跨领域搜索对共性技术溢出的双刃剑效应：产业联盟的放大作用

岑杰; 叶二子; 肖瑶

PDF(502 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 77-90.

论文

跨领域搜索对共性技术溢出的双刃剑效应：产业联盟的放大作用

岑杰^1，2,叶二子¹,肖瑶^1，2

作者信息 +

The double-edged sword effect of cross-domain search on generic technology spillover: The amplifying effect of industrial alliances

Cen Jie^1,2, Ye Erzi¹， Xiao Yao^1,2

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

在协同研发的背景下，多技术知识主体参与、多技术知识资源融合成为共性技术研发和溢出的主流范式，揭示跨领域搜索、产业联盟和共性技术溢出之间的关系，是现实驱动的结果。本文针对当前研究对“共性技术溢出如何产生”这一问题关注不足的现状，从企业“搜索行为”出发，基于专利分析法和内容分析法，构建了373家企业专利数据样本和190家企业产业联盟数据样本，通过实证研究发现：跨领域搜索对共性技术溢出的影响存在双刃剑效应，而产业联盟特性在二者关系中起到放大作用。主要研究结论是：（1）跨领域搜索与共性技术溢出深度存在倒U型关系；（2）跨领域搜索与共性技术溢出广度存在倒U型关系；（3）产业联盟的数量在“跨领域搜索-共性技术溢出深度”“跨领域搜索-共性技术溢出广度”的关系中均存在正向调节作用；（4）产业联盟的异质性在“跨领域搜索-共性技术溢出深度”“跨领域搜索-共性技术溢出广度”的关系中均存在正向调节作用。本文在一定程度上向前延伸了共性技术溢出的前因研究，并为企业和政府提供一定的现实借鉴意义。

Abstract

In the context of collaborative innovation, multi-agent participation and multi-knowledge integration have become the mainstream paradigm of generic technology R&D and spillover. Cross-domain search is essentially dependent on spillover from multiple knowledge sources, which implies that cross-domain search is necessarily associated with generic technology spillover, but this relationship is masked by the "subject view" of generic technology collaborative R&D paradigm. A large number of scholars have paid attention to the problem of "how to promote the spillover of generic technology" and examined the impact of the commercialization strategy, mode selection, network effect and stage characteristics of generic technology diffusion on the spillover of generic technology. Many achievements have been made, but the problem of "how generic technology spillover occurs" has not been answered. The existing research on generic technology spillover from the perspective of government procurement, patent licensing, research institutions and industry-university-research has implied the value of cross-domain search, but failed to directly explore the direct relationship between cross-domain search and generic technology spillover, and failed to reveal the double-edged sword effect of cross-domain search.
Starting from the "search behavior", this paper focuses on "how generic technology spillover occurs", trying to answer the question on "how knowledge search behavior affects generic technology spillover", and further examines the role of industrial alliance characteristics. Based on this, this paper constructs 373 enterprises′ patent data samples and 190 enterprises′ alliance data samples. Through patent analysis, text analysis and empirical research, it is found that cross-domain search has a double-edged sword effect on generic technology spillover, and the characteristics of industrial alliance play a magnifying role in the relationship between the two. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between cross-domain search and the depth of generic technology spillover; (2) There is an inverted U-shaped relationship between cross-domain search and the breadth of generic technology spillover ; (3) The number of industrial alliances has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between cross-domain search — generic technology spillover depth and cross-domain search — generic technology spillover breadth; (4) The heterogeneity of industrial alliances has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between cross-domain search — generic technology spillover depth and cross-domain search — generic technology spillover breadth.
This paper attempts to answer the question of "how generic technology spillover occurs", extends the antecedents of generic technology spillover, and further enriches the research results in the field of generic technology spillover. At the same time, this paper also puts forward some management implications. First, cross-domain search is an important means for enterprises to develop generic technology, and the research and development of generic technology is the pre-content of R & D proprietary technology. Enterprises should formulate reasonable cross-domain search strategies based on R & D needs and strategic objectives, and grasp the distance of cross-domain search. Second, in a reasonable cross-domain search strategy, enterprises should be good at using alliance strength, accelerate the realization of R & D goals; Third, this paper demonstrates the important role of enterprises and industrial alliances in the spillover of generic technology. Therefore, the government should actively guide and support them, seize the wave of the fourth scientific and technological revolution, boost the breakthrough of industrial key generic technology, and accelerate the transformation of the role from technology catcher to technology leader.

导出引用

岑杰叶二子肖瑶. 跨领域搜索对共性技术溢出的双刃剑效应：产业联盟的放大作用[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(7): 77-90

Cen Jie, Ye Erzi, Xiao Yao. The double-edged sword effect of cross-domain search on generic technology spillover: The amplifying effect of industrial alliances[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(7): 77-90

参考文献

[1] Altman E. I. Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy[J]. The Gournal of Finance, 1996, 23(4): 589-609.

[2] Ardito, L, Petruzzelli, AM, Panniello, U.Unveiling the breakthrough potential of established technologies: an empirical investigation in the aerospace industry[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2016, 28(8): 916-934.

[3] Barirani A, Beaudry C, Agard B. Can universities profit from general purpose inventions? The case of Canadian nanotechnology patents[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 120: 271-283.

[4] Caballero R J, Jaffe A B. How High Are the Giants'' Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth: Discussion[J]. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1993, 8:85-86.

[5] Campbell K, Minguez-Vera A. Gender Diversity in the Boardronm and Firm Finacial Performance[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 83(3): 435-451.

[6] Capaldo A, Lavie D, Messeni Petruzzelli A. Knowledge maturity and the scientific value of innovations: The roles of knowledge distance and adoption[J]. Journal of Management, 2017, 43(2): 503-533.

[7] Cobena M, Gallego A, Casanueva C. Heterogeneity,Diversity and Complement-arity in Alliance Portfolios[J]. European Management Journal, 2017, 35(4): 464-476.

[8] Coccia, M. The source and nature of general purpose technologies for supporting next K-waves: Global leadership and the case study of the US Navy's Mobile User Objective System[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2017, 116, 331-339.

[9] Corradini C, De Propris L. Beyond local search: Bridging platforms and inter-sectoral technological integration[J]. Research Policy, 2017, 46(1): 196-206.

[10] Feldman,Yoon. An empirical test for general purpose technology: an examination of the Cohen-Boyer rDNA technology[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2012, 21(2): 249-275.

[11] Forbes H, Schaefer D. Social product development: The democratiza-tion of design, manufacture and innovation[J]. Procedia Cirp, 2017, 60: 404-409.

[12] Gambardella A, Giarratana MS. General technological capabilities, product market fragmentation, and markets for technology[J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(2): 315-325.

[13] Gast J.,Werner A.,Kraus S. Antecedents of the Small Firm Effect: The Role of Knowledge Spillover and Blocked Mobility for Employee Entrepreneurial Intentions[J]. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2017, 13(1): 277-297.

[14] Grigoriou, K. Organizing for Knowledge Generation: Internal Knowledge Networks and the Contingent Effect of External Knowledge Sourcing[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2017, (38): 395-414.

[15] Guan J C, Liu N. Exploitative and exploratory innovations in knowledge network and collaboration network: A patent analysis in the technological field of nano-energy[J]. Research Policy, 2016, 45(1): 97-112.

[16] Kogut B., ZanderU.Knowledge of The Firm, Combinative Capabilities and the Replieation of Technology[J]. Organization Science, 1992(3): 383-397.

[17] Levinthal D A.The behavioral theory of the firm:Assessment and prospects[J]. Academy of Management Annals, 2012, 6(1): 1-40.

[18] Lichtenthaler U,Ernst H.Attitudes to externally organising knowledge management tasks:A review,reconsideration and extension of the NIH Syndrome[J]. R & D Management, 2010, 36(4): 367-386.

[19] March J G.Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991, 2(1): 71-87.

[20] Nohria O N, Gulati R．Is slack good or bad for innovation?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(5): 1245-1264．

[21] Raiteri E. A time to nourish? Evaluating the impact of public procurement on technological generality through patent data[J]. Research Policy, 2018, 47(5): 936-952.

[22] Richard O C,Chadwick K. Cultural Diversity in Management, Firm Performance, and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation Dimensions[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004, 47(2): 255-266.

[23] Savino T, Messeni Petruzzelli A, Albino V. Search and recombination process to innovate: A review of the empirical evidence and a research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2017,19(1): 54-75.

[24] Tan J, Peng M. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging during economic[J]. Management Journal, 2003, 24(13): 1249-1263.

[25] Tassey G. Choosing govenment R & D policies: tax incentives vs. direct funding[J]. Review of Industrial Organization, 1996, 11(5): 579-600.

[26] Taylor A, Greve H R. Superman or the fantastic four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49 (4): 723-740.

[27] Thoma G. Striving for a large market: evidence from a general purpose technology in action[J]. Industrial & Corporate Change. 2009, 18(1): 107-138.

[28] 陈傲, 柳卸林, 高广宇. 新兴产业高被引专利的形成特征——以燃料电池为例[J]. 科研管理, 2012, 33(11): 9-15. Chen Ao, Liu Xielin, Gao Guangyu. The formation characteristics of highly cited patents in emerging industry based on fuel cell industry [J]. Science Research Management, 2012, 33(11): 9-15.

[29] 樊霞, 黄妍, 朱桂龙. 产学研合作对共性技术创新的影响效用研究[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 1: 34-44. Fan Xia, Huang Yan, Zhu Guilong. The innovation effects of university-industry collaboration on industrial generic technology[J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 1: 34-44.

[30] 高良谋, 李宇. 企业规模与技术创新倒U关系的形成机制与动态拓展[J]. 管理世界, 2009, 8:113-123. Gao Liangmou, Li Yu. The formation mechanism and dynamic expansion of the inverted U relationship between enterprise scale and technological innovation[J]. Management World, 2009, 8: 113-123.

[31] 李纪珍. 共性技术供给与扩散的模式选择[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011, 32(10): 5-12. Li Jizhen. Supply and diffusion model selection of generic technology[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. , 2011, 32(10): 5-12.

[32] 李雅筝, 周荣庭. 国内出版上市企业多元化经营对其绩效影响的实证分析[J].科技与出版, 2015(10): 24-27. Li Yazheng, Zhou Rongting. The alienation of disruptive technology and governance——Based on the stylized fact of “Deepfake” technology[J]. Science-Technology & Publication, 2015(10): 24-27.

[33] 梁阜, 张志鑫. 外部知识搜索及其双元性的创新效应研究[J]. 情报杂志, 2019, 38(01):171-179. Liang Fu, Zhang Zhixin. Research on the innovation effect of external knowledge search and its ambidexterity[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2019, 38(01):171-179.

[34] 梁海山, 王海军. 异质性资源配置管理研究——基于开放式创新理论和模块化理论[J]. 软科学, 2019, 33(06): 8-11. Liang Haishan, Wang Haijun. Research on the configuration and management for heterogeneous resources——Based on the open innovati on theory and modularity theory[J]. Soft Science, 2019, 33(06): 8-11.

[35] 林明, 任浩, 董必荣. 技术多样化结构二元平衡､企业内聚性与探索式创新绩效[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(04): 65-72. Lin Ming, Ren Hao, Dong Birong. The binary equilibrium of the structure of technological diversity,coherence and performance of exploratory innovations[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(04): 65-72.

[36] 刘和旺, 郑世林, 王宇锋. 所有制类型、技术创新与企业绩效[J].中国软科学, 2015(3): 28-40. Liu Hewang, Zheng Shilin, Wang Yufeng. Ownership types, technological innovation,and enterprise performance[J]. China Soft Science, 2015(3): 28-40.

[37] 刘洪民, 姜黎辉, 王中魁. 制造业共性技术研发的知识管理评价体系构建[J]. 科研管理, 2016, 37(S1): 379-386. Liu Hongmin, Jiang Lihui, Wang Zhongkui. Construction of the knowledge management and evaluation system of generic technology R&D in manufaturing industries[J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(S1): 379-386.

[38] 刘娜, 武宪云, 毛荐其. 发明者自我网络动态对知识搜索的影响[J]. 科学学研究, 2019, 37(04): 689-700. Liu Na, Wu Xianyun, Mao Jianqi. The impact of inventors' ego-networks dynamic on knowledge searching[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 37(04): 689-700.

[39] 栾春娟, 王续琨, 刘则渊. 基于《德温特》数据库的核心技术确认方法[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2008, 29(6): 32-34. Luan Chunjuan, Wang Xukun, Liu Zeyuan. Methods of affirming core technology via Derwent Innovations Index[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. , 2008, 29(6): 32-34.

[40] 栾春娟, 王贤文. 全球太阳能产业共性技术测度[J]. 技术与创新管理, 2013, 34(06): 554-558. Luan Chunjuan, Wang Xukun. Measuring generic technology of solar energy industry worldwide[J]. Technology and Innovation Management, 2013, 34(06): 554-558.

[41] 罗能生, 刘文彬, 王玉泽. 杠杆率､企业规模与企业创新[J]. 财经理论与实践, 2018, 29(6): 112-118. Luo Nengsheng, Liu Wenbin, Wang Yuze. Enterprise leverage, scale and innovation[J]. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2018, 29(6): 112-118.

[42] 马荣康, 王艺棠. 知识组合多样性､新颖性与突破性发明形成[J]. 科学学研究, 2020, 38(02): 313-322. Ma Rongkang, Wang Yitang. Diversity and novelty of knowledge combination and the formation of breakthrough inventions[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020, 38(02): 313-322.

[43] 庞博, 邵云飞, 王思梦. 联盟组合管理能力与企业创新绩效:吸收能力的中介效应[J]. 管理工程学报, 2019(2): 28 -35. Pangbo, Shao Yunfei, Wang Simeng. Alliance portfolio management capability and firm innovation performance: The mediating effect of absorptive capacity[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019(2): 28 -35.

[44] 瞿孙平, 石宏伟, 俞林. 创新视角下知识搜索的研究回顾与展望[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(08): 195-201. Qu Sunping, Shi Hongwei, Yu Lin. Research and prospect of knowledge search from the perspective of innovation[J]. Journal of Intelligence, 2018, 37(08): 195-201.

[45] 任海云. 企业R&D投入影响因素——基于企业生命周期视角的实证检验[J]. 工业技术经济, 2015, 34(08): 40-49. Ren Haiyun. Empirical research on the effect factors of R&D input——Based on the perspective of enterprise life cycle[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2015, 34(08): 40-49.

[46] 苏鑫, 赵越.产业共性技术扩散三阶段模型构建与仿真研究[J]. 科技进步与对策, 2019, 36(12): 71-79. Su Xin, Zhao Yue. Three stage model building and simulation research of industrial generic technology diffusion[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2019, 36(12): 71-79.

[47] 王泓略, 曾德明, 陈培帧. 企业知识重组对技术创新绩效的影响: 知识基础关系特征的调节作用[J]. 南开管理评论, 2020, 23(01): 53-61. Wang Honglue, Zeng Deming, Chen Pei frame. A Research on knowledge recombination and technology innovation performance: moderate effect of knowledge elements relationship characteristic[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2020, 23(01): 53-61.

[48] 王文华, 张卓, 陈玉荣, 黄奇. 基于技术整合的技术多元化与企业绩效研究[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33(02): 279-286. Wang Wenhua, Zhang Zhuo, Chen Yurong, Huang Qi. Research on the relationship of technological diversification and firm performance based on technology integration[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33(02): 279-286.

[49] 谢永平, 王晶. 技术不确定环境下联盟关系对创新绩效的影响研究[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2017, 38(05) :60-71. Xie Yongping, Wang Jing. The effect of alliance relationship on innovation performance under uncertain technology environment[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. , 2017, 38(05) :60-71.

[50] 徐建中, 李奉书, 潘伟, 付静雯. 双元知识搜索对企业创新绩效的影响: 市场导向的调节作用[J]. 中国科技论坛, 2019(07): 119-127. Xu Jianzhong, Li Fengshu, Pan Wei, Fu Jingwen. The affect of knowledge search ambidexterity on enterprise innovation performance: moderating role of market orientation[J]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2019(07): 119-127.

[51] 杨伟, 周青, 方刚. 产业联盟的组织复杂度､牵头单位类型与合作创新率[J]. 科学学研究, 2015(5): 713-722. Yang Wei, Zhou Qing, Fang Gang. Organizational complexity, lead institution and cooperative innovation frequency of ITISA[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015(5): 713-722.

[52] 叶江峰, 任浩, 郝斌. 企业内外部知识异质度对创新绩效的影响——战略柔性的调节作用[J]. 科学学研究, 2015, 33( 4) : 574-584. Ye Jiangfeng, Ren Hao, Hao Bin. The impact of internal and external knowledge heterogeneity on innovation performance: The moderating effects of strategic flexibility[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2015, 33( 4) : 574-584.

[53] 岳鹄, 朱怀念, 张光宇, 刘怡新. 网络关系､合作伙伴差异性对开放式创新绩效的交互影响研究[J]. 管理学报, 2018, 15(7): 1 018-1 024. Yue Hu, Zhu Huainian, Zhang Guangyu, Liu Yixin. The interaction effect of network relationship and innovation partner heterogeneity on open innovation performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018, 15(7): 1 018-1 024.

[54] 朱建民, 金祖晨. 国外关键共性技术供给体系发展的做法及启示[J]. 经济纵横, 2016(07): 113-117. Zhu Jianmin, Jin Zuchen. Practice and enlightenment of foreign key common technology supply system[J]. Economic Review Journal, 2016(07): 113-117.

[55] 邹樵, 吴丁佳宝, 姜杰. 共性技术扩散的网络与外溢效应[J]. 管理世界, 2011(01): 182-183. Zou Qiao, Wu Dingjiabao, Jiang Jie. Network and spillover effects of generic technology diffusion[J]. Management World, 2011(01): 182-183.

基金

国家社科基金重大项目(20&ZD124，2021—2025);国家自然科学基金面上项目(72072162，2021—2024；71973129，2020—2023；71773115，2018—2021);国家自然科学基金青年项目(71704159，2018— 2020;71802181，2019— 2021)。