碳交易政策、研发创新与污染性企业碳绩效

马茜; 任晓松; 马茜; 赵国浩

PDF(451 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7) : 114-123.

论文

碳交易政策、研发创新与污染性企业碳绩效

马茜¹，任晓松²，张红兵²，赵国浩¹

作者信息 +

Carbon trading policy, R&D innovation and carbon performance of polluting enterprises

Ma Qian¹, Ren Xiaosong², Zhang Hongbing², Zhao Guohao¹#br# #br#

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

文章以中国上市企业数据为研究样本，首先采用三重差分法，总体评估碳交易政策对污染性企业碳绩效的影响；然后通过中介效应模型，检验研发创新的中介效应并进行企业规模异质性下中介效应的差异分析；最后利用被调节的中介模型挖掘信息披露对研发创新中介效应的调节作用，利用多重中介效应模型考量遵循成本压力和研发创新动力对污染性企业碳绩效的综合影响。结果显示：碳交易政策能够提升污染性企业碳绩效，研发创新起到了部分中介作用。相对于大规模企业，研发创新的中介效应能够在小规模企业完整显现，且碳绩效提升效果更优。进一步机制讨论发现，信息披露能够正向调节研发创新的中介作用，强化碳绩效提升水平；成本压力对研发创新中介效应存在负向遮掩，其综合作用弱化了碳绩效的提升效果，意味着碳交易政策“波特假说”尚处于“遵循成本”阶段。这些发现对助力全球低碳转型和后疫情时代绿色复苏具有重要理论价值与现实意义。

Abstract

As an essential governance tool for the implementation of China′s dual carbon target strategy, carbon trading policy is crucial to the green transformation and development of polluting enterprises. Facing the pressure of emission reduction, enterprises actively respond to the situation through many strategies such as R&D innovation, information disclosure and cost control, etc. Whether carbon performance can be effectively improved, its mechanism needs to be explored in depth. This paper took the data of Chinese listed companies from 2010 to 2018 as the research sample. Firstly, the difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) method was used to assess the impact of carbon trading policies on the carbon performance of polluting enterprises in general. Then, the mediating effect of R&D innovation was tested by the mediating effect model, and the difference of mediating effect under the heterogeneity of firm size was analyzed. Finally, the moderated mediating model was used to explore the moderating effect of information disclosure on the mediating effect of R&D innovation. The multiple mediating effect model was used to consider the comprehensive impact of compliance cost pressure and R&D innovation motivation on the carbon performance of polluting enterprises.
The main conclusions we have obtained from this study are as follows: (1) Carbon trading policy has a significant effect on carbon performance of polluting enterprises, and the findings remain valid through a series of methods such as common trend test, PSM-DDD, and replacement time window for robustness. (2) R&D innovation plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between carbon trading policy and carbon performance of polluting enterprises, and there is significant heterogeneity in the mediating effect. Compared with large-scale enterprises, the effect of R&D innovation on carbon performance of small-scale enterprises is more obvious. (3) Under the moderating effect of information disclosure, the mediating effect of carbon trading policy to enhance the carbon performance of polluting enterprises through R&D and innovation gradually increases. (4) Cost compliance pressure and R&D innovation motivation play multiple mediating roles in the relationship between carbon trading policy and carbon performance of polluting enterprises, in which the cumulative mediating role of cost pressure negatively overshadows the parallel mediating role of R&D innovation, so that the Porter effect of carbon trading policy has not yet appeared. And, the effect of carbon performance improvement is still in the stage of "cost compliance".
The possible marginal contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) In the research design, carbon trading policy, R&D innovation and carbon performance of polluting enterprises are incorporated in the same analytical framework, focusing on the impact of carbon trading policy on carbon performance of polluting enterprises, adding new empirical evidence to the micro mechanism of carbon trading policy. (2) In terms of mechanism analysis, the moderated mediating model and multiple mediating model are innovatively introduced to explore the moderated mediating effect and serial mediating effect that may exist between carbon trading policy and carbon performance of polluting enterprises, broadening the micro channels for carbon trading to exert institutional dividends. (3) On the theoretical boundary, the Porter hypothesis is subdivided into the stage of cost pressure and innovation motivation. The impact of the combined effect of cost pressure and innovation motivation on the carbon performance of enterprises is considered comprehensively, to clarify the realization context of the Porter hypothesis on carbon trading policy and add new theoretical literature on whether the Porter hypothesis is valid and the conditions of its action.

导出引用

马茜任晓松张红兵赵国浩. 碳交易政策、研发创新与污染性企业碳绩效[J]. 科研管理. 2023, 44(7): 114-123

Ma Qian, Ren Xiaosong, Zhang Hongbing, Zhao Guohao. Carbon trading policy, R&D innovation and carbon performance of polluting enterprises[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(7): 114-123

参考文献

[1]廖文龙,董新凯,翁鸣,等.市场型环境规制的经济效应:碳排放交易、绿色创新与绿色经济增长[J].中国软科学,2020(06):159-173.
Liao Wenlong, Dong Xinkai, Weng Ming, et al. Economic Effect of Market-oriented Environmental Regulation: Carbon Emission Trading, Green Innovation and Green Economic Growth[J]. China Soft Science, 2020(06):159-173.
[2]于向宇,陈会英,李跃.基于合成控制法的碳交易机制对碳绩效的影响[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(04):51-61.
Yu Xiangyu, Chen Huiying, Li Yue. Impact of carbon emission trading mechanism on carbon performance based on synthetic control method[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2021,31(04):51-61.
[3]李力,刘全齐,唐登莉.碳绩效、碳信息披露质量与股权融资成本[J].管理评论,2019,31(01):221-235.
Li Li, Liu Quanqi, Tang Dengli. Carbon Performance，Carbon Information Disclosure Quality and Cost of Equity Financing[J].Management Review, 2019,31(01):221-235.
[4] Lv M, Bai M. Evaluation of China's carbon emission trading policy from corporate innovation[J]. Finance Research Letters, 2020:101565.
[5] Qi S Z, Zhou C B, Li K, et al. Influence of a pilot carbon trading policy on enterprises' low-carbon innovation in China[J]. Climate Policy, 2021(1):1-19.
[6] Hu J, Pan X, Huang Q. Quantity or quality? The impacts of environmental regulation on firms' innovation–Quasi-natural experiment based on China's carbon emissions trading pilot[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2020, 158.
[7] Feng C, Shi B, Rong K. Does Environmental Policy Reduce Enterprise Innovation? Evidence from China[J]. Sustainability, 2017, 9(6):872.
[8] Zaim O, Taskin F. Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: a non-paramentric approach[J]. Journal of environmental management, 2000, 58(2):95-107．
[9]闫华红,蒋婕,吴启富.基于产权性质分析的碳绩效对财务绩效的影响研究[J].数理统计与管理,2019,38(01):94-104.
Yan Huahong, Jiang Jie, Wu Qifu. The effects of carbon performance on financial performance which is based on the perspective of ownership type[J]. Journal of Applied Statistics and Management, 2019,38(01):94-104.
[10] Qi S Z, Zhou C B, Li K, et al. The impact of a carbon trading pilot policy on the low-carbon international competitiveness of industry in China: An empirical analysis based on a DDD model[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 281(3):125361.
[11]沈洪涛,黄楠.碳排放权交易机制能提高企业价值吗?[J].财贸经济,2019,40(01):144-161.
Shen Hongtao, Huang Nan. Will the Carbon Emission Trading Scheme Improve Firm Value?[J]. Finance ＆ Trade Economics, 2019, 40(01):144-161.
[12]胡玉凤,丁友强.碳排放权交易机制能否兼顾企业效益与绿色效率?[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(03):56-64.
Hu Yufeng, Ding Youqiang. Can carbon emission permit trade mechanism bring both business benefits and green efficiency? [J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(03):56-64.
[13] Porter, M. E.. America's Green Strategy[J]. Scientific American,1991,264(4):193-246.
[14] Rolf Fare,Shawna Grosskopf,Carl A. Pasurka. Potential gains from trading bad outputs: The case of U.S. electric power plants[J]. Resource and Energy Economics,2014,36(1),99-122.
[15] Zhou D, Qiu Y, Wang M. Does environmental regulation promote enterprises' profitability? Evidence from the Implementation of China's Newly Revised Environmental Protection Law[J]. Economic Modelling, 2021(6):105585.
[16]周畅,蔡海静,刘梅娟.碳排放权交易的微观企业财务效果——基于“波特假说”的PSM-DID检验[J].财经论丛,2020(03):68-77.
Zhou Chang, Cai Haijin, Liu Meijuan. Research on Enterprise Financial Effects of the Carbon Emission Trading: Based on the “Porter Hypothesis”＆ PSM-DID Test[J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics,2020(03):68-77.
[17]武普照,王倩.排污权交易的经济学分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(S2):55-58．
Wu Puzhao, Wang Qian. Economic analysis on emission permits trading[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2010,20(S2):55-58．
[18] Dales J H. Land, water and ownership[J]. Canadian journal of economics, 1968(1): 791-804．
[19]刘传明,孙喆,张瑾.中国碳排放权交易试点的碳减排政策效应研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(11):49-58．
Liu Chuanming, Sun Zhe, Zhang Jin. Research on the effect of carbon emission reduction policy in China’s carbon emissions trading pilot[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2019,29(11):49-58．
[20]熊广勤,石大千,李美娜.低碳城市试点对企业绿色技术创新的影响[J].科研管理,2020,41(12):93-102.
Xiong Guangqin, Shi Daqian, Li Meina. The effect of low-carbon pilot cities on the green technology innovation of enterprises[J]. Science Research Management, 2020,41(12):93-102.
[21]徐红,赵金伟.研发投入的绿色技术进步效应[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(2):121-128.
Xu Hong, Zhao Jinwei. The green technology advancement effect of R&D investment[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2020,30 (2):121-128.
[22]周志方,李祎,肖恬,等.碳风险意识、低碳创新与碳绩效[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31(03):72-83.
Zhou Zhifang, Li Yi, Xiao Tian, et al. Carbon risk awareness, low carbon innovation and carbon performance[J]. R&D Management, 2019,31(03):72-83.
[23]王为东,王冬,卢娜.中国碳排放权交易促进低碳技术创新机制的研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(02):41-48.
Wang Weidong, Wang Dong, Lu Na. Research on the impact mechanism of carbon emissions trading on low-carbon innovation in China[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020,30(02):41-48.
[24]占华,后梦婷.环境信息披露如何影响企业创新——基于双重差分的检验[J].当代经济科学,2021,7:1-14.
Zhan Hua, Hou Mengtin. How does environmental information disclosure affect corporate innovation: A difference in differences estimation[J]. Modern Economic Science,2021,7:1-14.
[25]吴超,杨树旺,唐鹏程,等.中国重污染行业绿色创新效率提升模式构建[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2018,28(5):40-48．
Wu Chao, Yang Shuwang, Tang Pengcheng, et al. Construction of the efficiency promotion model of green innovation in China’s heavy polluted industries[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2018,28(5):40-48．
[26]尹建华,王森,弓丽栋.重污染企业环境绩效与财务绩效关系研究:企业特征与环境信息披露的联合调节效应[J].科研管理,2020,41(05):202-212.
Yin Jianhua, Wang Sen, Gong Lidong. Research on the relationship between environmental performance and financial performance of heavily polluting firms: The joint moderating effects of firm characteristics and environmental information disclosure[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(05):202– 212.
[27]李毅,胡宗义,何冰洋.环境规制影响绿色经济发展的机制与效应分析[J].中国软科学,2020(09):26-38.
Li Yi, Hu Zongyi, He Bingyang. Research on the mechanism and effect of environmental regulations on green economic development[J]. China Soft Science, 2020(09):26-38.
[28] Siegel, R. Why Has Productivity Slowed Down[J]. Data Resources US Review,1979, (1):59-65.
[29] Lofgren N, Wrake M, Hagberg T, et al. The Effect of EU-ETS on Swedish Industry’s Investment in Carbon Mitigating Technologies[R]. Working Papers in Economics,2013.
[30]任胜钢,郑晶晶,刘东华,等.排污权交易机制是否提高了企业全要素生产率——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].中国工业经济,2019(05):5-23.
Ren Shenggang, Zheng Jingjing, Liu Donghua, et al. Does Emissions Trading System Improve Firm’s Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(05): 5-23.
[31]任晓松,刘宇佳,赵国浩.经济集聚对碳排放强度的影响及传导机制[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(04):95-106.
Ren Xiaosong, Liu Yujia, Zhao Guohao. The impact and transmission mechanism of economic agglomeration on carbon intensity[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2020, 30(4): 95-106.
[32]温忠麟,叶宝娟.有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补?[J].心理学报,2014,46(05):714-726.
Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Different Methods for Testing Moderated Mediation Models:Competitors or Backups? [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46 (05):714-726.
[33]任晓松,马茜,刘宇佳,等.碳交易政策对高污染工业企业经济绩效的影响——基于多重中介效应模型的实证分析[J].资源科学,2020,42(09):1750-1763.
Ren Xiaosong, Ma Qian, Liu Yujia, et al. The impact of carbon trading policy on the economic performance of highly polluting industrial enterprises: Empirical analysis based on multiple mediating effect model[J]. Resources Science, 2020, 42(09): 1750-1763.
[34]Mielnik O, Goldemberg O. Communication the evolution of the “carbonization index” in developing countries[J]. Nature Geoscience, 2014, 7(10):709-715.
[35]周迪,刘奕淳.中国碳交易试点政策对城市碳排放绩效的影响及机制[J].中国环境科学,2020,40(01):453-464.
Zhou Di, Liu Yichun. Impact of China’s carbon emission trading policy on the performance of urban carbon emission and its mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2020, 40(01): 453-464.
[36] Clarkson P M , Yue L , Richardson G D , et al. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis[J]. Accounting Organizations & Society, 2008, 33(4-5):303-327.
[37]任晓松,马茜,刘宇佳,等. 碳交易政策对工业碳生产率的影响及传导机制[J].中国环境科学,2021,
Ren Xiaosong, Ma Qian, Liu Yujia, et al. The impact of carbon trading policy on industrial carbon productivity and its transmission mechanism[J]. China Environmental Science, 2021,
[38]史贝贝,冯晨,康蓉.环境信息披露与外商直接投资结构优化[J].中国工业经济,2019(04):98-116.
Shi Beibei, Feng Chen, Kang Rong. Environment Information Announcement and Structure Optimization of FDI[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019(04): 98-116.
[39]何玉,唐清亮,王开田.碳绩效与财务绩效[J].会计研究,2017(02):76-82+97.
He Yu, Tang Qinliang, Wang Kaitian. Carbon Performance versus Financial Performance[J]. Accounting Research,2017(02):76-82+97.
[40]王永钦,吴娴.中国创新型货币政策如何发挥作用:抵押品渠道[J].经济研究,2019,54(12):86-101.
Wang Yongqin, Wu Xian. How Unconventional Monetary Policy Works in China: The Collateral Channel[J].Economic Research Journal,2019,54(12):86- 101.
[41] Schumpeter J A, Opie R, Hansen A H. The theory of economic development[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003,1:61-116.
[42]孙维峰,黄祖辉.广告支出、研发支出与企业绩效[J].科研管理,2013,34(02):44-51.
Sun Weifeng, Huang Zuhui. Advertising expenditure, R&D expenditure, and firm performance[J]. Science Research Management,2013,34(02):44-51.
[43]李旭,熊勇清.“双积分”政策对新能源车企研发投入的影响分析[J].科学学研究,2021,7:1-19.
Li Xu, Xiong Yongqing. Research on the Influence of the CAFC-NEV Mandate on R&D Investment of New Energy Vehicle Manufacturers[J]. Studies in Science of Science,2021,7:1-19.
[44]王艳丽,类晓东,龙如银.绿色信贷政策提高了企业的投资效率吗?——基于重污染企业金融资源配置的视角[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2021,31(01):123-133.
Wang Yanli，Lei Xiaodong，Long Ruyin. Can green credit policy promote the corporate investment efficiency? [J]. China population, resources and environment,2021,31(01):123-133.
[45] Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis[J]. Psychological methods, 2007, 12(1):1-22．
[46]包国宪,关斌.财政压力会降低地方政府环境治理效率吗——一个被调节的中介模型[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2019,29(04):38-48.
Bao Guoxian，Guan Bin. Does fiscal pressure reduce the environmental governance efficiency of local governments[J]. China population，resources and environment,2019,29(04):38-48.

基金

国家社会科学基金一般项目：“技术联盟组织间知识转移有效性的动态影响机制与提升路径研究”(16BGL041，2016.06—2022.06)；山西省高校哲学社会科学研究项目：“双碳目标下山西省生态效率与高质量发展耦合机制研究”(2021W055，2021.09—2023.09)；山西省统计学会项目：“双碳目标下山西绿色低碳循环经济发展协同效应研究”(KY〔2021〕045，2021.11—2022.06)。