本文基于刺激-反应模型，采用回归分析方法，探究知识流动视角下战略性新兴产业创新网络形成机理，在此基础上，运用Agent建模仿真方法，分析市场机制和政府调控下创新主体、政府及环境之间的知识动态交互过程。回归结果表明：当主体间交互时，知识接收方的知识创新行为受到自身知识吸收能力、知识共享意愿、信息刺激强度以及知识发出方知识权力的显著正向影响；当主体与政府交互时，知识接收方的知识创新行为还受到政府支持力度的显著正向影响，且信息刺激强度在政府支持力度与知识创新行为间具有中介作用。仿真结果表明：创新网络中的知识交互式创新主体数量始终多于知识集成式创新，成为主流趋势，尤其是知识权力较大的主体更倾向于选择知识交互式创新；相比于市场机制，政府调控下的创新网络知识集成式创新主体数量未出现下降趋势，且退出者比例更小，说明政府调控能够有效引导主体知识创新行为。
Abstract
Based on the realistic background that strategic emerging industries (SEIs) are in the early stage of development, the resource advantages of various subjects, which is conducive to conquering key technologies can be integrated and concentrated by building a high-level innovation network. Thus, it is necessary to explore the formation mechanism of innovation network and fully grasp the rules of interaction of all elements.Previous studies have concluded that the process of innovation network formation is accompanied by knowledge flow and that the government macro-regulation has an important impact on the quality of innovation network formation. However, it still has the following shortcomings. First of all, previous studies have not examined the influence of knowledge innovation subject attribute on the formation of innovation network in terms of knowledge complementarity and symbiosis of SEIs. Secondly, previous studies lack the research on the influence of interaction rules among knowledge innovation subjects, environment and the government on the formation of innovation network. Finally, the research on analyzing the dynamic interaction process of the SEIs innovation network based on its static formation mechanism needs to be enriched.According to the above analysis, the formation mechanism of the innovation network of SEIs was studied by static regression based on the stimulus-response model in this paper. On this basis, the agent simulation model was used to analyze the dynamic interaction process among the innovation subject, the government and the environment under the market mechanism and government regulation, which is to explore the dynamic evolution mechanism. The contribution of this paper is to enrich the theoretical framework of research related to innovation networks in SEIs, and provides a theoretical basis for enterprise decision making and government policy formulation. On the one hand, the attributes of knowledge sender and receiver are considered comprehensively. On the other hand, the interaction rules and dynamic interaction process among innovation subjects, environment and the government are fully explored. The mechanism of SEIs innovation network formation is deeply revealed. The results shown that in the process of interaction between knowledge innovation subject, the knowledge innovation behavior of the knowledge receiver is positively affected by its own knowledge absorption capacity, knowledge sharing willingness, information stimulus intensity and knowledge power of the knowledge sender. In the process of interaction between the government and knowledge innovation subject, the knowledge innovation behavior of knowledge receiver positively affected by the government support intensity. At the same time, the perceived information stimulus intensity of knowledge receiver has a mediating effect on the relationship between the government support and knowledge innovation behavior. After the formation and stabilization of the innovation network, the number of knowledge-interactive innovation subjects is more than that of knowledge-integrated innovation. Compared with the market mechanism, the number of knowledge-integrated innovation subjects in the government-driven innovation network has always maintained a stable growth trend and the proportion of quitters is small.Based on the conclusions, this paper draws the following enlightenment. First of all, the subject of knowledge innovation should strengthen the accuracy of the prediction about opportunity, timeliness and ambiguity of opportunity information. As the sender of knowledge, it is necessary to enhance the expertise, irreplaceability and inimitability of its knowledge resources to increase its knowledge power. As the receiver of knowledge, it is necessary to continuously strengthen its own knowledge absorption ability and willingness to share knowledge. The knowledge resources of the innovation network can be used more effectively and maintain the stable operation of the innovation network. Secondly, the government should be able to quickly formulate more guiding policies and improve the policy implementation. Through the joint efforts of enterprises and the government, a high-level innovation network of SEIs will eventually be formed. Thus, a solid foundation will be laid for driving the innovation of traditional industries.
关键词
创新网络 /
战略性新兴产业 /
知识流动 /
Agent仿真 /
刺激-反应
Key words
innovative network /
strategic emerging industry /
knowledge flow /
Agent simulation /
stimulus-response
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]黄鲁成, 石媛嫄, 吴菲菲, 等.基于技术视角的新兴产业关联研究——以打印相关产业为例[J].管理评论, 2017, 29(02):47-58
[2]贾卫峰, 楼旭明, 党兴华.技术创新网络中核心企业形成过程中知识流动的适应性仿真[J].系统工程, 2017, 35(10):140-146
[3]Freema C.Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues[J].Research Policy, 1991, 20(5):499-514
[4]李雯, 解佳龙.创新集聚效应下的网络惯例建立与创业资源获取[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(12):1864-1874
[5]Tom D, Paolo M G, Willem S.Networked innovation and coalition formation: the effect of group-based social preferences[J].Economics of Innovation And New Technology, 2018, 27(7):577-593
[6]Jack S L.Approaches to studying networks: Implications and outcomes[J].Journal of Business Venturing, 2010, 25(1):120-137
[7]曹兴, 马慧.新兴技术“多核心”创新网络形成及仿真研究[J].科学学研究, 2019, 37(01):165-174
[8]Harold P F, Andreas P.A model of innovation network formation[J].Innovation Organization & Managent, 2017, 19(2):245-169
[9]Assis J A B.External linkages and technological innovation:(Some) topical issues[J].International Journal of Entrepreneurship ＆ Innovation Management, 2003, 3(1):151-175
[10] 张敬文, 李一卿, 陈建.战略性新兴产业集群创新网络协同创新绩效实证研究[J].宏观经济研究, 2018, (09):109-122
[11] Lacasa I D.Shubbak M H. Drifting towards innovation: The co-evolution of patent networks, policy, and institutions in China’s solar photovoltaics industry[J]. Energy Research & Social Science, 2018, 38: 87-101.
[12]Liu W W, Yang J N.The evolutionary game theoretic analysis for sustainable cooperation relationship of collaborative innovation network in strategic emerging industries[J].Sustainability, 2018, 10(12):4585-
[13]Koleros A, Mulkerne S, Oldenbeuving M.The actor-based change framework: A pragmatic approach to developing program theory for interventions in complex systems[J].American Journal of Evaluation, 2020, 41(1):34-53
[14]田钢, 张永安, 兰卫国.基于刺激——反应模型的集群创新网络形成机理研究[J].管理评论, 2009, 21(07):49-55
[15]Rubach S, Hoholm T, Hakansson H.Innovation networks or innovation within networks[J].IMP Journal, 2017, 11(2):178-206
[16]黄春萍, 赵林, 刘璞, 等.新创企业品牌联合伙伴选择的计算实验研究[J].中国管理科学, 2019, 27(08):129-141
[17]Latiff A, Hassan A, Mohamed H.Rise and fall of knowledge power: An in-depth Investigation[J].Humanomics the International Journal of Systems ＆ Ethics, 2008, 24(1):17-27
[18]李宇, 陆艳红.知识权力如何有效运用:“有核”集群的知识创造及权力距离的调节作用[J].南开管理评论, 2018, 21(06):107-120
[19] 曹兴, 杨威, 彭耿, 等.企业知识状态属性与企业技术核心能力关系的实证研究[J].中国软科学, 2009, (03):144-154+185
[20]Zahra S A, George G.Absorptive capacity: A review,reconceptualization,and extension[J].The Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(2):185-203
[21]Bock G W, Kim Y G.Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing[J].Information Management Resources Journal, 2002, 15(2):14-21
[22]Matheus T, Saunders M N K, Chakraborty S.Multiple dimensions of power influencing knowledge integration in supply chains[J].R & D Management, 2017, 47(5):673-688
[23] 王伟光, 冯荣凯, 尹博.产业创新网络中核心企业控制力能够促进知识溢出吗?[J]. 管理世界, 2015, (06): 99-109.
[24] Allen T J, Gloor P A, Colladon A F.The power of reciprocal knowledge sharing relationships for start up success[J]. Journal of Small Business And Enterprise Development, 2016, 23(3) 636-651.
[25] Cammarano A, Michelino F, Lamberti E.Accumulated stock of knowledge and current search practices: The impact on patent quality[J].Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 2017, (120): 204-222.
[26]Justin J P, Jansen F A J.Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter[J].Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(6):999-1015
[27]Moreira S, Markus A, Laursen K.Knowledge diversity and coordination: The effect of intrafirm inventor task networks on absorption speed[J].Strategic Management Journal, 2018, 39(9):2517-2546
[28]王娟茹, 罗岭.知识共享行为、创新和复杂产品研发绩效[J].科研管理, 2015, 36(06):37-45
[29]金辉, 段光, 李辉.面子、人情与知识共享意愿间关系的实证研究:基于知识隐性程度的调节效应[J].管理评论, 2019, 31(05):147-162
[30]Arunk W J.Effect of knowledge sharing and supply chain management on organizational performance[J].International Journal of Knowledge-Based Organizations, 2015, 5(3):19-32
[31]冯华, 聂蕾, 施雨玲.供应链治理机制与供应链绩效之间的相互作用关系—基于信息共享的中介效应和信息技术水平的调节效应[J].中国管理科学, 2020, 28(02):104-114
[32]Antonioli D, Gilli M, Mazzanti M.Backing environmental innovation through information technology adoptionEmpirical analyses of innovation related complementarity in firms[J].Technological And Economic Development Of Economy, 2018, 24(1):141-163
[33]段云龙, 余义勇, 张颖, 等.创新型企业持续创新过程重大机遇识别研究[J].管理评论, 2017, 29(10):58-72
[34] Rashed C A A, Azeem A, Halim Z.Effect of information and knowledge sharing on supply chain performance: a survey based approach[J]. Journal of Operations＆Supply Chain Management, 2010, (2): 61-77．
[35]Borzacchiello M T, Craglia M.The impact on innovation of open access to spatial environmental information: a research strategy[J].International Journal Of Technology Management, 2012, 60(12):114-129
[36] 杨建昆, 王心焕, 雷家骕.高新企业成长相关政策设计与执行对政策效果的作用分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2016, (11): 184-192.
[37]江飞涛, 李晓萍.改革开放四十年中国产业政策演进与发展—兼论中国产业政策体系的转型[J].管理世界, 2018, 34(10):73-85
[38] 郭玥.政府创新补助的信号传递机制与企业创新[J]. 中国工业经济, 2018, (09): 98-116.
[39]梁正.从科技政策到科技与创新政策—创新驱动发展战略下的政策范式转型与思考[J].科学学研究, 2017, 35(02):170-176
[40]朱武祥, 张平, 李鹏飞, 等.疫情冲击下中小微企业困境与政策效率提升—基于两次全国问卷调查的分析[J].管理世界, 2020, 36(04):13-26
[41]王建军, 叶明海, 曹宁.知识权力、跨界搜索与企业创新绩效的关系研究[J].软科学, 2020, 34(02):1-7
[42]叶江峰, 任浩, 郝斌.外部知识异质度对创新绩效曲线效应的内在机理—知识重构与吸收能力的视角[J].科研管理, 2016, 37(08):8-17
[43]张运华, 王美琳.信任和信息对称性对知识流动效果的影响—以知识共享意愿为中介的实证研究[J].情报理论与实践, 2016, 39(04):97-102
[44]Bock G W, Zmud R W, Kim Y G, et al.Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators,social-psychological forces,and organizational climate[J].Mis Quarterly, 2005, 29(1):87-111
[45]陈力田, 许庆瑞.知识搜寻跨边界协同对自主创新能力结构类型影响的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2014, 35(10):13-25
[46]彭华涛, 许晴, 张俊杰, 等.市场导向、政策导向对传统产业中企业二次创业路径选择的作用机理研究[J].科研管理, 2018, 39(05):56-66
基金
国家社会科学基金重点项目：“基于互惠理论的企业合作型原始创新过程与演化研究”（19FGLA001，2019.09—2022.10）。
PDF(1654 KB)
