知识创新管理研究热点与演进——基于“协同引证矩阵”和“时间异质性LOG模型”的分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在知识创新为主导的时代，知识创新推动着社会经济转型、社会组织变革和科学技术发展，并成为学术界研究的重要议题。本文以文献引证研究法为基础，通过定量分析知识创新研究议题、研究热点的发展和演化，探讨了知识创新研究未来可能的研究方向和研究机会。研究结果显示，知识创新中16个具有重要价值的研究议题呈动态变化，多数研究议题完成了从战略视角到操作视角的方向性转变，且呈现出不同的发展态势，同时揭示出跨越边界的知识团队创新、开放式知识创新、知识分享与知识转移、网络化知识创新等议题在未来的研究机会。研究结论消除了有关研究中在文献回顾时定量分析较少的质疑，使引证研究法确实成为知识创新文献研究的有力支撑和补充。研究能客观地揭示专家评估法等所没有察觉到的研究议题和未来研究趋势，以减少学者们在文献回顾中繁重、重复的工作，对研究人员和管理者精准把握知识创新研究的方向和未来具有一定的借鉴和参考价值。

关键词: , 知识创新；引证研究；研究议题；文献

Abstract:

In the nearly half a century, the one sure source of lasting competitive advantage is knowledge innovation, whose sole business is continuous innovation. When markets shift, technologies proliferate, competitors multiply, and products become obsolete almost overnight, successful companies are those that consistently create new knowledge, disseminate it widely throughout the organization, and quickly embody it in new technologies and products. The knowledge innovation is pushing the social and economic transformation, promoting social change and helping science and technology development, especially, when the big data, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, as well as the kinds of humanoid robot′s technology is widely used in the scenes of production, manufacture and life. it is said that knowledge innovation will become the most important key and the latest power in the development of national economy. As the primary part of productivity, in the past, knowledge has significantly changed in quantity and quality in the economic aspect of the developed countries, in the future, it will gradually become the basic driving force of the national economy in the development countries. It is true that knowledge innovation is considered to be the determinant of the development of national productivity and competitiveness when facing seriously and violently economic competition in the future of the world. As the basic cell of national economy, It is impossible to the enterprise to leave the knowledge innovation in order to the survival and development because the knowledge innovation will become the important strategic means for enterprises to cope with the severe industrial environment and the fierce market competition, more and more companies, businesses and enterprises is developing a new stage and attempt to acquire and maintain the core competitive advantage. Because it is important thinking and preparation in modern enterprise, so this article formal and serious conducting this research and work about the management problem of knowledge economy and knowledge innovation.

Economic Development Theory opens up a research trip of knowledge creation in the beginning of the 20th century. Then, knowledge innovation had been distinguished from knowledge creation as a define clear field of study was the article knowledge Innovation: The Common Language by American scholar Amidon in 1993. Because it not only improves innovation ability and environmental adaptability and core competitive ability of enterprise, dissolve the market risk, reduce the management cost, strengthen organization, help the enterprise to become outstanding, but also prosperity the national economy and guarantee the whole social progress, so that the academics and management practitioners has continues researched it until now. Specifically, with the deepening of China′s economic reform, the knowledge innovation has become a hotspot of the current research in China. To this, we cannot help to ask: what about we know in the field of research on knowledge innovation in the past? What is been studying by the academics and management practitioners at present? What also need to be explored in the future?

In general, the researchers and authors of an academic journal literature and paper who defines the area of research and status description which mainly according to their self in research field of the knowledge innovation, few studies less have used citation data for quantitative analysis when they have analyzed the system and development evolution process of research area. It is that the Citation Method usually can be more objectively, without personal bias. It can be revealed the research issues and future research trends without be limited by the circle of evaluation method which are not aware of by experts and researchers. It can be used as a strong support and supplement to the literature review and received the recognition from the academic circle. For this purpose, in order to understand the knowledge system of the knowledge innovation and its evolution in the academic and literature study, this paper is dedicated to exploring the following three questions: What is research topic in the field of academic and literature study in the existing knowledge innovation? How evolve about the research topic? What will become topic research issues in this field in future.

Therefore, the cited method is adopted in this paper, this article choose the most seven authoritative academic journals in the world ,such as Academy of Management Review, Strategic Management Journal, Journal of Management, Human Resource Management, International Journal of Human Resource Management, R&D Management, Journal of Product Innovation Management, we also choose three Chinese domestic authority journal in this field (Management World, Science Research Management, Nankai Management Review),have completed a full scan the 10 journals and analyzed the influence and uniqueness about samples and the literature by used Collaborative Cited Matrix and Heterogeneity Time LOG Model. At the same time, have supplemented dynamic Platts Diagram in order to show the development and evolution of the research topics in the field of knowledge Innovation, because it can reveal different issues between researchers and research and the growth rate of uniqueness to assess development potential of future in every research issue, expand the research intellectual link between the literature and influence. Finally, through the empirical research, the results of this study will reveal the main research issues and development process at present, and the possible research directions in the research field of knowledge innovation in future. By the citation method, this paper empirically tested the most heated topics in current research. This article are not only analyzed quantitatively the research topics on knowledge innovation and their developing trajectory, also identified the potential area and opportunities for future research. The results reveal 16 most important research topics and their dynamic evolution, the majority of research topics have shifted from strategic perspective to operational perspective, the future research opportunities are such as cross-border innovation, open innovation, knowledge sharing and transfer, external knowledge and innovation, the innovation network, innovation evaluation and application, innovation ecology and environmental and so on. The findings will solve some of questions which always cause confused and puzzled of experts and scholars, in order to promote theory research and offer referencing and guiding for enterprise practice in knowledge innovation.

Key words: knowledge innovation, citation analysis, research topic, literature

孙大光, 唐小飞, 鲁平俊. 知识创新管理研究热点与演进——基于“协同引证矩阵”和“时间异质性LOG模型”的分析[J]. 科研管理, 2021, 42(2): 1-11.

Sun Daguang, Tang Xiaofei, Lu Pingjun. Hotspots and evolution of knowledge innovation management research—— An analysis based on cocitation matrix and time-heterogenous log-multiplicative model[J]. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(2): 1-11.

参考文献

[1] Hansen M T, Birkinshaw J. The innovation value chain[J]. Harvard business review, 2007, 85(6): 121-130.

[2] Amidon D M. Knowledge innovation: the common language[J]. Journal of Technology Studies, 1993, 19(2): 15-21.

[3]郑俊巍. 我国管理创新研究结构与发展的文献计量与网络图景[J]. 科研管理, 2018, 39(9): 102-112.

Zhen Junwei. Structure and the development of literature metrology management innovation research in network picture in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(9): 102-112.

[4]Galunic D C, Rodan S. Resource Recombinations in the Firm: Knowledge Structures and the Potential for Schumpeterian Innovation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(12): 1193-1201.

[5]Nonoka I , Takeuchi H . The Knowledge-Creating Company[J]. Nankai Business Review, 1998, 482-484(2):175-187.

[6]郑成华. 创新集群知识网络环境系统构成及实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2017,290(11):182-183.

Zheng Chenghua. Empirical analysis of knowledge innovation cluster network environment system[J]. Management World, 2017,290(11):182-183.

[7]葛笑春. 企业协同NPOs获取竞争优势的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2012(07):129-136.

Ge Xiaochun. The empirical study of corporate synergy NPOs to obtain competitive advantage[J].Science Research Management, 2012(07):129-136.

[8]鲁平俊, 唐小飞. 深入理解营销渠道研究的过去和未来[J]. 科研管理, 2015 (1): 159-166.

Lu Pingjun, Tang Xiaofei.Deeper understanding of marketing channel research: The present and the future[J]. Science Research Management, 2015 (1): 159-166.

[9] Podsakoff P M, MacKenzie S B, Bachrach D G, et al. The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(5): 473-488.

[10]]鲁平俊, 唐小飞. 营销渠道研究综述与展望——基于“协同引证矩阵”和“时间异质性LOG模型”的分析[J]. 预测, 2015, 34(3): 74-80.

Lu Pingjun, Tang Xiaofei. Review and prospect in marketing channel research[J].Forecasting, 2015, 34(3): 74-80.

[11] Pieters R, Baumgartner H, Vermunt J, et al. Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1999, 16(2): 113-127.

[12] Kunz W H, Hogreve J. Toward a deeper understanding of service marketing: The past, the present, and the future[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2011, 28(3): 231-247.

[13] Jobber D, Simpson P. A citation analysis of selected marketing journals[J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1988, 5(2): 137-142

[14] Krackhardt E D . A second look at Krackhardt's graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations [J]. Social Networks, 2012,34(2):159-163

[15] Nerur S P, Rasheed A A, Natarajan V. The intellectual structure of the strategic management field: An author co‐citation analysis[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(3): 319-336.

[16] Agresti A. Categorical data analysis [M]. 2002，Hoboken，NJ: Wiley

[17] Wooldridge J M. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach[M]. Nelson Education, 2016.

[18] Drucker P. Innovation and entrepreneurship[M]. Routledge, 2014.

[19] Howells J R L. Tacit knowledge, innovation and economic geography[J]. Urban studies, 2002, 39(5-6): 871-884.

[20] Drucker P. The effective executive[M]. Routledge, 2018.

[21] Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., Uzzi, B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge[J]. Science, 2007, 316: 1036–1039.

[22] Gremler D D. The critical incident technique in service research[J]. Journal of service research, 2004, 7(1): 65-89.

[23] Stremersch S, Verniers I, Verhoef P C. The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2007, 71(3): 171-193.