深陷“盘丝洞”：网络关系嵌入过度与中小企业技术创新

王石磊

PDF(482 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 116-123.

论文

深陷“盘丝洞”：网络关系嵌入过度与中小企业技术创新

王石磊¹，王飞¹，彭新敏²

作者信息 +

The relationship between over-relational-embeddness and technological innovation of SMEs

Wang Shilei¹, Wang Fei¹, Peng Xinmin²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

深度嵌入网络关系的中小企业如何通过资源拼凑构建资源禀赋、实践技术创新，具有重要的理论和实践价值。269份中小企业数据分析证实：社会关系嵌入过度通过实物资源拼凑促进渐进性技术创新，甚至更显著地预测突破性技术创新，并且共同愿景正向调节该中介效用。研究结果表明，深陷“盘丝洞”的中小企业更需要培养实物资源利用能力、以及构建共同愿景实践技术创新。研究结论丰富和完善了技术创新理论，并对中小企业突破资源束缚实践技术创新提供证据。

Abstract

SMEs face significant resource constraints during attempts to innovate. Network provide partners with superior information about each other, engender knowledge-based trust and, as a result, enforce tie stability and often become overly relational embedded. Exhibit greater resource similarity and marketing commonality have greater propensity to engage in interfirm rivalry. Lacking distinctive competitive advantage, the majority of SMEs therefore never create any discernible technologically innovative outcomes due to overly relational embeddness. However, evidence suggests that SMEs - despite typically being small and resource constrained - are sometimes able to innovate effectively.
One promising theory that explicitly links to ways SMEs respond to resource constraints is bricolage. The definition of bricolage is "making do by applying combinations of the resources at hand to new problems and opportunities", provides an important pathway to achieve technological innovation for resource-constrained firms. Through a bias for action and a refusal to enact limitations on the resources that are available to create solutions, SMEs would tackle unexpected complex challenge, take advantage of opportunities, and go where most other firms won′t, in their attempts at technical innovation.
Authors have generated list of firm attributes that may help firms to conceive of and implement innovation strategies. For purpose of this discussion, these numerous possible firm resources can be conveniently classified into two categories: physical resources and intellectual resources. Physical resources contain physical technology used in a firm, such as plants and facilities, its geographic location, and its access to raw materials. While intellectual resources have experience, intelligence, wisdom. Through physical resource bricolage and intellectual resource bricolage, firms under resource constraints are engage in the process of recombination that are core to creating innovative outcomes. In this paper, we draw on recent studies of bricolage to develop and test theory that suggests that by engaging in physical and intellectual resource bricolage, SMEs overly relational embedded may thereby improve their innovativeness. However, the mechanism needs to be deeply revealed.
Data was collected from 269 SEMs, the empirical results show that over relational embeddness contributes to incremental technological innovation positively through physical bricolage, and shared vision significantly moderated the mediation effect. No general support for our competing hypothesis that the negative effects of bricolage on disruptive innovation was found. The result indicates that SMEs that overly relational embedded achieve technological innovation through physical bricolage and construction of shared vision.
The study has certain contribution in enriching the relevant theories of technological innovation, as well as offering evidence in helping SMEs achieve technological innovation. Contrary to common sense, over relational embeddness provides more opportunities for physical bricolage, making full use of the idle and single use physical resources to overcome the small and weakness of technological innovation of SMEs. In addition, the joint effect of shared vision and over relational embeddness greatly improves the quality of bricolage and enrich the resource, which helps to provide theoretical references for bricolage governance.
This paper also has the following implications for management practices: Firstly, SMEs shall not prevent accepting the reality of asymmetric dependence, and establish the key ties with government, commercial banks, and scientific research institutes. What is more, the SMEs should fully exploit the idle sites, ineffectively used production equipment, unexplored technologies, and innovation potential, which challenged the SMEs. Secondly, shared vison provides bricolage orientation and meaning for SMEs and partners who are overly connected, care should be taken to ensure that shared vision is realistic and achievable to focus their energies and engage in technological innovation.

导出引用

王石磊, 王飞, 彭新敏. 深陷“盘丝洞”：网络关系嵌入过度与中小企业技术创新[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(5): 116-123

Wang Shilei, Wang Fei, Peng Xinmin. The relationship between over-relational-embeddness and technological innovation of SMEs [J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(5): 116-123

参考文献

[1] Smith, W.K.M.L. Tushman.Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams[J]. Organization science, 2005. 16(5): p. 522-536.

[2] Lee, N. What holds back high-growth firms? Evidence from UK SMEs[J]. Small Business Economics,2014. 43(1): p. 183-195.

[3] 池仁勇.区域中小企业创新网络的结点联结及其效率评价研究[J]. 管理世界, 2007(1): p. 105-112.

Chi Renyong.A study of the evaluation of node inter-linkages and the effiiencies thereif if the innovate networks of regional small and medium-sized enterprises[J].Management world, 2007(1): p. 105-112.

[4] Swedberg, R., M.S. Granovetter. The sociology of economic life[M]. 1992: Westview Press.

[5] Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 1997: p. 35-67.

[6] 杨震宁,李东红,范黎波.身陷“盘丝洞”:社会网络关系嵌入过度影响了创业过程吗? [J].管理世界, 2013(12): p. 101-116.

Yang Zhenning,Li Donghong, Fan Libo.Being trapped: Does over network relationship embeddness affect the entrepreneurial process? [J]. Management world, 2013(12): p. 101-116.

[7] Uzzi, B.The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect[J]. American sociological review, 1996: p. 674-698.

[8] Rowley, T., D. Behrens, D. Krackhardt. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries[J]. Strategic management journal, 2000. 21(3): p. 369-386.

[9] 张艳玲,李欢.我国中小企业贡献过半税收，完成超7成发明专利[N/OL]. http://news.china.com.cn/ txt/2018-05/25/content_51521308.htm.

Zhang Guilin,Li Huan. Chinese SMEs contribute more than half of the tax revenue, and over 70% of invention patents[N/OL]. http://news.china.com.cn/txt/2018-05/25/content_51521308.htm.

[10] Baker, T., A.S. Miner, D.T. Eesley.Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process[J]. Research policy, 2003. 32(2): p. 255-276.

[11] McFadyen, M.A.,A.A. Cannella Jr. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships[J]. Academy of management Journal, 2004. 47(5): p. 735-746.

[12] Beck, T.E., D.A. Plowman. Temporary, emergent interorganizational collaboration in unexpected circumstances: A study of the Columbia space shuttle response effort[J]. Organization Science, 2013. 25(4): p. 1234-1252.

[13] Slotte–Kock, S., N. Coviello. Entrepreneurship research on network processes: A review and ways forward[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2010. 34(1): p. 31-57.

[14] Baker,T., R.E.Nelson,. Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage[J]. Administrative science quarterly, 2005. 50(3): p. 329-366.

[15] Winter, S.G. Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1984. 5(3-4): p. 287-320.

[16] Garud, R.,P. Karnøe.Bricolage versus breakthrough: distributed and embedded agency in technology entrepreneurship[J]. Research policy, 2003. 32(2): p. 277-300.

[17] 姜劲,孙延明.代工企业外部社会资本, 研发参与和企业升级[J]. 科研管理, 2012. 33(5): p. 47-55.

Jiang Jin,Sun Yanming.OEMs’ external social capital,R&D involvement, and enterprise upgrading [J].Science Research Management, 2012. 33(5): p. 47-55.

[18] Senyard, J., et al. Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource‐constrained new firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014. 31(2): p. 211-230.

[19] Heirman, A., B. Clarysse.How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective[J]. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004. 29(3-4): p. 247-268.

[20] Salunke, S., J. Weerawardena, J.R. McColl-Kennedy. Competing through service innovation: The role of bricolage and entrepreneurship in project-oriented firms[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013. 66(8): p. 1085-1097.

[21] Kor, Y.Y., J.T. Mahoney. How dynamics, management, and governance of resource deployments influence firm-level performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005. 26(5): p. 489-496.

[22] 杨玲丽,万陆.关系制约产业转移吗?--“关系嵌入-信任-转移意愿”的影响研究[J]. 管理世界, 2017(7).

Yang Lingli,Wan Lu. Does Relationship Restrict Industry Transfer?--A Study on the Influence of "Relationship Embedding-Trust-Transfer Willingness" [J]. Management world, 2017(7).

[23] Chesbrough, H.W. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology[M]. 2006: Harvard Business Press.

[24] 刘岩,蔡虹. 企业知识基础与技术创新绩效关系研究--基于中国电子信息行业的实证分析[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 2011(10): p. 64-69.

Liu Yan, Cai Hong.The Relationship between Knowledge Base and Innovative Performance:A Test in China’s Electrical & Electronic Industry[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 2011(10): p. 64-69.

[25] Tripsas, M., Unraveling the process of creative destruction: Complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997: p. 119-142.

[26] Damanpour, F. and D. Aravind, Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and organization review[J], 2012. 8(2): p. 423-454.

[27] Wu, L., H. Liu, J. Zhang. Bricolage effects on new-product development speed and creativity: The moderating role of technological turbulence[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2017. 70: p. 127-135.

[28] Senge, P.M.The fifth discipline:the art and practice of the learning organization[M]. 2006: Doubleday/Currency. 58.

[29] De Dreu, C.K., B.A. Nijstad, D. van Knippenberg. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2008. 12(1): p. 22-49.

[30] Collinson, S.,D.C. Wilson.Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate[J]. Organization Studies, 2006. 27(9): p. 1359-1387.

[31] Wangrow, D.B., D.J. Schepker, V.L. Barker III. Managerial discretion: An empirical review and focus on future research directions[J]. Journal of Management, 2015. 41(1): p. 99-135.

[32] Ardichvili, A., R. Cardozo, S. Ray. A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development[J]. Journal of Business venturing, 2003. 18(1): p. 105-123.

[33] Cassar, G. Are individuals entering self-employment overly optimistic? an empirical test of plans and projections on nascent entrepreneur expectations[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010. 31(8): p. 822-840.

[34] Phillips, D.J., E.W. Zuckerman. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2001. 107(2): p. 379-429.

[35] Dewald, J., F. Bowen. Storm Clouds and Silver Linings: Responding to Disruptive Innovations Through Cognitive Resilience[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 2010. 34(1): p. 197-218.

[36] Kuratko, D.F., R.D. Ireland, J.S. Hornsby. Improving Firm Performance through Entrepreneurial Actions: Acordia's Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy[J]. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 2001. 15(4): p. 60-71.

[37] Ahlstrom, D., G.D. Bruton. Rapid Institutional Shifts and the Co-evolution of Entrepreneurial Firms in Transition Economies[J]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2010. 34(3): p. 531-554.

[38] Wu, B., Z. Wan, D.A. Levinthal. Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: Innovation incentives and trajectory choices[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014. 35(9): p. 1257-1278.

[39] Subramaniam, M., M.A. Youndt. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities[J]. Academy of Management journal, 2005. 48(3): p. 450-463.

[40] Molina‐Morales, F.X., M.T. Martínez‐Fernández. Social networks: effects of social capital on firm innovation[J]. Journal of Small Business Management, 2010. 48(2): p. 258-279.

[41] Soda, G., A. Zaheer. A network perspective on organizational architecture: performance effects of the interplay of formal and informal organization[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2012. 33(6): p. 751-771.

[42] Chatterjee, S., B. Price.Regression diagnostics[M]. New York, 1991.

[43] Granovetter, M. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited[J]. Sociological theory, 1983: p. 201-233.

[44] 边燕杰,丘海雄.企业的社会资本及其功效[J]. 中国社会科学, 2000. 2(002): p. 2.

Bian Yanjie Qiu Haixiong.The social capital of enterprises and its efficiency [J].Social Sciences in China,2000.2(002):p.2.

[45] 张春雨,郭韬,刘洪德.网络嵌入对技术创业企业商业模式创新的影响[J].科学学研究, 2018(1): p. 167-175.

Zhang Chunyu, Guo Tao,Liu Hongde. The impact of network embedding on the business mode innovation of technological entrepreneurship[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2018(1): p. 167-175.

[46] Alavi, M.,D.E. Leidner.Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues[J]. MIS quarterly, 2001: p. 107-136.

[47] Weiss, M., M. Hoegl, M. Gibbert. The influence of material resources on innovation projects: the role of resource elasticity[J]. R&D Management, 2013. 43(2): p. 151-161.

[48] Siemsen, E., A. Roth, P. Oliveira. Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects[J]. Organizational Research Methods, 2010. 13(13): p. 456-476.