冗余资源与创业导向：制度环境的调节效应

王钰; 胡海青

PDF(314 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 35-42.

论文

冗余资源与创业导向：制度环境的调节效应

王钰^1,2,胡海青¹

作者信息 +

Slack resources and entrepreneurial orientation: The moderating effects of institutional environment

Wang Yu^1,2, Hu Haiqing¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在创新驱动发展的趋势下，内生资源是决定企业战略导向及获取竞争优势的重要来源，对于外部资源约束下“小而弱”的新创企业更是如此。因此，新创企业创新发展的本源必须回归企业内部，既要重视对冗余资源的开发利用，也要加强对创业导向的培育；而组织内部“资源-战略”的转化过程必然与外部制度环境息息相关。基于此，本文通过2011—2016年间252家创业板企业为研究对象，分别验证了非沉淀冗余、沉淀冗余资源对创业导向的倒U型影响；并分别以社会网络为非正式制度、以知识产权保护为正式制度的调节因素，检验了不同制度对于冗余资源与创业导向的差异化调节效果。以此完善了对资源基础观、创业机会观及制度观的整合研究。

Abstract

In the context of innovation-driven development, endogenous resource is an important source to determine both the strategic behavior and sustainable competitive advantages of enterprises, especially for the "small and weak" new ventures with external resource constraints. Therefore, the driven force of innovative development must go back to the internal of enterprises, which not only need to pay much attention to the utilization of slack resources, but also strengthen the cultivation of entrepreneurial orientation. Different from the present studies of most literatures on the post-variables such as entrepreneurial orientation and innovation performance, this paper, based on the combination of resource-based view and entrepreneurial opportunity view, explores the important pre-variables of entrepreneurial orientation-slack resources. Since the appearance of resource constraint of new ventures often conceals the fact that they do have slack resources, few studies have paid attention to the function of slack of new ventures. In fact, new ventures need more slack resources to ensure the continuity of their core business. Therefore, this paper takes the new ventures as the research object, analyzes the function value of slack resources in the enterprise more dialectically, and clarifies the non-linear effect and formation mechanism of slack resources on entrepreneurship orientation. The rational development and optimized allocation of slack resources will help to relieve the external resource constraints faced by the enterprise and help to understand the integration concept of "resource-strategy".
In addition, the current economic transformation development in China presents a diversified trend of "from planned economy to market economy, from monopoly to competition, from traditional industries to emerging industries". Therefore, another key to deepening the research on entrepreneurial orientation is to introduce relevant external situational factors to analyze the moderating effect. Enterprises do not exist in a vacuum. Institutional economics emphasizes that innovation is a process of interaction between external institutional environment and internal organization activities. As the game rules of the society, the regimes can regulate the resources allocation within the organization and the communication activities between the organizations for regimes directly determine the implementation of enterprise strategy. Therefore, due to a firm′s internal activities inevitably affected by external regimes, we respectively analysis the moderating effects of informal institution and formal institution environment on the relationship between slack resources and entrepreneurial orientation from two dimensions by social network and intellectual property protection, to deepen the understanding of different effects of internal "resource-strategy" transformation process. While giving full play to the positive guiding role of formal regime, we should also rely on the key guiding role of informal regime in resource allocation and give play to the role of market mechanism. Through the joint action of two different mechanisms, it can not only restrain the possible "policy regulation failure", but also effectively correct the potential "market regulation failure", which is of practical significance for guiding the innovation and development of new ventures.
On this basis, we take 252 GEM listed companies from 2011 to 2016 as samples, using the multiple regression model to empirically examine the relationship between slack resources and entrepreneurial orientation, and analyzes the moderating effect of social network and intellectual property protection. The results show that both unabsorbed slack and absorbed slack resources have the inverted U-shaped impact on entrepreneurial orientation. In addition, taking social network as the informal institution, and intellectual property protection as the formal institution moderating factor respectively, differential effects on slack resources and entrepreneurial orientation are tested. There are three main conclusions are drawn: (1) Slack resources accumulated by the new ventures are the key to innovation and development, however, as slack resources are accumulated beyond the threshold, enterprises will gradually show path-dependent entrepreneurial inertia, leading to inefficient or even inefficient entrepreneurial oriented behavior stagnation. (2) As an informal institution, social network strengthens the positive relationship between unabsorbed slack and entrepreneurial orientation, and also strengthens the negative relationship between them. While the positive relationship between absorbed slack and entrepreneurial orientation is strengthened, the negative relationship between them is weakened. It can be seen that new ventures embedded in social network cannot ignore the differentiation effect of network relationship on "resource-strategy", and enterprises must base on their own internal resource endowment when making innovative strategies with the help of social network. (3) The intellectual property protection, as an important formal institution, weakens the inverted u-shaped relationship between unabsorbed slack and entrepreneurial orientation, and intensifies the inverted u-shaped relationship between absorbed slack and entrepreneurial orientation. It can be seen that the intellectual property protection has different positive and negative external effects on the transformation process from internal resources precipitated in different forms to entrepreneurial behaviors. While giving full play to the "incentive effect" produced by the formal institution, enterprises must be careful of the possible "crowding out effect". To sum up, this paper proposes an integrated framework for the dynamic path of strategic management of new ventures, it not only provides a new viewpoint for the integration of enterprise strategic management theory and institutional economics, but also guiding directions for expanding the theory of organizational strategic management.

导出引用

王钰胡海青. 冗余资源与创业导向：制度环境的调节效应[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(8): 35-42

Wang Yu, Hu Haiqing. Slack resources and entrepreneurial orientation: The moderating effects of institutional environment[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(8): 35-42

参考文献

[1] WERNERFELT B. The resource-based theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5: 171-180.

[2] GEORGE G. Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(4): 661-676.

[3] SMITH K, TUSHMAN L. Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation stream [J]. Organization Science, 2005, 16: 522-536.

[4] KAPLAN S. Research in cognition and strategy: Reflection on two decades of progress and a look to the future [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2011, 48(3):665-69.

[5] SRIVASTAVA A, LEE L. Predicting order and timing of new product moves: The role of top management in corporate entrepreneurship [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2005, 20 (4): 459-48l.

[6] COVIN G, SLEVIN P. A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1991, 16 (1) :07-26.

[7] 蔡莉, 费宇鹏, 朱秀梅. 基于流程视角的创业研究框架构建[J].管理科学学报, 2006, 9 (1) : 86-95. CAI Li, FEI Yupeng, ZHU Xiumei. Establishing of the frame of entrepreneurship research based on new business creation and development process[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2006, 9 (1) : 86-95.

[7] PENG W. Institutional transitions and strategic choices [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2003, 28(2): 275-296.

[8] 徐娜娜, 徐雨森. 资源、创新网络与后发企业逆向创新的协同演化—基于海尔集团的纵向案例研究[J]. 管理评论, 2016, 28(6): 216-228. XU Nana, XU Yusen. The co-evolutional mechanism on resource, innovation network and reverse innovation of latecomer enterprise: A research on Haier group [J]. Management Review, 2016, 28(6): 216-228.

[10] SHARFMAN M P, WOLF G, CHASE R B,TANSIK D A. Antecedents of organizational slack[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1988, 13(4): 601-614.

[11] 陈晓红, 王思颖. 组织冗余与公司绩效关系研究[J]. 科研管理,2012,33(9):78-86. CHEN Xiaohong, WANG Siying. The relationship between organizational redundancy and firm performance—A modificatory role of governance institution[J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(9): 78-86.

[12] PAMELA M, JOHN R, ERIC H. Determinants of user innovation and innovation sharing in a local market [J]. Management Science, 2000, 46(12): 1513- 1527.

[13] 白景坤, 王健. 创业导向能有效克服组织惰性吗? [J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(3):492-499. BAI Jingkun, WANG Jian. Can entrepreneurial orientation overcome organizational inertia effectively? [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(3):492-499.

[14] BROMILEY P. Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(1): 37-59.

[15] SHIMIZU K, HITT A.What constrains or facilitates divestitures of formerly acquired firms? The effects of organizational inertia [J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31 (1) :50-72.

[16] BARNRY B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J]. Journal of Management, 1991,17 (1): 99-120.

[17] 金丽. 创业导向与创新绩效的关系研究—吸收能力的中介作用[D]. 沈阳: 辽宁大学, 2016. JIN Li. Research on the relationship of entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance:Absorptive capacity as a mediating variable [D]. Shenyang: Liaoning University, 2016.

[18] NORTH D C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[19] HAUSCHILD M, BECKMAN M. When do interlocks matter? alternate sources of information and interlock influence [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1998, 43(4): 815–844.

[20] OWEN J, POWELL W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community [J]. Organization Science, 2004, 15(1): 5-21.

[21] 严若森, 华小丽, 钱晶晶. 组织冗余及产权性质调节作用下连锁董事网络对企业创新投入的影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018,15(2): 217-229. QIAN Ruosen, HUA Xiaoli, QIAN Jingjing. The impact of interlocking directorate network on innovation investment with the moderation of organization slack and nature of property right [J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018, 15(2): 217-229.

[22] 陈岩, 张红霞, 王琦. 知识资源对企业创新影响的实证研究[J]. 科研管理,2018,39(11): 61-68. CHEN Yan, ZHANG Hongxia, WANG Qi. An empirical research on the relationship between knowledge resources and enterprise innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(11): 61-68.

[23] 彭正银, 廖天野. 连锁董事治理效应的实证分析—基于内在机理视角的探讨[J]. 南开管理评论, 2008, 11(1): 99-105. PENG Zhengyin, LIAO Tianye. An empirical study on the governance effect of interlocking directorates: Based on an analysis of the inherent mechanism [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2008, 11(1): 99-105.

[24] MARCO V. BAUMOL W J. The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship [J]. Journal of Economics, 2011, 103(2):199-202.

[25] ZIMMERMAN M, ZEITZ G. Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy [J].The Academy of Management Review, 2002, 27(3):414-431.

[26] BOURGEOIS J. On the measurement of organizational slack [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1981, 6(1): 29-39.

[27] WILLIANMS C, LEE H. Resource allocations, knowledge network characteristics and entrepreneurial orientation of multinational corporations [J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38 (8): 1376-1387．

[28] 杨林. 高管团队异质性、企业所有制与创业战略导向—基于中国中小企业板上市公司的经验证据[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理. 2013, 34(9): 159-171. YANG Lin. Demographical heterogeneity of top management team, corporate ownership and entrepreneurial strategic orientation: Evidence from the listed companies of the China's small and medium-sized enterprises board [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2013, 34(9): 159-171.

[29] 陈运森, 谢德仁. 董事网络：定义、特征和计量 [J]. 会计研究, 2012(3): 44-51+95. CHEN Yunsen, XIE Deren. Board network: Definition, characteristics and measurement [J]. Accounting Research, 2012 (3): 44-51+95.

[30] GINARTE J, PARK W. Determinants of patent rights: A cross-national study[J]. Research Policy, 1997 (26):283-301.

[31] 韩玉雄,李怀祖. 关于中国知识产权保护水平的定量分析[J]. 科学学研究, 2005,23 (3) : 377-382. HAN Yuxiong, LI Huaizu. Quantitative analysis for intellectual property protection level of China [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2005,23 (3) : 377-382.

[32] 董雪兵, 朱慧, 康继军, 宋顺峰. 转型期知识产权保护制度的增长效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012 (8): 04-17. DONG Xuebing, ZHU Hui, KANG Jijun, SONG Shunfeng. The effect of intellectual property rights protection system on Chinese economic growth during transition period [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012 (8): 04-17.

[33] SHEN G. Nominal level and actual strength of China’s intellectual property protection under TRIPS agreement [J]. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 2010 (3) : 71-88.

[34] 史宇鹏, 顾全林. 知识产权保护、异质性企业与创新:来自中国制造业的证据[J]. 金融研究, 2013(8):136-149. SHI Yupeng, GU Quanlin. Protection of intellectual property rights, heterogeneous firms and innovation: Evidence from China’s scale manufacturing enterprises[J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2013(8):136-149.

[35] 吴超鹏, 唐菂. 知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效—来自中国上市公司的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2016 (11): 125-139. WU Chaopeng, TANG Di. Intellectual property rights enforcement, corporate innovation and operating performance: Evidence from China’s listed companies[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016 (11): 125-139.

基金

国家自然基金面上项目：“创业孵化链支持下创业企业生态位提升机理、跃迁条件及路径研究”（7207020589，2021.01—2024.12）；“孵化网络治理机制、网络负效应对网络绩效的影响机理研究”（71672144，2017.01—2020.12）；陕西省软科学研究计划重点项目：“瞪羚企业成长路径与培育策略研究”（2019KRZ007，2019.05—2020.12）；西安外国语大学校级项目：“制度转型情境对新创企业绩效的影响效应研究”（20XWC13，2020.07—2022.07）。