企业协同创新风险对创新绩效的作用路径研究

吴卫红; 赵鲲; 张爱美

PDF(1381 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 124-132.

论文

企业协同创新风险对创新绩效的作用路径研究

吴卫红，赵鲲，张爱美

作者信息 +

A research on acting paths of cooperative innovation risk on innovation performance of firms

Wu Weihong, Zhao Kun, Zhang Aimei

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

基于已有研究，构建了“投入-过程-产出”的风险研究框架，总结出6类企业协同创新风险，即创新要素投入风险、道德风险、资源共享风险、组织协同风险、市场风险和利益分配风险。引入协同效应为中介变量、动态能力为调节变量，运用SEM模型和层次回归分析研究企业协同创新风险和创新绩效的关系。结果表明：①6类风险均对创新绩效具有显著负向影响，且不同风险对创新绩效的影响程度有所差别；②协同效应在创新要素投入风险、道德风险、资源共享风险、组织协同风险、利益分配风险与创新绩效之间具有显著中介作用，在市场风险与创新绩效之间不存在中介作用；③动态能力显著调节创新要素投入风险、道德风险、资源共享风险、组织协同风险、市场风险与创新绩效的关系，对利益分配风险与创新绩效的关系不存在调节作用。

Abstract

With the continuous development of economic globalization, our country′s economy has become more and more deeply integrated into the world economic system. It is urgent for enterprises to seek more technological innovations resources and built core competitiveness to meet the fierce competition in the international market. In this context, the important role of collaborative innovation in the survival and sustainable development of enterprises has become more and more prominent. However, because of the complexity, multi-agent and dynamic characteristics of the collaborative innovation, there might be various risk factors arise in the process of collaborative innovation, which is going to directly or indirectly affect the effect of collaborative innovation and eventually in turn affects enterprises innovation performance and the exerting of competitive advantage.
On the basis of existing research, from the perspective of the entire chain of enterprise collaborative innovation, we build a three-stage, double-faced risk research framework of "input-process-output" which is based on the two levels of innovation resources and cooperative entities. Then, we identify the 6 types of enterprise collaborative innovation risks through the above risk research framework, which including the innovation factor input risk and moral hazard that are caused by the insufficient investment or information asymmetry between the partners at the initial stage of cooperation, resource sharing risks and organizational synergy risks arising from insufficient innovation resource sharing and unsmooth communication and collaboration among innovative entities at the process stage , and the market risk and benefit distribution risk caused by the mismatch between the product and the market in the final output stage and the interest disputes between subjects. At the same time, we further introduce synergy effect as an intermediary variable and dynamic capabilities as a moderating variable to deeply study the relationship between enterprise collaborative innovation risk and innovation performance. Through a questionnaire survey, we take 226 high-tech listed companies as the research object, and use SEM model and hierarchical regression analysis to conduct empirical research.
The results of the study are as follows: (1) The six types of collaborative innovation risks all have a significant negative impact on innovation performance, and different risks have different degrees of impact on innovation performance. Organizational collaborative risk has shown the most obvious negative effect, followed by benefit distribution risks, and moral hazard is the smallest. (2) Synergy effect has a significant intermediary effect between innovation factor input risk, moral hazard, resource sharing risk, organizational synergy risk, benefit distribution risk and innovation performance, but there is no obviously intermediary effect between market risk and innovation performance; (3) Dynamic capabilities significantly regulate the relationship between innovation factor input risk, moral hazard, resource sharing risk, organizational synergy risk, market risk and innovation performance, but there is no regulatory effect on the relationship between benefit distribution risk and innovation performance.
In response to the above-mentioned research results, from the aspects of enhancing the awareness of risk prevention and control and promoting dynamic capability formation, we put forward suggestions to provide theoretical support and practical experience for the collaborative innovation management of enterprises.

导出引用

吴卫红赵鲲张爱美. 企业协同创新风险对创新绩效的作用路径研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(5): 124-132

Wu Weihong, Zhao Kun, Zhang Aimei. A research on acting paths of cooperative innovation risk on innovation performance of firms[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(5): 124-132

参考文献

[1] 洪银兴.关于创新驱动和协同创新的若干重要概念[J].经济理论与经济管理,2013,v33(05):5-12.

HONG Yinxing. Some conceptions on innovation-driven growth and collaborative innovation[J]. Economic Theory and Business Management, 2013, v33(05):5-12.

[2] 陈劲,阳银娟.协同创新的理论基础与内涵[J].科学学研究,2012,30(02):161-164.

CHEN Jin, YANG Yinjuan. Theoretical basis and content for collaborative innovation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2012, 30(02):161-164.

[3] DETTMANN A, PROFF S V, BRENNER T. Co-operation over distance? The spatial dimension of inter-organizational innovation collaboration[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2015,25(4):729-753.

[4] DAS T K, TENG B S. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances:[J]. Journal of Management, 2000, 26(1):31-61.

[5]赵鲲. 企业协同创新风险对创新绩效的影响机理研究[D].北京化工大学,2019.

ZHAO Kun. Research on the influence mechanism of enterprise collaborative innovation risk on innovation performance[D]. Beijing University of Chemical Technology, 2019.

[6] 苏世彬,陈美乔.企业专利风险对校企隐性知识转移绩效影响研究[J].科学学研究,2018,36(03):502-512.

SU Shibin, CHEN Meiqiao.Research on enterprise patent risk affect tacit knowledge transfer performance in university-enterprise cooperation[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018, 36(03):502-512.

[7] MUESER P. A Note on Simultaneous Equations Models of Migration and Employment Growth[J]. Southern Economic Journal, 1985, 52(2):516-522.

[8] 董保宝. 风险需要平衡吗:新企业风险承担与绩效倒U型关系及创业能力的中介作用[J]. 管理世界,2014,(01):120-131.

DONG Baobao. Does the risk need to be balanced? The new enterprise risk-bearing and performance inverted U-type relationship and the intermediary role of entrepreneurial abili-ty[J]. Management World, 2014, (01):120-131.

[9] 祁红梅,王森,樊琦.知识产权风险与创新联盟形成绩效:快速信任的调节作用[J].科研管理,2015,36(01):135-142.

QI Hongmei, WANG Sen, FAN Qi.An empirical study on intellectual property risk and innovation alliance formation performance: The moderating effecting effects of swift trust[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(01):135-142.

[10] ANSOFF H I. Strategies for diversification[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1957, 33(5):113-124.

[11] JIANG K, LIN S C. An Empirical Study on Listed Companies Merger Synergies[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 24(8):726-730.

[12] 解学梅,刘丝雨.协同创新模式对协同效应与创新绩效的影响机理[J].管理科学,2015,28(02):27-39.

XIE Xuemei, LIU Siyu. Impact mechanism of collaborative innovation modes on collaborativ-e effect and innovation performance[J]. Journal of Management Science, 2015, 28(02):27-39.

[13] 褚淑贞,都兰娜.基于CDM模型的创新投入、创新产出与企业创新绩效关系研究——以医药制造业上市公司为例[J].工业技术经济,2017,36(07):136-142.

CHU Shuzhen, DU Lanna. Research on the relationship between innovation input，innovation output and enterprise innovation performance based on CDM model—A case study of pharmaceutical manufacturing listed companies[J]. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 2017, 36(07):136-142.

[14] MANEINELLISM.Innovation, Networking and Implementation[J].Annals of RegionalScience, 2008, 43(3):567-597.

[15] 肖玲诺,史建锋,孙玉忠. 基于BP神经网络的产学研知识创新联盟风险评价研究[J]. 中国软科学,2011,(12):173-179.

XIAO Lingnuo, SHI Jianfeng, SUN Yuzhong. Risk Assessment of Industry-university-research Knowledge Innovation Alliance Based on BP Neural Network Algorithm[J]. China Soft Science, 2011, (12):173-179.

[16] BAKER W E, SINKULA J M. The synergistic effect of market orientation and learning orientation on organizational performance[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1999, 27(4):411.

[17] 陈光. 企业内部协同创新研究[D].西南交通大学,2005.

CHEN Guang. Research on collaborative innovation within enterprises[D]. Southwest Jiaotong University, 2005.

[18] TEECE D, PISANO G. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: an Introduction[J]. Industrial & Corporate Change, 1994, 3(3):537-556.

[19] TEECE D J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13):1319-1350.

[20] WINTER S G. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(10):991-995.

[21] JANTUNEN A, ELLONEN H K, JOHANSSON A. Beyond appearances–Do dynamic capabilities of innovative firms actually differ?[J]. European Management Journal, 2012, 30(2):141-155.

[22] MAKKONEN H, POHJOLA M, OLKKONEN R, et al. Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2014, 67(1):2707-2719.

[23] WANG C L, AHMED P K. Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda[J]. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007, 9(1):31-51.

[24] CYERT R M, GOODMAN P S. Creating effective University-industry alliances: An organizational learning perspective[J]. Organizational Dynamics, 1997, 25(4):45-57.

[25] FAWCETT S E, WALLER M A. Mitigating the Myopia of Dominant Logics: On Differential Performance and Strategic Supply Chain Research[J]. Journal of Business Logistics, 2012, 33(3):173–180.

[26] 陈文博. 中小企业协同创新网络绩效评价[D].大连理工大学,2011

CHEN Wenbo. Performance Evaluation of SME Collaborative Innovation Network[D]. Dalian University of Technology, 2011

[27]XIE X M, ZENG S X, TAM C M. How does cooperative innovation affect innovation performance? Evidence from Chinese firms[J]. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2013, 25(8):939-956.

[28] 胡慧玲,杜栋.基于AHP灰色综合理论的产学研协同创新项目风险评价[J].项目管理技术,2014,12(06):20-24.

HU Huiling, DU Dong. Risk Evaluation of Industry-University-Research Collaborative Innovation Project Based on AHP Grey Comprehensive[J]. Theory Project Management Technology,2014, 12(06):20-24.

[29] SMITH P G. Managing Risk as Product Development Schedules Shrink[J]. Research-Technology Management, 1999, 42(5):25-32(8).

[30] 高昕欣,叶惠,康永博.基于风险矩阵的企业技术创新风险管理研究[J].科技管理研究,2014,34(16):8-11+17.

GAO Xinxin, YE Hui, KANG Yongbo. Research on Risk Management of Enterprise TechnologyInnovation Based on Risk Matrix[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2014, 34(16):8-11+17.

[31] 董静,苟燕楠,吴晓薇.我国产学研合作创新中的知识产权障碍——基于企业视角的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008,29(7):20-25.

DONG Jing, GOU Yannan, WU Xiaowei. Intellectual Property Rights Conflicts in Firm-University R&D Cooperation:An Empirical Study in China[J]. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 2008, 29(7):20-25.

[32] LEIPONEN A, BYMA J. If you cannot block, you better run: Small firms, cooperative innovation, and appropriation strategies[J]. Research Policy, 2009, 38(9):1478-1488.

[33] HAGEDOORN J, CLOODT M. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators?[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 32(8):1365-1379.

[34] 董保宝,葛宝山,王侃.资源整合过程、动态能力与竞争优势:机理与路径[J].管理世界,2011(03):92-101.

DONG Baobao, GE Baoshan, WANG Kan. Resource Integration Process, Dynamic Capabilities and Competitive Advantages: Mechanism and Path[J]. Management World, 2011(03):92-101.

[35] 张莉,林与川.实验研究中的调节变量和中介变量[J].管理科学,2011,24(01):108-116.

ZHANG Li, LIN Yuchuan. Moderation and Mediation in Experimental Study[J]. Management Science, 2011, 24(01):108-116.

[36] 温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用[J].心理学报,2005(02):268-274.

WEN Zhonglin, HOU Jietai, ZHANG Lei. A comparison of moderator and mediator and their applications[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2005(02):268-274.

[37] 宝贡敏,龙思颖.企业动态能力研究:最新述评与展望[J].外国经济与管理,2015,37(07):74-87.

BAO Gongmin, LONG Siying. Dynamic Capabilities Research: The latest review ang prospects[J]. Foreign Economics & Management, 2015, 37(07):74-87.

基金

北京市自然科学基金面上项目：“基于环境-创新-效益共生演化的京津冀重污染行业绿色转型升级路径研究”（9212013,2021.01—2023.12）；教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目：“高校创新资源集聚对区域创新绩效的溢出效应研究”（17YJA630111，2017.03—2020.03）；中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目：“企业协同创新风险对协同创新绩效的影响机理研究”（PTRW1820,2018.08—2020.08）。