基于动态能力理论和理性行为理论，探讨创新伙伴关系对创新绩效的影响，供应链整合能力的中介作用以及双元战略意图的调节效果。将创新伙伴关系划分成基于科技的创新伙伴关系和基于交互的创新伙伴关系，采用逐层回归分析和有调节的中介效应检验对211家目标企业数据进行验证，研究结果表明：（1）创新伙伴关系维护的好和供应链整合能力强的企业，其创新绩效高；（2）创新合作伙伴是通过供应链整合能力提高创新绩效，即创新伙伴关系好的企业，对供应链整合能力有促进效果，进而创新绩效越好；（3）探索性战略意图强的企业正向调节供应链整合能力在基于科技的创新合作伙伴和创新绩效间的关系，利用性战略意图强的企业正向调节供应链整合能力在基于交互的创新合作伙伴和创新绩效间的关系。供应链整合能力是被调节的中介变量。
Abstract
A large number of enterprises realized that interdisciplinary and transregional fusion can bring unexpected innovation, which is a new growth point for them to maintain competitiveness. Some enterprises start to rely on external partners to innovate, while the surge of external resources make them more difficult to choose cooperation objects and determine cooperation modes, that is, what kind of innovation partnership to establish has become a new pain point restricting the development of enterprises′ innovation. Based on dynamic capability theory and reasoned action theory, this paper reveals the impact of innovation partnership on innovation performance, the mediating role of supply chain integration capability and the moderating effect of ambidexterity strategic intention. The design and methodology of this paper are summarized as follows: All variables were measured from the mature scale. This method has strong practicability and passes the reliability and validity test. The hypothesis is verified by questionnaire survey. In the implementation of data collection, 500 enterprises were randomly selected from the member list of innovative enterprises published on the website of national high-tech enterprise identification and management as the target enterprises. The questionnaire was distributed and returned to the middle and senior managers of the target enterprises randomly selected by E-mail, QQ, WeChat, telephone and door-to-door visits. Invalid questionnaires were deleted and 211 questionnaires were retained. Finally, we analyzed the correlation of variables, and used hierarchical regression analysis and moderated mediating effect test to verify the data of 211 target enterprises.The finding shows that :(1) Enterprises with good innovation partnership maintenance and strong supply chain integration capability have higher innovation performance; (2) Innovation partners improve innovation performance through supply chain integration capability, that is, enterprises with good innovation partnership have a promotion effect on supply chain integration capability, and then the better innovation performance; (3) Enterprises with strong exploratory strategic intention can positively regulate the relationship between supply chain integration capability and STI partners and innovation performance, while enterprises with strong exploitative strategic intention can positively regulate the relationship between supply chain integration capability and DUI partners and innovation performance. Supply chain integration capability is a moderated intermediary variable.According to the research conclusions, the contributions of this paper are as follows: (1) it enriches the research on the types of innovative partners and verifies the significant effect of innovation partnership on firm′s innovation performance. (2) Innovation partnership improves innovation performance through supply chain integration capability, revealing that the advantages and disadvantages of enterprises′ external innovation lie in the choice of partners and supply chain integration capability. On the one hand, the enterprise needs to extend its innovation behavior to the outside of the enterprise, actively establish a good innovation partnership, determine whether the enterprise can build an STI or DUI partnership, and then realize its own innovation through partner resources. On the other hand, it can also realize the effective use of external innovation by strengthening the supply chain integration capability. (3) The strategic intention of an enterprise will become the strategic orientation for the enterprise to identify external opportunities. The enterprise needs to clarify whether its strategic intention is to innovate by introducing changes in products and markets or to innovate by improving efficiency. This research can be extended in two aspects in the future. First, the linkage model of the two innovation partnerships can be taken into account. Second, supply chain integration capability and innovation performance can be decomposed.
Keywords
关键词
创新伙伴关系 /
供应链整合能力 /
双元战略意图 /
创新绩效
Key words
innovation partnership /
supply chain integration capability /
ambidexterity strategic intention /
innovation performance
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] West J, Bogers M. Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2014, 31(4): 814-831.
[2] Parrilli M D, Heras H A. STI and DUI innovation modes: Scientific-technological and context-specific nuances[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(4): 747-756.
[3] Cheng J H, Chen M C, Huang C M. Assessing inter-organizational innovation performance through relational governance and dynamic capabilities in supply chains[J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2014, 19(2): 173-186.
[4] 陈伟,王秀锋,曲慧,魏轩,林超然.产学研协同创新共享行为影响因素研究[J].管理评论,2020,32(11):92-101.
Chen Wei, Wang Xiufeng, Qu Hui, et al. The Influencing Factors of Sharing Behavior of the Industry-University-Research Collaboration[J]. Management Review, 2020, 32(11):92-101.
[5] 李柏洲,曾经纬.知识搜寻与吸收能力契合对企业创新绩效的影响——知识整合的中介作用[J].科研管理,2021,42(06):120-127.
Li Baizhou, Zeng Jingwei. Impact of the fit of knowledge search and absorptive capacity on enterprise innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge integration [J].Science Research Management,2021,42(06):120-127.
[6] Vai F J. Regional and international inter-organizational STI and DUI collaborations as carriers for eco-innovation[J]. Regional Studies, Regional Science, 2021, 8(1): 402-419.
[7] Kim H C, Yoon W. Study on types of technology cooperation partner and innovation performance: Focusing on incremental and radical innovation[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2019, 23(01): 1950005. (Available online, Doi: 10.1142/S1363919619500051)
[8] 陈钰芬,叶伟巍.企业内部R&D和外部知识搜寻的交互关系——STI和DUI产业的创新战略分析[J].科学学研究,2013,31(02):266-275+285.
CHEN Yu fen, YE Weiwei. The interaction between internal R＆D and external knowledge sourcing:the study on innovation strategy of STI and DUI industries [J].Studies in Science of Science,2013,31(02):266-275+285.
[9] Ferraris A, Devalle A, Ciampi F, et al. Are global R&D partnerships enough to increase a company's innovation performance? The role of search and integrative capacities[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2019, 149: 119750. (Available online, Doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119750)
[10] Gregory R W, Keil M, Muntermann J, et al. Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs[J]. Information Systems Research, 2015, 26(1): 57-80.
[11] Asimakopoulos G, Revilla A J, Slavova K. External knowledge sourcing and firm innovation efficiency[J]. British Journal of Management, 2020, 31(1): 123-140.
[12] Ko Y J, O'Neill H, Xie X. Strategic intent as a contingency of the relationship between external knowledge and firm innovation[J]. Technovation, 2021, 104: 102260. (Available online, Doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102260)
[13] Hameed W U, Nisar Q A, Wu H C. Relationships between external knowledge, internal innovation, firms’ open innovation performance, service innovation and business performance in the Pakistani hotel industry[J]. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2021, 92: 102745. (Available online, Doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102745)
[14] Moon H, Johnson J L, Mariadoss B J, et al. Supplier and customer involvement in new product development stages: implications for new product innovation outcomes[J]. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 2018, 15(01): 1850004. (Available online, Doi: 10.1142/S0219877018500049)
[15] 方晓.创新伙伴关系：打造全球伙伴关系的新增长点[J].国际问题研究,2019, 61(06):41-55.
Fang Xiao, Innovative Partnership: Forging a New Growth Point of Global Partnership Network[J]. International Studies,2019, 61(06):41-55.
[16] Clauss T, Tangpong C. In search for impregnable exchange relationships with buyers: Exploratory insights for suppliers[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2018, 75: 1-16. Doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.03.005
[17] Schiele H, Hofman E, Zunk B M, et al. Why and How to Involve Purchasing in New Product Development?[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2021, 25(03): 2150027.
[18] Fitjar R D, Rodríguez-Pose A. Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway[J]. Research policy, 2013, 42(1): 128-138.
[19] West J, Bogers M. Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2014, 31(4): 814-831.
[20] Picaud-Bello K, Johnsen T, Calvi R, et al. Exploring early purchasing involvement in discontinuous innovation: A dynamic capability perspective[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2019, 25(4): 100555. (Available online, Doi: 10.1016/j.pursup.2019.100555)
[21] Lewis, M., Brandon-Jones, A., Slack, N., Howard, M., Competing through operations and supply: The role of classic and extended resource‐based advantage[J]. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 2010, 30(10), 1032–1058.
[22] Seo Y J, Dinwoodie J, Kwak D W. The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link?[J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2014, 19(5): 733-746.
[23] Doran J, McCARTHY N, O’connor M. The importance of internal knowledge generation and external knowledge sourcing for sme innovation and performance: evidence from Ireland[J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, 2019, 23(07): 1950069. (Available online, Doi: 10.1142/S1363919619500695)
[24] Freije I, de la Calle A, Ugarte J V. Role of supply chain integration in the product innovation capability of servitized manufacturing companies[J]. Technovation, 2021: 102216. (Available online, Doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102216)
[25] Sabri Y, Micheli G J L, Nuur C. Exploring the impact of innovation implementation on supply chain configuration[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 2018, 49: 60-75. Doi: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.06.001
[26] González-Pernía J L, Parrilli M D, Pe?a-Legazkue I. STI–DUI learning modes, firm–university collaboration and innovation[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2015, 40(3): 475-492.
[27] Solaimani S, van der Veen J. Open supply chain innovation: an extended view on supply chain collaboration[J]. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2021. (Available online, Doi: 10.1108/SCM-09-2020-0433)
[28] Mariadoss, B.J., Johnson J L, Martin K D. Strategic intent and performance: The role of resource allocation decisions[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(11): 2393-2402.
[29] Matysiak, L., Rugman A M, Bausch A. Dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises: the dominant logics behind sensing, seizing, and transforming matter![J]. Management International Review, 2018, 58(2): 225-250.
[30] Seepana C, Paulraj A, Huq F A. The architecture of coopetition: Strategic intent, ambidextrous managers, and knowledge sharing[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2020, 91: 100-113. Doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.012
[31] úbeda-García M, Claver-Cortés E, Marco-Lajara B, et al. Toward a dynamic construction of organizational ambidexterity: Exploring the synergies between structural differentiation, organizational context, and interorganizational relations[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2020, 112: 363-372. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.051
[32] Cheng C C J, Huizingh E K R E. When is open innovation beneficial? The role of strategic orientation[J]. Journal of product innovation management, 2014, 31(6): 1235-1253.
[33] Yim B, Leem B. The effect of the supply chain social capital[J]. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2013, 113(3): 324-349
[34] Parrilli M D, Elola A. The strength of science and technology drivers for SME innovation[J]. Small Business Economics, 2012, 39(4): 897-907.
[35] Goyal S, Ahuja M, Kankanhalli A. Does the source of external knowledge matter? Examining the role of customer co-creation and partner sourcing in knowledge creation and innovation[J]. Information & Management, 2020, 57(6): 103325. (Available online, Doi: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103325)
[36] Wang M C, Chen P C, Fang S C. A critical view of knowledge networks and innovation performance: The mediation role of firms' knowledge integration capability[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 88: 222-233. Doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.03.034
基金
国家自然科学基金项目：“供应商参与新产品开发中知识整合过程与实现机制研究”（71872148,2019.01—2023.01）；陕西省教育厅专项科研计划项目：“循环供应链视角下陕西省双碳目标实现机制研究”（22JK0101（教育厅）；2022HZ1185（社科联），2022.01—2023.12）。
PDF(493 KB)
