海归高管、区域差异与企业创新

黄伟丽, 马广奇

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 200-208.

PDF(443 KB)
PDF(443 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7) : 200-208.
论文

海归高管、区域差异与企业创新

  • 黄伟丽1,马广奇2
作者信息 +

Returnee executives, regional differences and corporate innovation

  • Huang Weili1, Ma Guangqi2
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于高阶梯队理论和新经济地理学理论,选取2012-2016年中国电子通信类177家上市企业作为样本,运用PSM-DID方法,按照因果推论的分析思路,从沿海和内陆区域差异的角度探讨了海归高管对企业创新的影响。研究发现:整体上海归高管显著提升了企业创新水平,并且这种促进作用存在典型的区域异质性。沿海企业的海归高管对创新的平均边际贡献相对低于内陆企业。实证结论表明,沿海企业的人才聘用决策在产生集聚效应的同时也带来边际递减效应。建议:一方面,内陆企业继续加大海归高管引进力度;另一方面,沿海企业通过优化海归高管引进结构和激励机制提升海归高管对企业创新的边际贡献。

Abstract

     The improvement of the independent innovation capability of enterprises is an important indicator for the enhancement of national soft power. The innovation capability of Chinese companies has rapidly increased in the 40 years of reform and opening up. New and emerging companies represented by unicorn companies are constantly emerging. However, the occurrence of the "ZTE event" indicates that the independent innovation capability of Chinese enterprises is still weak in the international market competition. With the intensification of Sino-US trade wars, the improvement of Chinese enterprises′ independent innovation capability will be more and more restricted, which directly affecting the survival of enterprises and even the realization of strategic goal of the "Made in China 2025". In above, it can be seen that carrying out research on enterprise innovation has important theoretical and practical significance.
   Many factors affect the enterprise innovation. Past studies have explained it from the perspectives of institutional environment, market environment, financial constraints, corporate governance, executive characteristics and so on. In general, the key to improving the innovation capability of enterprises is to gather more resources and improve the level of optimizing and configuring limited resources. Especially, the "imprint" of the returnee executive′s foreign study or work experience will have an important impact on the agglomeration and optimization of enterprise resources.
    Although this issue has drawn attention since it was put forward, there is still no clear explanation on how returnee executive affect corporate innovation. On the one hand, it is well established that the utility of returnee executive increases the motivation of enlarging the company innovation. Dai O (2009) suggested that the high skill, expertise knowledge and international horizon from the returnee entrepreneur could be beneficial to increasing the firm innovation. Li et al. (2016) found that the Chinese company with returnee executive from the United States can more readily issue the American stock exchange securities to raise funds. 
   On the other hand, the inadaptability of returnees due to socially individual status can limit the enhancement of firm innovation. The medium-sized and small companies with CEO from abroad are not more fruitful in innovation behaviour than those without returnee CEO. Kenny M (2013) thought that the native entrepreneur is more important to achieve the increase of innovation behaviour than the returnees, and only during the business expansion does the returnee play a positive role after empirically analysing the samples from the information and communications technology (ICT) in China and India. In addition, the difficulty in building up trust within the administration of the native enterprise in China can also suppress the utility of returnee in raising the innovation behaviour.
    In addition, this paper also notes that the influence of returnees′ executives on corporate innovation is regulated by regional heterogeneity. Lin, Chen, and Lin (2018) ignored the impact of regional differences when analyzing the impact of returnees′ board members on corporate venture capital performance. However, based on the theory of new economic geography theory, it is difficult for returnees to overcome the problem of their inadaptability to the native inland enterprise with much weaker strength resulting from the limiting of the disadvantaged geospatial location. Simultaneously, due to the slower and fewer opening up of native market from the inland company, higher efforts from the inland firm and returnee can be taken to building up the trust with each other on the administration. Moreover, the slower response to the demand of market and the less benefit from policy result in the less utility of returnee in the inland company than the coastal one. 
    In contrast, it is well believed that the better location to business of coastal enterprise plays a greater role in utilizing and transferring the returnee labour to expand the market scale and produce the agglomeration effect in the past four decades of opening up. However, when the saturation of returnee in the coastal enterprise arrives, the agglomeration effect can produce the marginal diminishing so that the contribution to the firm innovation from the returnee would shrink. 
    Based on the analyses above, the proposed hypothesis was provided in the following: H1a: The returnee executive positively influences the innovation behaviour of company in China. H1b: The returnee executive negatively influences the innovation behaviour of company in China. H2: When the agglomeration effect from the returnee is below the threshold value, the marginal contribution to coastal firm of returnee would be larger than that to the inland firm. When the agglomeration effect from the returnee is above the threshold value, the marginal contribution to coastal firm of returnee would be smaller than that to the inland firm.
    To test the above theoretical assumptions,this paper utilize a typical sample of high-tech firms with available data in CSMAR. Our initial sample consists of 935 firm-year observations and our matched samples based on a multivariate propensity score consist of 885 firm-year observations. Firms are classified as treatment groups if a firm has at least one returnee executive, control groups otherwise. Second, the matched samples are used to assess the net effect of the role of returnee executives in the innovation behaviour by DID approach. We found that firm′s innovation is commonly increased through the introduction of returnees. Third, the results of regional heterogeneity analysis indicate that the average marginal contribution from the returnees of coastal enterprises is lower than that of inland enterprises which is contrary to the conclusion of previous literatures.
    This paper aims to make several contributions. Firstly, It is a deepening of the current research on the characteristics of executives that using specific types of executives as the entry point. Secondly, we investigate the specific association between the employment of returnee and the firm innovation with considering the geospatial heterogeneity from coastal area to inland. Finally, the modern approach of PSM-DID can efficiently solve the potential problems of mixed bias and selective bias with performing an examination.

关键词

海归高管 / 企业创新 / 区域差异 / PSM-DID / 政策效应

Key words

 returnee executive / corporate innovation / regional difference / PSM-DID / policy effect

引用本文

导出引用
黄伟丽, 马广奇. 海归高管、区域差异与企业创新[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(7): 200-208
Huang Weili, Ma Guangqi. Returnee executives, regional differences and corporate innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(7): 200-208

参考文献

[1] 虞义华,赵奇锋,鞠晓生.发明家高管与企业创新[J].中国工业经济,2018(03):136-154.

YU Yihua, ZHAO Qifeng, JU Xiaosheng. Inventor executives and innovation [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(03):136-154.

[2] 黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51(04):60-73.

Li Wenjing, Zheng Manni. Is it substantive innovation or strategic innovation?—impact of macro-economic policies on micro-enterprises' innovation [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2016, 51(04):60-73.

[3] 周飞,沙振权,孙锐. 市场导向、资源拼凑与商业模式创新的关系研究[J].科研管理,2019(01):113-120.

Zhou Fei, Sha Zhenquan, Sun Rui. Market orientationresource bricolage and business model innovation [J]. Science Research Management, 2019(01):113-120.

[4] 张玉明,迟冬梅. 互联网金融、企业家异质性与小微企业创新[J].外国经济与管理,2018,40(09):42-54.

Zhang Yuming, Chi Dongmei. Internet finance, entrepreneur heterogeneity and small and

micro enterprises’ innovation [J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2018, 40(09):42-54.

[5] 贺建风,张晓静. 劳动力成本上升对企业创新的影响[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35(08):56-73.

He Jianfeng, Zhang xiaojing. The influence of rising labor cost on enterprise innovation [J]. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2018, 35(08):56-73.

[6] 吕文栋,赵杨. 管理层风险特质、董事会治理与科技保险参保意愿[J].科研管理,2016,37(08):113-122.

Lyu Wendong, Zhao Yang. Managerial risk characteristicsboard governance and willingness to

purchase science and technology insurance [J]. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(08):113-122.

[7] 杨林,段牡钰,刘娟,徐臣午.高管团队海外经验、研发投入强度与企业创新绩效[J].科研管理,2018,39(06):9-21.

Yang Lin, Duan Muyu, Liu Juan, Xu Chenwu. Top management team overseas experiencesR&D investment intensity and enterprise innovation performance [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(06):9-21.

[8] Akhavan, P., & Hosseini, S. M. Social capital, knowledge sharing, and innovation capability: an empirical study of R&D teams in Iran [J]. Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 2016, 28(1), 96-113.

[9] Simsek, Z., Fox, B. C., & Heavey, C. “what’s past is prologue” [J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 41(1), 288-317.

[10] Dai O, Liu X. Returnee entrepreneurs and firm performance in Chinese high-technology industries [J]. International Business Review, 2009, 18(4):373-386.

[11] Li J, Wei M, Lin B. Does top executives' US experience matter? Evidence from US-listed Chinese firms [J]. China Journal of Accounting Research, 2016, 9(4):267-282.

[12] Tzeng C H. How foreign knowledge spillovers by returnee managers occur at domestic firms: An institutional theory perspective [J]. International Business Review, 2018, 27(3):625-641.

[13] Lin D, Lu J, Liu X, et al. Returnee CEO and innovation in Chinese high-tech SMEs [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2014, 65(1/2/3/4):151-171.

[14] Kenney M, Dan B, Murphree M. Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries [J]. Research Policy, 2013, 42(2):391-407.

[15] Lin Y-H, Chen C-J and Lin B-W. The dual-edged role of returnee board members in new venture performance [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2018, 90(09): 347-358.

[16] Tabuchi, T. Historical trends of agglomeration to the capital region and new economic geography [J]. Regional Science Urban Economics, 2014, 44(44), 50-59.

[17] Florida, R. The economic geography of talent [J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 2015, 92(4), 743-755.

[18] 吴立元,刘研召. 贸易成本、要素流动与区域经济差异[J].中国经济问题,2018(03):12-22.

Wu Liyuan, Liu Yanzhao. Trade costfactor flow and the difference of regional economy [J]. China Economic Studies, 2018(03):12-22.

[19] 李雪松,王冲.要素市场扭曲是否抑制了创新效率的提升?——基于区域差异的视角[J].南京审计大学学报,2019,16(01):48-58.

Wang Xuesong, Wang Chong. Does factor market distortion inhibit the improvement of innovation e-fficiency?--From the perspective of regional differences [J]. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 2019, 16(01):48-58.

[20] Li H, Zhang Y, Li Y, et al. Returnees versus locals: Who perform better in China's technology entrepreneurship? [J]. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2012, 6(3):257-272.

[21] 杜勇,张欢,陈建英.CEO海外经历与企业盈余管理[J].会计研究,2018(02):27-33.

Du Yong, Zhang Huan, Chen Jiaying. CEOs overseas experience and earnings management [J]. Accounting Research, 2018(02):27-33.

[22] Dass NKini ONanda V. Board expertiseDo directors from related industries help bridge the information gap? [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 2014, 27(5):1533-1592.

[23] 戴维奇,刘洋,廖明情.烙印效应:民营企业谁在“不务正业”?[J].管理世界,2016(05):99-115+187-188.

Dai Weiqi, Liu Yang, Liao Mingqing. The imprinting of danwei system and “making fast bucks”:

Evidence from chinas private enterprises [J]. Management World, 2016(05):99-115+187-188.

[24] 付保宗. 当前我国工业转型升级的进展、障碍与对策[J]. 经济纵横, 2016, 364(3):23-30.

Fu Baolin. The progress, obstacles and counter measures of current industrial transformation and upgrading in China [J]. Economic Review, 2016, 364(3):23-30.

[25] 戴其文,魏也华,宁越敏.欠发达省域经济差异的时空演变分析[J].经济地理,2015,35(02):14-21+29.

Dai Qiwen, Wei Yehua, Ning Yuemin. Spatial-temporal analysis of intra-provincial economic inequality in less developed provinces [J]. Economic Geography, 2015, 35(02):14-21+29.

[26] 周皓.人口流动对生育水平影响的区域差异[J].人口与发展,2016,22(03):2-12.

Zhou Hao. Heterogeneous effect of migration on fertility [J]. Population and Development, 2016, 22(03):2-12.

[27] 代昀昊,孔东民. 高管海外经历是否能提升企业投资效率[J].世界经济,2017,40(01):168-192.

Dai Junhao,Kong Dongmin. Can executives with overseas experience improve corporate investment efficiency? [J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2017, 40(01):168-192.

[28] Rosenbaum P R, Rubin D B. Assessing sensitivity to an unobserved binary covariate in an observational study with binary outcome [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1983, 45(2):212-218.

[29] Berg G D. An application of kernel-based versus one-to-one propensity score matching for a nonexperimental causal study: Example from a disease management program evaluation [J]. Applied Economics Letters, 2011, 18(5):439-447.

[30] Jensen N M. Job creation and firm-specific location incentives [J]. Journal of Public Policy, 2016, 37(1):85-112.

[31] Luan D X, Vu N T, Huong K T T, et al. Is access to agribank credit an effective tool in improving household income? Evidence from the northern mountainous region of vietnam [J]. Asian Social Science, 2016, 12(8):110.

[32] Jensen N M. Job creation and firm-specific location incentives [J]. Journal of Public Policy, 2016, 37(1):85-112.

基金

国家社会科学基金:“基于互联网的丝绸之路合作机制研究”(16BJY180,2016.06—2021.05)。

PDF(443 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/