发明者网络社群动态配置及对创新能力的影响

刘娜; 嵇金星; 毛荐其; 王霄飞; 官建成

PDF(1062 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (9) : 44-51.

论文

发明者网络社群动态配置及对创新能力的影响

刘娜¹,嵇金星¹,毛荐其¹,王霄飞¹,官建成²

作者信息 +

The dynamic configuration of inventors′ network community and its influence on innovation capacity

Liu Na¹, Ji Jinxing¹, Mao Jianqi¹, Wang Xiaofei¹, Guan Jiancheng²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

鉴于发明者在创新活动中的“抱团”研发现象，采用GN算法，识别可再生能源行业发明者合作创新网络的社群结构，根据社群内部成员和社群经纪人网络位点的不同，通过相邻期社群动态追踪，划分社群结构动态配置，实证社群配置与社群创新能力间的关系。结果表明：发明者合作创新网络存在明显的社群划分，不同类型的社群动态配置对社群发明者创新影响显著不同。总体为，动态与静态相协调的社群配置优于双动或双静的社群配置，具体为，“动荡”社群创新能力最弱，“纽带”社群创新能力最强，“独立”及“固化”社群介于两者间。以促进发明者创新，政策应该有利于创新网络动态及稳定的折中。

Abstract

In innovation activities, inventors have shown a phenomenon of "hugging together", which leads to the clustering of collaborative innovation networks and forms network communities. The network community of inventors is an aggregated structural group in collaborative networks. Inventors within the same community are frequently and closely linked with each other. Community brokers locate on the periphery of a community and have a position advantage of crossing the boundaries of different communities, which are critical to transfer knowledge from outside the community into a form that can be absorbed by inventors within the community.
There is a lack of research on how the dynamic and stable structure configuration of different network loci influences innovation. Solving this problem is helpful to provide theoretical guidance for improving innovation capacity and decision supports for innovation network management. Thus, this study aims to explore how network community structure and its dynamic configuration in inventors′ collaborative innovation network influence their innovation capacity in the field of renewable energy. We stress the roles of the overall dynamic of the community and the dynamic of community brokers. Firstly, inventors′ collaborative networks are constructed based on co-inventing relationship in renewable energy patents. Then, inventors′ network communities are identified by adopting GN algorithm. Community dynamic configuration is defined through tracking communities in adjacent phases based on the dynamic difference of network loci between members within communities and community brokers. Four types of community dynamic configuration are defined, and there are independent community, rigid community, volatile community and broking community, respectively. We hypothesize that among the four types of communities, broking communities have the strongest innovation capacity, while volatile communities have the weakest innovation capacity. OLS regression analyses are used to empirically test our hypotheses and the robustness tests are carried out by using nonparametric bootstrap method.
Through this study, we aim to break through the limitations of studies on the functional mechanism of innovation networks from the static network perspective and integrate the advantages of static and dynamic networks. We contribute to the study of innovation network structure and network dynamics, enriches studies on the functional mechanism of innovation network, and expect to provide guidance and suggestions for improving inventors′ innovation capacities.
The results of GN algorithm show that there are obvious community structures in inventors′ collaborative innovation network in the renewable energy field, and network communities and communities′ brokers evolve over time and they present different dynamic configurations. Moreover, the results of OLS regressions and robustness tests show that different dynamic configuration of community has a significantly different impact on community innovation capacity. Overall, the dynamic and static harmonious community configuration is better than the dual dynamic or static community configuration. Specifically, the innovation capacity of the volatile community is weak and that of broking community is strong and that of independent community and rigid community are somewhere in between. This study emphasizes the effect of heterogeneity of community dynamic configuration on innovation of community inventors, and the policy should be conducive to the compromise of dynamic and stable structure of innovation networks, so as to promote innovation of inventors.

导出引用

刘娜嵇金星毛荐其王霄飞官建成. 发明者网络社群动态配置及对创新能力的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(9): 44-51

Liu Na, Ji Jinxing, Mao Jianqi, Wang Xiaofei, Guan Jiancheng. The dynamic configuration of inventors′ network community and its influence on innovation capacity[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(9): 44-51

参考文献

[1] SYTCH M, TATARYNOWICZ A. Exploring the locus of invention: The dynamics of network communities and firms' invention productivity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(1): 249-79.

[2] KNOKE D. Playing well together: Creating corporate social capital in strategic alliance networks[J]. American Behavioral Scientist, 2009, 52(12): 1690-708.

[3] 辛宝贵.嵌入生态产权要素的寡头博弈研究[M]. 北京：经济科学出版社，2019.

XIN Baogui. Oligopaly games with ecological property rights[M]. Beijing, Economic Science Press, 2019.

[4] WANG J, YANG N. Dynamics of collaboration network community and exploratory innovation: The moderation of knowledge networks[J]. Scientometrics, 2019, 121(2): 1067-84.

[5] 刘娜, 武宪云, 毛荐其. 发明者自我网络动态对知识搜索的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(4): 689-700.

LIU Na, WU Xianyun, MAO Jianqi. The impact of inventors' ego-networks dynamic on knowledge searching[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(4): 689-700.

[6] LIU N, GUAN J. Dynamic evolution of collaborative networks: evidence from nano-energy research in China[J]. Scientometrics, 2015, 102(3): 1895-919.

[7] GUAN J, LIU N. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 97-112.

[8] MANNAK R, MARKUS A, MEEUS M, et al. Loci of network dynamics and their impact on innovation outcomes: R&D consortia in the Dytch water sector[R]. Druid Working Paper, 2019: 1-37.

[9] 刘娜, 嵇金星, 毛荐其, 等. 发明者网络社群系统识别、结构动态及对创新绩效的影响——网络位置的双重调节作用[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2021, 38(3): 11-20.

LIU Na, JI Jinxing, MAO Jianqi, et al. System identification, structural dynamics and impacts on innovation performance of inventors’ network community[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2021, 38(3): 11-20.

[10] SCHILLING MA, PHELPS CC. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(7): 1113-26.

[11] 吕一博, 聂婧斐, 刘泉山, 等. 产业技术群体分化对创新扩散的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(5): 78-88.

LYU Yibo, NIE Jingfei. LIU Quanshan, et al. Impact of industrial technology grouping on innovation diffusion[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(5):78-88.

[12] BRESCHI S, LENZI C. The role of external linkages and gatekeepers for the renewal and expansion of US cities' knowledge base, 1990–2004[J]. Regional Studies, 2015, 49(5): 782-97.

[13] GRAF H, KRUGER JJ. The performance of gatekeepers in innovator networks[J]. Industry and Innovation, 2011, 18(1): 69-88.

[14] 汤小莉, 孙笑明, 田高良, 等. 小世界网络的动态性对企业关键研发者创造力的影响[J]. 管理工程学报, 2018, 32(4): 54-62.

TANG Xiaoli, SUN Xiaoming, TIAN Gaoliang, et al. The influence of past and current small-world characteristics on the creativity of key inventors[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2018, 32(4): 54-62.

[15] ZHANG G, DUAN H, ZHOU J. Network stability, connectivity and innovation output[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 114: 339-49.

[16] KUMAR P, ZAHEER A. Ego-network stability and innovation in alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2019, 62(3): 691-716.

[17] GULATI R, SYTCH M, TATARYNOWICZ A. The rise and fall of small worlds: Exploring the dynamics of social structure[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(2): 449-71.

[18] FLEMING L, KING III C, JUDA AI. Small worlds and regional innovation[J]. Organization Science, 2007, 18(6): 938-54.

[19] LEE GALLO J, PLUNKET A. Regional gatekeepers, inventor networks and inventive performance: Spatial and organizational channels[J]. Research Policy: 2020, 49(5): 103981.

[20] YAN Y, GUAN J. Social capital, exploitative and exploratory innovations: The mediating roles of ego-network dynamics[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2018, 126: 244-58.

[21] FERNANDEZ V, SIMO P, SALLAN JM. Turnover and balance between exploration and exploitation processes for high-performance teams[J]. Team Performance Management, 2016, 222(3/4): 204-22.

[22] AHUJA G, SODA G, ZAHEER A. The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks[J]. Organization Science, 2012, 23(2): 434-48.

[23] YOON J, OH Y, LEE J. The impact of policy consistency on technological competitiveness: A study on OECD countries[J]. Energy Policy, 2017, 108: 425-434.

[24] LIN B, ZHU J. The role of renewable energy technological innovation on climate change: Empirical evidence from China[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2019, 659: 1505-1512.

[25] NEWMAN ME, GIRVAN M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks[J]. Physical Review E, 2004, 69(2): 026113.

[26] BUBNA A, DAS SR, PRABHALA N. Venture capital communities[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2020, 55(2): 621-651.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目（71702090，2018.01—2020.12；71874176，2019.01—2022.12)；山东省社会科学规划研究优势学科项目（19BYSJ16，2019.01—2021.12）；泰山学者工程专项经费资助（Tsqn201909149，2020.01—2024.12）。