制造业聚集对能源绩效的影响及区域比较研究

杨浩昌, 李廉水, 张发明

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 102-115.

PDF(654 KB)
PDF(654 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (5) : 102-115.
论文

制造业聚集对能源绩效的影响及区域比较研究

  • 杨浩昌1,李廉水2,张发明1
作者信息 +

The impact of manufacturing agglomeration on energy performance and its regional comparison

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

基于2003-2015年中国省级制造业面板数据,本文运用两阶段最小二乘法实证分析了制造业聚集对静态和动态能源绩效的影响及其区域差异。结果显示,(1)从全国总体来看,无论在无环境约束还是在环境约束下,制造业聚集与静态和动态能源绩效及其分解指标之间均存在明显的“U型”曲线关系。(2)制造业经济发展水平与静态和动态能源绩效也呈现出显著的“U型”关系,即“环境库兹涅茨假说”在中国制造业中显著存在。其次,制造业企业规模和环境规制强度均有利于提升静态和动态能源绩效,验证了“熊彼特假说”和“波特假说”。此外,制造业外商直接投资和产权结构对静态和动态能源绩效均具有一定的负向影响作用,支持了“污染避难所”假说。(3)在无环境约束和环境约束两种情形下,制造业聚集对静态和动态能源绩效的影响作用均存在明显的区域差异。其中,东部和中部地区制造业聚集主要通过能源技术效率跨期提高和能源技术跨期进步的共同作用来促进其动态能源绩效提高,而西部地区制造业聚集则主要仅通过能源技术效率跨期提高来推进其动态能源绩效提升。

Abstract

   In the process of China′s rapid growth into the world′s second largest economy, the contribution of manufacturing industry is particularly prominent. "Made in China" is famous all over the world, and a large number of products are exported overseas, which has created one miracle after another for China′s economy, as a result, China has gradually become the largest manufacturing country in the world. Looking back on the development of Chinese manufacturing industry, "resource dividend" was one of the main driving forces for Chinese manufacturing industry to create a miracle of economic growth. However, with the substantial increase of energy factor prices, the increasing pressure of energy conservation and emission reduction and the rapid deterioration of environmental quality problems, the traditional "resource dividend" is gradually disappearing, Chinese manufacturing industry paid for expensive resources and environment, and the extensive economic growth mode characterized by "high energy consumption, high emission, high pollution and low efficiency" is difficult to sustain. Therefore, Chinese manufacturing industry must take the "green manufacturing" road of energy conservation, emission reduction and sustainable development, and it is unsustainable to rely too much on the input of human resources, capital, energy and other factors, the development mode of Chinese manufacturing industry must change from factor expansion to efficiency enhancement. The Fifth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee clearly puts forward the five development concepts of "innovation, coordination, green, opening and sharing", adhering to the basic national policy of resource conservation and environmental protection, and adhering to sustainable development. The 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China also clearly proposes to establish and improve the green economic system, low-carbon and circular development, promote the revolution of energy production and consumption, and advocate green development. Therefore, under the dual pressure of energy and environmental constraints, in order to achieve the sustainable and green development of Chinese manufacturing industry, so as to achieve the win-win of economic growth, energy conservation and environmental protection, and then promote the sound and rapid development of China′s economy, improving the energy performance of manufacturing industry has become the key problem to be solved.
    As the largest manufacturing country in the world, the miracle of economic growth created by Chinese manufacturing industry is also a process of deepening industrial agglomeration. Since the reform and opening up, China′s industrialization process has been advancing with the improvement of the geographical spatial agglomeration level of its economic activities. Therefore, industrial agglomeration has become one of the most significant characteristics of China′s manufacturing economic activities. Theoretically speaking, on the one hand, manufacturing agglomeration can significantly improve energy performance through increasing returns to scale, knowledge or technology spillover, transaction cost reduction and incentive mechanism of energy conservation and emission reduction formed by imperfect competition; On the other hand, it will also lead to the monopoly of resources through the negative externalities, which will lead to the distortion of resource allocation and inefficient use of energy, and then inhibit the improvement of energy performance. Therefore, in-depth study on the impact of manufacturing agglomeration on energy performance and explore feasible ways to improve the energy performance of manufacturing industry will not only help to clarify the mechanism of manufacturing agglomeration on energy performance, but also effectively analyze the influencing factors that restrict the improvement of energy performance, so as to promote Chinese manufacturing industry from a high-speed growth stage to a high-quality development stage and from an extensive development stage mode to intensive development mode. Moreover, it has very important theoretical research significance and practical guiding value to realize the sustainable growth of China′s economy, the intensive and efficient use of energy, the improvement of environmental quality problems, thus speeding up the construction of "two oriented society", the practice of "ecological civilization" and the promotion of "green manufacturing". 
    Based on the provincial manufacturing panel data in China from 2003 to 2015, this paper makes an empirical analysis of the impact of manufacturing agglomeration on static and dynamic energy performance and its regional differences by using the two-stage least square method. The results show that: (1) As a whole, no matter without environmental constraints or under environmental constraints, there is an obvious "U" curve relationship between manufacturing agglomeration and static and dynamic energy performance as well as its decomposition index; (2) There is also a significant "U" relationship between manufacturing economic development level and static and dynamic energy performance, namely that the "environmental Kuznets hypothesis" is significant existence in Chinese manufacturing industry. Secondly, manufacturing enterprises scale and environmental regulation are both beneficial to the improvement of static and dynamic energy performances, Schumpeter′s hypotheses and Porter hypothesis are verified. In addition, foreign direct investment and property right structure of manufacturing industry have a negative impact on static and dynamic energy performance, pollution haven hypothesis is supported; (3) Under two circumstances of without environmental constraints and environmental constraints, there are both obvious regional differences in the impact of manufacturing agglomeration on static and dynamic energy performance. Among them, the manufacturing agglomeration in the eastern and central regions promotes the dynamic energy performance mainly through the combined action of energy technical efficiency improvement and energy technological progress, while the manufacturing agglomeration in the western region promotes the dynamic energy performance only through the energy technical efficiency improvement. Based on the above conclusions, this paper draws some policy implications to promote the manufacturing industry to improve quality and efficiency, save energy and reduce emissions, and realize the high-quality, intensive and sustainable development of Chinese manufacturing industry. 

关键词

制造业聚集 / 能源绩效 / 能源技术效率 / 能源技术进步 / 节能减排


Key words

 manufacturing agglomeration / energy performance / energy technical efficiency / energy technological progress / conserve energy and reduce emissions

引用本文

导出引用
杨浩昌, 李廉水, 张发明. 制造业聚集对能源绩效的影响及区域比较研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(5): 102-115
Yang Haochang, Li Lianshui, Zhang Faming. The impact of manufacturing agglomeration on energy performance and its regional comparison[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(5): 102-115

参考文献

[1]李廉水,周彩红,刘军.中国制造业发展研究报告2012[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.

    Li Lianshui, Zhou Caihong, Liu Jun. A research report on the development of China’s manufacturing industry 2012[M].Beijing: Science Press, 2012.

[2]李廉水,程中华,刘军.中国制造业“新型化”及其评价研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(2):63-75.

    Li Lianshui, Cheng Zhonghua, Liu Jun. The New Pattern” of Chinese manufacturing industry and its evaluation research[J].China Industrial Economics, 2015(2):63-75.

[3]李健旋,杨浩昌.制造业产品和工艺创新协同及其区域比较研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(4):43-54.

    Li Jianxuan, Yang Haochang. A study on the product & process innovation synergy of manufacturing industry and its regional comparison[J].Science Research Management,2018,39(4):43-54.,

[4]李兰冰.中国能源绩效的动态演化、地区差距与成因识别——基于一种新型全要素能源生产率变动指标[J].管理世界,2015(11):40-52.

    Li Lanbing. Dynamic evolution, regional gap and genesis identification of Chinese energy performance: Based on a new variation index of total factor energy productivity[J].Management World, 2015(11):40-52.

[5]李廉水,周勇.技术进步能提高能源效率吗?——基于中国工业部门的实证检验[J].管理世界,2006(10):82-89.

    Li Lianshui, Zhou Yong. Can technological progress improve energy efficiency?: An empirical test based on China's industrial sector[J].Management World, 2006(10):82-89.

[6]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,44(4):41-55.

    Chen Shiyi. Energy consumption, CO2 emission and sustainable development in Chinese industry[J].Economic Research Journal, 2009,44(4):41-55.

[7]朱平辉,袁加军,曾五一.中国工业环境库兹涅茨曲线分析——基于空间面板模型的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(6):65-74.

    Zhu Pinghui, Yuan Jiajun, Zeng Wuyi. Analysis of Chinese industry environment Kuznets curve: Empirical study based on spatial panel model[J].China Industrial Economics, 2010(6):65-74.

[8]冯泰文,孙林岩,何哲等.生产性服务业影响制造业能耗强度的路径分析[J].科研管理,2009,30(4):80-88.

    Feng Taiwen, Sun Linyan, He Zhe, et al. Path analysis on the influence of producer services on manufacturing energy intensity[J].Science Research Management,2009,30(4):80-88.

[9]汪克亮,杨宝臣,杨力.中国全要素能源效率与能源技术的区域差异[J].科研管理,2012,33(5):56-63+78.

    Wang Keliang, Yang Baochen, Yang Li. The regional disparities of China’s total-factor energy efficiency and energy technology[J].Science Research Management,2012,33(5):56-63+78.

[10]杨浩昌,李廉水,刘军.产业聚集与中国城市全要素生产率[J].科研管理, 2018,39(1):83-94.

Yang Haochang,Li Lianshui,Liu Jun. Industrial agglomeration and total factor productivity of cities in China[J].Science Research Management,2018,39(1):83-94.

[11]周五七,聂鸣.中国工业碳排放效率的区域差异研究——基于非参数前沿的实证分析[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究,2012,29(9):58-70+161.

    Zhou Wuqi, Nie Ming. Regional differences in the efficiency of industrial carbon emissions in China[J].The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics,2012,29(9):58-70+161. [12]李廉水,杨浩昌,刘军.我国区域制造业综合发展能力评价研究——基于东、中、西部制造业的实证分析[J].中国软科学,2014(2):121-129.

    Li Lianshui,Yang Haochang,Liu Jun. Evaluation study on comprehensive developing ability of regional manufacturing industry in China based on the empirical analysis of manufacturing industry in East, Middle and West[J].China Soft Science, 2014(2):121-129.

[13]师博,沈坤荣.政府干预、经济集聚与能源效率[J].管理世界,2013(10):6-18+187.

    Shi Bo, Shen Kunrong. The government intervention, the economic agglomeration and the energy efficiency[J].Management World, 2013(10):6-18+187.

[14]He C. Foreign manufacturing investment in China: The role of industrial agglomeration and industrial linkages[J].China & World Economy,2008,16(1):82-99.

[15]杨浩昌,李廉水,刘军.高技术产业聚集对技术创新的影响及区域比较[J].科学学研究,2016,34(2):212-219.

Yang Haochang,Li Lianshui,Liu Jun. Impact of high-tech industrial agglomeration on technological innovation and its regional comparison[J].Studies in Science of Science,2016,34(2):212-219.

[16]Farla J, Blok K. Energy efficiency and structural change in the Netherlands, 1980–1995[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2000, 4(1):93-117.

[17]Freire-González J, Vivanco D F, Puig-Ventosa I. Economic structure and energy savings from energy efficiency in households[J].Ecological Economics,2017,131:12-20.

[18]吴琦,武春友.我国能源效率关键影响因素的实证研究[J].科研管理,2010,31(5):164-171.

    Wu Qi, Wu Chunyou. Empirical research on key influencing factors of energy efficiencies in China[J].Science Research Management,2010,31(5):164-171. 

[19]徐士元.技术进步对能源效率影响的实证分析[J].科研管理,2009,30(6):16-24.

    Xu Shiyuan. Empirical analysis of the impact of technological progress on energy efficiency[J].Science Research Management,2009,30(6):16-24.[20]陈夕红,张宗益,康继军等.技术空间溢出对全社会能源效率的影响分析[J].科研管理,2013,34(2):62-68.

    Chen Xihong, Zhang Zongyi, Kang Jijun, et al. The impact of technological spatial spillover on society-wide energy efficiency[J].Science Research Management,2013,34(2):62-68.

[21]Managi S, Jena P R. Environmental productivity and Kuznets curve in India[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(2):432-440.

[22]史丹,吴利学,傅晓霞等.中国能源效率地区差异及其成因研究——基于随机前沿生产函数的方差分解[J].管理世界,2008(2):35-43.

    Shi Dan, Wu Lixue, Fu Xiaoxia, et al. Regional differences in energy efficiency in China and its causes[J].Management World, 2008(2):35-43.

[23]范丹,王维国.基于低碳经济的中国工业能源绩效及驱动因素分析[J].资源科学,2013,35(9):1790-1800.

    Fan Dan, Wang Weiguo. Industrial energy efficiency in China and driving factors based on a low carbon economy[J].Resources Science,2013,35(9):1790-1800.

[24]Chen N, Xu L, Chen Z. Environmental efficiency analysis of the Yangtze River Economic Zone using super efficiency data envelopment analysis (SEDEA) and tobit models [J].Energy,2017,134:659-671.

[25]陈媛媛,李坤望.FDI省际工业能源效率的影响[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2010,20(6):28-33.

    Chen Yuanyuan, Li Kunwang.The impact of FDI on energy efficiency of interprovincial industries[J].China Population Resources and Environment,2010,20(6):28-33.

[26]Porter M E, Van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship[J].The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118.

[27]张成,陆旸,郭路等.环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J].经济研究,2011,46(2):113-124.

    Zhang Cheng, Lu Yang, Guo Lu, et al. Environmental regulation intensity and technology progress[J].Economic Research Journal, 2011,46(2):113-124.  

[28]Hu J L, Wang S C. Total-factor energy efficiency of regions in China[J].Energy Policy,2006,34(17):3206-3217.

[29]Chien T, Hu J L. Renewable energy and macroeconomic efficiency of OECD and non-OECD economies[J].Energy Policy,2007,35(7):3606-3615.

[30]韩峰,冯萍,阳立高.中国城市的空间集聚效应与工业能源效率[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2014,24(5):72-79.

    Han Feng, Feng Ping, Yang Ligao. Spatial agglomeration effects of Chinas cities and industrial energy efficiency[J].China Population Resources and Environment,2014,24(5):72-79.

[31]Liu J, Cheng Z, Zhang H. Does industrial agglomeration promote the increase of energy efficiency in China? [J].Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 164:30-37.

[32]Peng L, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Energy efficiency and influencing factor analysis in the overall Chinese textile industry[J].Energy,2015,93:1222-1229.

[33]刘军,程中华,李廉水.产业聚集与环境污染[J].科研管理,2016,37(6):134-140.

    Liu Jun, Cheng Zhonghua, Li Lianshui. Industrial agglomeration and environmental pollution[J].Science Research Management,2016,37(6):134-140.

[34]沈能.工业集聚能改善环境效率吗?——基于中国城市数据的空间非线性检验[J].管理工程学报,2014,28(3):57-63+10.

    Shen Neng. Can industrial agglomeration improve environmental efficiency: Spatial empirical test based on city data in China[J].Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2014,28(3):57-63+10.

[35]Fisher-Vanden K, Jefferson G H, Liu H, et al. What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity? [J].Resource and Energy Economics, 2004, 26(1):77-97.

[36]Grossman G M, Krueger A B. Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement[R].CambridgeMA:National Bureau of Economic Research,1991.

[37]张伟,吴文元.基于环境绩效的长三角都市圈全要素能源效率研究[J].经济研究,2011,46(10):95-109.

    Zhang Wei, Wu Wenyuan. Research on total factor energy efficiency of metropolitan regions of Yangtze river delta based on environmental performance[J].Economic Research Journal, 2011,46(10):95-109.

[38]Wang K, Yu S, Zhang W. China’s regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation[J].Mathematical and Computer Modelling,2013, 58(5): 1117-1127.

[39]薛静静,沈镭,彭保发等.区域能源消费与经济和环境绩效——基于14个能源输出和输入大省的实证研究[J].地理学报,2014,69(10):1414-1424.

    Xue Jingjing, Shen Lei, Peng Baofa, et al. The economic and environmental performance of regional energy consumption: An empirical study on 14 major energy output and input provinces in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2014,69(10):1414-1424.

[40]Färe R, Grosskopf S, Hernandez-Sancho F. Environmental performance: an index number approach[J].Resource and Energy Economics,2004,26(4):343-352.

[41]陈晓红,周智玉.基于规模报酬可变假设的城市环境绩效评价及其成因分解[J].中国软科学,2014(10):121-128.

    Chen Xiaohong, Zhou Zhiyu. Urban environmental performance assessment and its causes decomposition based on variable scale reward hypothesis[J].China Soft Science,2014(10):121-128.

[42]Lo S F, Sheu H J, Hu J L. Taking CO2 emissions into a country's productivity change: The Asian growth experience[J].The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,2005,12(3):279-290.

[43]张兵兵,朱晶,全晓云.技术进步与二氧化碳排放强度:理论与实证分析[J].科研管理,2017,38(12):41-48.

    Zhang Bingbing, Zhu Jing, Quan Xiaoyun. A theoretical and empirical analysis of technical progress and CO2 emission intensity[J].Science Research Management,2017,38(12):41-48.

[44]Murty M N, Kumar S, Paul M. Environmental regulation, productive efficiency and cost of pollution abatement: a case study of the sugar industry in India[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2006,79(1):1-9.

[45]熊彼特[美].经济发展理论[M].何畏等译.北京:商务印书馆,1990.

    Schumpeter. Economic development theory[M].Beijing: Commercial Press,1990.

[46]Hatzipanayotou P, Lahiri S, Michael M S. Can cross–border pollution reduce pollution? [J].Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne D'économique, 2002, 35(4):805-818.

[47]Akbostanci E, Tunc G I, TÜRÜT-AŞIK S. Pollution haven hypothesis and the role of dirty industries in Turkey's exports[J].Environment and Development Economics,2007,12(2): 297-322.

[48]范剑勇.产业集聚与地区间劳动生产率差异[J].经济研究,2006(11):72-81.

    Fan Jianyong. Industrial agglomeration and regional labor productivity differences[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2006(11):72-81.

[49]Henderson J V. Marshall's scale economies[J].Journal of Urban Economics,2003,53(1):1-28.

[50]孙浦阳,韩帅,许启钦.产业集聚对劳动生产率的动态影响[J].世界经济,2013(3):33-53.

Sun Puyang, Han Shuai, Xu Qiqin. Dynamic impact of industrial agglomeration on labor productivity[J].The Journal of World Economy,2013(3):33-53.


基金

江西省高校人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:“产业集聚对江西区域环境的影响与对策研究”(JJ18212,2018.10—2020.12);国家自然科学基金项目:“基于‘互联网+’的中国制造业转型升级研究”(71673145,2017.01—2020.12);国家社会科学基金重大项目:“新时代绿色发展绩效评估与美丽中国建设道路研究”(18ZDA047,2018.11—2023.11);教育部哲学社会科学发展报告项目:“中国制造业发展研究报告”(13JBG004,2013.11—2016.11)。


PDF(654 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/