科技伦理视角下的人工智能研究

黎常; 金杨华

PDF(290 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 9-16.

论文

科技伦理视角下的人工智能研究

黎常,金杨华

作者信息 +

A research on artificial intelligence from the perspective of science and technology ethics

Li Chang, Jin Yanghua

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

人工智能在深刻影响人类社会生产生活方式的同时，也引发诸多伦理困境与挑战，建立新的科技伦理规范以推动人工智能更好服务人类，成为全社会共同关注的主题。本文从科技伦理的视角，围绕机器人、算法、大数据、无人驾驶等人工智能领域所出现的伦理主体、责任分担、技术安全、歧视与公平性、隐私与数据保护等问题，以及人工智能技术的伦理治理，对国内外相关研究成果进行回顾分析，并提出未来需要在中国情境下伦理原则与治理体系的建立、人工智能伦理研究的跨学科合作、理论分析与实践案例的融合、多元主体伦理角色分工与协作等方面进行进一步研究。

Abstract

Artificial intelligence not only affects the production and life style of human society profoundly, but also causes many ethical dilemmas and challenges. These problems cannot be solved completely by technology. As the fast iterative of technology and business models, the legislation and regulation is also difficult to keep up with the pace of technology development. Therefore, setting up new ethics of science and technology to promote better artificial intelligence service is the subject of the whole society. From the perspective of science and technology ethics, this paper reviews and analyzes relevant researches, focusing on the ethical issues in artificial intelligence fields, such as robotics, algorithms, big data and unmanned vehicle.
The research on machine ethics focuses on moral responsibility, realization of machine ethics and robot ethics. It is the core of robot ethics to realize the harmony among robot, human and nature. The emergence and governance of algorithm discrimination in algorithm ethics has become the focus of academic research and public attention. As algorithms have more and more life attributes, algorithm discrimination is the most likely ethical risk in the algorithmic decision-making process. Unmanned vehicles are faced with such ethical issues as the determination of "moral algorithm", the legal responsibility of traffic accidents and the protection of passenger privacy. Ethics has become one of the main obstacles to commercializing unmanned vehicle. Big data technology has produced a series of ethical problems, such as insufficient autonomy of data subject, vanishing boundary of individual data right, and violation of information privacy, which are generated from the source of subject, objective reasons and social background and need to be solved from the establishment of ethical principles, ethical governance system and ethical policies of big data. In many cases, the ethical issues of big data technology are essentially the ethical contradictions between users as data producers and users of big data technology. Artificial intelligence technology brings a series of ethical risks. The ethical governance of artificial intelligence technology needs to reshape ethical strategies from the perspectives of government management, technology, public and relationship, and to be based on the concept of "responsible innovation", the participation of multiple subjects and the ethical embedding of the whole process of technology development. In general, the study of artificial intelligence ethics is still in its early stage of development, and there are still deficiencies in the localization, systematization, comprehensiveness and implementability of the study, which need to be further explored with the development of artificial intelligence technology.
In the future, first of all, we should establishing the ethics principle and management system according to Chinese situation to promote the high-quality development of artificial intelligence in China. Secondly, we should promote interdisciplinary cooperation in the study of artificial intelligence ethics. Thirdly, we need to take into account the context in which different cases occur, and integrate theory analysis into practice cases to improve the pertinence and operability of artificial intelligence ethics. Fourthly, scholars generally believe that only the government, the market, social organizations, academia and other diverse subjects to participate, we should make clear the responsibility division and cooperation of multiple subjects in ethical governance. At present, how to realize the responsibility division and cooperation of multiple subjects still needs to be discussed and continuously promoted.

导出引用

黎常金杨华. 科技伦理视角下的人工智能研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(8): 9-16

Li Chang, Jin Yanghua. A research on artificial intelligence from the perspective of science and technology ethics[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(8): 9-16

参考文献

[1] 于雪,段伟文. 人工智能的伦理建构[J]. 理论探索,2019（6）:43-49.

YU Xue, DUAN Weiwen. Ethical construction of artificial intelligence[J]. Theoretical Exploration, 2019（6）:43-49.

[2] 翟振明.“强人工智能”将如何改变世界[J]. 人民论坛•学术前沿，2016（7）:22-33.

ZHAI Zhenming. How will “strong artificial intelligence” change the world? [J]. Frontiers，2016（7）：22-33.

[3] 莫宏伟. 强人工智能与弱人工智能的伦理问题思考[J]. 科学与社会,2018（1）:14-24.

MO Hongwei. Consideration of ethics issue of strong artificial intelligence and weak artificial intelligence[J]. Science and Society, 2018（1）:14-24.

[4] 段伟文. 机器人伦理的进路及其内涵[J]. 科学与社会,2015,5（2）:35-45.

DUAN Weiwen. The basic approaches and meaning in the ethical construction of robot[J]. Science and Society, 2015,5（2）:35-45.

[5] WATSON R. Self-consciousness and the rights of nonhuman animals and nature[J]. Environmental Ethics，1979,1 (2)：99-129.

[6] JOHNSON, Miller K. Un-making artificial moral agents[J]. Ethics and Information Technology,2008,10(2):123-133.

[7] WALLACH W, ALLEN C. Moral machines: Teaching robots right from wrong[M].Oxford University Press，2009.

[8] 杜严勇. 论机器人道德能力的建构[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2018（5）：43-48.

DU Yanyong. On the construction of moral competence in robots[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2018（5）：43-48.

[9] 苏令银. 能将伦理准则嵌入人工智能机器吗?——以无人驾驶汽车为例[J]. 理论探索,2018（3）：38-45.

SU Lingyin. Can ethical principles be embedded in AI machines?—take driverless car as example[J].Theoretical Exploration, 2018（3）：38-45.

[10] 杜严勇. 机器人伦理中的道德责任问题研究[J]. 科学学研究,2017（11）：1608-1813.

DU Yanyong. On the moral responsibility in robot ethics[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2017（11）：1608-1813.

[11] 杜严勇. 现代军用机器人的伦理困境[J]. 伦理学研究,2014（5）：98–102.

DU Yanyong. Ethical dilemmas of modern military robots[J]. Studies in Ethics, 2014（5）：98–102.

[12] 王亮. 社交机器人“单向度情感”伦理风险问题刍议[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2020（1）:56-61.

WANG Liang. Discussion on “unidirectional emotional” ethical risk arising from social robots[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2020（1）:56-61.

[13] MITTELSTADT, B D, ALLO P, TADDEO M, WACHTER S, & FLORIDI L. The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate[J]. Big Data & Society, 2016, 3(2):01-21.

[14] BURREL J．How the machine " thinks" : Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms[J]. Big Data &Society,2016,3( 1) : 01－12.

[15] 周涛. 大数据与人工智能的伦理挑战（上）[J]. 电子科技大学学报（社科版）,2018（5）:01-06.

ZHOU Tao. Ethical challenge brought by big data and artificial intelligence (Part 1) [J]．Journal of UESTC（Social Sciences Edition）, 2018（5）:01-06.

[16] 贾开. 人工智能与算法治理研究[J]. 中国行政管理,2019（1）:17-22.

JIA Kai. Artificial intelligence and algorithm governance research[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2019（1）:17-22.

[17] 徐圣龙.“公共的”与“存在于公共空间的”——大数据的伦理进路[J]. 哲学动态，2019（8）：86-94.

XU Shenlong. “Public” and “existing in public space” ——An ethical approach to big data[J]. Philosophical Trends, 2019（8）：86-94.

[18] 刘培，池忠军. 算法歧视的伦理反思[J]. 自然辩证法通讯，2019（10）：16-20.

LIU Pei, Chi Zhongjun. Ethical reflections on algorithmic discrimination[J]. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 2019（10）：16-20.

[19] 白惠仁. 自动驾驶汽车的“道德算法”困境［J］．科学学研究，2019（1）：18-24.

BAI Huiren. The dilemma of “moral algorithm” for automated vehicles[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019（1）：18-24.

[20] 和鸿鹏. 无人驾驶汽车的伦理困境、成因及对策分析[J]. 自然辩证法研究，2017（11）：58-62.

HE Hongpeng. An analysis of the ethical dilemma,causes and countermeasures of driveless vehicles[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2017（11）：58-62.

[21] 王珀. 无人驾驶与算法伦理：一种后果主义的算法设计伦理框架[J]. 自然辩证法研究，2018（10）：70-75.

WANG Po. Driverless technology and the ethics of algorithm: A consequential ethical framework for algorithm designing[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2018（10）：70-75.

[22] JEAN-François B, SHARIFF A, RAHWAN I. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles[J]. Science, 2016, 352(6293): 1573-1576.

[23] 黄闪闪. 无人驾驶汽车的伦理植入进路研究[J]. 理论月刊,2018（5）:182-188.

HUANG Shanshan. Research on the ethical implantation approach of driverless vehicles[J]. Theory Monthly, 2018（5）:182-188.

[24] 潘恩荣，杨嘉帆. 面向技术本身的人工智能伦理框架—以自动驾驶系统为例［J］．自然辩证法通讯,2020（3）:33-39.

PAN Enrong, YANG Jiafan. A framework of technology-oriented ethics for artificial intelligence: On self-driving systems[J]. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 2020（3）：33-39.

[25] GRUNWALD A. Societal risk constellations for autonomous driving: analysis, historical context and assessment[M]. in MAURER M, Gerdes J C, Lenz B, & Winner H. Autonomous driving: technical, legal and social aspects. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated, 2016.

[26] 安宝洋. 大数据时代的网络信息伦理治理研究[J]. 科学学研究,2015（5）:641-646.

AN Baoyang. The governance of network ethics in big data times[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015（5）：641-646.

[27] 董军，程昊. 大数据技术的伦理风险及其控制——基于国内大数据伦理问题研究的分析［J］．自然辩证法研究,2017（11）：80-85.

DONG Jun,CHENG Hao. Risks and control of big data technology: Analysis based on the research on the ethical issues of big data in China[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2017（11）：80-85.

[28] 陈仕伟. 大数据时代透明社会的伦理治理[J]. 自然辩证法研究，2019（6）：68-72.

CHENG Shiwei. On ethical governance of transparent society in big data era[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2019（6）：68-72.

[29] 张峰. 大数据时代隐私保护的伦理困境及对策[J]. 人民论坛·学术前沿，2019（15）：76-87.

ZHANG Feng. The ethical dilemma about and solutions to privacy protection in the age of big data[J]. Frontiers,2019（15）：76-87.

[30] 邱仁宗,黄雯,翟晓梅. 大数据技术的伦理问题[J]. 科学与社会，2014（1）：36-48.

QIU Renzong, HUANG Wen, ZHAI Xiaomei. Ethical issues in big data technology[J]. Science and Society, 2014（1）：36-48.

[31] 田维琳. 大数据环境对民众伦理意识的淡化与冲击[J]. 自然辩证法研究,2019（7）:23-27.

TIAN Weilin. The desalination and impact of big data environment on people’s ethical consciousness[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2019（7）:23-27.

[32] 谭九生,杨建武. 人工智能技术的伦理风险及其协同治理[J]. 中国行政管理，2019（10）：44-50.

TAN Jiusheng, YANG Jianwu. The ethical risk of artificial intelligence and its cooperative governance[J]. Chinese Public Administration, 2019（10）：44-50.

[33] 李伦，孙保学. 给人工智能一颗“良芯(良心)”——人工智能伦理研究的四个维度[J]. 教学与研究，2018（8）：72-79.

LI Lun,SUN Baoxue. Enduing artificial intelligence ‘‘moral chips(conscience)’’——Four dimensions of ethical research of artificial intelligence[J]. Teaching and Research, 2018（8）：72-79.

[34] 高奇琦. 全球善智与全球合智：人工智能全球治理的未来[J]. 世界经济与政治，2019（7）:24-48.

GAO Qiqi. Global good intelligence and collective intelligence: The normative goal of artificial intelligence in global governance[J]. World Economics and Politics, 2019（7）:24-48.

[35] 王钰，程海东. 人工智能技术伦理治理内在路径解析[J]. 自然辩证法通讯，2019（8）：87-93.

WANG Yu, CHENG Haidong. An analysis of the internal pathway of the ethics governance of artificial intelligence techniques[J]. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 2019（8）：87-93.

[36] 梅亮,吴欣桐,王伟楠. 科技创新的责任治理:从开放科学到开放社会[J]. 科研管理，2019（12）：01-10.

MEI Liang,WU Xintong,WANG Weinan. Responsible governance of scientific and technological innovation:from open science to open society[J]. Science Research Management, 2019（12）：01-10.