数字技术的快速发展与应用,显著弱化了传统的国家优势,重构着世界竞争格局,促使各国纷纷制定数字化发展战略以抢占科创高地、形成数字竞争优势。本文基于美国、英国、德国与日本等主要发达国家数字化发展战略演进规律与实践经验的总结梳理,建构并分析了数字经济、数字政府与数字社会的逻辑关系与理论框架。研究发现:(1)各国数字化发展源起与目的可能不同,但其内容聚焦在数字经济、数字政府与数字社会发展三方面;(2)各国数字化发展路径可能存在不同,主要包括“技术-制度”驱动、“政府-政策”牵引、工业升级推动、社会建设拉动等模式,但其发展重心最终均转向数字经济发展;(3)数字化发展战略应以数字经济为主体、以数字政府与数字社会为两翼,三者互为支撑、彼此渗透与交融,互推共进。基于此,研究提出了中国情境下数字化发展路径、对策建议与未来展望。
Abstract
The rapid development and application of digital technology is weakening the traditional national advantage and reconstructing the world′s competition landscape, which urges countries to develop digital development strategies to seize the high ground of digital technological innovation and form the digital competitive advantage. By sorting out and summarizing the digital development strategic path models of major developed countries, and exploring the internal relationship mechanism and theoretical framework of digital economy, digital government and digital social development, it will provide theoretical support and model mirror for China′s current digital development. However, the existing literature on digital development mostly discusses its development path and construction logic from of digital government, digital economy, and digital society respectively, few literatures analyze the development logic and theoretical framework from an overall perspective. Based on the analysis of the evolution law and practical experience in digital development strategies of major developed countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Japan, this paper constructs a theoretical framework of national digital development based on digital economy, digital government and digital society.
The results found that: (1) The origin of digital development in various countries is different, but its content focuses on three aspects: digital economy, government and social development; (2) The digital development strategy evolution of the four countries, the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany and Japan, has formed different digital economy development modes, such as "technology-system" double-wheel driving, "government-policy" pulling, industrial upgrading promoting, social demand pulling, but all development focus of the evolution process has turned to the digital economy as the center of gravity; (3) The digital development strategy should take the digital economy as the main body, the digital government and the digital society as the two wings. The three aspects support each other, penetrate and blend with each other, and advance together.
Based on this, the study puts forward the logic and countermeasures of digital development in the Chinese context. The development logic is the development of the digital economy continues to provide technical and service support for the constructions of digital government and digital society, the digital government empowers the digital economy and digital society to deepen development through top-level design and system reshaping; and the digital society provides long-term growth momentum for the digital economy and help the overall improvement of the effect of digital government governance.
The policy implications include: reconstructing the top-level design of the digital background, giving full play to the leading role of the government, guiding the participation of multiple parties, cultivating the digital literacy of the whole society, building a digital ecology, and activating data productivity. In addition, it puts forward the prospect of the future path of China further digital development in the three aspects of digital economy, digital government and digital society.
关键词
数字化发展 /
数字经济 /
数字政府 /
数字社会 /
理论逻辑
Key words
digital development /
digital economy /
digital government /
digital society /
theoretical logic
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 裴长洪, 刘斌. 中国开放型经济学:构建阐释中国开放成就的经济理论[J]. 中国社会科学, 2020, 290(2): 47-70+206.
[2] OECD. Oecd digital economy outlook 2020[M]. City: Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Publishing, 2020.
[3] 郭周明, 裘莹. 数字经济时代全球价值链的重构:典型事实,理论机制与中国策略[J]. 改革, 2020, (10): 73-85.
[4] Unitednation. Digital economy report 2019[R]. City: United Nations Publications, 2019.
[5] 陈昌盛, 许伟, 兰宗敏, et al. “十四五”时期我国发展内外部环境研究[J]. 管理世界, 2020, 36(10): 1-14+40+15.
[6] Perez C. Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms[J]. Cambridge journal of economics, 2010, 34(1): 185-202.
[7] 王志刚. 矢志科技自立自强 加快建设科技强国[J]. 求是, 2021, (6).
[8] 荆林波, 袁平红. 全球价值链变化新趋势及中国对策[J]. 管理世界, 2019, 35(11): 72-79.
[9] 马兴瑞. 加快数字化发展[J]. 求是, 2021, (2).
[10] 田丽. 各国数字经济概念比较研究[J]. 经济研究参考, 2017, (40): 101-106.
[11] 李柏洲, 尹士. 数字化转型背景下ICT企业生态伙伴选择研究——基于前景理论和场理论[J]. 管理评论, 2020, 32(05): 165-179.
[12] 刘淑春. 数字政府战略意蕴,技术构架与路径设计——基于浙江改革的实践与探索[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018, (9): 37-45.
[13] 梅燕, 鹿雨慧, 毛丹灵. 典型发达国家数字乡村发展模式总结与比较分析[J]. 经济社会体制比较, 2021, (03): 58-68.
[14] 王钦敏. 推动数字政府高质量发展 不断完善国家行政体系[J]. 中国行政管理, 2021, (12): 7-8.
[15] 吴晓怡, 张雅静. 中国数字经济发展现状及国际竞争力[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(05): 250-258.
[16] 丁声一, 谢思淼, 刘晓光. 英国《数字经济战略(2015-2018)》述评及启示[J]. 电子政务, 2016, (4): 91-97.
[17] 杜超, 赵雪娇. 基于“政府即平台”发展趋势的政府大数据平台建设[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018, 402(12): 148-150.
[18] 张晓, 鲍静. 数字政府即平台:英国政府数字化转型战略研究及其启示[J]. 中国行政管理, 2018, (3): 27-32.
[19] 赵锐. 评《德国数字纲要2014-2017》:战略目标、举措和启示[J]. 电子政务, 2015, (8): 101-112.
[20] 李丹琳, 马学礼. 日本it立国战略的推进与成效分析[J]. 日本问题研究, 2017, 031(2): 1-9.
[21] 蓝庆新, 马蕊, 刘昭洁. 日本数字经济发展经验借鉴及启示[J]. 东北亚学刊, 2018, 41(6): 58-62.
[22] Goldfarb A, Greenstein S M, Tucker C E. Economic analysis of the digital economy[J]. Nber Books, 2015, 26(4): págs. 695-697.
[23] Zhao F, Wallis J, Singh M. E-government development and the digital economy: A reciprocal relationship[J]. Internet Research, 2015, 25(5): 734-766.
基金
国家自然科学基金重点项目:“中国企业创新链产业链融合发展模式与机制研究”(72232004,2023.01—2027.12);国家自然科学基金青年项目:“云资源‘拼凑-协奏’视角下中小企业数字创新平衡及适配机制研究”(72002061,2021.01—2023.12);国家自然科学基金青年项目:“突破性创新导向的企业多维知识搜寻同时性平衡机制研究”(72204019,2023.01—2025.12)。