科研管理 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 151-157.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

商事制度改革与企业全要素生产率——来自准自然实验的证据

李慧1,余东升2,余娟娟3   

  1. 1.武汉工程大学 法商学院,湖北 武汉430205;
    2.中南财经政法大学 统计与数学学院,湖北 武汉430073;
    3.中南财经政法大学 经济学院,湖北 武汉430073

  • 收稿日期:2020-08-21 修回日期:2021-08-28 出版日期:2023-03-20 发布日期:2023-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 余东升
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目:“贸易摩擦对我国出口企业技术创新的影响及突围路径”(20BJL053,2020.06—2023.06);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:“共同富裕目标下促进民营企业发展的制度安排研究:基于制度性交易成本视角”(22YJC790053,2022.09—2025.09);中央高校基本科研业务费项目:“中国工业企业绿色全要素生产率的微观测度、增长差异及收敛性研究”(2722023BQ054,2023.01—2024.01);武汉工程大学科学研究基金项目:“商事制度改革对企业绩效的影响及作用机制研究”(K202247,2022.06—2024.06);武汉工程大学高等教育研究重点项目:“双创教育视域下地方高校大学生企业家精神培养研究”(2022ZD02,2022.05—2023.05)。

Commercial system reform and total factor productivity of enterprises: The evidence from quasi-natural experiments

Li Hui1, Yu Dongsheng2, Yu Juanjuan3   

  1. 1.School of Law and Business, Wuhan Institute of Technology, Wuhan 430205, Hubei, China;
    2. School of Statistics and Mathematics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China;
    3. School of Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, China
  • Received:2020-08-21 Revised:2021-08-28 Online:2023-03-20 Published:2023-03-20

摘要: 本文以商事制度改革为“准自然实验”,将中国286个地级市商事制度改革数据与2010-2018年中国A股上市企业数据库匹配,采用多期双重差分模型实证分析了商事制度改革对企业全要素生产率的影响效应。研究发现:(1)商事制度改革促进了企业全要素生产率水平的提升。该结论在缓解非平行趋势、变换企业全要素生产率测算方法、排除“一带一路”倡议政策干扰、安慰剂等多项检验后依然稳健。(2)商事制度改革主要是通过降低企业制度性交易成本,增加企业研发时间和资金,促进企业创新,从而提升企业全要素生产率水平。(3)异质性分析发现,商事制度改革对中小微型企业和高融资约束企业全要素生产率水平的促进作用更大。

关键词: 商事制度改革, 企业全要素生产率, 双重差分, 制度性交易成本

Abstract:      Improving enterprise total factor productivity is undoubtedly an important focus for high-quality economic development. Taking the commercial system reform as a "quasi-natural" experiment, this paper matches the data of commercial system reform of 286 prefecture level cities in China with the database of China′s A-share listed enterprises from 2010 to 2018, and empirically analyzes the impact of commercial system reform on enterprise total factor productivity and channel mechanism by using multi period double difference model.First of all, through the study of domestic and foreign literature, we find that very few papers focus on the impact of commercial systems reform on enterprise total factor productivity from theoretical and empirical angles. Therefore, this paper takes the lead in introducing a new round of commercial system reform into the analysis framework of enterprise total factor productivity from both theoretical and empirical levels, and explores how the commercial system reform can promote enterprise total factor productivity. This is important to reveal relationship between systems and enterprise total factor productivity during economic reform, optimize business environment, and promote high-quality economic development. It is also the original intention of the paper.Secondly, a multi-phase difference-in-differences model was applied for empirical evaluation. The estimated coefficient of the reform is significantly positive in benchmark regression results. The reform helps enhance enterprise total factor productivity levels. Fortunately, the conclusion was still credible after multiple robustness tests of alleviating non-parallel tendency, changing the measurement method of enterprise total factor productivity, eliminating interference from the Belt and Road Initiative and placebo. Then we conduct mechanism tests and heterogeneity analyses.At the end of this paper, the research conclusions and policy suggestions are given. This study shows that the reform was conducive to enhancing enterprise total factor productivity levels. Fortunately, the conclusion was still credible after multiple robustness tests of alleviating non-parallel tendency, altering proxy variable of enterprise innovation, and eliminating interference from the Belt and Road Initiative and placebo. What had been shown from impact mechanism was that the reform aimed to enhance total factor productivity levels of enterprises by reducing institutional costs of enterprises. According to heterogeneity analysis, more benefits were acquired by small, medium and micro enterprises as well as enterprises with more financing constraints from the reform. Through the conclusion of the study, we will continue to deepen the reform of the commercial system, implement the time limited completion system according to law, effectively reduce the examination and approval time of enterprises, improve the efficiency of the government, reduce the institutional transaction costs of enterprises, optimize the business environment of enterprises, release the vitality of the system and improve the production performance of enterprises. Second, the promotion of commercial system reform should be closely combined with enterprise heterogeneity, implement classified policies and make accurate efforts. Continue to provide more superior, fair and just business and access environment for small and medium-sized micro enterprises, so that small and medium-sized micro enterprises can enter not only the door of the market, but also the small door of the industry, and obtain greater "dividends" from the reform of the commercial system. At the same time, we will further deepen the reform of financial enterprises, improve supporting measures such as financing support and fiscal and tax incentives, effectively reduce the burden on enterprises and promote total factor productivity.

Key words: commercial system reform, total factor productivity of enterprise, difference-in-differences model, institutional transaction cost