我国企业国际化过程中的创新模式研究

谢先达

PDF(305 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 31-38.

论文

我国企业国际化过程中的创新模式研究

谢先达^1,2，程聪³

作者信息 +

A research on the driving pattern of innovation in China enterprises′ internationalization

Xie Xianda^1,2, Cheng Cong³

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

由于我国企业在实施国际化赶超战略过程中的目标不同，导致我国后发企业在创新战略实施上具有显著的差异。在对国际化企业创新相关研究回顾的基础上，本文以我国长三角地区51家企业为调研对象，采用定性比较分析方法对我国企业国际化过程中的创新路径及其模式进行了分析，研究结果表明，由于企业在创新动机、资源匹配以及适应能力等三方面要素组合上存在显著差异，我国企业国际化过程中的技术创新可以划分为成熟型市场驱动创新模式、新兴市场驱动创新模式、企业内部驱动创新模式、投机市场驱动创新模式等五种模式，并且每一模式在创新驱动要素组合方面存在显著的差异。本文的研究结论对于我国企业提高创新效率具有启发意义。

Abstract

The number of China′s enterprises taking internationalization strategy has shown rapid growth. However, compared with the investment efficiency of the major foreign direct investment enterprises in the world, the foreign direct investment of Chinese enterprises is still at a low level, which is reflected in the company′s ability to enhance innovation through internationalization strategies. The effect is not obvious. At the same time, due to the different goals of Chinese enterprises in implementing the international catch-up strategy, they have significant differences in the implementation of innovation strategies. Based on the review of international enterprise innovation related research, this paper proposes three hypothetical elements of the enterprise internationalization process innovation model: innovation motivation, resource matching and adaptability. It is considered that the combination of these three elements forms different configurations of the international innovation mode.
The study used the Yangtze River Delta as a sample source, conducted in-depth investigations of some enterprises engaged in international operations in the region, and visited 51 research samples, and then used qualitative comparative analysis methods to innovate in their internationalization process. The decision-making model was analyzed to identify the antecedent conditional configuration that determines the effectiveness of innovation in the process of internationalization of Chinese enterprises. In the research, we set the consistency threshold of innovation results in the process of enterprise internationalization to not less than 0.8, and obtained the initial antecedent conditional configuration, ie complex solution, of innovation satisfaction and dissatisfaction in the process of enterprise internationalization. After that, combined with the three types of driving factors of innovative behavior in the process of internationalization of Chinese enterprises, the simple conditions of counterfactual preconditions are set, and the simple and counterfactual analysis and the difficult fact analysis are used to obtain the simple solution and the optimal solution. When a variable appears in both the concise solution and the optimization solution, it is recorded as a core condition; if the variable appears only in the optimization solution and does not appear in the concise solution, it is recorded as an edge condition.
The research show that because enterprises have significant differences in the combination of factors such as innovation motivation, resource matching and adaptability, the innovation decisions in the process of internationalization of Chinese enterprises can be divided into five modes. We define a mature market-driven innovation model that attaches great importance to soft resource matching and industrial chain integrity requirements, and an emerging market-driven innovation model that emphasizes hard resource matching, and attaches importance to technology and management advantages in enterprise internationalization, while attaching importance to the soft resource matching is called the internal driving innovation mode. It is called the speculative market-driven innovation mode, which emphasizes the internationalization style of enterprise executives and the matching problem of enterprise soft resources. These research conclusions are a complete exposition of the innovation mechanism in the process of internationalization of Chinese enterprises, which has rich theoretical significance, and also has a good practical enlightenment significance for how Chinese enterprises implement innovative decision-making suitable for the internationalization strategy of enterprises according to their own situations.
At the end of the paper, the limitations of this study are explained. The main limitations are as follows: Firstly, due to the limitation of the detailed data, the data of this paper is mainly based on the subjective judgment of the executives responsible for international operations. The role of executives in subjective emotional factors in corporate judgment makes the research data subjectively biased. In addition, although this paper analyzes the innovation strategy in the internationalization of enterprises from the perspectives of internationalization motivation, resource matching and adaptability, it still has certain limitations. In the future, it may be necessary to further explore this from the perspectives of system and culture mechanism. Finally, the data in this paper mainly comes from the Yangtze River Delta region, which makes the application of the antecedent conditions of this paper restricted, which needs further study in the future research.

导出引用

谢先达, 程聪. 我国企业国际化过程中的创新模式研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(5): 31-38

Xie Xianda, Cheng Cong. A research on the driving pattern of innovation in China enterprises′ internationalization[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(5): 31-38

参考文献

[1]. 陈岩, 翟瑞瑞, 韩文征. 国际化战略、逆向技术溢出与企业成长—整合资源与制度视角的中国企业经验分析[J]. 科研管理, 2014, (6):24-32.

CHEN Yan，ZHAI Ruirui，HAN Wenzheng.Internationalization strategy，reverse technology spillovers and firm growth—Anempirical analysis of Chinese firmsfrom integrating resource and institution perspective[J]. Science Research Management, 2014, (6):24-32.

[2]. DEYOUNG, R., EVANOFF, D., MOLYNEUX, P. Mergers and acquisitions of financial institutions: a review

of the post-2000 literature[J]. Journal of Financial Services Research, 2009, 36(2-3): 87-110.

[3]. 葛顺奇, 罗伟. 中国制造业企业对外直接投资和母公司竞争优势[J]. 管理世界, 2013, (6): 28-42.

GE Shunqi,LUO Wei.Foreign Direct Investment of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises and the parent company’s Competitive Advantage[J],Management World, 2013, (6): 28-42.

[4]. 马亚明, 张岩贵. 技术优势与对外直接投资:一个关于技术扩散的分析框架[J]. 南开经济研究, 2003, (4): 10-14.

MA Yaming,ZHANG Yangui.Technology Advantage and Foreign Direct Investment: An Analytical Framework on Technology Spread[J].Nankai Economic Studies,2003, (4): 10-14.

[5]. 汤临佳, 范彦成, 池仁勇, 程聪. 跨国投资活动中的经验学习和经验误用效应研究: 来自中国企业对拉美投资的经验证据[J]. 经济理论与经济管理, 2016, 36(11): 101-112.

TANG Linjia,FAN Yancheng,CHI Renyong,CHENG Cong,Experience Learnig Efect And Misusing Effect on Cross-Border Investment Activities[J].Economic Theory and Business Management, 2016, 36(11): 101-112

[6]. 葛顺奇, 罗伟. 中国制造业企业对外直接投资和母公司竞争优势[J]. 管理世界, 2013, (6): 28-42.

GE Shunqi,LUO Wei.Foreign Direct Investment of Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises and the parent company’s Competitive Advantage[J],Management World, 2013, (6): 28-42

[7]. DUNNING,J. H. Toward an eclectic theory of international production: some empirical test[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1980, (11): 9-31.

[8]. 程聪, 贾良定. 我国企业跨国并购驱动机制研究：基于清晰集的定性比较分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2016, 19(6): 113-121.

CHENG Cong,JIA Liangding.Research on the Driving Pattern of China’s Enterprise Cross-border M&As: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis[J].Nankai Business Review, 2016, 19(6): 113-121.

[9]. HYMER, S. H. The international operation of national firms: A study of direct investment[M]. Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, England: The MIT Press, 1960.

[10]. KOJIMA, K. A macroeconomic approach to foreign direct investment[J]. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 1973,(14): 1-21

[11]. 乔晶, 胡兵. 中国对外直接投资:过度抑或不足[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2014, (7): 38-51.

QIAO Jin,HU Bing.Overinvestment or underinvestment:an impirical Analysis on china’s outward Foreign Direct Inverstment[J].The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2014, (7): 38-51.

[12]. 毛其淋, 许家云. 中国对外直接投资促进抑或抑制了企业出口?[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2014, (9): 3-21.

MAO Qilin,XU Jiayun.Does Chinese Outwad FDI Promote or Suppress Firms’Export?Evidence from Manufacturing Firms? [J],The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 2014, (9): 3-21.

[13]. 阎大颖. 中国企业对外直接投资的区位选择及其决定因素[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2013, (7): 128-135.

YAN Daying,Location Choice of China’s Outward FDI Firms and the Decisive Factors[J].Journal of International Trade, 2013, (7): 128-135

[14]. KUIVALAINEN O, SAARENKETO S, PUUMALAINEN K. Start-up patterns of internationalization: A framework and its application in the context of knowledge-intensive SMEs[J]. European Management Journal, 2012, 30(4): 372-385.

[15]. 王永钦, 杜巨澜, 王凯. 中国对外直接投资区位选择的决定因素: 制度、税负和资源禀赋[J]. 经济研究, 2014, (12): 126-142.

WANG Yongqin,DU Julan,WANG Kai.The Diterminants of Location Choices of China’s ODI:Istitution ,Taxation And Resources[J]. Economic Research Journal,2014, (12): 126-142.

[16]. 程聪, 刘凤婷, 池仁勇, 郭元源. 产业国际分工与企业跨国并购:并购战略决策的视角[J].管理评论, 2016, 28(12): 92-100.

CHENG Cong,LIU Fengting,CHI Renyong,GUO Yuanyuan.Research on International Industrial Division and Enterprises’Cross-border M&A:Based on M&A Strategy[J].Management Review, 2016, 28(12): 92-100.

[17]. 项本武. 中国对外直接投资的贸易效应研究——基于面板数据的协整分析[J]. 财贸经济, 2009, (4): 77-82..

XIANG Benwu.The Effects of Outward Foreign Direc tInvestment on International Trade:Evidence

From China[J].Finance & Trade Economics, 2009, (4): 77-82.

[18]. 阎大颖, 洪俊杰, 任兵. 中国企业对外直接投资的决定因素:基于制度视角的经验分析[J]. 南开管理评论, 2009, (6): 135-142..

YAN Daying, HONG Junjie, REN Bing.The Determinants of Outward Direct Investment by Chinese Enterprises: An Empirical Study from Institutional Perspective[J]. Nankai Business Review,2009, (6): 135-142.

[19]. WOLF P, KAUDELA-BAUM S, MEISSNER J O. Exploring innovating cultures in small and medium-sized enterprises: Findings from Central Switzerland[J], International Small Business Journal, 2012, 30(3): 242-274.

[20]. BUSCHGENS T, BAUSCH A, BALKIN D B. Organizational Culture and Innovation: A Meta‐Analytic Review[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2013, 30(4): 763-781.

[21]. 王程韡. 腐败的社会文化根源: 基于模糊集的定性比较分析[J]. 社会科学, 2013, (10): 28-39..

WANG Chengwei.Cultural roots for corruption and beyond:A fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis[J].Journal of Social Sciences2013, (10): 28-39.

[22]. RAGIN, C. C. Fuzzy-set social science[M]. University of Chicago Press, 2000.

[23]. 王凤彬, 江鸿, 王璁. 央企集团管控架构的演进: 战略决定, 制度引致还是路径依赖?一项定性比较分析(QCA)尝试[J]. 管理世界, 2014, (12): 92-114.

WANG Fengbin, JIANG Hong and WANG Cong.The Evolution of the Control Framework China’s Central SOEs: Is it Strategy Determined, InstitutionDriven, or Dependence on the Path?—An Attempt of a Quality Comparative Analysis[J].Management World, 2014, (12): 92-114

[24]. GRANDORI, A., & FURNARI, S. A chemistry of organization: Combinatory analysis and design[J]. Organization Studies, 2008, 29(3): 459-485.

[25]. AXEL MARXA and ADRIAN DUSA. Crisp-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), Contradictions and Consistency Benchmarks for Model Specification[J]. Methodological Innovations Online, 2011, 6(2): 103-148.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目（71772164，2018.01—2021.12）；浙江省自然科学基金项目（LR19G020001，2019.01—2022.12）；浙江省社科规划基金项目（15NDJC167YB，2015.05—2019.12）；教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目（15YJC880095，2015.09—2019.09）。