中国智慧城市政策体系演化研究

李霞 陈琦 贾宏曼

科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 1-10.

PDF(668 KB)
PDF(668 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7) : 1-10.
论文

中国智慧城市政策体系演化研究

  • 李霞,陈琦,贾宏曼
作者信息 +

Research on evolution of the smart city policy system in China

  • Li Xia, Chen Qi, Jia Hongman
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

智慧城市是信息技术创新应用并嵌入到社会服务与管理的智慧表现。本文构建基于“资源效用-技术结构-应用领域”的智慧城市政策工具分析框架,运用文本内容分析与社会网络分析方法对2011年以来我国智慧城市政策进行演进脉络、政策网络关系、阶段性共现主题词和政策工具分析。研究发现:(1)我国智慧城市政策经历了感知基础架构与顶层设计、智慧产业培育与创新驱动、智慧应用领域异构化发展三个演进阶段;(2)第一阶段政策主题涵盖政策目标、基础技术、政策特征和组织体系四个主题词群,第二阶段政策主题是产业结构优化与创新资源协同、创新驱动环境构建、技术标准化与评价,第三个阶段政策主题是数据深度融合、异构领域应用和政策作用效应;(3)我国智慧城市政策存在结构性非均衡,相较于演进初期衡稳使用的供给型政策工具,环境导向政策工具稳步增加,需求导向政策工具动态匹配;(4)相较于以供给型政策工具为主导的云计算支撑产业层,物联感知平台政策倾向于供给型与环境型组合效用,并深化推动与环境型政策工具适配耦合的智慧应用领域政策。

Abstract

    Smart city is the intelligent performance of innovative applications for information technology embedded in social service and management. Smart city pilot projects have gradually been included in 89% of provincial and sub-provincial cities whereas repetitive or conflicting construction has shown the potential negative impact on urban resource due to policy ambiguity, although the government has taken a series of measures to promote the smart construction process. Therefore, this paper establishes an analysis framework of policy instruments based on resource utility - technical structure - application field, text content analysis, social network analysis and multidimensional scale analysis are used to analyze the evolution of smart city policies, policy network relations, co-occurrence keywords from year 2011 to 2021. Meanwhile, explores the structural evolution process of supply-oriented, environment-oriented and demand-oriented policy instruments in IoT sensing platform policies, cloud computing industrial policies and smart application service policies in smart city. The main valid data set related to smart city policy document issued by the central state ministries and functional departments of local government are collected, and then analyzed through text content unit encoding, from which the following conclusions can be inferred.
    The first conclusion shows that smart city policy has experienced three evolutionary stages involving in perceptive infrastructure and top-level design stage, cultivation and innovation-driven stage of smart industry, and heterogeneous development of smart application field. In the first stage, the technical concept and architecture system of the Internet of Things are put forward; in the second stage, intensive promulgation and rapid development of core supporting technology are reflected, involving big data, artificial intelligence and other strategic emerging industry; and in the third stage, the application integration of smart government, smart medical and smart transportation are exhibited, gradually expanding to various application systems such as smart environment and security.
   The second one reveals that many independent network groups have developed in smart city policy network, early policies mostly focused on top-level construction of infrastructure in relevant to Internet of Things and gradually transferred to implementation in heterogeneous domain in terms of programmatic policy document.
   The third one points out the thematic evolution of smart city policy at different evolutionary stages. Policy theme at the first stage covering policy objectives, foundational technology, organizational security system, and policy theme at the second stage take consideration of synergy of industrial structure optimization and innovation resources, establishment of innovation environment, technology standardization and evaluation. Policy theme at the third stage means data fusion, heterogeneous smart application fields and policy effect.
   The fourth one expounds the structurally unbalanced in smart city policies, and compared with the supply-oriented policy instruments that were used steadily in the initial stage of evolution, environment-oriented policy instruments are steadily increasing, while demand-oriented policy instruments are dynamically matched. In comparison with the cloud computing support industry layer dominated by supply-oriented policy instruments, IoT platform policies tend to combine utility of supply-oriented and environment-oriented. smart application policies are adaptive coupled with environment-oriented policy instruments and further developed from government-oriented pattern to market-oriented collaboration, with public service, scientific and technological information support are frequently employed. IoT sensing platform policies emphasis on smart infrastructure, while cloud computing industrial policies are influenced by citizen participation mechanism, innovation and entrepreneurship measures with top-level design and regulations. Priorities of smart construction are adaptive to different evolutionary path of smart application fields from early technology architecture, and gradually upgraded to industrial innovation chain system from environment-oriented instruments.
    Finally, this study puts forward some suggestions to improve relevant policies, including optimization of supply-oriented and environment-oriented policy instruments structure for sensing platform, balanced application of environment-oriented and demand-oriented policy tools in supporting smart industries; development of data fusion, data mining and demonstration application of commercial database to foster emerging strategic industrial clusters, structured configuration procurement, collaborative incentives for innovation and entrepreneurship as well to provide strong support for high-quality development of smart city.

关键词

智慧城市 / 政策网络 / 演进 / 政策工具 / 文本内容分析

Key words

 smart city / policy network / evolution / policy instrument / text content analysis


引用本文

导出引用
李霞 陈琦 贾宏曼. 中国智慧城市政策体系演化研究[J]. 科研管理. 2022, 43(7): 1-10
Li Xia, Chen Qi, Jia Hongman. Research on evolution of the smart city policy system in China[J]. Science Research Management. 2022, 43(7): 1-10

参考文献

[1]United Nations.2018 revision of world urbanization prospects[J].United Nations,New York,2018. https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html
[2]Giffinger R, Gudrun H.Smart cities ranking: an effective instrument for the positioning of the cities?[J].ACE: architecture, city and environment, 2010, 4(12):7-26
[3]Praharaj S, Han J H, Hawken S.Urban innovation through policy integration: Critical perspectives from 100 smart cities mission in India[J]. City, culture and society, 2018, 12: 35-43.[J].City, culture and society, 2018, (12):35-43
[4]Scholl H J, AlAwadhi S.Smart governance as key to multi-jurisdictional smart city initiatives: The case of the eCityGov Alliance[J].Social Science Information, 2016, 55(2):255-277
[5]Deren L, Jianjun C, Yuan Y.Big data in smart cities[J].Science China (Information Sciences), 2015, 58(10):1-12
[6]许庆瑞, 吴志岩, 陈力田.智慧城市的愿景与架构[J].管理工程学报, 2012, 026(004):1-7
[7]Calderoni L,Maio D,Rovis S.Deploying a network of smart cameras for traf?c monitoring on a ‘city Kernel’ [J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2014(41): 502-507.[J].Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, (41):502-507
[8]Nowicka A.Smart city logistics on cloud computing model[J].Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014(151): 266-281.[J].Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2014, (151):266-281
[9]Lau B P L, Marakkalage S H, Zhou Y, et al.A survey of data fusion in smart city applications[J]. Information Fusion, 2019, 52: 357-374.[J].Information Fusion, 2019, (52):357-374
[10]Schuurman D, Baccarne B, Marez L D, Mechant P.Smart ideas for smart cities: investigating crowdsourcing for generating and selecting ideas for ICT innovation in a city context[J].Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2012(7): 49-62.[J].Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 2012, (7):49-62
[11]孙志燕, 侯永志.对我国区域不平衡发展的多视角观察和政策应对[J].管理世界, 2019, 35(08):1-8
[12]Angelidou M.Smart city policies: A spatial approach[J].Cities, 2014(41): 3-11.[J].Cities, 2014, (41):3-11
[13]Kumar H, Singh M K, Gupta M P.A policy framework for city eligibility analysis: TISM and fuzzy MICMAC-weighted approach to select a city for smart city transformation in India[J]. Land use policy, 2019, 82: 375-390.[J].Land use policy, 2019, (82):375-390
[14]He M, Guan Z, Bao L, et al.Performance analysis of a polling-based access control combining with the sleeping schema in V2I VANETs for smart cities[J].Sustainability, 2019, 11(2):503-
[15]Sharifi A.A critical review of selected smart city assessment tools and indicator sets[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 233: 1269-1283.[J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, (233):1269-1283
[16]Chatterjee S, Kar A K, Gupta M P.Success of IoT in smart cities of India: An empirical analysis[J].Government Information Quarterly, 2018, 35(3):349-361
[17]Charles E.LindblomPolicy analysis[J].The American Economic Review, 1958, 48(3):298-312
[18]吴旭红.智慧社区建设何以可能——基于整合性行动框架的分析[J]. 公共管理学报, 17(4):110-125+173.[J].公共管理学报, 2020, 17(4):110-125+173
[19]熊勇清, 徐文.新能源汽车产业培育:“选择性”抑或“功能性”政策[J].科研管理, 2021, 42(6):58-64
[20]袁航, 朱承亮.智慧城市是否加速了城市创新?[J]. 中国软科学, 2020(12):77-83.[J].中国软科学, 2020, (12):77-83
[21]张宝建, 李鹏利, 陈劲, 等.国家科技创新政策的主题分析与演化过程——基于文本挖掘的视角[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(11):15-31
[22]Huang C, Su J, Xie X, et al.A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949-2010[J].Scientometrics, 2015, 102(2):1521-1539
[23]张超, 官建成.基于政策文本内容分析的政策体系演进研究——以中国创新创业政策体系为例[J].管理评论, 2020, 32(5):138-150
[24]马玉新, 吴爱萍, 李华, 王方.中国企业技术创新政策演变过程——基于扎根理论与加权共词分析法[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2018, 39(09):61-72
[25]Rothwell R, Zegveld W.An assessment of government innovative policies[J].Review of Policy Research, 2010, 3(3-4):436-444
[26]Howlett M, Ramesh M.The policy effects of internationalization: a subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change[J].Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 2002, 4(1):31-50
[27]Ingram S H.Behavioral assumptions of policy tools[J].Journal of Politics, 1990, 52(2):510-529
[28]刘云, 黄雨歆, 叶选挺.基于政策工具视角的中国国家创新体系国际化政策量化分析[J]. 科研管理, 2017(S1): 470-478.[J].科研管理, 2017, (S1):470-478
[29]徐硼, 罗帆.政策工具视角下的中国科技创新政策[J].科学学研究, 2020, 38(05):826-833
[30]黄萃, 徐磊, 钟笑天, 苏竣.基于政策工具的政策-技术路线图(P-TRM)框架构建与实证分析——以中国风机制造业和光伏产业为例[J].中国软科学, 2014(05):76-84.[J].中国软科学, 2014, (5):76-84
[31]刘亚亚, 曲婉, 冯海红.中国大数据政策体系演化研究[J].科研管理, 2019, 40(05):15-25
[32]成全, 董佳, 陈雅兰.创新型国家战略背景下的原始性创新政策评价[J]. 科学学研究, 2021(05):1-17.[J].科学学研究, 2021, (5):1-17
[33]吴杨.大数据政策文本与现实的偏差及完善路径研究[J].公共管理学报, 2020, 17(1):31-46
[34]吕文晶, 陈劲, 刘进.政策工具视角的中国人工智能产业政策量化分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2019(10): 1765-1774.[J].科学学研究, 2019, (10):1765-1774
[35]张骁, 周霞, 王亚丹.中国科技服务业政策的量化与演变——基于扎根理论和文本挖掘分析[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2018, (06): 6-13.[J].中国科技论坛, 2018, (6):6-13
[36]李德仁, 邵振峰.论物理城市、数字城市和智慧城市[J].地理空间信息, 2018, 16(9):1-5

基金

国家自然科学基金项目:“基于位置数据网络建模的智慧城市智能感知信息服务模型与应用研究”(71503099,2016.01—2018.12);教育部人文社会科学项目:“基于动态演化与效应感知的智慧城市政策推动区域创新机理研究”(20YJC630067,2020.01—2022.12);华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目资助:“基于KDE-PSM模型的智慧城市政策推进技术创新机理研究”(CCNU19A06031,2019.09—2022.08)。

PDF(668 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/