不确定情境推动了组织结构的虚拟化调整，尽管已有研究开始探讨团队虚拟性的影响模式，但关于团队虚拟性如何影响团队成员工作表现缺乏深入理论探讨。依据情感事件理论，运用来自63个研发团队317份团队成员数据，探究团队虚拟性对员工沉默行为的跨层影响机理。研究结果表明：团队虚拟性对沉默行为有显著正向影响；职场孤独感在团队虚拟性与沉默行为之间起部分中介作用；心理弹性不仅负向调节了团队虚拟性与职场孤独感之间的关系，而且还负向调节了团队虚拟性-职场孤独感-沉默行为这一中介机制。研究结果揭示了团队虚拟性影响员工沉默行为的作用机制与边界条件，为企业在虚拟情境下提升绩效提供了理论启示和实践指导。
Abstract
With the flattening trend of organizational structure and the popularization of network information technology, especially in the uncertain environment caused by the COVID-19 epidemic, many teams have begun to adjust their organizational structure and management mode to virtualization. Team virtuality describes the virtualization level of a team. While meeting the need for organizational flexibility, team virtuality can also lead to management challenges: In virtual organizational situations, many employees hide behind the screens. Even though they know the problems and solutions in some aspects of the organization′s operation and management process, the employees choose to keep silent. Employee silence will hinder organizational change and development, contrary to the original intention of virtualization adjustment. To reduce employee silence, organizations must understand the formation mechanism of employee silence. Previous studies have confirmed that employees will look for clues to guide their behavior in work situations. As a representation of the work situation, whether team virtuality has an impact on employee silence and how it works, our study aims to discuss these questions.The Affective Events Theory points out that the work situation characteristics can stimulate individual emotional reactions, and the emotional responses will affect individual work behavior. Workplace loneliness reflects the emotion of employees facing teams with different virtual degrees, and it can explain the mechanism of team virtuality on employee silence. In addition, the Affective Events Theory further emphasizes that individual traits play an essential role in the boundary of individual emotional responses. Psychological resilience is a particular trait that can drive employees to recognize and adjust to the work situation. It may be a boundary condition that explains the influence of team virtuality on employee silence through workplace loneliness.Although the existing research on employee silence are relatively rich, most of them explored the internal mechanism of employee silence from the relational and cognitive path, ignoring the influence of emotional factors on work results, resulting in one-sidedness conclusions, which is not conducive to guiding organizational management practice. Drawing on the Affective Events Theory, this paper collects a lot of primary data from 317 team members from 63 research and development teams, and analyzes the multilevel influence of team virtuality on employee silence. The results are as follows: team virtuality has a positive impact on employee silence; workplace loneliness mediates the relationship between team virtuality and employee silence; psychological resilience negatively moderated the relationship between team virtuality and workplace loneliness, also negatively moderated the whole mediating mechanism. The theoretical contribution of this study is reflected in the following three aspects: First, this study explores the influence of team virtuality on members′ interaction in any form of the team, breaking through the limitation of previous studies only focusing on virtual teams. The conclusion provides a new analytical perspective and theoretical framework for explaining employees′ behavioral tendencies. Besides, previous studies mostly explored the formation mechanism of employee silence from a single level. This study used a multilevel analysis method to explore the internal mechanism of team virtuality on employee silence. Second, this study chooses the emotional path, which is rarely used in previous studies, to explain the generation mechanism of employee silence in virtual organization situations. Third, this study comprehensively investigates the interaction effect of team virtuality and psychological resilience, and delineates more precise conditions for the main results.In a business environment characterized by flexible working arrangements and rapid technological development, virtuality is increasingly becoming an essential attribute of teams rather than an exception. The problem for organizations is not to reduce virtuality, but to make better use of it. Based on this, the management implications of this study are as follows: First, managers should be fully aware of the negative impact of team virtuality on employees′ work behaviors, create conditions to maintain the timeliness and synchronicity of communication among members, so that the team can keep the appropriate virtuality. At the same time, the organization should design training programs for virtual work situations. Second, managers should take intervention measures in daily work to minimize employees′ workplace loneliness, such as giving employees value recognition and social care, and lead emotional interaction among members. Third, managers should fully consider the psychological resilience of employees, and hire candidates who can actively adapt to the virtual nature of the team.
关键词
团队虚拟性 /
员工沉默行为 /
职场孤独感 /
心理弹性
Key words
team virtuality /
employee silence /
workplace loneliness /
psychological resilience
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 陈丽金,唐宁玉.员工沉默的前因与后果:回顾与展望[J].中国人力资源开发,2019,36(12):84-104.
CHEN Lijin, TANG Ningyu. The antecedents and consequences of employee silence: A literature review and future prospects[J].Human Resources Development of China,2019,36(12):84-104.
[2] ORHAN M A, RIJSMAN J B, van DIJK G M. Invisible, therefore isolated: Comparative effects of team virtuality with task virtuality on workplace isolation and work outcomes[J].Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology,2016,32(2):109-122.
[3] 刘振华,闵庆飞,刘子龙.虚拟团队中的社会惰性——基于知识型团队的实验研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2015,35(1):115-123.
LIU Zhenhua, MIN Qingfei, LIU Zilong. Social loafing in virtual teams: An experimental study based on knowledge teams[J].Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice,2015,35(1):115-123.
[4] KHALID J, AHMED J. Perceived organizational politics and employee silence: Supervisor trust as a moderator[J].Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,2016,21(2):174-195.
[5] MORRISON E W, MILLIKEN F J. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world[J].Academy of Management Review,2000,25(4):706-725.
[6] KIRKMAN B L, ROSEN B, TESLUK P E, et al. The impact of team empowerment on virtual team performance: The moderating role of face-to-face interaction[J].Academy of Management Journal,2004,47(2):175-192.
[7] 刘晓婷,黄颖,李瑞婻,等.虚拟团队研究:特征、演化与趋势[J].现代情报,2021,41(9):144-156.
LIU Xiaoting, HUANG Ying, LI Ruinan, et al. Virtual teams research: Characteristics, evolution and trends[J]. Journal of Modern Information,2021,41(9):144-156.
[8] 徐洋洋,林新奇.职场孤独感如何影响员工绩效? ——基于工作要求和资源理论的视角[J].经济管理,2021,43(6):69-83.
XU Yangyang, LIN Xinqi. How does workplace loneliness affect employee performance? From the perspective of JD-R Theory[J].Business and Management Journal,2021,43(6):69-83.
[9] 徐洋洋,林新奇,习怡衡.孤独的员工何时会更投入：未来工作自我清晰度和变革型领导的干预效应研究[J].南开管理评论, 2019,22(5):79-89.
XU Yangyang, LIN Xinqi, XI Yiheng. How will the lonely employee be more engaged in: Research on the moderation effect of future work self salience and transformational leadership[J].Nankai Business Review, 2019,22(5):79-89.
[10] DONG Y, SEO M G, BARTOL K M. No pain, no gain: An affect-based model of developmental job experience and the buffering effects of emotional intelligence[J].Academy of Management Journal,2014,57(4):1056-1077.
[11] BAKKER A B, DEMEROUTI E. The Job Demands-Resources model: state of the art[J].Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2007,22(3):309-328.
[12] TOWNSEND A M, DEMARIE S M, HENDRICKSON A R. Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future[J].Academy of Management Perspectives,1998,12(3):17-29.
[13] QIN X, YAM K C, CHEN C, et al. Talking about COVID-19 is positively associated with team cultural tightness: Implications for team deviance and creativity[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,2021,106(4):530-541.
[14] KIRKMAN B L, MATHIEU J E. The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality[J].Journal of Management,2005,31(5):700-718.
[15] PINDER C C, HARLOS K P. Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice[J].Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management,2001,20:331-369.
[16] 郑晓涛,柯江林,石金涛,等.中国背景下员工沉默的测量以及信任对其的影响[J].心理学报,2008(2):219-227.
ZHENG Xiaotao, KE Jianglin, SHI Jintao, et al. Survey on employee silence and the impact of trust on it in China[J].Acta Psychologica Sinica,2008(2):219-227.
[17] MORRISON E W. Employee voice and silence[J].Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior,2014, 1(1):173-197.
[18] PURVANOVA R K. Face-to-face versus virtual teams: What have we really learned? [J].The Psychologist-Manager Journal,2014, 17(1): 2-29.
[19] 魏巍,彭纪生,华斌.资源保存视角下高绩效人力资源系统对员工突破式创造力的双刃剑效应[J].管理评论,2020,32(8):215-227.
WEI Wei, PENG Jisheng, HUA Bin. The double-edged sword effect of high performance work system on employees’ radical creativity based on the resource conservation perspective[J].Management Review, 2020,32(8):215-227.
[20] DERKS D, FISCHER A H, BOS A E. The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2008,24(3):766-785.
[21] BELL B S, KOZLOWSKI S W J. A typology of virtual teams implications for effective leadership[J].Group & Organization Management, 2002,27(1):14-49.
[22] PENARROJA V, ORENGO V, ZORNOZA A, et al. The effects of virtuality level on task-related collaborative behaviors: The mediating role of team trust[J].Computers in Human Behavior,2013,29(3):967-974.
[23] 李宗波,王明辉.威权领导对员工沉默行为的影响:一个有调节的中介效应模型[J].心理与行为研究,2018,16(5):713-719.
LI Zongbo, WANG Minghui. The impact of authoritarian leadership on employee?s silence behavior: A study of a moderated mediating effect[J].Studies of Psychology and Behavior,2018,16(5):713-719.
[24] 罗瑾琏,易明,钟竞.双元领导对亲社会性沉默的影响[J].管理科学,2018,31(2):105-119.
LUO Jinlian, YI Ming, ZHONG Jing. Effects of ambidextrous leadership on prosocial silence[J].Journal of Management Science,2018,31(2):105-119.
[25] WRIGHT S L. Loneliness in the workplace[D].Doctoral Dissertation, UK: University of Canterbury,2005.
[26] 毛重琳.职场孤独感问卷的编制及其影响因素研究[D].广州:华南师范大学硕士学位论文,2013.
MAO Zhonglin. Development of questionnaire about workplace loneliness and research on its influence factors. [D].Guangzhou: South China Normal University,2013.
[27] 余璇,贺彬,刘美琳.人际关系视角下虚拟团队主动性人格对团队创造力的影响[J/OL].软科学:1-11. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1268.G3.20211213.1849.002.html,2021-12-16.
YU Xuan, HE Bin, LIU Meilin. The effect of proactive personality of the virtual teams on team creativity from the perspective of interpersonal relationships[J/OL]. Soft Science:1-11.
[28] 吕惠聪,温忠麟,邓家毓,等.职场孤独感的前因与后果[J].心理科学,2015,38(4):979-986.
LV Huicong, WEN Zhonglin, DENG Jiayu, et al. Antecedent variables and consequent variables of workplace loneliness[J].Journal of Psychological Science,2015,38(4):979-986.
[29] MAKARIUS E E, LARSON B Z. Changing the perspective of virtual work: Building virtual intelligence at the individual level [J].Academy of Management Perspectives,2017,31(2):159-178.
[30] 李超虹,叶茂林.工作场所孤独感研究述评[J].中国人力资源开发,2015(11):29-37.
LI Chaohong, YE Maolin. Review on workplace loneliness[J]. Human Resources Development of China, 2015(11):29-37.
[31] CACIOPPO J T, HAWKLEY L C. Perceived social isolation and cognition[J].Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2009,13(10):447-454.
[32] ERTOSUN ? G, ERDIL O. The effects of loneliness on employees’ commitment and intention to leave[J].Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,2012,41:469-476.
[33] ROKACH A. Leadership and loneliness: A review[J].Psychology Journal,2012,9(4):133-152.
[34] 成瑾,曹婷.基于情绪事件理论的员工非理性外部揭发机理研究[J].中国人力资源开发,2018,35(2):6-18.
CHENG Jin, CAO Ting. Investigation on employees' irrational external whistleblowing based on affective event theory[J].Human Resources Development of China,2018,35(2):6-18.
[35] 王永跃,张玲.心理弹性如何影响员工创造力:心理安全感与创造力自我效能感的作用[J].心理科学,2018,41(1):118-124.
WANG Yongyue, ZHANG Ling. How psychological resilience influence employees’ creativity: The role of psychological safety and creative self-efficacy[J].Journal of Psychological Science,2018,41(1):118-124.
[36] 谢文心,杨纯,周帆.资质过剩对员工工作形塑行为关系的研究——工作疏离感与心理弹性的作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36(2):149-160.
XIE Wenxin, YANG Chun, ZHOU Fan. Overqulification and employee's job crafting: The impacts of work alienation and psychological resilience[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&.T, 2015, 36(2):149-160.
[37] 苏伟琳,林新奇.上级发展性反馈能否抑制员工沉默?一个被中介的调节模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(11):158-170.
SU Weilin, LIN Xinqi. Can supervisor developmental feedback suppress employee silence? A mediated moderation model[J].Science of Science and Management of S.&.T,2018,39(11):158-170.
[38] GARMEZY N. Stress-resistant children: The search for protective factors[J].Recent Research in Developmental Psychopathology, 1985(4):213-233.
[39] SHIN J, TAYLOR M S, SEO M G. Resources for change: The relationships of organizational inducements and psychological resilience to employees’ attitudes and behaviors toward organizational change[J]Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(3):727-748.
[40] 王丽平,李忠华.半虚拟创新团队中虚拟性概念界定与量表开发[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(3):110-116.
WANG Liping, LI Zhonghua. The construct definition and scale development of innovation team virtuality [J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy,2017,34(3):110-116.
[41] TANGIRALA S, RAMANUJAM R. Employee silence on critical work issues: The cross level effects of procedural justice climate[J].Personnel Psychology,2008,61(1):37-68.
[42] SMITH B W, DALEN J, WIGGINS K, et al. The brief resilience scale: Assessing the ability to bounce back[J].International Journal of Behavioral Medicine,2008,15(3):194-200.
[43] 周浩,龙立荣.共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(6):942-950.
ZHOU Hao, LONG Lirong. Statistical remedies for common method biases[J].Advances in Psychological Science,2004,12(6):942-950.
[44] 方杰,温忠麟,张敏强,等.基于结构方程模型的多层中介效应分析[J].心理科学进展,2014,22(3):530-539.
FANG Jie, WEN Zhonglin, ZHANG Minqiang, et al. Analyzing multilevel mediation using multilevel structural equation models[J].Advances in Psychological Science,2014,22(3):530-539.
[45] SHACHAF P. Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study[J].Information & Management,2008,45(2):131-142.
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目：“‘一带一路’重大项目风险动态监测与预警研究”（22&ZD135,2023.01—2025.12）；国家社会科学基金国家应急管理体系建设专项项目：“智能化公共卫生重大风险评估研判、应急决策与防控协同机制研究”（20VYJ061,2020.06—2023.05）。
PDF(364 KB)
