高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的“双刃剑”作用：业务多元化视角

孙玥璠; 张琦; 张永冀

PDF(358 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 141-149.

论文

高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的“双刃剑”作用：业务多元化视角

孙玥璠¹，张琦¹，张永冀²

作者信息 +

The double-edged sword effects of top management team faultline on enterprise substantive innovation: A study from the business diversification perspective

Sun Yuefan¹, Zhang Qi¹, Zhang Yongji²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本文基于业务多元化视角，系统地检验了高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的“双刃剑”作用。研究发现：（1）在专业化经营模式下，高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新具有显著的正向作用；（2）在相关业务多元化经营模式下，高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新具有显著的正向作用；（3）在非相关业务多元化经营模式下，高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新具有显著的负向作用；（4）拓展性分析发现：当相关业务多元化程度越高时，高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的正向作用越强，当非相关业务多元化程度越高时，高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的负向作用越强；以及在不同业务多元化经营模式下，高管团队断裂带对企业策略性创新的影响与高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的影响存在差异性。本文丰富了企业实质性创新影响因素研究，且对于企业管理者的聘任决策、团队结构的合理设置等有重要参考价值。

Abstract

Based on the perspective of business diversification, this paper uses the micro data of non-financial A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2009 to 2018 to examines the characteristics of the top management team faultline, which causes the difference of subgroups, and systematically tests the influence mechanism of the double-edged sword effects of top management team faultline on the substantive innovation of enterprises.
The research shows that: (1) Under the specialized business model, the top management team faultline has a significant positive impact on the substantive innovation of enterprises; (2) Under the related business diversification model, the top management team faultline has a significant positive impact on the substantive innovation of enterprises; (3) Under the unrelated business diversification model, the top management team faultline has a significant negative impact on the substantive innovation of enterprises; (4) Further research shows that when the related business is more diversified, the stronger the positive impact of the top management team faultline on the substantive innovation of enterprises, when the unrelated business is more diversified, the stronger the negative impact of the top management team faultline on the substantive innovation of enterprises; Moreover, under different business diversification modes, the impact of the top management team faultline on the strategic innovation of enterprises is different from the impact of the top management team faultline on the substantive innovation of enterprises. This paper enriches the research on the influencing factors of enterprise substantive innovation, and has important reference value for the appointment decision of enterprise managers and the reasonable setting of team structure.
This paper may contribute in the following aspects: Firstly, there is not much research on the substantive innovation of enterprises in the existing research, it is rarer to see the research on the substantive innovation of enterprises by the top management team faultline. This paper enriches the research on the factors affecting the substantive innovation of enterprises from the perspective of the top management team faultline, provides a new direction for the follow-up research on the substantive innovation of enterprises, and enriches the literature in this field. Secondly, this paper explores the double-edged sword effect of the top management team faultline on the substantive innovation of enterprises from the perspective of business diversification, and effectively expands the deep driving factors of the double-edged sword of the top management team faultline. Thirdly, it provides a more detailed reference for building the diversity of the top management team and improving the structure of the top management team. In other words, the enterprise needs to reasonably arrange the top management team personnel structure and match the diversified characteristics of the business, instead of blindly pursuing the diversity of team members.
Based on concrete empirical data, this paper provides strategic support for enterprises to construct and improve the governance structure of the top management team, and provides important countermeasures and suggestions for enterprises to develop and utilize human resources. For example, enterprises should arrange the structure of the top management team based on the characteristics of business structure, not blindly pursue the diversity of team members, and set a reasonable level of team structure to match the characteristics of the enterprise′s business operation. When nominating top management team members, enterprises should not only consider the individual abilities of the top management team members, but also pay full attention to the team faultline caused by the differences in educational level, professional background, social capital and other characteristics of team members. At the same time, when the individual abilities of candidate members of the top management team meet the requirements of the enterprise, attention should also be paid to the overall cognitive diversity of the top management team after the appointment of candidate members of the top management team, so as to make full use of the cognitive diversity and difference caused by the intensity of the top management faultline. In addition, this paper is conducive to a comprehensive understanding of the factors affecting the construction of enterprises′ substantive innovation capacity, and has important guiding significance for enterprises to select appropriate related and unrelated business diversification and to enhance their substantive innovation capacity.

导出引用

孙玥璠张琦张永冀. 高管团队断裂带对企业实质性创新的“双刃剑”作用：业务多元化视角[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(8): 141-149

Sun Yuefan, Zhang Qi, Zhang Yongji. The double-edged sword effects of top management team faultline on enterprise substantive innovation: A study from the business diversification perspective[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(8): 141-149

参考文献

[1] 徐欣, 唐清泉. 财务分析师跟踪与企业R&D活动——来自中国证券市场的研究 [J]. 金融研究, 2010(12): 173-189.

XU Xin, TANG Qingquan. Financial analyst tracking and corporate R&D activity: A study from the Chinese securities market [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2010(12): 173-189.

[2] 金永红, 蒋宇思, 奚玉芹. 风险投资参与、创新投入与企业价值增值 [J].科研管理, 2016, 37 (9): 59-67.

JIN Yonghong, JIANG Yusi, XI Yuqin. Venture capital, innovation investment and corporate value-adding [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37 (9): 59-67.

[3] 钟凯, 程小可, 肖翔, 郑立东. 宏观经济政策影响企业创新投资吗——基于融资约束与融资来源视角的分析 [J]. 南开管理评论, 2017, 20(6): 04-14+63.

ZHONG Kai, CHENG Xiaoke, XIAO Xiang, ZHENG Lidong. Do macroeconomic policies affect corporate innovation investment? Evidence from financing constraints and financing sources [J]. Nankai Business Review, 2017, 20(6): 04-14+63.

[4] 庄新霞, 欧忠辉, 周小亮, 朱祖平. 风险投资与上市企业创新投入:产权属性和制度环境的调节 [J]. 科研管理, 2017, 38(11): 48-56.

ZHUANG Xinxia, OU Zhonghui, ZHOU Xiaoliang, ZHU Zuping. Venture capital and innovation investment in listed firms: Moderating effects of property rights and institutional environment [J]. Science Research Management, 2017, 38(11): 48-56.

[5] 余明桂, 范蕊, 钟慧洁. 中国产业政策与企业技术创新 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2016(12): 05-22.

YU Minggui, FAN Rui, ZHONG Huijie. Chinese industrial policy and corporate technological innovation [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2016(12): 05-22.

[6] 冯根福, 温军. 中国上市公司治理与企业技术创新关系的实证分析 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2008(7): 91-101.

FENG Genfu, WEN Jun. An empirical study on relationship between corporate governance and technical innovation of Chinese listed companies [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2008(7): 91-101.

[7] 李文贵, 余明桂. 民营化企业的股权结构与企业创新 [J]. 管理世界, 2015(4): 112-125.

LI Wengui, YU Minggui. Ownership structure and enterprise innovation of privatized enterprises [J]. Management World, 2015(4): 112-125.

[8] 马富萍, 郭晓川. 高管团队异质性与技术创新绩效的关系研究——以高管团队行为整合为调节变量 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2010, 31(12): 186-191.

MA Fuping, GUO Xiaochuan. A study on the correlation between heterogeneity of TMT and technological innovation performance-The moderating role of behavioral integration of TMT [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. , 2010, 31(12): 186-191.

[9] 肖挺, 刘华, 叶芃. 高管团队异质性与商业模式创新绩效关系的实证研究:以服务行业上市公司为例 [J]. 中国软科学, 2013(8): 125-135.

XIAO Ting, LIU Hua, YE Peng. An empirical study on relation between TMT heterogeneity and business model innovation performance: Evidence from listed service firms [J]. China Soft Science, 2013(8): 125-135.

[10] 包莉丽, 何少奎, 何威风, 尹顺秋, 杨昀. 高管团队背景特征影响企业技术创新绩效的理论分析 [J]. 财会通讯, 2020(18): 09-11+38.

BAO Lili, HE Shaokui, HE Weifeng, YIN Shunqiu, YANG Yun. A theoretical analysis of the influence of the background characteristics of top management team on the performance of technological innovation [J]. Communication of Finance and Accounting, 2020(18): 09-11+38.

[11] FINKELSTEIN S, HAMBRICK D C, CANNELLA A A. Strategic leadership: Theory and research on executives, top management teams, and boards [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, USA, 2008.

[12] 林明, 鞠芳辉 ,任浩. 高管团队任务断裂带对探索性创新“双刃剑”作用——CEO特征的调节效应 [J]. 科研管理, 2019, 40(12): 253-261.

LIN Ming, JU Fanghui, REN Hao. The double-edged sword effects of task-related top management team faultline on exploratory innovations—The moderating role of CEO characteristics [J]. Science Research Management, 2019, 40(12): 253-261.

[13] 林明, 戚海峰, 鞠芳辉. 国企高管团队任务断裂带、混合股权结构与创新绩效 [J]. 科研管理, 2018, (8): 26-33.

LIN Ming, QI Haifeng, JU Fanghui. Task-related top management team faultline, mixed-ownership structure and innovation performance in state-owned companies [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, (8): 26-33.

[14] 黎文靖, 郑曼妮. 实质性创新还是策略性创新？——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响 [J]. 经济研究, 2016(4): 60-73．

LI Wenjing, ZHENG Manni. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation? ——Impact of macroeconomic policies on micro-enterprises' innovation [J]. Economic Research Journal，2016 (4): 60 -73.

[15] 邢会, 王飞, 高素英. 战略性新兴产业政策促进企业实质性创新了吗?——基于“寻租”调节效应的视角 [J]. 产经评论, 2019, 10(1): 86-99.

XING Hui, WANG Fei, GAO Suying. Does strategic emerging industry policy promote substantial innovation?——Based on the perspective of rent-seeking theory [J]. Industrial Economic Review, 2019, 10(1): 86-99.

[16] LAU D C, MURNIGHAN J K. Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(2): 325-340.

[17] THATCHER S M B, JEHN K A, ZANUTTO E. Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance [J]. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2003, 12(3): 217-241.

[18] BEZRUKOVA K, JEHN K A, ZANUTTO E L, et al. Do workgroup faultlines help of hurt? A moderated model of faultlines, team identification, and group performance [J]. Organization Science, 2009, 20(1): 35-50.

[19] HAMBRICK D C, MASON P A. Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1984, 9(2): 193-206.

[20] BANTEL K A, JACKSON S E. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? [J]. Strategic Management Joumal, 1989, 10: 107-124.

[21] HARRSION David A, KLEIN, Katherine J. What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2007, 32(4): 1199-1228.

[22] 潘清泉, 唐刘钊, 韦慧民. 高管团队断裂带、创新能力与国际化战略——基于上市公司数据的实证研究 [J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2015, 36(10): 111-122.

PAN Qingquan, TANG Liuzhao, WEI Huimin. Top management team faultlines, innovation capability and internationalization strategy: An empirical study: Based on the panel data of listed company [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. , 2015, 36(10): 111-122.

[23] LI J, HAMBRICK D C. Factional groups: A new vantage on demographic faultlines, conflict, and disintegrationin work teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005, 48(5): 794-813.

[24] 孙玥璠, 陈爽, 张永冀. 高管团队异质性、群体断裂带与企业风险承担 [J]. 管理评论, 2019, 31(8): 157-168.

SUN Yuefan, CHEN Shuang, ZHANG Yongji. Top management team heterogeneity, faultlines and corporate risk-taking [J]. Management Review, 2019, 31(8): 157-168.

[25] 梁上坤, 徐灿宇, 王瑞华. 董事会断裂带与公司股价崩盘风险 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2020(03): 155-173.

LIANG Shangkun, XU Canyu, WANG Ruihua. Board faultlines and stock price crash risk[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2020(03): 155-173.

[26] BYRNE D E. The attraction paradigm [M]. New York: Academic Press, 1971.

[27] TAJFEL H.The social identity theory of intergroup behavior [J]. Psychology of Intergroup Relations, 1986, 13(3): 7-24.

[28] ANSOFF H I. Corporate strategy: An analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion [M]. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965.

[29] THOMAS Hutzschenreuter, JULIAN Horstkotte. Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification [J]. 2013, 34(6): 704-726.

[30] 吕贤杰, 陶锋. 相关与非相关多元化经营抑制了实质性创新吗 [J]. 科技进步与对策, 2020, 37(19): 96-104.

LYU Xianjie, TAO Feng. Do related and unrelated diversification inhibit substantial innovation [J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2020, 37(19): 96-104.

[31] 毕静煜, 谢恩. 伙伴社会价值对企业突破性创新的影响研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(1): 67-77.

BI Jingyu, XIE En. A research on the impact of partner's social value on firms' critical innovation [J]. Science Research Management 2021, 42(1): 67-77.

[32] TAN Y, TIAN X, ZHANG C X, et al. Privatization and innovation: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural experience in China [J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2014.

[33] Berry C H. Corporate growth and diversification [M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.

[34] 徐辉, 周孝华. 外部治理环境、产融结合与企业创新能力——基于中国上市公司参股金融机构的实证研究 [J]. 科研管理, 2020, 41(1): 98-107.

XU Hui, ZHOU Xiaohua. A research on the impact of external governance environment and financial-industrial integration on enterprise innovation ability [J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41(1): 98-107.