科技向善：基于竞争战略导向的企业创新行为研究

杨淼; 雷家骕

PDF(619 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8) : 1-8.

论文

科技向善：基于竞争战略导向的企业创新行为研究

杨淼¹,雷家骕²

作者信息 +

Science and technology for social good: A study of enterprise innovation behaviors based on competitive strategy orientation

Yang Miao¹, Lei jiasu²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本文将科技向善定位为一种基于竞争性战略导向的企业创新行为。通过回顾技术伦理、负责任的研究与创新、社会创新创业、企业生态化战略、颠覆式技术创新异化、企业社会责任等相关理论，对腾讯公司提出的科技向善概念从经济学和管理学角度提出具体的研究内容。首先对科技向善概念从理念、行为、内容和制度四个维度进行解析，进而尝试构建企业科技向善量表，提出可能的问卷题项，最终提出建立企业科技向善行为的过程模型，从质性和量化质性两个角度对企业科技向善行为对企业绩效水平的影响开展研究，并给出未来值得深入研究的重要问题。本文研究内容对推动科技向善从理念向实践转化，成为数字经济时代下企业的常规战略选择，对于创新理论的补充完善、企业数字化转型的成功实践、数字技术的合理运用、产业创新政策的调整变革等内容具有重要的理论研究和现实指导意义。

Abstract

This paper defines science and technology for social good as a kind of enterprise innovation behavior based on competitive strategy orientation. By reviewing the relevant theories of Technology Ethics, Responsible Research and Innovation, Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Enterprise Ecological Strategy, Disruptive Technology Innovation Alienation, Corporate Social Responsibility, this paper puts forward the specific research content of the concept of science and technology for social good proposed by Tencent from the perspective of economics and management. Firstly, this paper analyzes the concept of science and technology for social good from four dimensions：Concept, Behavior, Content and System, and then attempts to build a scale of science and technology for social good of enterprises, puts forward possible questionnaire items. Finally, it proposes to establish a process model of Science and technology for social good behavior of enterprises and studies the impact of the behavior on enterprise performance from qualitative and quantitative qualitative perspectives and gives some important issues worthy of further study in the future, including six specific problems in five aspects: ecological level, strategic level, resource level, technical level and boundary level. The specific problems are the business ecosystem of science and technology for social good, the relationship between science and technology for social good behavior and competitive advantage, organizational resilience, the adaptability of science and technology for social good behavior and strategic choice and cultural construction, the relationship between science and technology for social good behavior and resource management, the relationship between science and technology for social good behavior and technological heterogeneity, and the situational research of science and technology for social good behavior. The main conclusions are as follows:The concept of "science and technology for social good" is defined as that the enterprise embeds the concept of ethics into the design and production of technology products and services, and actively uses responsible innovative technology to solve social problems such as improving health status, improving the quality of education, promoting social equity and promoting environmental protection. The concept can be explained from four dimensions: Concept, Behavior, Content and System.The development of the scale lays the measurement foundation for the construction of the process model of the enterprise′s scientific and technological for social good behavior. The process model of the enterprise′s scientific and technological for social good behavior has guiding significance for understanding the dynamic evolution law of scientific and technological for social good behavior, mutual verification with the conclusions of the case study and improving the universality of the theoretical model based on the case study method.The research content of this paper has important theoretical research and practical significance to promote the transformation of science and technology for social good from idea to practice and become the conventional strategic choice set by enterprises in the era of digital economy. It is also of great significance for theoretical research and practical guidance for the supplement and perfection of innovation theory, successful practice of digital transformation of enterprises, rational application of digital technology, adjustment and reform of industrial innovation policies.

导出引用

杨淼雷家骕. 科技向善：基于竞争战略导向的企业创新行为研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(8): 1-8

Yang Miao, Lei jiasu. Science and technology for social good: A study of enterprise innovation behaviors based on competitive strategy orientation[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(8): 1-8

参考文献

[1]王佑镁，宛平，赵文竹，柳晨晨.科技向善：国际“人工智能+教育”发展新路向——解读《教育中的人工智能：可持续发展的机遇和挑战》[J].开放教育研究，2019，25（5）：23-32.

WANG Youmei, WAN Ping, ZHAO Wenzhu, LIU Chenchen. Science and technology for social good: A new development direction of international "Artificial Intelligence+Education" -- Interpretation of "Artificial intelligence in Education: opportunities and challenges for sustainable development" [J]. Open education research, 2019, 25 (5): 23-32.

[2]BARNETT M L.An attention based view of real options reasoning[J].Academy of Management Review,2008,33(3):606-628.

[3]ZHOU K Z,CHI K Y,TSE D K.The effects of strategic orientations on technology and market based break through innovations[J].Journal of Marketing,2005,69(2):42-60.

[4]张妍，魏江，朱子君.中小型医药企业战略导向与产品创新绩效：一个多案例研究[J].中国科技论坛，2019（7）：138-144.

ZHANG Yan, WEI Jiang, ZHU Zijun. Strategic orientation and product innovation performance of small and medium-sized pharmaceutical enterprises: A multi case study[J].China Science and Technology Forum, 2019 (7): 138-144.

[5]KURUCZ E C,COLBERT B A,WHEELER D.The business case for corporate social responsibility in Crane[M].The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility,Oxford: Oxford University Press,2008.

[6]张卫.道德物化：技术伦理的新思路[N].中国社会科学报，2016-1-19（890）.

ZHANG Wei. Moral materialization: A new idea of technological ethics[N].China Social Science Journal, 2016-1-19（890）.

[7]王飞.伦克的技术伦理思想评介[J].自然辩证法研究,2008(3)：57-63.

WANG Fei. A review of Lunke's thoughts on technological ethics[J].Dialectics of Nature,2008 (3): 57-63.

[8]张新樟，汪健达.技术伦理如何避开人类中心主义和生物中心主义——约纳斯《责任的命令：寻求技术时代的伦理》解读[J].自然辩证法研究，2007（08）:06-10.

ZHANG Xinzhang, WANG Jianda. How to avoid anthropocentrism and biological centrism in technological ethics -- Interpretation of Jonas's order of responsibility: Seeking ethics in the era of technology[J].Study of Dialectics of nature, 2007 (08): 06-10.

[9]李文潮.技术伦理与形而上学——试论尤纳斯《责任原理》[J].自然辩证法研究，2003（2）：41-47.

LI Wenchao.Technical ethics and metaphysics -- On Yunus' principle of responsibility[J]. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, 2003 (2): 41-47.

[10]闫坤如.人工智能“合乎伦理设计”的理论探源[J].自然辩证法通讯，2020，42（4）：14-18.

YAN Kunru.Exploration of the theory of "ethical design" in Artificial Intelligence[J].Journal of Dialectics of Nature, 2020, 42 (4): 14-18.

[11]赵延东,廖苗.负责任研究与创新在中国[J].中国软科学,2017（3）:37-46.

ZHAO Yandong, LIAO Miao. Responsible research and innovation in China[J].China soft science, 2017 (3): 37-46.

[12]刘战雄.负责任创新研究综述：背景、现状与趋势[J].科技进步与对策，2015（11）：155-160.

LIU Zhanxiong. Review of responsible innovation research: Background, current situation and trend[J].Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2015 (11): 155-160.

[13]薛桂波，闫坤如.“负责任创新”视角下技术伦理的政策转向[J].大连理工大学学报（社会科学版）,2018，39（1）:09-14.

XUE Guibo, YAN Kunru.Policy turn of technological ethics from the perspective of "responsible innovation" [J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology(Social Sciences), 2018, 39 (1): 09-14.

[14]陶秋燕，高腾飞.社会创新：源起、研究脉络与理论框架[J].外国经济与管理，2019，41（6）：85-104.

TAO Qiuyan, GAO Tengfei.Social innovation: Origin, research context and theoretical framework [J].Foreign Economics & Management, 2019, 41 (6): 85-104.

[15]刘志阳,庄欣荷.社会创业定量研究:文献述评与研究框架[J].研究与发展管理, 2018,30(2):123-135.

LIU Zhiyang, ZHUANG Xinhe.Quantitative research on social entrepreneurship:Literature review and research framework[J].R&D Management,2018,30(2): 123-135.

[16]刘振,杨俊,张玉利.社会创业研究——现状述评与未来趋势[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2015,36(06):26-35.

LIU Zhen, YANG Jun, ZHANG Yuli.Research on social entrepreneurship: Current situation review and future trend [J].Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2015,36 (06): 26-35.

[17]刘志阳,李斌,陈和午.企业家精神视角下的社会创业研究[J].管理世界, 2018,34(11):171-173.

LIU Zhiyang, LI Bin, CHEN Hewu. Research on social entrepreneurship from the perspective of entrepreneurship[J].Management World, 2018,34 (11): 171-173.

[18]许芳，李建华，吕红.企业生态战略：和谐社会理念下的战略新思维[J].生态经济，2005（11）：66-70.

XU Fang, I Jianhua, LYU Hong.Enterprise ecological strategy: Strategic new thinking under the concept of harmonious society [J].Ecological Economy, 2005 (11): 66-70.

[19]苗争鸣，尹西明，许展玮，陈劲.颠覆性技术异化及其治理研究——以“深度伪造”技术的典型化事实为例[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2020，41（12）：83-98.

MIAO Zhengming, YIN Ximing, XU Zhanwei, CHEN Jin. Subversive technology alienation and its governance research -- Taking the typical facts of "deep forgery" technology as an example [J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2020, 41 (12): 83-98.

[20]TURKER D.Measuring corporate social responsibility:A scale development study[J].Journal Of Business Ethics,2009,85(4):411-427.

[21]PEREZ A,RODRIGUEZ del Bosque I.Measuring CSR image:Three studies to develop and to validate a reliable measurement tool[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2013,118(2):265-286.

[22]OBERSEDER M,SCHLEGELMILCH B B,MURPHY P E,et al.Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility:Scale development and validation[J].Journal of Business Ethics,2014,124(1):101-115.

[23]王站杰，买生.企业社会责任、创新能力与国际化战略——高管薪酬激励的调节作用[J].管理评论，2019，31（3）：193-202.

WANG Zhanjie, MAI Sheng.Corporate social responsibility, innovation capability and internationalization strategy: The moderating effect of executive compensation incentive[J]. Management Review, 2019, 31 (3): 193-202.

[24]秦绪忠,王宗水，赵红.公司治理与企业社会责任披露——基于创业板的中小企业研究[J].管理评论，2018，30（3）：188-200.

QIN Xuzhong, WANG Zongshui, ZHAO Hong.Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosure: A study of SMEs based on GEM[J].Management Review, 2018, 30 (3): 188-200.

[25]买生，匡海波，张笑楠.基于科学发展观的企业社会责任评价模型及实证[J].科研管理,2012,33(3):148-154.

MAI Sheng, KUANG Haibo, ZHANG Xiaonan.Evaluation model and demonstration of corporate social responsibility based on scientific outlook on Development[J].Science Research Management, 2012,33 (3): 148-154.

[26]田虹,姜雨峰.网络媒体企业社会责任评价研究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报，2014,54(1)：150-158.

TIAN Hong, JIANG Yufeng.Research on the evaluation of network media corporate social responsibility[J].Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition, 2014,54 (1): 150-158.

[27]齐丽云，李腾飞，尚可.企业社会责任的维度厘定与量表开发——基于中国企业的实证研究[J].管理评论，2017,29(5):143-152.

QI Liyun, LI Tengfei, SHANG Ke.Dimension determination and scale development of corporate social responsibility: An empirical study based on Chinese enterprises[J].Management Review, 2017,29 (5): 143-152.

[28]腾讯研究院.动因：技术、商业与我们的未来（科技向善大哉问）[M].杭州：浙江出版集团数字传媒有限公司，2020（4）.

Tencent Research Institute. Motivation: technology, commerce and our future[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Publishing Group Digital Media Co., Ltd., 2020 (4).

[29]司晓，马永武,等.科技向善：大科技时代的最优选[M].杭州：浙江大学出版社，2020（7）.

SI Xiao, MA Yongwu, et al. Good science and technology: the best choice in the era of big science and technology[M]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University Press, 2020 (7).

[30]Trevino L K.Ethical decision making on organizations:A person-situation interactionist model[J].Academy of Management Review,1986(3):601-617.

[31]张利斌，张鹏程，王豪.关系嵌入、结构嵌入与知识整合效能:人—环境匹配视角的分析框架[J].科学学与科学技术管理，2012(05):78-83.

ZHANG Libin,ZHANG Pengcheng,WANG Hao.Relationship embeddedness,structure embeddedness and knowledge integration efficiency: An analytical framework from the perspective of human environment matching[J].Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2012 (05): 78-83.

[32]彭雪蓉，刘洋.战略性企业社会责任与竞争优势：过程机制与权变条件[J].管理评论，2015，27（7）：156-167.

PENG Xuerong, LIU Yang. Strategic corporate social responsibility and competitive advantage: Process mechanism and contingency conditions[J].Management Review, 2015, 27 (7): 156-167.

[33]JONES T M.Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations:An issue-contingent model[J].Academy of Management Review,1991(2):366-395.

[34]韩震，匡海波，武成圆，王含含，李志轩.基于消费者感知的产品道德属性表达研究——以网购农产品为例[J].管理评论，2018，30（4）：83-93.

HAN Zhen, KUANG Haibo, WU Chengyuan, WANG Hanhan, LI Zhixuan.Research on the expression of product moral attributes based on consumer perception -- Taking online shopping of agricultural products as an example[J]. Management Review, 2018, 30 (4): 83-93.

[35]ADNER R.Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem[J]. Harvard Business Review,2006,84(4):98-107+148.

[36]FICHMAN R G, SANTOS B L D, ZHENG Z Q. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum[J]. MIS Quarterly,2014, 38（2）: 329-353.

[37]CHADWICK C, J F Super,K Kwon.Resource orchestration in practice:CEO emphasis on SHRM,commitment-based HR systems,and firm performance[J].Strategic Management Journal,2015,36(3):360-376.