摘要
为了揭示中国式财政分权对区域创新的影响作用是导致了区域创新水平的“竞次”还是“竞优”。鉴于此,基于2000~2018年中国30个省份的面板数据,构建空间杜宾面板模型,实证考察中国式财政分权对区域创新的影响。研究发现:(1)区域创新水平本身具有空间溢出效应,相邻地区创新活动形成良好的协同集聚创新效应。(2)中国式财政分权显著改进了区域创新水平,深化财政分权体制改革有利于调动地方政府的积极性,将有助于激励创新产出。(3)中国式财政分权对区域创新的影响存在空间自相关性,财政分权增加会显著提高相邻地区创新水平,是形成相邻地区创新“趋优竞争”的重要原因。本文研究结论有助于更好地理解区域创新空间策略的外在驱动力,并为激发区域创新动力提供政策启示。
Abstract
China′s economy fundamentals have changed in essence, which has stepped to a new stage of economic development. In the new normal state, China′s economy of high-quality development is the key point of realization of shifting from that of factor-driven and investment-driven to innovation-driven. The report of the 19th CPC National Congress pointed out that it is necessary to accelerate the construction of an innovative country and strengthen strategic and technological strength and it will be among the forefront of an innovative country from 2020 to 2035. In theory, innovation is not only the result of market choice, but also the result of government promotion. Perfect regional innovation system cannot be formed endogenously in the process of operation by market mechanism and economic system. Therefore, the development of regional innovation activities is intrinsically dependent on government forces. The government plays an important role in the innovation system, including formulating the innovation strategy and guiding the direction of innovation, shaping the innovation environment, coordinating the economic and social interests of the innovation subjects, and providing basic knowledge and common technology for the application research. As an important state function, fiscal decentralization has some unique advantages in stimulating regional innovation, and can play an important role in both supply side and demand side. Based on this background, the paper reveals how the China′s fiscal decentralization system impact on regional innovation level: race to the bottom or race to be better? Therefore, spatial panel Durbin model is used to explore the impact of China′s fiscal decentralization system on regional innovation based on the panel data of 30 provincial-level regions in China from 2000 to 2018. The empirical results show that: First, regional innovation level itself has spatial spillover effect, and innovation activities of adjacent areas have formed a good effect of collaborative innovation agglomeration. Second, China′s fiscal decentralization system improves the regional innovation level, and further deepening fiscal system reform is conducive to mobilize regional government enthusiasm, which will be helpful to stimulate innovation outputs. Third, there is an obvious spatial correlation for the effects of China′s fiscal decentralization on the regional innovation, which indicates that regional innovation of both local and surrounding regions will increase as fiscal decentralization enhances, which is the fundamental cause of race to the better of regional innovation. This study contributes to better understanding of the external driving force of local innovation investment and provides some helpful ideas for stimulating regional innovation. Based on the above research conclusions, the enlightenment of this paper mainly includes the following points: Firstly, strengthen the linkage effect among different provinces. Considering the spatial spillover effect of regional innovation in empirical outcomes, provincial-level regions should strengthen cooperation with each other in innovation activities. Secondly, perfect financial incentive mechanism of supporting the implementation of innovation driven strategy. The central government should also further decentralize the financial power, gradually improve the self-determination of local fiscal revenue and expenditure, and guarantee the flexibility and regional suitability of local fiscal expenditure. Thirdly, setting up fiscal system of innovative powers appropriate to expenditure responsibility, which will gradually transfer grass-roots governments′ innovative expenditure responsibility to upper-level governments, and reduce the pressure on grass-roots governments′ innovative expenditure. Finally, changing government performance appraisal mechanism, and the central and local governments should gradually change the content of performance appraisal oriented by short-term GDP growth. The innovations of this paper are as follows: Firstly, this paper focuses on the provincial spatial effect, and analyzes spatial effect of fiscal decentralization on regional innovation, which enriches the relevant research on the impact of fiscal decentralization on regional innovation. Secondly, the paper will establish a theoretical model of fiscal decentralization and regional innovation, which further explore its theoretical mechanism. The contribution will expand the research content and perspectives of fiscal decentralization on regional innovation and deepen the theoretical knowledge in the fiscal decentralization′s innovation effect. Thirdly, the paper crystallizes the mechanism of the role of fiscal decentralization in regional innovation and provides new empirical evidence for the State and local governments. The evidence will help policymakers improve regional innovation incentive mechanisms and the institutional environment. Moreover, the paper also offers policy recommendations to ensure that fiscal decentralization can bring in the positive effect of regional innovation and shed light on the good uses of fiscal decentralization for governments.
关键词
中国式财政分权 /
区域创新 /
竞优 /
竞次
Key words
China′s fiscal decentralization /
regional innovation /
race to be better /
race to the bottom
邱国庆, 李静雯.
中国式财政分权对区域创新的影响:“竞次”还是“竞优”[J]. 科研管理. 2023, 44(3): 86-94
Qiu Guoqing, Li Jingwen.
The impact of China′s fiscal decentralization on regional innovation: Race to the bottom or race to be better[J]. Science Research Management. 2023, 44(3): 86-94
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 刘建民,胡小梅.财政分权、空间效应与产业结构升级——基于SDM模型的经验研究[J].财经理论与实践,2017(1):116-121.
[2] 任懿,刘传哲,刘娜娜,等.中国式财政分权对绿色经济发展的空间效应研究[J].金融与经济,2020(5):37-44.
[3] 卞元超,白俊红.“为增长而竞争”与“为创新而竞争”——财政分权对技术创新影响的一种新解释[J].财政研究,2017(10):43-53.
[4] 宣烨,冯涛,孔凯歌.创新价值链视角下的财政分权与创新效率——基于三阶段DEA与Tobit模型分析[J].南京财经大学学报,2017(1):35-44.
[5] 薛婧,张梅青,王静宇.中国式财政分权与区域创新能力——基于R&D边际创新产出及要素市场扭曲的解释框架[J].经济问题探索,2018(11):152-162.
[6] 赵文哲.财政分权与前沿技术进步、技术效率关系研究[J].管理世界,2008(7):34-44.
[7] 刘丙泉,田晨,马占新.财政分权对区域技术创新效率的影响研究[J].软科学,2018(7):5-9+15.
[8] 李政,杨思莹.财政分权、政府创新偏好与区域创新效率[J].管理世界,2018(12):29-42.
[9] 杨志安,邱国庆.中国式财政分权与科技创新驱动发展:线性抑或倒“U”[J].华东经济管理,2019(1):5-10.
[10] 吴延兵. 财政分权促进技术创新吗?[J].当代经济科学,2019(3):13-25.
[11] 李政,杨思莹.官员激励和政府创新偏好对工业创新效率的影响[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2019(1):135-146.
[12] 李琳,周一成.财政分权对中国工业企业创新能力的影响研究[J].财贸研究,2018(7):81-90.
[13] 王春元.地方政府行为、政府R & D投资与创新[J].财经论丛,2016(6):29-39.
[14] 梁强.FDI、财政分权与区域技术创新[J].华东经济管理,2019(5):43-49.
[15] 田红宇,祝志勇,刘魏.政府主导、地方政府竞争与科技创新效率[J].软科学,2019(2):22-25.
[16] Besley T, Smart M. Fiscal Restraints and Voter Welfare [J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2007, 91(3-4): 755-773.
[17] 周亚虹,宗庆庆,陈曦明.财政分权体制下地市级政府教育支出的标尺竞争[J].经济研究,2013(11):127-139+160.
[18] 曹鸿杰,卢洪友,潘星宇.地方政府环境支出行为的空间策略互动研究——传导机制与再检验[J].经济理论与经济管理,2020(1):55-68.
[19] Revelli F. On Spatial Public Finance Empirics [J]. International Tax and Public Finance, 2005, 12(4): 475-492.
[20] 龚锋,雷欣.中国式财政分权的数量测度[J].统计研究,2010(10):47-55.
[21] 苏屹,林周周.区域创新活动的空间效应及影响因素研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017(11):63-80.
[22] 白俊红,戴玮.财政分权对地方政府科技投入的影响[J].统计研究,2017(3):97-106.
[23] 段铸,王雪祺.京津冀经济圈财政合作的逻辑与路径研究[J].财经论丛,2014(6):31-37.
[24] 杨志安,邱国庆.区域环境协同治理中财政合作逻辑机理、制约因素及实现路径[J].财经论丛,2016(6):29-37.
[25] 王丽.区域协同的财政路径选择——从财政竞争走向财政合作[J].学术论坛,2018(3):69-74.
[26] 赵国钦,宁静.京津冀协同发展的财政体制:一个框架设计[J].改革,2015(8):77-83.
基金
辽宁省哲学社会科学青年人才培养对象委托项目:“辽宁省财政科技资金投入的创新效应及其优化路径研究”(2022lslwtkt-033,2021.08—2023.08);沈阳市社会科学项目(经济社会发展专项):“沈阳构建协同创新机制突破‘卡脖子’技术对策研究”(SYSK2022-01-054,2022.08—2023.08);沈阳市哲学社会科学规划项目:“新发展格局下沈阳加强有效投资研究”(SY202205Y,2022.12—2023.12)。