国企混改整合的主要目标是改善国有企业资本结构,培养有竞争力和创新力的治理体系,进而有效提升国企运行效率。然而,现有理论研究表明,国企混改整合是否能提升国企运行效率与绩效,还未形成一致的结论。以创新方式为视角,基于双元创新理论,采用双案例对比研究方法,探讨处在不同的混改整合阶段下创新方式对战略绩效的影响路径与机理。研究发现,在混改整合准备阶段,利用式创新更有利提升企业战略绩效;而在混改整合优化阶段,探索式创新更有利于提升企业战略绩效。研究结论不仅解释了理论界对国企混改经济结果的现象与争议,建立了国企混改整合中不同创新方式对企业战略绩效影响路径的理论框架,而且拓展了双元创新理论应用在管理学中的边界范围,为混改企业提升战略绩效提供了理论指导。
Abstract
The main goal of the reform and integration of state-owned enterprises is to improve the capital structure of state-owned enterprises, cultivate a competitive and innovative governance system, and effectively improve the operational efficiency of state-owned enterprises. However, the existing theoretical research shows that there is no consistent conclusion on whether the integration of state-owned enterprises can improve the operational efficiency and performance of state-owned enterprises. From the perspective of innovation mode, and based on the theory of dual innovation and the method of dual case comparison, this paper discusses the influence path and mechanism of innovation mode on strategic performance in different stages of mixed reform and integration. It is found that in the preparation stage of mixed reform and integration, the utilization innovation is more beneficial to improve the strategic performance of enterprises. While, in the stage optimization of mixed reform and integration, innovation is more conducive to improving the strategic performance of enterprises.
To be specific, in the preparation stage of mixed reform and integration, enterprises can improve the industrial structure, advance the operation efficiency, increase production capacity, explore problems of existing technologies, raise product qualification rate and improve internal processes through utilization innovation, actively enhance the enthusiasm of employees, provide customers with quality products, so that this can escalate the number of existing customer groups and the level of customer satisfaction, gradually expand the market share, constantly increase the return on equity, thus improving the overall strategic performance. However, in this stage, enterprises, by using the exploratory innovation modes, usually spend a large amount of capital to expand the scale of production lines, and new technologies are not mature and the control over product quality is neglected. As a result, a large amount of capital is invested in new technical renovation project, but after-sales service fails to catch up with the selling. This leads to excess production capacity, internal process slip, reduction of new product qualification rate, difficulties in broadening sales channels, and decline of market share in some regions. Furthermore, it may cause a decline in corporate profits and reduction of financial dimension.
Therefore, in the preparation stage of mixed reform and integration, the successful application of utilization innovation will be more beneficial to the strategic performance improvement of state-owned enterprises. On one hand, the employment mechanism, reward mechanism and performance feedback mechanism are no longer suitable for the current development of enterprises. So, the motivation of employees is not sufficient to undertake the work and their enthusiasm is at a low level. On the other hand, enterprises still target their sales groups at existing customers, and fail to effectively explore new markets and new customers, thus resulting in narrow sales channels and a decline of customer satisfaction.
In addition, the main research still focused on the transformation of existing products and the improvement of existing technologies, the research and development of new technologies being at a low level, the introduction of professional talents cannot meet the demands, the research and development process limited by professional technologies, and the improvement of learning and growth of employees is not obvious, which leads to issues on the advance of internal processes and reduction of strategic performance indicators. Whereas, by means of exploratory innovation, enterprises can actively introduce technical talents and research and development personnel, carry out novel research and development of new technologies and new products, so as to optimize their production mode, significantly increase product quality, sharply lower product cost, thus improving their internal processes in all aspects to reach a high level. At the same time, attention should be paid to cultivate employee′s learning ability and to promote a new business model, actively expand sales channels, excavate potential customer base, and significantly increase strategic performance. The problem of integration in many aspects in the process of mixing and reforming is effectively solved, and the production and operation are relatively stable.
Therefore, in order to further improve the performance of state-owned enterprises, they should actively explore innovation paths, so as to finally enhance the vitality of enterprises and competitiveness of enterprises. It can be seen that exploratory innovation, which can realize differentiation advantage, is more significant to improve the strategic performance of enterprises in the stage of hybrid reform, integration and optimization. On this basis, the theoretical path of the impact of innovation on the strategic performance of enterprises in the stage of mixed reform and integration is constructed from the perspective of dual innovation.
The practical enlightenment is as follows: firstly, in the process of reform of state-owned enterprises, it is necessary to implement the innovation-driven development strategy, so as to effectively improve the innovation ability of enterprises. Innovation is the main means to improve the strategic performance of enterprises during their reform. Although different innovation methods have different effects on improving the strategic performance of enterprises at different stages of mixed reform, the implementation of innovation-driven development strategy for effective improvement of the innovation ability of enterprises is still the only way for the mixed reform of state-owned enterprises to achieve their strategic performance.
Secondly, in the process of reform of state-owned enterprises, the concept of dual innovation should be integrated into each stage, in order to lead the development by innovation and realize the complementary advantages of enterprise resources and elements with the help of different types of innovation. While implementing the mixed reform and integration, enterprises should pay attention to the impact of different innovation methods on enterprise resources. Whether in the preparation stage or in the optimization stage of mixed reform and integration, enterprises should choose the suitable innovation methods which will have a positive impact on their strategic performance, identify the impact of the development path of innovation methods on strategic performance, and improve strategic performance accordingly, so as to achieve the strategic goal of mixed reform and integration.
关键词
国有企业 /
探索式创新 /
利用式创新 /
案例研究
Key words
state-owned enterprise /
exploratory innovation /
utilization innovation /
case study
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[ ]Jian,M.Wong.J. Propping through related party transactions [J]. Review of Accounting Studies,2010,15:70-105.
[ ]Min Du,Agyenim Boateng. State ownership,institutional effects and value creation in cross-border mergers & acquisitions by Chinese firms[J]. International Business Review,2015,24(3):430-442.
[ ]武常岐,张林.国企改革中的所有权和控制权及企业绩效[J].北京大学学报,2014,(05):149-156.
[ ]Guy S. Liu,John Beime,Pei Sun. The performance impact of firm ownership transformation in China: mixed ownership vs fully privatised ownership[J]. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies,2015,vol.13(3):1476-5284 .
[ ]赵放,刘雅君.混合所有制改革对国有企业创新效率影响的政策效果分析———基于双重差分法的实证研究[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,(6):67-73.
[ ]Zhou B,Guo J,Hua J,et al.Does State Ownership Drive M&A Performance? Evidence from china[J].European Financial Management,2015,21(1):79-105.
[ ]顾露露,Robert Reed.中国企业海外混改失败了吗? [J].经济研究,2011(7):116-129.
[ ]同生辉,王骏.中央企业上市公司混改绩效的实证研究[J].中央财经大学学报,2015,(5):46-53.
[ ] 尹美群,盛磊,李文博.高管激励、创新投入与公司绩效——基于内生性视角的分行业实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(01):109-117.
[ ] AUH S,MENGUC B.Balancing exploration and exploitation:the moderating role of competitive intensity[J].Journal of Business Research,2005,58(58):1652-1661.
[ ] March,J.G..Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.Organization Science,1991,(2):71-87.
[ ]刘志迎,付丽华,马朝良,冷宗阳.基于Meta分析的创新二元性与企业绩效关系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(06):171-180.
[ ]吴晓波,陈小玲,李璟琰.战略导向、创新模式对企业绩效的影响机制研究[J].科学学研究,2015,33(01):118-127.
[ ]吴亮,赵兴庐,张建琦.以资源拼凑为中介过程的双元创新与企业绩效的关系研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(03):425-431.
[ ]胡保亮.商业模式、创新双元性与企业绩效的关系研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(11):29-36.
[ ]李婧,贺小刚,茆键.亲缘关系、创新能力与企业绩效[J].南开管理评论,2010,13(03):117-124.
[ ]李忆,司有和.探索式创新、利用式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响[J].南开管理评论,2008(05):4-12.
[ ]汪涛,王繁荣,陈炜然.开放式创新背景下新兴企业创新模式对创新绩效的影响[J].科技进步与对策,2017,34(2):80-86.
[ ]Daft R.A dual-core model of organizational innovation[J].Academy of Management Journa-l,1987,21(2):193-210.
[ ]Yamin S,Mavond F,Gunasekaran A,et al.A study of competitive strategy,organizational i-nnovation and organizational performance among Australian manufacturing companies[J].Inter-national Journal of Production Economics,1997,52(2):161-172.
[ ]Johne A.Using market vision to steer innovation[J].Tech-novation,1999,19(4):203-207.
[ ]何郁冰,张思.技术创新持续性对企业绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2017,38(09):1-11.
[ ]杨伟,刘益,沈灏,王龙伟.管理创新与营销创新对企业绩效的实证研究——基于新创企业和成熟企业的分类样本[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2011,32(03):67-73.
[ ]解学梅,刘丝雨.协同创新模式对协同效应与创新绩效的影响机理[J].管理科学,2015,28(02):27-39.
[ ]陈钰芬,陈劲.开放式创新促进创新绩效的机理研究[J].科研管理,2009,30(04):1-9+28.
[ ]李剑力.探索性创新、开发性创新与企业绩效关系研究——基于冗余资源调节效应的实证分析[J].科学学研究,2009,27(09):1418-1427.
[ ]Benner M J, Tushman M L. Exploitation,exploration,and process management the productivity dilemma revisited[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003,2:238- 256.
[ ]Lin C,Chang C C. A patent-based study of the relationships among technological por西宁特钢olio, ambidextrous innovation, and firm performance[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2015,27(10): 1193-1211.
[ ]SMITH W K, TUSHMAN M L. Managing strategic contradictions :a top management model for managing innovation streams[J].Organization Science,2005,16(5):522-536.
[ ]李忆,司有和.探索式创新、利用式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响[J].南开管理评论,2008(05):4-12.
[ ]陶秋燕,孟猛猛.探索式创新和利用式创新对组织绩效的影响——基于中国中小企业的实证[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2018,20(02):102-108.
[ ]Yin R K.Case study research:design and methods[M].3rd ed.California:Sage Publications,2003.
[ ]颉茂华.资源型企业增长过度吗?一一兼对可持续增长理论的评价与检验[J].管理案例研究与评论,2013,6(3):192-295.
[ ]彭新敏,吴晓波,吴东.基于二次创新动态过程的企业网络与组织学习平衡模式演化——海天1971-2010 年纵向案例研究[J]. 管理世界,2011,(4):138-149+166.
[ ]]Capron,Laurenee.Mechanism of value creation in horizontal mergers and acquisitions:A test of efficiency,market Power and resource-based arguments.Richard Ivey Sehool of Business working paper,1996:96-23.
[ ]Madhok,A.The organization of economic activity:transaction costs, firm capabilities and the nature of governance[J].Organization Seience,1996,7(5):577- 590.
[ ]Haspeslagh,P. ,Jemison,D.Managing Acquisitions:Creating Value Through Corporate Renewal [M].New York:Free Press, 1991.
[ ]Szulanski G..Exploring internal stickiness: impedmients to the transfer of best practice with in the firm[J].Strategie Management Joumal.1996,17:27-43.
[ ]Yin, R. K..Case study research: design and methods (3rd ed.) [M]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,2003.
[ ]蒋春燕,赵署明. 社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用——江苏与广东新兴企业的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,10(11):90-99+171-172.
[ ]HITT M A ,KING D ,KRISHNANH ,et al. Creating value through mergers and acquisitions [M]. The Handbook of Mergers and Acquisitions ,2012 : 516-538.
[ ]Carvalho,D.,“The Real Effects of Government-Owned Banks: Evidence from an Emerging Market” [J].The Journal of Finance,2014,Vol. 69(2):pp. 577~609.
[ ]颉茂华,贾建楠,干胜道,焦守滨.能源企业海外并购:取得了什么效应?———以兖州煤业并购菲利克斯为例[J].管理案例研究与评论,2012,05(06):447-462.
[ ]Steinbach A,et al. Top Management Team Heterogeneity,Strategic Investment Behavior,and Performance: A Contingency Theory of Incentive Alignment[J].Strategic Management Journal,2017( forthcoming) .
[ ]Dunbar J K. The Leaders Who Make M&A Work [J].Harvard Business Review,2014,92, (9) :28.
[ ]Yang Z, Zhou X M, Zhang P C. Discipline versus passion: Collectivism, centralization, and ambidextrous innovation[J]. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2015,32(3): 745-769.
[ ]Uotila J, Maula M, Keil T,et al. Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: Analysis of S&P500 corporations[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2009,30(2):221-231.
基金
国家自然科学基金项目(71840017);内蒙古自治区哲学社会科学规划项目(2020NDA001);内蒙古统计科学研究项目(TJXHKT202011)。