制造业服务化、知识资本与技术创新

陈伟; 陈银忠; 杨柏

PDF(354 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 17-25.

论文

制造业服务化、知识资本与技术创新

陈伟^1,2，陈银忠³，杨柏^1,2

作者信息 +

Manufacturing servicization, knowledge capital and technological innovation

Chen Wei^1,2, Chen Yinzhong³, Yang Bai^1,2#br#

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

基于技术创新理论与知识资本理论，首先从理论上深入探讨了制造业服务化对技术创新的直接影响机制，以及基于知识资本的中介作用机制，其中将知识资本界定为研发资本、人力资本和创新设施资本三个维度，之后利用2000—2014年中国制造业行业面板数据进行了实证检验。研究结果表明：从直接影响机制看，制造业服务化对技术创新具有显著的正向影响，但该影响效应存在着行业异质性；从制造业行业异质性视角看，制造业服务化对劳动密集型制造业技术创新的影响并不显著，对资本密集型和技术密集型制造业技术创新的影响却是显著的，但影响效应不存在着差异性；从服务要素投入行业异质性视角看，低端服务要素投入对技术创新的服务化效应具有显著的负向影响，而高端服务要素投入则具有显著的正向影响。从中介作用机制看，研发资本、人力资本和创新设施资本是制造业服务化影响技术创新的中介作用渠道，其中创新设施资本的中介作用效应最大，研发资本的中介作用效应最小。

Abstract

The development of China′s manufacturing industry is facing the dilemma of "low-end locking and high-end blockade". Under the realistic background of "new normalcy" and "three-stage superposition" in Chinese economic development, how to get rid of the predicament and accelerate the transformation and upgrading is an important issue that needs solving urgently in the development of China′s manufacturing industry. "Innovation driven" is an important principle for the transformation and upgrading of China′s manufacturing industry and the realization of high-quality development. As the core content of "innovation driven", technological innovation has naturally become an important activity for China′s manufacturing industry to transform and upgrade and enhance its competitiveness. In order to comply with the trend of global manufacturing development, manufacturing servicization has become an important strategy for the development of manufacturing industry. With the acceleration on China′s manufacturing servicization, what is the impact of manufacturing servicization on technological innovation? How does it work? What is the impact of different types of manufacturing industry and service input on technological innovation in manufacturing industry? How does service, represented by knowledge capital, works between manufacturing servicization and technological innovation? At present, there are still few documents to discuss these issues in depth, but it is of great practical significance to correctly understand the internal relationship between manufacturing servicization and technological innovation and to scientifically build a new engine of manufacturing transformation and upgrading driven by "servicization" and "technological innovation". Based on all above, the main contents of this paper are as follows:
The first part is the analysis of influence mechanism. Firstly, combined with the connotation of manufacturing servicization, this paper analyzes the impact of manufacturing servicization on technological innovation from the aspects of resource reallocation, factor substitution and technology spillover. Secondly, considering the heterogeneity of manufacturing industry and its service input, this paper not only analyzes the impact of manufacturing servicization on technological innovation which is among different types of manufacturing industry, but also analyzes the impact of different service input elements on technological innovation in manufacturing industry. The manufacturing industry is divided into labor intensive, capital intensive and technology intensive. And the input factors of service mainly divided into high-end service elements and low-end service elements. Finally, based on the theory of technological innovation and knowledge capital, this paper analyzes mediating mechanisms when manufacturing servicization affects technological innovation.
The second part is empirical test. Based on the panel data of China′s manufacturing industry from 2000 to 2014, considering the heterogeneity of manufacturing industry and its service input, this paper empirically tests the theoretical hypothesis. The results are as follows: First, from the perspective of direct mechanism, manufacturing servicization has a significant positive impact on technological innovation, however, there is industry heterogeneity in this effect; Second, from the perspective of manufacturing industry heterogeneity, the impact of manufacturing servicization on labor intensive manufacturing technology innovation is not significant, but the impact on capital intensive and technology intensive manufacturing technology innovation is significant, but there is no difference in the influence effect; Third, from the perspective of industry heterogeneity of service factor input, low-end service factor input has a significant negative impact on technological innovation, while high-end service factor has a significant positive impact; Fourth, from the perspective of the mechanism, R&D capital, human capital and innovation facility capital are the channels of manufacturing servicization influencing technological innovation, the mediation effect of innovation facility capital is the largest, and the mediation effect of R&D capital is the least.
The third part is the research inspiration. Basing on the above research conclusions, we can get enlightenment as follows: First, take the deepening construction of Free Trade Zone as an opportunity to accelerate the development of service industry; Second, lower the access threshold and constantly improve the market environment for the flow of service factors; Third, actively guide the enterprises of labor intensive manufacturing to carry out digital and intelligent transformation with the help of the new revolution of scientific and technological.

导出引用

陈伟陈银忠杨柏. 制造业服务化、知识资本与技术创新[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(8): 17-25

Chen Wei, Chen Yinzhong, Yang Bai. Manufacturing servicization, knowledge capital and technological innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(8): 17-25

参考文献

[1]. NEELY A. Exploring the financial consequences of the servitization of manufacturing[J]. Operations Management Research, 2008, 1(2): 103-118.

[2]. KASTALLI I V, LOOY B V. Servitization: Disentangling the impact of service business model innovation on manufacturing firm performance[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2013, 31(4): 169-180.

[3]. 陈丽娴, 沈鸿. 制造业服务化如何影响企业绩效和要素结构—基于上市公司数据的PSM-DID实证分析[J]. 经济学动态, 2017, 58(5): 64-77.

CHEN Lixian, SHEN Hong. How does manufacturing servitization affect firm performance and factor structure - An empirical analysis of PSM-DID based on the data of listed companies[J]. Economic Perspectives, 2017, 58(5): 64-77.

[4]. 刘斌, 魏倩, 吕越, 祝坤福. 制造业服务化与价值链升级[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(3): 151-162.

LIU Bin, WEI Qian, LYU Yue, ZHU Kunfu. Servitization of manufacturing and value chain upgrading[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(3): 151-162.

[5]. 胡昭玲, 夏秋, 孙广宇. 制造业服务化、技术创新与产业结构转型升级—基于WIOD跨国面板数据的实证研究[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2017, 33(12): 04-21.

HU Zhaoling, XIA Qiu, SUN Guangyu. Servitization, technological innovation and industrial structure upgrading of manufacturing industry-Multinational empirical research based on the data of WIOD[J]. International Economics and Trade Research, 2017, 33(12): 04-21.

[6]. 王向进, 杨来科, 钱志权. 制造业服务化、高端化升级与碳减排[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2018, 34(7): 35-48.

WANG Xiangjin, YANG Laike, QIAN Zhiquan. Servitization and high-end upgrading of manufacturing industry and carbon emission reduction[J]. International Economics and Trade Research, 2018, 34(7): 35-48.

[7]. 杨水利, 杨祎. 技术创新模式对全球价值链分工地位的影响[J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12): 11-20.

YANG Shuili, YANG Yi. Effect of technological innovation models on global value chains status[J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 11-20.

[8]. 姚战琪. 制造业服务化对中国制造业参与全球价值链的影响[J]. 哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2019, 21(4): 126-133+2.

YAO Zhanqi. The impact of manufacturing services on China’s manufacturing industry’s participation in global value chain[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 2019, 21(4): 126-133+2.

[9]. ARNOLD J M, MATTOO A, NARCISO G. Services inputs and firm productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from firm-level data[J]. Journal of African Economies, 2008, 17(4): 578-599.

[10]. 顾乃华. 工业投入服务化: 形成机制、经济效应及其区域差异—基于投入产出数据和HLM模型的实证研究[J]. 产业经济研究, 2010, 19(3): 23-30.

GU Naihua. Servicing formation mechanism, economic effects and their regional differences: An empirical study based on input-output data and HLM models[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2010, 19(3): 23-30.

[11]. EVANGELISTA R, LUCCHESE M, MELICIANI V. Business services and the export performances of manufacturing industries[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2015, 25(5): 959-981.

[12]. 吕越, 李小萌, 吕云龙. 全球价值链中的制造业服务化与企业全要素生产率[J]. 南开经济研究, 2017, 36(3): 88-110.

LYU Yue, LI Xiaomeng, LYU Yunlong. Servicification in global value chain and firm’s productivity[J]. Nankai Economic Studies, 2017, 36(3): 88-110.

[13]. 王岚. 投入服务化是否提高了中国制造业全要素生产率[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2020, 46(2): 29-43.

WANG Lan. Does servicification enhance the total factor productivity of manufacturing industries in China?[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2020, 46(2): 29-43.

[14]. 吕云龙, 吕越. 制造业出口服务化与国际竞争力—基于增加值贸易的视角[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2017, 43(5): 25-34.

LYU Yunlong, LYU Yue. Servitization of manufacturing export and international competitiveness-Based on the perspective of value added trade[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2017, 43(5): 25-34.

[15]. 马盈盈, 盛斌. 制造业服务化与出口技术复杂度: 基于贸易增加值视角的研究[J]. 产业经济研究, 2018, 27(4): 1-13+87.

MA Yingying, SHENG Bin. Servitization of manufacturing and export sophistication: From the perspective of trade added value[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2018, 27(4): 1-13+87.

[16]. 耿伟, 王亥园. 制造业投入服务化与中国出口企业加成率[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019, 45(4): 92-108.

GENG Wei, WANG Haiyuan. Input servitization in manufacturing and exporters’ markup: Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Journal of International Trade, 2019, 45(4): 92-108.

[17]. 祝树金, 谢煜, 段凡. 制造业服务化、技术创新与企业出口产品质量[J]. 经济评论, 2019, 40(6): 3-16.

ZHU Shujin, XIE Yu, DUAN Fan. Manufacturing servitization, technological innovation and quality of export products[J]. Economic Review, 2019, 40(6): 3-16.

[18]. 潘安, 郝瑞雪, 王迎. 制造业服务化、技术创新与全球价值链分工地位[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2020, 36(10): 104-113.

PAN An, HAO Ruixue, WANG Ying. Servitization of manufacturing, technological innovation and division status in global value chain[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2020, 36(10): 104-113.

[19]. VANDERMERWE S, RADA J. Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services[J]. European Management Journal, 1998, 6(4): 314-324.

[20]. HUR J. Research article on “services, trade and global value chains” services global value chain in Korea[J]. Southeast Asian Economies, 2020, 36(3): 424-445.

[21]. 石学刚, 齐二石, 姜宏. 制造业服务化对提升制造型企业创新能力的作用研究[J]. 天津大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 14(4): 295-299.

SHI Xuegang, QI Ershi, JIANG Hong. Function of manufacturing servitization on improving the innovative capability of manufacturing enterprise[J]. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Sciences), 2012, 14(4): 295-299.

[22]. 刘维刚, 倪红福. 制造业投入服务化与企业技术进步: 效应及作用机制[J]. 财贸经济, 2018, 39(8): 126-140.

LIU Weigang, NI Hongfu. Service input of manufacturing and enterprise technological progress: Effects and mechanism[J]. Finance & Trade Economics, 2018, 39(8): 126-140.

[23]. 孙林岩, 高杰, 朱春燕, 李刚, 何哲. 服务型制造: 新型的产品模式与制造范式[J]. 中国机械工程, 2008, 30(21): 2600-2604+2608.

SUN Linyan, GAO Jie, ZHU Chunyan, LI Gang, HE Zhe. Service-oriented manufacturing: A new product mode and manufacturing paradigm[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 30(21): 2600-2604+2608.

[24]. 邹国伟, 纪祥裕, 胡晓丹, 胡品平. 服务贸易开放能否带来制造业服务化水平的提升?[J]. 产业经济研究, 2018, 27(6): 62-74.

ZOU Guowei, JI Xiangyu, HU Xiaodan, HU Pinping. Does service trade opening promote the servitization of manufacturing industry?[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2018, 27(6): 62-74.

[25]. 陈艳莹, 原毅军, 袁鹏. 中国高端服务业的内涵、特征与界定[J]. 大连理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2011, 32(3): 20-26.

CHEN Yanying, YUAN Yijun, YUAN Peng. The concept, features and definition of high-end service[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences), 2011, 32(3): 20-26.

[26]. GRILICHES Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J]. Bell Journal of Economics, 1979, 10(1): 92-116.

[27]. GRILICHES Z. R&D and productivity: The econometric evidence[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998.

[28]. GOH T. Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organisation[J]. International Journal of Manpower, 2000, 21(1): 60-70.

[29]. GUELLEC D, POTTERIE B V P. R&D and productivity growth: A panel data analysis of 16 OECD countries[J]. OECD Economic Studies, 2001, 33 (11): 103-126.

[30]. ZHU L, JEON B N. International R&D spillovers: Trade, FDI and information technology as spillover channels[J]. Review of International Economics, 2007, 15(5): 955-976.

[31]. MADSEN J B. Semi-endogenous versus schumpeterian growth models: Testing the knowledge production function using international data[J]. Journal of Economic Growth, 2008, 13(1): 01-26.

[32]. 程惠芳, 陈超. 开放经济下知识资本与全要素生产率—国际经验与中国启示[J]. 经济研究, 2017, 52(10): 21-36.

CHENG Huifang, CHEN Chao. A study on knowledge capital and total factor productivity under open economy: International evidence and implication for China[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2017, 52(10): 21-36.

[33]. 余东华, 王必好. 技术创新效率的内生性与随机变动效应研究—要素投入中知识资本与人力资本的差异化影响[J]. 南方经济, 2020, 38(1): 76-94.

YU Donghua, WANG Bihao. The research on the endogenous of the technology innovation productivity and the stochastic change effect: The differential affection of the knowledge capital and human resource investment[J]. South China Journal of Economics, 2020, 38(1): 76-94.

[34]. 周亚虹, 贺小丹, 沈瑶. 中国工业企业自主创新的影响因素和产出绩效研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012, 47(5): 107-119.

ZHOU Yahong, HE Xiaodan, SHEN Yao. An evaluation of the efficiency of Chinese industry enterprises' innovation performance[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2012, 47(5): 107-119.

[35]. 黄群慧, 霍景东. 全球制造业服务化水平及其影响因素—基于国际投入产出数据的实证分析[J]. 经济管理, 2014, 36(1): 1-11.

HUANG Qunhui, HUO Jingdong. The servitization intensity of manufacturing and its influencing factors: Based on the world input-output data analysis[J]. Economic Management, 2014, 36(1): 1-11.

[36]. 刁莉, 朱琦. 生产性服务进口贸易对中国制造业服务化的影响[J]. 中国软科学, 2018, 33(8): 49-57.

DIAO Li, ZHU Qi. The impact of producer services import on China’s service-oriented manufacturing[J]. China Soft Science, 2018, 33(8): 49-57.

[37]. 戴翔. 中国制造业出口内涵服务价值演进及因素决定[J]. 经济研究, 2016, 51(9): 44-57+174.

DAI Xiang. Evolution and determinants of service added value embodied in China's manufactured exports[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(9): 44-57+174.

基金

国家社会科学基金项目：“项目导向型供应链创新生态系统的构建机理与治理机制研究”(18CGL003，2018.06—2021.12)；重庆市自然科学基金项目：“基于知识流动的项目导向型供应链创新生态系统价值演化及仿真研究”(cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0864，2020.07—2023.06)；重庆市教育委员会人文社科项目：“项目导向型供应链协同创新生态系统的演化机理与稳定性评价”(19SKGH080，2019.06—2021.06)。