虚拟企业社会责任共创参与意愿的影响因素

张洁梅 王昊

科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 90-99.

PDF(403 KB)
PDF(403 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8) : 90-99.
论文

虚拟企业社会责任共创参与意愿的影响因素

  • 张洁梅,王昊
作者信息 +

The influencing factors on the willingness to participate in virtual corporate social responsibility co-creation

  • Zhang Jiemei, Wang Hao
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

随着数字化技术的蓬勃发展,越来越多的企业运用社交媒体吸引顾客参与企业社会责任,虚拟企业社会责任共创已成为企业履行社会责任的重要形式。本研究以顾客心理授权(选择权、知情权、影响力)为中介变量,探讨企业社会责任感知(利益感知、情感感知、期望一致性)对参与意愿的作用机理,并由实证分析得出利益感知通过选择权、知情权、影响力对参与意愿有显著正向影响;情感感知通过选择权、知情权对参与意愿有显著正向影响;期望一致性通过选择权、知情权、影响力对参与意愿有显著正向影响;企业声誉在利益感知与选择权、知情权中起到正向调节的作用;企业声誉仅在情感感知与选择权中起到正向调节的作用;企业声誉在期望一致性与选择权、知情权、影响力中起到正向调节的作用。本研究拓展了顾客心理授权理论的应用范围,进一步探索了企业社会责任感知到参与意愿的“黑箱”,并为虚拟企业社会责任共创的有效开展提供了重要启示。

Abstract

    In the digital context, enterprises continue to explore new ways to fulfill their social responsibilities, and encourage consumers to contribute to solving social problems by building scenes with digital technology. Virtual Corporate Social Responsibility Co-Creation (VCSRC) refers to the endeavors by enterprises in social media like Micro-blogs and WeChat public accounts to attract and involve customers in activities that fulfill their corporate social responsibilities. It can establish brand image, publicize corporate culture, establish a stronger relationship between customers and enterprises, and bring more considerable financial performance to enterprises in the future. Only by deeply understanding the driving factors behind customer participation and attracting customers to join, can enterprises make better use of VCSRC to provide development power for enterprises. Compared with the single participation form of traditional corporate social responsibility, customers, in VCSRC, can understand the activity content based on internet information, form a preliminary judgment on the activity itself, and know their subjective initiatives, which will have an impact on the subsequent participation behaviors. Therefore, the division of different types of customers′ perception and the analysis of psychological activities brought by perception can provide new ideas for the effective implementation of VCSRC and create sustainable competitive advantages.
    At present, the research on VCSRC mainly involves the direct driving factors of customer participation and the performance brought by participation in co-creation. In the digital environment, many enterprises have endowed customers with more rights to know so as to enhance their sense of control in co-creation activities. This mediating role of customer psychological empowerment in corporate social responsibility perception on willingness to participate has not been explored in previous studies. Hence, it is of theoretical and practical significance to discuss the impact of customer psychological empowerment. Based on previous studies, this paper further discusses the relationship between corporate social responsibility perception and willingness to participate by using data statistical analysis, and studies the mediating role of customer psychological empowerment and the regulatory role of corporate reputation, revealing the mechanism of corporate social responsibility perception on the willingness to participate in VCSRC.
    This study takes customer psychological empowerment (right to choose, right to know and influence power) as the intermediary variables to explore the mechanism of corporate social responsibility perception (interest perception, emotional perception and expectation consistency) on participation intention. Through empirical analysis, the paper concludes that interest perception has a significant positive impact on participation intention through right to choose, right to know and influence power; Emotional perception has a significant positive impact on participation intention through right to choose and right to know; Expectation consistency has a significant positive impact on participation intention through right to choose, right to know and influence power; Corporate reputation plays a positive role in perception of interests, right to choose and right to know; Corporate reputation only plays a positive role in emotional perception and right to choose; Corporate reputation plays a positive role in expectation consistency and right to choose,  in right to know and influence power.
    According to the three dimensions of interest perception, emotion perception and expectation consistency divided by previous research, this paper proposes, through empirical analysis, that in the digital environment, corporate social responsibility perception is the driving factor of customer participation in VCSRC, and that customer participation is the key to VCSRC and value realization. This paper enriches the theoretical system of customer participation in VCSRC, and also provides new ideas for enterprises to effectively carry out VCSRC. Secondly, this study enlarges the application scope of customer psychological empowerment, and confirms that customer psychological empowerment (right to choose, right to know and influence power) plays an intermediary role in the impact of corporate social responsibility perception on participation intention. It provides new visions for the research system of VCSRC, and provides strong guidance for enterprises to improve the activity mechanism according to customer psychological empowerment. Finally, through empirical analysis, it proves the regulatory role of corporate reputation in corporate social responsibility perception and customer psychological empowerment, further enriches the theoretical framework of VCSRC, and confirms the important role of corporate reputation in customer participation in VCSRC.

关键词

企业社会责任感知 / 虚拟企业社会责任共创 / 顾客心理授权 / 参与意愿

Key words

corporate social responsibility perception / virtual corporate social responsibility co-creation (VCSRC) / customer psychological empowerment / willingness to participate


引用本文

导出引用
张洁梅 王昊. 虚拟企业社会责任共创参与意愿的影响因素[J]. 科研管理. 2022, 43(8): 90-99
Zhang Jiemei, Wang Hao. The influencing factors on the willingness to participate in virtual corporate social responsibility co-creation[J]. Science Research Management. 2022, 43(8): 90-99

参考文献

[1]焦娟妮.基于顾客参与虚拟CSR项目的社会价值共创驱动因素分析[J].商场现代化,2021,0(20):8-10.
[2]毛倩,顾颖,张洁.数字化体验环境、顾客—企业社会价值共创与顾客契合[J].广东财经大学学报,2021,36(05):61-74.
[3]王利彩.顾客心理授权对顾客契合行为影响机制研究[D].西北大学,2016.
[4]Vargo S L, Lusch R F. Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2016, 44(1):5-23.
[5]刘小平,邓文香.虚拟CSR共创对消费者认同的影响机制研究——自我建构的调节作用[J].软科学,2019,33(12):139-144.
[6]Morsing M, Schultz M. Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies[J]. Business Ethics A European Review, 2010, 15(4):323-338.
[7]C Flavián, M Guinalíu. The influence of virtual communities on distribution strategies in the internet[J]. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 2013, 33(6):405-425.
[8]C, K, Prahalad, et al. Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2004, 32(3):4-9.
[9]樊帅,田志龙,胡小青.心理所有权视角下消费者参与虚拟CSR共创的影响研究[J].管理学报,2017,14(03):414-424.
[10]刘小平,邓文香.虚拟CSR共创、消费者互动与共创绩效——基于扎根理论的单案例研究[J].管理案例研究与评论,2019,12(05):509-520.
[11]安冉. “互联网+公益”背景下消费者参与虚拟CSR行为的影响研究[D].西南交通大学,2018.
[12]Carrigan M, Attalla A. The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behaviour?[J]. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 2001, 18(7):560-578.
[13]Lichtenstein D R, Braig D. The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2004, 68(4):16-32.
[14]Pérez, R Currás. Effects of Perceived Identity Based on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Consumer Identification with the Company[J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2009, 12(2):177-191.
[15]Chen H, Kong Y. Chinese consumer perceptions of socially responsible consumption[J]. Social Responsibility Journal, 2009, 5(2):144-151.
[16]Bhattacharya C B, Sen S. Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond To Corporate Social Initiatives[J]. California Management Review, 2004, 47(1):9-24.
[17]蒋丽芹,史敏,张迪.基于消费者感知的企业伦理行为与消费者响应分析[J].商业研究,2017,0(9):40-46
[18]刘建花.消费者响应企业社会责任的内在机理研究[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2014,34(11):36-45.
[19]黄慧丹.平台型企业社会责任感知与顾客忠诚度关系研究[D].浙江工商大学,2021.
[20]谢礼珊,赵强生,马康.旅游虚拟社区成员互动、感知利益和公民行为关系——基于价值共创的视角[J].旅游学刊,2019,34(03):28-40.
[21]韩小芸,黎耀奇.顾客心理授权的多层次模型分析:基于控制欲的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(03):4-11.
[22]Conger J A, Kanungo R N. The Empowerment Process: Integrating Theory and Practice[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13(3):471-482.
[23]Thomas K W, B.A. Velthouse. Cognitive elements of empowerment: An 'interpretive' model of intrinsic task motivation[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1990, 15(4):666-681.
[24]金春花,何峰.互联网背景下顾客心理授权与顾客公民行为的关系研究[J].中国商论,2018,0(2):175-177.
[25]胡孝平,李玺.顾客心理授权对顾客公民行为的影响研究——基于顾客参与的中介作用[J].商业经济研究,2017,0(23):49-52
[26]Kucuk U, S. Consumer empowerment model: from unspeakable to undeniable[J]. Direct Marketing An International Journal, 2013, 3(4):327-342.
[27]Labrecque L I, Jonas V, Mathwick C, et al. Consumer Power: Evolution in the Digital Age[J]. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 2013, 27(4):257-269.
[28]韩小芸,黎耀奇.顾客心理授权的多层次模型分析:基于控制欲的调节作用[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(03):4-11.
[29]韩小芸,谢礼珊,杨俊峰.顾客心理受权及其与服务公平性关系的实证研究.营销科学学报,2011,7(3):111-122.
[30]刘艳博,耿修林.环境不确定下的营销投入、企业社会责任与企业声誉的关系研究[J].管理评论,2021,33(10):159-170.
[31]Barnett M L, Jermier J M, Lafferty B A. Corporate Reputation: The Definitional Landscape[J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 2006, 9(1):26-38.
[32]徐金发,符加林,黄晓红.基于声誉信息效应的战略伙伴逆向选择抑制研究[J].技术经济,2007,26(6):1-5
[33]季丹,郭政.产品危机应对策略对消费者购买意愿影响的实证研究——基于企业声誉的调节作用[J].上海交通大学学报,2018,52(02):247-252.
[34]李海芹,张子刚.CSR对企业声誉及顾客忠诚影响的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(01):90-98.
[35]宝贡敏,徐碧祥.国外企业声誉理论研究述评[J].科研管理,2007,No.148(03):98-107.
[36]范志国,郭靖丽.虚拟品牌社群体验对消费者购买意愿影响的实证研究——基于感知不确定性的中介效应[J].工业技术经济,2014,33(11):29-37.
[37]黎冬梅,韩小芸.服务性企业顾客心理授权浅析[J].桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2006,17(2):145-148
[38]黄敏学,廖俊云,周南.社区体验能提升消费者的品牌忠诚吗——不同体验成分的作用与影响机制研究[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(03):151-160.
[39]李丽.虚拟品牌社区体验对顾客购买意愿的影响[D].山西财经大学,2021.
[40]Oliver R L. A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1980, 17(4):460-469.
[41]Becker-Olsen K L, Cudmore B A, Hill R P. The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2006, 59(1):46-53.
[42]Pires G D, Stanton J, Rita P. The internet, consumer empowerment and marketing strategies[J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2006, 40(9/10):936-949.
[43]刘思,张德鹏,林萌菲.顾客心理授权、顾客承诺与网络口碑推荐关系研究——在线品牌社区类型的调节作用[J].预测,2019,38(04):24-31.
[44]金春花,何峰.互联网背景下顾客心理授权与顾客公民行为的关系研究[J].中国商论,2018,0(2):175-177.
[45]O'Cass A, Ngo L V. Achieving customer satisfaction in services firms via branding capability and customer empowerment[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2011, 25(7):489-496.
[46]范钧,付沙沙,葛米娜.顾客参与、心理授权和顾客公民行为的关系研究[J].经济经纬,2015,32(06):89-94.
[47]范宝财,杨洋,李蔚.产品伤害危机属性对横向溢出效应的影响研究——产品相似性和企业声誉的调节作用[J].商业经济与管理,2014,0(11):21-30
[48]Fombrun C, Van Riel C. The Reputational Landscape[J]. Corporate Reputation Review, 1997, 1(1):5-13.
[49]Franke N, Shah S. How communities support innovative activities: an exploration of assistance and sharing among end-users[J]. Research policy, 2003, 32(1): 157-178.
[50]Hertel G, Niedner S, Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel[J]. Research policy, 2003, 32(7): 1159-1177.
[51]韩小芸,谢礼珊,杨俊峰.顾客心理授权及其与服务公平性关系的实证研究[J].营销科学学报,2011,7(3):111-122.
[52]Spreitzer G M. Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(5):1442-1465.
[53]Lin H. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions[J]. Journal of Information Science,2007, 33(2):135-149.
[54]Park N, Yang A. Online environmental community members' intention to participate in environmental activities: An application of the theory of planned behavior in the Chinese context[J]. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, 28(4):1298-1306.
[55]Hsu C L, Liu C C, Lee Y D. Effect of Commitment and Trust Towards Micro-blogs on Consumer Behavioral Intention: A Relationship Marketing Perspective[J]. International Journal of Electronic Business Management, 2010, 8(4):292-303.
[56]Behrend T S,Baker B A,Thompson L F. Effects of pro-environmental recruiting messages: The role of organizational reputation[J]. Journal of Business & Psycology, 2009, 24(3):341-350.
[57]Zhao X, Lynch Jr J G, Chen Q. Reconsidering baron and kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis[J]. Journal of consumer research, 2010, 37(2): 197-206.
[58]Parasuraman A. Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1997, 25(2):154-161.

基金

河南省高等学校智库研究项目:“数字赋能下河南企业社会责任价值共创演进机制研究”;河南大学哲学社会科学创新团队培育计划:“社会化媒体下虚拟社区消费者行为研究”;河南省教育科学规划重点课题:“社会需求视角的研究生培养模式创新研究”;辽宁省社科重大项目:“法治化营商环境建设研究”

PDF(403 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/