内部控制专业胜任能力对研发资金管控的影响

刘斌

科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 150-159.

PDF(452 KB)
PDF(452 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10) : 150-159.
论文

内部控制专业胜任能力对研发资金管控的影响

  • 刘斌
作者信息 +

The influence of internal control professional competence on management and control of R&D funds

  • Liu Bin
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

董事会是企业创新活动的引领者,亦是研发资金内部控制和风险管理的领导者。本文运用2011-2018年内部控制、研发活动及财务数据,检验董事会“内部控制专业胜任能力”与企业研发资金管控行为和管控效果的关联性。研究发现:(1)董事会内部控制专业胜任能力愈强,企业研发资金管控行为愈自信,包括管控方式自信、投入力度自信。(2)董事会内部控制专业胜任能力的正向变动,同样正向影响企业研发资金管控行为的自信程度。(3)进一步研究发现,董事会内部控制专业胜任能力愈强,企业研发投入增长更快,研发专利申请和授权数量均增长更快。本研究建议股东大会、董事会和监管机构,积极引导所有董事会成员开展“内部控制专业胜任能力”专业化培育,以期更好的在企业研发资金管控中履职尽责。

Abstract

   Corporate innovation activities are widely considered to be high-risk business activities, which are manifested in the uncertainty of innovation input and output, which poses challenges to the management and control of corporate R&D funds. The board of directors is the leader of enterprise innovation activities and the decision maker of innovation input, as well as the core of leadership for internal control and risk management. At the same time, corporate innovation activities have high-risk characteristics, and R&D fund management and control require "professional" quality and experience, that is, R&D fund management and control "professional competence". This paper uses the 2011-2018 data of corporate R&D and members of board of directors, to test the "professional competence of internal control" on corporate R&D fund management and control behavior and effect.
   The study finds that: (1) The "professional competence of internal control" has a positive impact on corporate R&D fund management and control behavior, including a higher proportion of "capitalized" R&D investment in accounting treatments (confidence in management and control methods) and a higher proportion of R&D investment funds (confidence in investment). (2) Positive changes in "professional competence of internal control" of the board of directors also positively affect the confidence of R&D fund management and control behavior, including the more confident the R&D fund management and control methods and investment intensity. (3) Further research finds that the "professional competence of internal control" has positive impacts on the growth of corporate R&D investment, and the faster the number of R&D patent applications and authorizations.
    The significance of this paper is, on the one hand, to introduce the behavioral factor of the "professionalism" of internal control into the field of corporate R&D funds management, which has theoretical significance to fill the partial research gap in this field. On the other hand, it verifies the correlation between corporate innovation activities and internal-control competence, and provides information on how innovative boards of directors can better perform their duties in corporate innovation activities and capital management and control. Correspondingly, put forward the basis for behavioral decision-making and policy recommendations based on the situation, and realize the practical value of the "professional competence of internal control" of board of directors.
    The contributions of this paper are as follows: first, it is found that the "professional competence of internal control" has a positive impact on corporate R&D fund management and control behavior, including the confidence in the R&D fund management and control method and the confidence in the R&D fund investment. Among them, the degree of confidence in the management and control of R&D funds uses the "capitalized" R&D investment ratio (ROCR&D) indicator, which is significantly different from the indicators used by previous scholars. Second, it is found that "professional competence of internal control" of the board of directors and its positive changes, affect the confidence of R&D funds management and control behavior. In detail, the higher the "professional competence of internal control" (or the higher its positive change), the higher the proportion of "capitalized" R&D investment in accounting treatment, and the higher the proportion of corporate R&D investment, which shows that corporate is more confident in R&D capital management behavior. Third, it is found that the "professional competence of internal control" of the board of directors in the management and control effect of R&D funds, including: the higher the "professional competence of internal control", the bigger the R&D investment, and the faster the number of R&D patent applications and authorizations. The findings above highlight the important role and application value of the "professional competence of internal control" of board of directors in the management and control of corporate R&D funds.
    Based on empirical conclusions, the "professional competence of internal control" could play an important role in the management and control of corporate R&D funds, which is not only reflected in the more confident fund management and control behavior, but also in the better effect of fund management and control. Thus, we recommend that corporate shareholders′ meetings, corporate boards and external supervisory agencies actively guide all board members to develop the professional cultivation of "professional competence of internal control" in order to better perform their duties in the management and control of corporate R&D funds.

关键词

内部控制专业胜任能力 / 董事会 / 研发风险 / 资金管控行为

Key words

internal control professional competence / board of directors / R&D risk / fund management and control behavior

引用本文

导出引用
刘斌. 内部控制专业胜任能力对研发资金管控的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2022, 43(10): 150-159
Liu Bin. The influence of internal control professional competence on management and control of R&D funds[J]. Science Research Management. 2022, 43(10): 150-159

参考文献

[1] 中国企业家调查系统,李兰,张泰,李燕斌,盛来运,于武,贡森,丛亮,王克良,吴频,余明勤,杨元伟,余平,郝玉峰,李强,樊纲,路江涌,彭泗清,潘建成,郝大海,仲为国. 新常态下的企业创新:现状、问题与对策——2015?中国企业家成长与发展专题调查报告[J]. 管理世界,2015(06):22-33.
[2] 黄新建,尤珊珊. 股权激励契约、技术创新与创新效率[J]. 科研管理,2020,41(03):217-226.
[3] Lev B., and Sougiannis T. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1996, 21(1), 107-138.
[4] 张治河,许珂,李鹏. 创新投入的延迟效应与创新风险成因分析[J]. 科研管理,2015,36(05):10-20.
[5] 许罡,朱卫东.管理当局、研发支出资本化选择与盈余管理动机——基于新无形资产准则研发阶段划分的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(09):39-43.
[6] 谢德仁,廖珂,郑登津.控股股东股权质押与开发支出会计政策隐性选择[J].会计研究,2017(03):30-38+94.
[7] Baruk J. Innovativeness of Polish enterprises in the initial period of system transformation[J]. Technovation, 1997, 17(9), 477-489+529-530
[8] 鲁桐,党印.公司治理与技术创新:分行业比较[J].经济研究,2014, 560(06):115-128.
[9] 李常青,李宇坤,李茂良.控股股东股权质押与企业创新投入[J].金融研究,2018(07):143-157.
[10] Celikyurt U., Sevilir M., and Shivdasani A. Venture Capitalists on Boards of Mature Public Firms[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2014, 27(1):56-101.
[11] 程新生,赵旸.权威董事专业性、高管激励与创新活跃度研究[J].管理科学学报, 2019, 177(03):40-52.
[12] 阎达五,杨有红.内部控制框架的构建[J].会计研究,2001,(2):9-14+65.
[13] 张娟,黄志忠.内部控制、技术创新和公司业绩——基于我国制造业上市公司的实证分析[J].经济管理,2016,38(09):120-134.
[14] 方红星,池国华,樊子君.内部控制(第四版)[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2019.
[15] 张倩倩,周铭山,董志勇.研发支出资本化向市场传递了公司价值吗?[J].金融研究,2017(06):176-190.
[16] 王燕妮,刘艳妮.R&D会计政策选择对企业价值的影响[J].科学学研究,2015,33(03):398-406.
[17] Jensen M. C. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems[J]. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(3):831-880.
[18] Kaplan R. S.,and Norton D. P. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action [M]. Harvard Business Press, 1996.
[19] Dougherty D., and Hardy C. Sustained Product Innovation in Large, Mature Organizations: Overcoming Innovation-to-organization Problems[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39 (5):1120-1153.
[20] Verona G. A. Resource-based View of Product Development[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, 24(1): 132-142.
[21] 李瑛玫,史琦. 内部控制能够促进企业创新绩效的提高吗?[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(06):86-99.
[22] 易靖韬,张修平,王化成.企业异质性、高管过度自信与企业创新绩效[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(06):101-112.
[23] 刘斌,迟健心,季侃.董事会“内部控制专业胜任能力”重要吗?--基于文本分析和机器学习的经验证据[J/OL].南开管理评论:1-22[2021-11-16].http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/12.1288.f.20211112.0905.002.html.
[24] 朱乃平,朱丽,孔玉生,沈阳.技术创新投入、社会责任承担对财务绩效的协同影响研究[J].会计研究,2014(02):57-63+95.
[25] 尹美群,盛磊,李文博.高管激励、创新投入与公司绩效——基于内生性视角的分行业实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(01):109-117.
[26] 林钟高,刘捷先.研发支出资本化与管理层薪酬契约——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].财经论丛,2012(02):90-97.
[27] 陈强.高级计量经济学及Stata应用(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2014.4.

基金

国家社会科学基金重大项目:“‘一带一路’国家资金融通机制设计及资金配置效率评价体系研究”(18ZAD095)。

PDF(452 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/