科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 131-139.
张艺1,2,杜军1,3,白福臣1
收稿日期:
2020-11-28
修回日期:
2021-05-03
出版日期:
2023-05-20
发布日期:
2023-05-22
通讯作者:
杜军
基金资助:
Zhang Yi1,2, Du Jun1,3, Bai Fuchen1
Received:
2020-11-28
Revised:
2021-05-03
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-05-22
摘要: 本文基于三螺旋创新理论方法,以我国创新系统的知识创新主体——“双一流”大学为例,探究其与企业、科研院所之间双边或三边互动对知识创造的影响关系。研究发现:学术部门之间耦合互动关系随着时间推移而不断增强,这不仅有利于知识创造,还有助于改善科研投入到知识产出的转化;然而,学术部门与产业部门双边互动关系出现了解耦迹象,它们之间互动不仅不利于知识创造,还间接削弱了科研投入对知识产出的正向影响;此外,产学研三螺旋互动还出现了解耦现象,并且对知识创造并没有起到显著的促进作用。
张艺, 杜军, 白福臣. 产学研三螺旋互动有利于知识创造吗?[J]. 科研管理, 2023, 44(5): 131-139.
Zhang Yi, Du Jun, Bai Fuchen. Are the triple helix interactions among industry-university-research institutes beneficial for knowledge creation?[J]. Science Research Management, 2023, 44(5): 131-139.
[1] Shi X, Wu Y, Fu D. Does University-Industry collaboration improve innovation efficiency? Evidence from Chinese Firms?[J], Economic Modelling.2020, (68): 39-53.[2] Choi S, Yang J S, Park H W. Quantifying the Triple Helix relationship in scientific research: statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries[J], Quality & Quantity.2015,49(4): 1381-1396.[3] Zhang Y, Chen K, Fu X. Scientific effects of Triple Helix interactions among research institutes, industries and universities[J], Technovation.2019,(86-87): 33-47.[4] 张艺, 陈凯华. 官产学三螺旋创新的国际研究:起源、进展与展望[J], 科学学与科学技术管理.2020,41(5): 116-139.[5] Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix -- University-Industry-Government Relations: A Laboratory for Knowledge Based Economic Development[J], EASST Review.1995,14(1): 14-19.[6] Chen K, Zhang Y, Zhu G, Mu R. Do research institutes benefit from their network positions in research collaboration networks with industries or/and universities?[J], Technovation.2020,(94-95): 102002.[7] Yang H, Jung W S. Assessing Knowledge Structures for Public Research Institutes[J], Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia.2016,15(1): 27-40.[8] Yoon J, Park H W. Triple helix dynamics of South Korea’s innovation system: a network analysis of inter-regional technological collaborations[J], Quality & Quantity.2017,51(3): 989-1007.[9] Yoon J. The evolution of South Korea’s innovation system: moving towards the triple helix model?[J], Scientometrics.2015,104(1): 265-293.[10] Gretsch O, Salzmann E C, Kock A. University‐industry collaboration and front‐end success: the moderating effects of innovativeness and parallel cross‐firm collaboration[J], R&D Management.2019,49(5): 835-849.[11] Sánchez-Barrioluengo M, Benneworth P. Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance[J], Technological Forecasting and Social Change.2019, (141): 206-218.[12] Elvekrok I, Veflen N, Nilsen E R, Gausdal A H. Firm innovation benefits from regional triple-helix networks[J], Regional studies.2018,52(9): 1214-1224.[13] Souzanchi Kashani E, Zarghami H R. The dynamics of university-industry-government relationships in Nanoscience: investigating the Triple-Helix differences between Iran and Switzerland[J], Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.2019,31(7): 817-832.[14] Li R, Fang W. University-industry-government relations of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) universities: The perspective of the mutual information[J], Plos One.2019,14(2): 1-14.[15] Leydesdorff L, Porto-Gomez I. Measuring the expected synergy in Spanish regional and national systems of innovation[J], The Journal of Technology Transfer.2019,44(1): 189-209.[16] Li Y, Arora S, Youtie J, Shapira P. Using web mining to explore Triple Helix influences on growth in small and mid-size firms[J], Technovation.2018,(76-77): 3-14.[17] Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and "mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations[J], Research Policy.2000,29(2): 109-123.[18] Yoda N, Kuwashima K. Triple helix of university–industry–government relations in Japan: Transitions of collaborations and interactions[J], Journal of the Knowledge Economy.2020, 11(3): 1120-1144.[19] Leydesdorff L, Ivanova I, Meyer M. 2019a. Synergy in Innovation Systems Measured as Redundancy in Triple Helix Relations[C]. In: Gl?nzel W., Moed H.F., Schmoch U., Thelwall M. (eds), Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Cham: Springer: 421-443.[20] Santoro G, Bresciani S, Papa A. Collaborative modes with Cultural and Creative Industries and innovation performance: The moderating role of heterogeneous sources of knowledge and absorptive capacity[J], Technovation.2020, (92-93): 102040. [21] Kang W, Zhao S, Song W, Zhuang T. Triple helix in the science and technology innovation centers of China from the perspective of mutual information: a comparative study between Beijing and Shanghai[J], Scientometrics.2019,118(3): 921-940.[22] Leydesdorff L. Synergy in Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems at National and Regional Levels: The Triple-Helix Model and the Fourth Industrial Revolution[J], Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.2018,4(16): 1-13.[23] Gustafsson R, Jarvenpaa S. Extending community management to industry‐university‐government organizations[J], R&d Management.2018,48(1): 121-135.[24] Mêgnigbêto E. Modelling the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships with game theory: Core, Shapley value and nucleolus as indicators of synergy within an innovation system[J], Journal of Informetrics.2018,12(4): 1118-1132.[25] Barrie J, Zawdie G, Jo?o E. Assessing the role of triple helix system intermediaries in nurturing an industrial biotechnology innovation network[J], Journal of Cleaner Production.2019,214(5): 209-223.[26] Carayannis E G, Campbell D F. Mode 1, Mode 2, and Mode 3: Triple Helix and Quadruple Helix[M], Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems. Springer, 2019: 17-30.[27] Mcadam M, Debackere K. Beyond ‘triple helix’toward ‘quadruple helix’models in regional innovation systems: Implications for theory and practice[J], R&d Management.2018,48(1): 3-6.[28] Miller K, Mcadam R, Mcadam M. A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda[J], R&D Management.2018,48(1): 7-24.[29] Lozano R, Petterssén S, Jons?ll A, Niss C, Bergstr?m B. Moving to a quintuple helix approach in SPP: Collaboration and LCC for lighting procurements[M], Cost and EU Public Procurement Law:Routledge. 2019.[30] Harwiki W, Malet C. Quintuple helix and innovation on performance of SMEs within ability of SMEs as a mediator variable: A comparative study of creative industry in Indonesia and Spain[J], Management Science Letters.2020,10(6): 1389-1400.[31] Park H W. An interview with Loet Leydesdorff: the past, present, and future of the triple helix in the age of big data[J], Scientometrics.2014,99(1): 199-202.[32] Park H W. Transition from the Triple Helix to N-Tuple Helices? An interview with Elias G. Carayannis and David F. J. Campbell[J], Scientometrics.2014,99(1): 203-207.[33] Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix, …, and an N-Tuple of Helices: Explanatory Models for Analyzing the Knowledge-Based Economy?[J], Journal of the Knowledge Economy.2012,3(1): 25-35.[34] Barbalho S C M, Burba L, Martin A R. The effort of “Triple Helix” actors in disruptive technologies[J], Product: Management & Development.2019,16(2): 92-103.[35] Ryan P, Geoghegan W, Hilliard R. The microfoundations of firms’ explorative innovation capabilities within the triple helix framework[J], Technovation.2018,(76-77): 15-27.[36] Guerrero M, Urbano D. The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy[J], Technological Forecasting and Social Change.2017,(119): 294-309.[37] 张艺, 陈凯华, 朱桂龙. 产学研合作与后发国家创新主体能力演变——以中国高铁产业为例[J], 科学学研究.2018,36(10): 227-244.[38] Biscaro C, Comacchio A. Knowledge creation across worldviews: How metaphors impact and orient group creativity[J], Organization Science.2018,29(1): 58-79.[39] Lee T, Liu C H, Fei W, Tsang L Y 2018. Knowledge Transfer in an Organization: Effects of Individual and Departmental Network Centrality [J], Academy of Management, 2018,(1): 13099.[40] Azagra-Caro J M, Barberá-Tomás D, Edwards-Schachter M, Tur E M. Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent[J], Research Policy.2017,46(2): 463-474.[41] Gomes-Casseres B, Hagedoorn J, Jaffe A B. Do alliances promote knowledge flows?[J], Journal of Financial Economics.2006,80(1): 5-33.[42] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J], Academy of Management Journal.2001,44(5): 996-1004.[43] Meyer M, Kuusisto J, Grant K, De Silva M, Flowers S, Choksy U. Towards new Triple Helix organisations? A comparative study of competence centres as knowledge, consensus and innovation spaces[J], R&D Management.2019,49(4): 555-573.[44] Leydesdorff L, Ivanova I. “Open innovation” and “triple helix” models of innovation: can synergy in innovation systems be measured?[J], Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity.2016,2(1): 1-12.[45] Leydesdorff L, Etzkowitz H, Ivanova I, Meyer M S. The Measurement of Synergy in Innovation Systems: Redundancy Generation in a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations[C]. In: Gl?Nzel, H. Moed, U. Schmoch, et al., Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Springer handbook of science and technology indicators. Heidelberg: Springer, 2017.[46] Paruchuri S. Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms[J], Organization Science.2010,21(1): 63-80.[47] Lee Y H, Kim Y. Analyzing interaction in R&D networks using the Triple Helix method: Evidence from industrial R&D programs in Korean government[J], Technological Forecasting and Social Change.2016,110: 93-105.[48] Berchicci L. Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance[J], Research Policy.2013,42(1): 117-127.[49] 张艺, 孟飞荣. 海洋战略性新兴产业基础研究竞争力发展态势研究——以海洋生物医药产业为例[J], 科技进步与对策.2019,36(16): 67-76.[50] Kang W M, Zhao S L, Song W, Zhuang T. Triple helix in the science and technology innovation centers of China from the perspective of mutual information: a comparative study between Beijing and Shanghai[J], Scientometrics.2019,118(3): 921-940.[51] Kashani E S, Zarghami H R. The dynamics of university-industry-government relationships in Nanoscience: investigating the Triple-Helix differences between Iran and Switzerland[J], Technology Analysis & Strategic Management.2019,31(7): 817-832.[52] 吴卫红, 陈高翔, 张爱美. 互信息视角的政产学研资协同创新四螺旋实证研究[J], 科技进步与对策.2018,35(6): 21-28.[53] Zhang Y, Chen K, Zhu G, Yam R C M, Guan J. Inter-organizational scientific collaborations and policy effects: an ego-network evolutionary perspective of the Chinese Academy of Sciences[J], Scientometrics.2016,108(3): 1383-1415.[54] Leydesdorff L. The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics[J], Scientometrics.2003,58(2): 445-467.[55] Shannon C E. A mathematical theory of communication[J], Bell System Technical Journal.1948,27(3): 379-423.[56] Shannon C E, Weaver W. The Mathematical theory of communication[M]. Urbana, USA: University of Illinois Press. 1949.[57] Abramson N. Information Theory and Coding[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill. 1963.[58] 庄涛, 吴洪. 基于专利数据的我国官产学研三螺旋测度研究——兼论政府在产学研合作中的作用[J], 管理世界.2013,(8): 175-176.[59] 李培凤. 我国大学跨界协同创新的耦合效应研究——基于SCI合作论文的互信息计量[J], 复旦教育论坛.2015,13(2): 68-72.[60] Leydesdorff L, Ivanova I A. Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems: Steps toward a calculus of processing meaning[J], Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology.2014,65(2): 386-399.[61] Leydesdorff L, Petersen A M, Ivanova I. Self-organization of meaning and the reflexive communication of information[J], Social Science Information.2017,56(1): 4-27.[62] Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth[J], Journal of Economics.1979,10: 92-116.[63] 张艺, 陈凯华, 朱桂龙. 学研机构科研团队参与产学研合作有助于提升学术绩效吗?[J], 科学学与科学技术管理.2018,39(10): 125-137.[64] Banal-Esta?ol A, Macho-Stadler I, Pérez-Castrillo D. Endogenous matching in university-industry collaboration: Theory and empirical evidence from the United Kingdom[J], Management Science.2018,64(4): 1591-1608.[65] Blais M A. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.)[J], Journal of Personality Assessment.2003,81(3): 293-293.[66] Belsley D A. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity[M]. Hoboken, NJ. USA: John Wiley & Sons. 2005.[67] Callaert J, Landoni P, Van Looy B, Verganti R. Scientific yield from collaboration with industry: The relevance of researchers’ strategic approaches[J], Research Policy.2015,44(4): 990-998.[68] Bikard M, Vakili K, Teodoridis F. When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity[J], Organization Science.2019,30(2): 235-445.[69] Perkmann M, Walsh K. The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research[J], Industrial and Corporate Change.2009,18(6): 1033-1065.[70] 张艺. 学研机构科研团队的产学研合作网络对学术绩效影响研究[M]. 北京: 中国经济出版社. 2018.[71] Efi A E. Synergy between Academic Research and Industrialization: The Search for Development in Nigeria[J], Human Resource Management Research.2014,4(3): 69-74.[72] Kafouros M, Wang C, Piperopoulos P, Zhang M. Academic collaborations and firm innovation performance in China: The role of region-specific institutions[J], Research Policy.2015,44(3): 803-817.[73] Galan-Muros V, Plewa C. What drives and inhibits university-business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessement[J], R & D Management.2016,46(2): 369-382.[74] 吕铁, 贺俊. “后高铁时代”需加强基础研究和前沿技术研究[J], 中国发展观察.2016,(13): 35-38.[75] 朱桂龙. 产学研与企业自主创新能力提升[J], 科学学研究.2012,30(12): 5-6. |
[1] | 李海林, 廖杨月, 李军伟, 林春培. 高校杰出学者知识创新绩效的影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2022, 43(3): 63-71. |
[2] | 张华, 顾新, 王涛, 柯舸. 知识链合作创新的权力结构与组织行为研究[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(10): 104-112. |
[3] | 赵欣 张之光 向希尧. 专业虚拟社区研究综述与PVC知识创造模型构建[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(11): 132-145. |
[4] | 张鹏程,李铭泽,刘文兴,彭坚. 科研合作与团队知识创造:一个网络交互模型[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(5): 51-59. |
[5] | 万坤扬 陆文聪. 创业企业知识异质性与公司投资者知识创造[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(2): 9-19. |
[6] | 吴翠花, 张永云, 张雁敏. 组织控制、知识创造与技术创新关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(12): 29-38. |
[7] | 胡钢, 曹兴. 知识视角下动态能力对多元化战略影响的研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(9): 98-105. |
[8] | 苏中锋, 李嘉. 吸收能力对产品创新性的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(5): 62-69. |
[9] | 蒋天颖, 丛海彬, 王峥燕, 张一青. 集群企业网络嵌入对技术创新的影响 —基于知识的视角[J]. 科研管理, 2014, 35(11): 26-34. |
[10] | 张雪, 张庆普. 知识创造视角下客户协同产品创新投入产出研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(2): 122-129,155. |
[11] | 张宝生, 张庆普, 王晓红. 知识网络成员合作行为策略选择研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(11): 144-151. |
[12] | 张鹏程, 彭菡. 科研合作网络特征与团队知识创造关系研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(7): 104-112. |
[13] | 李随成,姜银浩. 供应商参与NPD与企业自主创新能力的关系机理研究[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(2): 28-36 . |
[14] | 林岩. 汽车生产供应链上下游企业间的合作知识创造[J]. 科研管理, 2010, 31(3): 52-60 . |
[15] | 金芸,孙东川. 基于CAS理论的组织知识创造影响因素分析[J]. 科研管理, 2009, 30(3): 74-78 . |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||