科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (8): 40-47.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

科技服务业集聚提升了工业效率吗?

王猛,习敏   

  1. 陕西师范大学 国际商学院,陕西 西安710119
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-11 修回日期:2020-02-06 出版日期:2022-08-20 发布日期:2022-08-22
  • 通讯作者: 习敏
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省社会科学基金项目:“关中平原城市群的产业分工及其对经济绩效的影响研究”(2018D10);陕西省软科学研究计划一般项目:“关中平原城市群的科技服务业集聚研究”(2020KRM100)。

Has S&T service agglomeration improved industrial efficiency?

Wang Meng, Xi Min   

  1. School of International Business, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi′an 710119, Shaanxi, China
  • Received:2019-08-11 Revised:2020-02-06 Online:2022-08-20 Published:2022-08-22

摘要:     随着中国经济向高质量发展转型,工业效率的提升成为重要的现实问题。本文构造理论模型,说明科技服务业集聚能通过经济关联、知识关联机制产生外部规模经济,进而促进工业效率提升。在此基础上,利用2008—2016年30个省的面板数据,实证检验科技服务业集聚对工业效率的影响。研究表明:科技服务业集聚能显著提升工业效率。科技服务业集聚对工业效率的影响是线性的,并不存在非线性关系。科技服务业集聚的空间溢出效应不显著,但邻近省份间的工业劳动生产率相互抑制。科技服务业集聚对工业效率的提升主要体现在东部地区,在中、西部地区不显著。本研究为从科技服务业集聚角度提升工业效率提供了政策启示。

关键词: 科技服务业, 集聚, 工业效率, 门限回归, 空间计量

Abstract:    With the transformation of China′s economy to high-quality development, the improvement of industrial efficiency has become a more pressing task. We try to prove that promoting spatial agglomeration of S&T service is an effective way to improve industrial efficiency. There are two deficiencies in existing literatures. In the theoretical dimension, the mechanism of S&T service agglomeration affecting industrial efficiency is not yet clear and needs further exploration. Empirical studies on the influence of S&T service agglomeration on industrial efficiency are also very scarce, and more causal inference analysis is needed. Compared with the existing literatures, our marginal contributions lie in not only the construction of a theoretical model to illustrate the influence mechanism of S&T service agglomeration on industrial efficiency, but also the regression analysis using provincial data to confirm that the agglomeration of S&T service would significantly improve industrial efficiency. 
   We demonstrate that the spatial agglomeration of S&T service can produce strong economic linkage, which is manifested as competition effect and trust effect. On one hand, when S&T service companies agglomerate in the same region, they compete with each other. Competition urges enterprises to innovate constantly to improve their efficiency. Meanwhile, competition forces enterprises in S&T service industry to provide high-quality and inexpensive services to industrial enterprises, and timely adjust the service content to meet the changing needs of industrial enterprises. On the other hand, industrial enterprises can effectively alleviate the adverse selection problem caused by information asymmetry and identify trustworthy upstream suppliers by observing and comparing S&T service enterprises in the agglomeration area. Once the cooperative relationship is established, even if there are commercial disputes in the execution of the contract, they are easy to be settled through friendly negotiation. This trust saves industrial firms the transaction costs of searching, negotiating and monitoring, thus increasing their efficiency. Agglomeration of S&T service also improves industrial efficiency through knowledge linkage. The spatial agglomeration of S&T service forms an informal place for knowledge exchange, effectively overcoming the spatial limitations of tacit knowledge and greatly reducing the barriers to its transfer. As long as industrial enterprises enter the agglomeration area of S&T service, they can obtain tacit knowledge of S&T service enterprises through casual contact and communication. The tacit knowledge not only helps to expand the knowledge stock of industrial enterprises, but also promotes the creation and accumulation of new knowledge, which will greatly improve the industrial efficiency. 
    The sample period used in the empirical analysis is from 2008 to 2016, and the sample individuals are 30 provincial administrative regions in China. The core variable S&T service agglomeration is measured by location entropy, the explained variable industrial efficiency is measured respectively by labor productivity and total factor productivity, and control variables include industrial labor stock, the level of economic development, industrial structure, trade dependency, degree of government intervention, fixed effect of year and fixed effect of province. In addition to the linear baseline regression model, we set a threshold regression model to explore the nonlinear influence of the agglomeration of S&T service, and analyze whether the influence of S&T service agglomeration has spatial overflow characteristics by using the spatial econometric model. Finally, regional heterogeneity is tested by sub-sample regression. The baseline regression shows that the agglomeration of S&T service significantly promotes the improvement of industrial efficiency. From the threshold regression result, the agglomeration of S&T service has no nonlinear effect on industrial efficiency. Next, spatial econometric analysis finds that the spatial spillover effect of S&T service agglomeration is not significant, but the industrial labor productivity among neighboring provinces would be mutually inhibited. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the improvement effect of S&T service agglomeration on industrial efficiency mainly exists in the eastern region, but is not significant in the central and western regions. 

Key words: S&T service, agglomeration, industrial efficiency, threshold regression, spatial econometrics