基于边界组织的科技成果转化机构分类体系研究

许可

PDF(729 KB)

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 113-122.

论文

基于边界组织的科技成果转化机构分类体系研究

许可¹,肖冰²

作者信息 +

A research on the classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization based on the boundary organization

Xu Ke¹, Xiao Bing²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

科技成果转化机构是推动跨边界的科技成果转化活动的有效载体，研究科技成果转化机构分类体系，有利于发现并改进共性问题，促进机构高效运转。目前对科技成果转化机构分类的研究数量众多，但分类方式过于分散、且分类方式的理论支撑不足。边界组织是一种作用于跨边界活动的优秀组织范式，可以认为科技成果转化机构是服务于科学与市场界域之间的边界组织。在边界组织理论的基础上，系统的构建了科技成果转化机构的分类体系，按象限划分方法将科技成果转化机构分为科学边界模式、市场边界模式、边界间模式，并建立了科技成果转化机构社会贡献、交互、专业化三个维度的分析框架。利用多案例分析的方式，丰富分类体系的内涵，总结了不同模式的优劣，针对性地提出了每种模式的改进策略，为科技成果转化机构的理论延伸与实践探索提供有益参考。

Abstract

The purpose of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements is to realize the value of scientific and technological achievements. The transformation of scientific and technological achievements is a process in which knowledge and technology become wealth. Research on the classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization is conducive to discover and improve common problems and promote the efficient operation of organization.In recent years, in order to systematically optimize the scientific and technological achievements transformation organization and improve their operational efficiency, many scholars have studied the classification of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization. The existing research has provided useful reference for exploring the classification methods of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization, but there are still some problems: first, the classification methods are too scattered, most of the classification methods are divided into more than four categories, too many categories lead to the classification and exploration of common problems of different modes, and are not conducive to improving common problems and obtaining targeted policy support; second, there is no classification system strong theoretical support, most scholars are based on practical cases to explore the scientific and technological achievements transformation organization, which is not conducive to the construction and improvement of the theoretical system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization.In order to make up for the limitations of the existing research, this paper aims to build a new classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization based on the new perspective of boundary organization and theoretical research, and then carries out case analysis to verify the feasibility and effectiveness of the classification system, and puts forward improvement strategies for each mode.The boundary usually refers to the geographical boundary. The boundary in the knowledge society and academic research usually refers to the abstract barriers caused by the differences between different social boundaries. The transformation of scientific and technological achievements is an obvious cross-border activity, which crosses the scientific and market boundaries. In the process of transformation, there is a common consideration of multiple interests, including not only the interests of both sides of the border, but also the interests of boundary organizations and their own interests. Boundary organization is an effective means to solve cross boundary problems. Boundary organization exists between two different social boundaries. Through the interaction between itself and both sides of the boundary, the boundary becomes fuzzy and integrated. Based on the new perspective of boundary organization, combined with the boundary characteristics in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements, and according to the positioning of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization in the scientific and market fields, a new classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization is constructed according to quadrant division, which can be divided into three types: the office mode of achievements transformation close to the scientific boundary and the resource integration close to the market boundary. It is a service-oriented intermediary mode, which is in the middle of the boundary.According to the traditional theory of boundary organization, there are five distinct characteristics of boundary organization: public welfare, professionalism, neutrality, stability and integration. At the same time, as a special organization type, scientific and technological achievements transformation organization has the following characteristics: first, it brings certain social and public benefits. Second, participate in the transformation of scientific and technological achievements through interaction with both sides. Third, provide professional services. Therefore, based on the definition of boundary organization characteristics in boundary organization theory, combined with the characteristics of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization, the two theories are deeply classified and integrated, and the analysis perspective of social contribution attribute, interactive attribute and professional attribute of scientific and technological achievements transformation institution is established, which is taken as the theoretical framework of case analysis.Finally, this paper shows the research conclusions of three typical cases, and finds that: the scientific boundary model has strong social contribution, poor interaction and poor specialization; the market boundary model has poor social contribution, general interaction and strong specialization; the boundary model is relatively balanced in terms of social contribution, interaction and specialization, There are no obvious advantages and disadvantages. The optimization strategies are proposed for the three modes.The main contributions and enlightenment of this paper are: (1) theoretical contribution and enlightenment. The first is to expand the scope of application of the boundary organization theory, taking the boundary organization as the theoretical basis of the research on the classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization; the second is to expand the research field of the classification of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization, and systematically construct a new classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization by the scientific method of quadrant division. (2) Practical contribution and enlightenment. The first is to integrate the scientific and technological achievements transformation organization with the boundary organization theory, and construct a case analysis framework of three dimensions: social contribution attribute, interaction attribute and specialization attribute; the second is that the case selection is typical and novel and unique, and the case content rarely appears in previous studies; the third is to summarize the case analysis results and find out the advantages and disadvantages of different models and put forward the improvement strategy of each mode. In order to improve the theoretical system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization, and better improve the existing problems of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization, provide useful reference.

导出引用

许可, 肖冰. 基于边界组织的科技成果转化机构分类体系研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(4): 113-122

Xu Ke, Xiao Bing. A research on the classification system of scientific and technological achievements transformation organization based on the boundary organization[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(4): 113-122

参考文献

[1] 潘教峰.加快科技成果转化让社会财富不断涌流[J].中国科学院院刊,2014,29(01):17-26.

Pan Jiaofeng. Accelerating the transformation of scientific and technological achievements and making social wealth flow continuously [J]. Journal of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2014,29 (01): 17-26

[2] Link A N, Oliver Z T. Literature on US federal laboratory and agency technology transfer mechanisms[M]//Technology Transfer and US Public Sector Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020.

[3] Jolly J A. The stevenson-wydler technology innovation act of 1980 public law 96-480[J]. The journal of technology transfer, 1980, 5(1): 69-80.

[4] Baglieri D, Baldi F, Tucci C L. University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all[J]. Technovation, 2018, 76: 51-63.

[5] 马海涛,岳林峰.知识产权保护实践中的地方政府因素[J].经济与管理评论,2020,36(04):56-64.

Ma Haitao, Yue Linfeng. Local government factors in the practice of intellectual property protection [J]. Economic and management review, 2020,36 (04): 56-64

[6] 戚湧,朱婷婷,郭逸.科技成果市场转化模式与效率评价研究[J].中国软科学,2015(06):184-192.

Qi Yong, Zhu Tingting, Guo Yi. Research on market transformation mode and efficiency evaluation of scientific and technological achievements [J]. China soft science, 2015 (06): 184-192

[7] Horner S, Jayawarna D, Giordano B. Strategic choice in universities: Managerial agency and effective technology transfer[J]. Research Policy, 2019, 48(5): 1297-1309.

[8] 林洪,盛建新,牛婧红,范欲晓.技术转移机构服务模式与服务类别比较研究——以湖北省27家技术转移示范机构为例[J].科技进步与对策,2014,31(12):50-53.

Lin Hong, Sheng Jianxin, Niu Jinghong, Fan Yuxiao. Comparative study on service mode and service category of technology transfer institutions -- Taking 27 technology transfer demonstration institutions in Hubei Province as an example [J]. Science and technology progress and countermeasures, 2014,31 (12): 50-53

[9] 郭曼,朱常海,邵翔,石宁宁.中国技术转移机构的发展策略研究——基于能力升级的视角[J].中国科技论坛,2018(01):16-23.

Guo man, Zhu Changhai, Shao Xiang, Shi Ningning. Research on the development strategy of China's technology transfer institutions from the perspective of capability upgrading [J]. China Science and Technology Forum, 2018 (01): 16-23

[10] 陈红喜,姜春,袁瑜,王帅斌.基于新巴斯德象限的新型研发机构科技成果转移转化模式研究——以江苏省产业技术研究院为例[J].科技进步与对策,2018,35(11):36-45.

Chen Hongxi, Jiang Chun, Yuan Yu, Wang shuaibin. Research on the transfer and transformation mode of scientific and technological achievements of new R&D institutions based on the new Pasteur Quadrant: a case study of Jiangsu Institute of industrial technology [J]. Scientific and technological progress and countermeasures, 2018,35 (11): 36-45

[11] Jacob M. Boundary work in contemporary science policy: A review[J]. Prometheus, 2005, 23(2): 195-207.

[12] 孟强. 科学划界:从本质主义到建构论[J]. 科学学研究, 2004, 22(6):561-565.

Meng Qiang. Demarcation of Science: From Essentialism to constructivism [J]. Scientific research, 2004, 22 (6): 561-565

[13] Fletcher P J, Spranger M S, Ortner P B. Using boundary organizations to address complex environmental issues: case study of the NOAA-AOML Sea Grant liaison position[J]. 2017.

[14] Gareth M. Images of organization[M]. London: Stage, 1986.

[15] Guston D H. Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the Office of Technology Transfer as a boundary organization. [J]. Social Studies of Science, 1999, 29（1）:87-111.

[16] 黄小茹,饶远.从边界组织视角看新兴科技的治理机制——以合成生物学领域为例[J].自然辩证法通讯,2019,41(05):89-95.

Huang Xiaoru, Rao yuan. Governance mechanism of emerging science and technology from the perspective of boundary organization -- Taking synthetic biology as an example [J]. Dialectics of nature communication, 2019, 41 (05): 89-95

[17] 朱旭峰,贾杨.研究基金机构在中国智库建设中的作用：“边界组织”的视角[J].社会科学文摘,2019(10):117-119.

Zhu Xufeng, Jia Yang. The role of research fund institutions in the construction of think tanks in China: the perspective of border organizations [J]. Social Science Abstracts, 2019 (10): 117-119

[18] Yeow A, Sia S K, Soh C, et al. Boundary organization practices for collaboration in enterprise integration[J]. Information Systems Research, 2018, 29(1): 149-168.

[19] 马小亮.科学与政策之间的边界组织研究[D].中国科学院大学,2017

Ma Xiaoliang. Research on boundary organization between science and policy [D]. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017

[20] 许可,刘海波,肖冰.基于边界组织的技术转移服务机构新范式[J].科学学研究,2019,37(07):1231-1237.

Xu Ke, Liu Haibo, Xiao Bing. New paradigm of technology transfer service institutions based on boundary organization [J]. Scientific research, 2019,37 (07): 1231-1237

[21] 陈光华.高技术研究机构研发模式分类体系研究[J].科研管理,2018,39(10):120-127.

Chen Guanghua. Research on the classification system of R&D mode of high-tech research institutions[J]. Science research management,2018,39(10):120-127.

[22] 樊春良,马小亮.科技与政策之间的边界组织[J].科学学研究,2018,36(08):1353-1359+1420.

Fan Chunliang, Ma Xiaoliang. Boundary organization between science and technology and policy [J]. Scientific research, 2018,36 (08): 1353-1359 + 1420

[23] Cash D W, Borck J C, Patt A G. Countering the Loading-Dock Approach to Linking Science and Decision Making: Comparative Analysis of EI Niño/Southern Oscillation Forecasting Systems[J]. Science Technology & Human Values, 2006, 31(4):465-494.

[24] Kirchhoff C J, Esselman R, Brown D. Boundary organizations to boundary chains: Prospects for advancing climate science application[J]. Climate Risk Management, 2015, 9(C):20-29.

[25] 许可,贺宁馨,肖冰.基于专利诉讼的中国企业专利决策行为研究[J].宏观经济研究,2020(01):129-140.

Xu Ke, He Ningxin, Xiao Bing. Research on patent decision-making behavior of Chinese enterprises based on patent litigation [J]. Macroeconomic research, 2020 (01): 129-140

[26] 孙涛.我国老工业基地科技成果转化效率评价研究——以东北地区为例[J].中国软科学,2020(01):164-170.

Sun Tao. Evaluation on the transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements in China's old industrial bases -- Taking Northeast China as an example [J]. China soft science, 2020 (01): 164-170

[27] 文剑英.科技成果转化的理性思考[J].科研管理,2019,40(05):175-181.

Wen Jianying. Rational thinking on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements [J]. Science research management, 2019,40 (05): 175-181

[28] 唐五湘.科技成果转化绩效评价指标体系的比较分析[J].工业技术经济,2017,36(01):61-67.

Tang Wuxiang. Comparative analysis of performance evaluation index system of scientific and technological achievements transformation [J]. Industrial Technology Economy, 2017,36 (01): 61-67

[29] Yin R K. Case study research and applications: Design and methods[M]. Sage publications, 2017.

[30] 中国科学院课题组. 中国科学院科技促进发展报告[R],北京:2018

Research group of Chinese Academy of Sciences. Report on science and technology promotion and development of Chinese Academy of Sciences [R], Beijing: 2018

[31] 张虎,杨柳,何为.高校科技成果转化的现状与症结[J].科研管理,2017,38(S1):676-679.

Zhang Hu, Yang Liu, He Wei. Current situation and crux of transformation of scientific and technological achievements in Colleges and universities [J]. Science research management, 2017,38 (S1): 676-679.