研究城市创新活动发展与关键产业增长的作用关系,为针对性地实施城市创新空间规划、有效实现创新驱动发展目标提供技术方法支持。选择杭州为实证对象,采用2004-2017年的专利申请数据和相应产业产值数据为基础,应用VAR模型检验并辨识城市创新活动与相应产业发展的互动作用。结果显示并不是所有类型的城市创新活动都对其相应的关键产业具有发展驱动作用。进一步应用核密度分析法、空间自相关分析,研究了对关键产业发展具有因果驱动作用的创新活动的空间分布规律并提出了的相应的规划应对措施。研究方法和内容,对提高城市要素空间规划配置的科学性,以有效促进城市关键产业的创新驱动发展具有实践应用价值。
Abstract
The real economy is fundamental to promote the development of social economy, and innovation activities are closely related to the development of the real economy. Exploring the relationship between innovation activities and the real economy is of great significance for realizing the transition from "Made in China" to "Created in China". Only by clarifying the causal logic between innovation activities and industrial development, summarizing its spatial development rules and trends, can we take further effective measures to promote the development of the real economy. Cities are the most basic and important units that can effectively implement policies and plans for creating development. However, the research on the relationship between innovation activities and the development of real economy at the city scale is still very scarce. This leads to the problem of "missing link" between "research and planning of urban innovation space development" and "research of urban industrial development". This has greatly affected the pertinence and effectiveness of urban factor resources planning and allocation. At the same time, different industries have their own characteristics of production activities, so innovation activities have different impacts on different industries. At present, there is still a lack of targeted research on specific industries.This paper selects Hangzhou as the object of empirical study. Information industry, health industry and high-end equipment manufacturing industry, which are driven by innovation, are chosen to carry out the empirical research. In terms of data selection, gross output value of main economic indicators of industrial is selected to represent industrial development, and patent data is selected to represent innovation activities. First of all, we establish VAR model to analyze the causal logic between industrial innovation activities and industrial development. Secondly, we use Kernel density estimation and spatial autocorrelation to judge the spatial distribution and trends of innovation activities, and further put forward planning countermeasures and suggestions.In the perspective of the interaction logic between innovation activities and industrial development, not all the key industrial developments in cities with the attribute of "innovation-driven development" directly benefit from urban innovation activities. Among them, the time sequence evolution process of innovation activities and industrial development of high-end equipment manufacturing industry is specifically manifested as "the increase of innovation activities is the cause, and the acceleration of industrial development is the result". That is to say, the innovation activities of high-end equipment manufacturing industry have a significant causal driving effect on its industrial development, and this driving effect has certain periodic characteristics.In the perspective of the distribution pattern, the development of innovation activities in high-end equipment manufacturing industry presented three main stages from 2004 to 2017, including "agglomeration in the downtown area"," emergence of growth poles" and "scatter distribution". In the first stage, the innovation activities show the development of a single center in the downtown area. In the second stage, with the further development of the downtown area, knowledge production sources relying on universities and innovation clusters appeared in the urban fringe. In the third stage, innovation activities were further gathered around the knowledge production source, and at the same time a large number of clusters appeared in the urban fringe. The evolution of the distribution pattern of innovation activities in Hangzhou high-end equipment manufacturing industry has the spatial development process and characteristics from "small agglomeration and large dispersion" to "multi-center and dispersion" and then to "multi-center and fragmented agglomeration".Based on the space-time evolution process and trends of innovation activities, and with the purpose of promoting the development of high-end equipment manufacturing industry, the corresponding measures for the spatial development of innovation activities are proposed: (1) Focus on innovation and cultivation in surrounding areas of universities. It is necessary to gradually cultivate and promote the gathering of innovative talents around universities and strengthen the ability of independent innovation of enterprises. Universities should become innovation centers and promote the development of neighboring areas. (2) Strengthen the cultivation and development of industrial clusters. The coordinated development of transportation organizations and infrastructure should be fully considered. The joint construction of the downtown area and industrial agglomeration areas should be planed. The integration of industrial agglomeration areas and urban central areas should be improved. (3) Optimize the use of the stock space in the downtown area of the city. We should pay attention to the optimal utilization of space stock resources in the downtown area in the development of innovative space.This study takes a typical city as an example to carry out an empirical study, and discusses the spatial development law of urban innovation activities and its driving role in the development of urban real economy, which is of great significance for implementing the allocation of urban resource elements and organizing the development of innovation activities, and improving the innovation-driven effectiveness of urban R&D investment in industrial development. Furthermore, it will be of great significance to realize innovation-driven development of real economy.
关键词
创新驱动发展 /
实体经济 /
因果关系 /
规划对策 /
杭州
Key words
innovation-driven development /
real economy /
causal relationship /
planning countermeasure /
Hangzhou City
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]蔡跃洲, 付一夫.全要素生产率增长中的技术效应与结构效应——基于中国宏观和产业数据的测算及分解[J].经济研究, 2017, 52(01):72-88
[2]佟玲.以科技创新引领实体经济转型升级[J].人民论坛, 2019, 22(24):100-101
[3]刘超, 马玉洁, 史同飞.我国实体经济发展困境与新动能探索研究[J].天津财经大学学报, 2019, 39(12):3-19
[4]马德, 刘岳, 赵蕾.FDI、产业集聚与技术创新——基于高技术产业的实证分析[J].生产力研究, 2013, 18(9):117-120
[5]张丽华, 林善浪.创新集聚与产业集聚的相关性研究[J].科学学研究, 2010, 28(04):635-640
[6]谢婷婷, 任丽艳.技术创新、金融创新与经济增长——基于中国省际面板数据[J].工业技术经济, 2017, 36(11):110-117
[7]Hasan I, Tucci C L.The Innovation–economic Growth Nexus: Global Evidence[J].Research Policy, 2010, 39(10):1264-1276
[8]张林.金融发展、科技创新与实体经济增长——基于空间计量的实证研究[J].金融经济学研究, 2016, 31(01):14-25
[9]Blanco L R, Gu J, Prieger J E.The Impact of Research and Development on Economic Growth and Productivity in the US States[J].Southern Economic Journal, 2016, 82(3):914-934
[10]Liu N, Wang J, Song Y.Organization Mechanisms and Spatial Characteristics of Urban Collaborative Innovation Networks: A Case Study in Hangzhou,China[J].Sustainability, 2019, 11(21):5988-5995
[11]王纪武, 孙滢, 林倪冰.城市创新活动分布格局的时空演化特征及对策——以杭州市为例[J].城市发展研究, 2020, 27(01):12-18
[12]陈嘉平, 黄慧明, 陈晓明.基于空间网格的城市创新空间结构演变分析——以广州为例 [J].现代城市研究, 2018, 18(9):84-90
[13]张泽, 黎智枫, 肖扬.上海市创新活动的微观分布空间特征:基于专利申请数据的研究[J].现代城市研究, 2018, 20(5):80-85
[14]Hanna K.Spaces to Think: Innovation Districts and the Changing Geography of London’s Knowledge Economy [J].Centre Lond, 2016, 86(6):532-543
[15]黄娉婷, 张晓平.大都市区工业重心时空变动轨迹分析:以天津市为例[J].经济地理, 2012, 32(03):89-95
[16]王智勇, 黄亚平, 张毅.基于的武汉城市工业空间发展的实证研究[J].华中建筑, 2012, 30(03):132-138
[17]Audretsch D B, Feldman M P.R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production[J].The American economic review, 1996, 86(3):630-640
[18]Coe D T, Helpman E.International R&D Spillovers[J].European economic review, 1995, 39(5):859-887
[19]Hall R E, Jones C I.Why do Some Countries Produce so much more Output per Worker than Others?[J].The quarterly journal of economics, 1999, 114(1):83-116
[20]Guloglu B, Tekin R B.A Panel Causality Analysis of the Relationship among Research and Development,Innovation,and Economic Growth in High-income OECD Countries[J].Eurasian Economic Review, 2012, 2(1):32-47
[21]Sims C A.Macroeconomics and Reality[J]. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1980, 33(2):1-14
[22]Jaffe A B, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R.Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations[J].the Quarterly journal of Economics, 1993, 108(3):577-598
[23]Acs Z J, Anselin L, Varga A.Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge[J].Research policy, 2002, 31(7):1069-1085
[24]Lim U.The Spatial Distribution of Innovative Activity in US Metropolitan Areas: Evidence from Patent Data[J].Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 2003, 33(2):97-126