the further research directions. We need to advance the academic research, better the government policies and promote the business practices of green credits. It is therefore in need to improve the green credit policy system and statistical system in order to provide enough data support for green credit research and supervision, to strengthen and deepen the evaluation research on the effect of green credit policy implementation and to expand research on green credit incentive and restraint policies is also important.

关键词

绿色信贷 / 知识图谱 / 可视化分析

Key words

green credit / knowledge map / visualized analysis

引用本文

导出引用
田利辉, 聂艳明. 基于知识图谱的我国绿色信贷研究综述[J]. 科研管理. 2023, 44(7): 97-104
Tian Lihui, Nie Yanming. A literature review of the development of green credit in China based on the knowledge map[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(7): 97-104

参考文献

[1] 牛海鹏,张夏羿,张平淡.我国绿色金融政策的制度变迁与效果评价——以绿色信贷的实证研究为例[J].管理评论,2020,32(08):3-12.
[2] 陈悦,陈超美,刘则渊,胡志刚,王贤文.CiteSpace知识图谱的方法论功能[J].科学学研究,2015,33(02):242-253.
[3] Chen C. Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature [J]. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2017, 2(2):1-40.
[4] 谢洪明,杨浩.大数据在商业中的研究态势与前沿热点——基于科学知识图谱的文献计量分析.科技与经济, 2019 (5): 42-46.
[5] 顾海良.马克思经济学“术语的革命”与中国特色“经济学说的系统化”[J].中国社会科学,2016(11):20-28.
[6] 张平淡,张夏羿.我国绿色信贷政策体系的构建与发展[J].环境保护,2017,45(19):7-10.
[7] 王玉婧,江航翔.环境风险与绿色金融[J].天津商学院学报,2006(06):16-20.
[8] 常杪,任昊.中国银行业环境风险控制体系构建现状分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2011,21(S1):521-524.
[9] 何德旭,张雪兰.对我国商业银行推行绿色信贷若干问题的思考[J].上海金融,2007(12):4-9.
[10] 杜莉,张鑫.绿色金融、社会责任与国有商业银行的行为选择[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2012,52(05):82-89+160.
[11] 沈洪涛,马正彪.地区经济发展压力、企业环境表现与债务融资[J].金融研究,2014(02):153-166.
[12] 中国人民银行贵阳中心支行青年课题组,任丹妮.政策推动还是市场驱动?——基于文本挖掘技术的绿色金融发展指数计算及影响因素分析[J].西南金融,2020(04):78-89.
[13] 麦均洪,徐枫.基于联合分析的我国绿色金融影响因素研究[J].宏观经济研究,2015(05):23-37.
[14] 曾煜,陈旦.供给侧改革背景下绿色信贷的制度创新[J].江西社会科学,2016,36(04):48-52.
[15] 王遥,潘冬阳,彭俞超,梁希.基于DSGE模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究[J].金融研究,2019(11):1-18.
[16] 李善民.奖惩机制下绿色信贷的演化博弈分析[J].金融监管研究,2019(05):83-98.
[17] 孟科学,马晓雨,魏霄.商业银行绿色金融实施的管理者效应与政策启示[J].华东经济管理,2018,32(03):44-51.
[18] 屠红洲,屠金光.从风险偏好管理视角探析我国银行业发展绿色信贷之建议[J].新金融,2018(04):38-42.
[19] 符淼,谭小波.中国银行信贷项目环境风险评估模型的构建和应用[J].广东金融学院学报,2011,26(04):15-24.
[20] 任康钰,张晨希.绿色信贷对我国商业银行业绩的异质性影响——基于16家上市商业银行面板数据的分析[J].武汉金融,2018(05):18-24.
[21] 邵传林,闫永生.绿色金融之于商业银行风险承担是“双刃剑”吗——基于中国银行业的准自然实验研究[J].贵州财经大学学报,2020(01):68-77.
[22] 张琳,廉永辉.绿色信贷如何影响商业银行财务绩效?——基于银行收入结构分解的视角[J].南方金融,2020(02):45-56.
[23] 胡乃武,曹大伟.绿色信贷与商业银行环境风险管理[J].经济问题,2011(03):103-107.
[24] 马秋君,刘文娟.基于绿色信贷的我国商业银行环境风险管理体系研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,23(S2):264-267.
[25] 陈伟光,卢丽红.中国商业银行绿色信贷外部障碍与环境风险管理框架的构建[J].广东金融学院学报,2011,26(03):66-76.
[26] 叶勇飞.“绿色信贷”的“赤道”之旅[J].环境保护,2008(07):46-48.
[27] 张晨,董晓君.绿色信贷对银行绩效的动态影响——兼论互联网金融的调节效应[J].金融经济学研究,2018,33(06):56-66.
[28] 陶茜.绿色信贷对银行绩效的影响机制探讨[J].宏观经济管理,2016(05):47-50.
[29] 李苏,贾妍妍,达潭枫.绿色信贷对商业银行绩效与风险的影响——基于16家上市商业银行面板数据分析[J].金融发展研究,2017(09):72-77.
[30] 王晓娆.环境治理投入与银行资产质量——基于绿色信贷视角的分析[J].金融论坛,2016,21(11):12-19+60.
[31] 孙光林,王颖,李庆海.绿色信贷对商业银行信贷风险的影响[J].金融论坛,2017,22(10):31-40.
[32] 何凌云,吴晨,钟章奇,祝婧然.绿色信贷、内外部政策及商业银行竞争力——基于9家上市商业银行的实证研究[J].金融经济学研究,2018,33(01):91-103.
[33] 高晓燕,高歌.绿色信贷规模与商业银行竞争力的关系探究[J].经济问题,2018(07):15-21.
[34] 张长江,张玥.绿色信贷能提高商业银行绩效吗?——基于绿色声誉的中介效应[J].金融发展研究,2019(07):70-76.
[35] 丁宁,任亦侬,左颖.绿色信贷政策得不偿失还是得偿所愿?——基于资源配置视角的PSM-DID~1成本效率分析[J].金融研究,2020(04):112-130.
[36] 颜廷峰,徐旭初,任森春.绿色信贷与银行财务绩效——基于制度、技术和机构的视角[J].江西社会科学,2019,39(07):63-72.
[37] 蔡海静,许慧.市场化进程、环境信息披露与绿色信贷[J].财经论丛,2011(05):79-85.
[38] 范瑾.企业环境信息披露与银行借款成本——来自2010~2015年沪深两市重污染行业的经验证据[J].财会月刊,2018(08):64-71.
[39] 谢芳,李俊青.环境风险影响商业银行贷款定价吗?—基于环境责任评分的经验分析[J].财经研究,2019,45(11):57-69+82.
[40] 陈幸幸,史亚雅,宋献中.绿色信贷约束、商业信用与企业环境治理[J].国际金融研究,2019(12):13-22.
[41] 苏冬蔚,连莉莉.绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?[J].金融研究,2018(12):123-137.
[42] 陈琪.中国绿色信贷政策落实了吗——基于“两高一剩”企业贷款规模和成本的分析[J].当代财经,2019(03):118-129.
[43] 丁杰.绿色信贷政策、信贷资源配置与企业策略性反应[J].经济评论,2019(04):62-75.
[44] 朱朝晖,谭雅妃.契约监管与重污染企业投资效率——基于《绿色信贷指引》的准自然实验[J].华东经济管理,2020,34(10):74-86.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“中国特色社会主义金融学的理论创新和实践探索”(17ZDA071,2017.11—2023.12);南开大学中央高校基本科研业务费:“生态金融和服务管理研究”(63182015,2018.12—2022.12);南开大学中央高校基本科研业务费:“金融风险防控和金融稳定”(63192314,2018.12—2022.12);广西发展战略研究院广西高校人文社会科学重点研究基地基金:“习近平重要论述指引下的中国-东盟经济金融合作高质量发展研究”(2022GDSIZD01,2022.06—2022.12)。

PDF(440 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/