设计科学知识图谱研究——基于国家自科基金视角

徐江, 欧细凡, 孙刚

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 65-71.

PDF(408 KB)
PDF(408 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (12) : 65-71.
论文

设计科学知识图谱研究——基于国家自科基金视角

  • 徐江,欧细凡, 孙刚
作者信息 +

A research on the knowledge graph of design science——A perspective based on the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)

  • Xu Jiang, Ou Xifan, Sun Gang
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

   以1997—2017年间获得国家自然科学基金资助发表的设计科学中文文献为研究对象,运用文献计量方法并结合VOSviewer 和CiteSpace V等可视化分析软件对设计科学文献进行统计分析和内容挖掘,进而探测了设计科学领域的知识分布、研究热点和动态前沿,建构出设计科学知识图谱。研究表明:(1)我国设计科学研究文献数不断上升,西北工业大学发文量领先于国内其他高等院校,概念设计、产品设计、人机交互、创新设计等关键词在设计学中出现频次最高;(2)设计科学研究的六个热点领域是设计理论与方法、概念设计、情感设计、智能设计、交互设计和人机工程;(3)设计科学研究的发展经历了研究意识觉醒期、研究奠基期、研究拓展期及研究纵深期等4个阶段。

Abstract

   With the change of the structure of scientific knowledge, the scientific paradigm of seeking knowledge has been reconsidered and developed. Breaking the division of disciplines that are over-segmented and isolated, and responding to increasingly complex design sciences in an interdisciplinary and integrated approach is more than ever. In this case, relying solely on the designer′s experience and intuition can no longer effectively solve complex design practice problems, but more and more frequent and active "design science" are needed. In order to meet the needs of social development, it is necessary to explore the hotspots of design science from the existing literature research results, which is conducive to the systematic construction of design science. Design science combines scientific research paradigm with designer-style thinking, which has attracted many scholars′ attention. However, the current research results are basically based on qualitative and speculative methods, so far there is still a lack of multi-index, quantitative and systematic research on the "hot spot of design science and its evolution trend". 
   This paper uses the bibliometric method to visualize the literature results. On the one hand, it can effectively overcome the subjective one-sidedness caused by the single experience summary, solve the differences and confusion in the development of design research, and provide new ideas for the review of the discipline literature of design research. On the other hand, this paper studies the hotspots and frontiers of design science based on open and transparent authoritative data, which is conducive to clarify the inner theoretical framework and logical structure of design science, and then proposes new research perspectives and paradigms for the development of interdisciplinary theory. It takes the design science Chinese literature published by the National Natural Science Foundation from 1997 to 2017 as the research object, and uses the bibliometric method and the visual analysis software such as VOSviewer and CiteSpace V to conduct statistical analysis and content mining on the design scientific literature. 
    Firstly, it reflects the knowledge distribution rule of design research by mining the co-occurrence relationship between high-frequency words, and studies the hot spot and direction of design research based on cluster analysis of co-word network. Then the citation analysis is carried out by using the reference data. By drawing the citation time series map of design science, the frontier and trend of design discipline are studied intuitively and deeply. Finally, through comprehensive and comparative analysis, the design scientific knowledge graph system is constructed. In this paper, the macroscopic and microscopic knowledge structure, the evolution law and the development trend of the design science field are interpreted in the way of data visualization, and the reference for the scientific research direction and the research focus is provided for the scientific researchers. 
   The research results show that: firstly, in the past 20 years, the number of literature on design science in China has been increasing step by step with time, and the degree of design scientific research and the degree of attention have been increasing continuously. In the past 20 years, Northwestern Polytechnic University has produced the largest amount of literatures in this field, followed by Zhejiang University, Software Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sichuan University, Tongji University, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Hebei University of Technology,Hunan University and other institutions which have  established the first batch of design majors in China. Keywords such as conceptual design, product design, human-computer interaction, and innovative design have the highest frequency in design science. 
   Secondly, the six hot areas of design science research are design theory and methods, conceptual design, emotional design, intelligent design, interaction design, and ergonomics. Conceptual design and design theory and methods provide a core idea for the development of design science. The field of human-computer interaction and computer, network communication, anthropology and other fields are intertwined, which profoundly reflects the interdisciplinary nature of design science. Personalized emotional design is closely related to conceptual design, and it is a research hotspot in recent years. The field of intelligent design focuses on the expression of knowledge and the reasoning of concepts, and is strongly associated with the field of conceptual design. The knowledge base in the field of ergonomics mainly comes from engineering psychology, anthropometry, technology aesthetics and so on. The various fields of design broadly integrate the theories and methods of various disciplines, and realize the orderly inheritance and evolution of the internal knowledge of design, and the integration, reorganization, creation and appreciation of interdisciplinary knowledge. It reflects the cross-disciplinary and innovative nature of design. 
    Thirdly, the development of design science research has gone through four stages: research awareness awakening period, research foundation period, research expansion period and research depth period. During the awakening period of the research, the heat and attention of the design research began to rise, the conceptual design research was enriched and developed, and the characterization of the emerging design cognitive research direction began to awaken. It injects vitality into the development of modeling and reasoning technology applications and conceptual design studies for analyzing product information. In the research foundation period, design science research focuses on axiomatic design, which lays a foundation for the orderly inheritance and evolution of internal knowledge in design science research. In the research expansion period, design science research has gathered into emotional design. Grasping the user′s emotional tendency and humanistic care in design has become a new hot spot in design science. In the depth of the research period, scholars examine and reflect on the problems existing in the research, trace the source, and turn to new questions such as the inner cognition of design and the way of thinking.

关键词

设计科学 / 知识图谱 / 科学基金 / 研究前沿 / 演变趋势

Key words

design science / knowledge graph / science fund / research frontier / evolution trend

引用本文

导出引用
徐江, 欧细凡, 孙刚. 设计科学知识图谱研究——基于国家自科基金视角[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(12): 65-71
Xu Jiang, Ou Xifan, Sun Gang. A research on the knowledge graph of design science——A perspective based on the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC)[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(12): 65-71

参考文献

[1]郭湧.当下设计研究的方法论概述[J].风景园林, 2011, 1(2):68-71
[2]Nigle Cross.Design Research: A Disciplined Coversation[J].Design Issues, 1999, 15(2):6-6
[3] Nigle Cross.Designerly Ways of Knowing[M]. London: Springer- Verlag London Limited, 2006: 2.
[4] Jonas W.Design Research and its Meaning to the Methodological Development of the Discipline[M]. Ralf Michel (eds). Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects. Berlin: Birkhauser.2006:187.
[5]李立新.中国设计学源流辩[J].南京艺术学院学报(美术与设计), 2016, (02):1-4
[6]邹其昌, 华沙.近五年中国设计学理论建设与发展概述——中国当代设计理论体系建构问题探索系列研究[J].创意与设计, 2018, (01):96-101
[7] 郑曙旸.设计学之中国路[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2013.
[8]韩增林, 李彬, 张坤领, 李璇.基于中国海洋经济研究的知识图谱分析[J].地理科学, 2016, 36(05):643-652
[9]夏恩君, 宋剑锋.开放式创新研究的演化路径和热点领域分析——基于科学知识图谱视角[J].科研管理, 2015, 36(07):28-37
[10] 赵伟.广义设计学的研究范式危机与转向:从“设计科学”到“设计研究”[D].天津大学, 2012.
[11] 方晓风.设计研究新范式[M].上海人民美术出版社, 2018.
[12]徐江,设计科学知识图谱[M], 北京:中国科学技术出版社,2018.
[13] 徐江, 欧细凡, 苏浦捷, 孙刚.设计学科相关领域国家自然科学基金资助项目分析[J].装饰, 2018, (05):100-103
[14] 胡芳槐.基于多种数据源的中文知识图谱构建方法研究[D].华东理工大学, 2015.
[15] Xifan OU, Jiang Xu, Gang Sun, Xu Jingyu.Research on the Construction of Knowledge Map of Design Theory and Method - Based on the Perspective of Natural Science Foundation of China[C]. Wuxi: Cumulus Association 2018, 10.
[16]金玉然, 戢守峰, 于江楠.商业模式创新的研究热点及其演化可视化分析[J].科研管理, 2018, 39(07):50-58
[17] Pahl G, Beitz W, Engineering Design[M], London: Design Council, 1984.
[18]孙守迁, 黄琦, 潘云鹤.计算机辅助概念设计研究进展[J].计算机辅助设计与图形学学报, 2003, (06):643-650
[19]任磊, 魏永长, 杜一, 张小龙, 戴国忠.面向信息可视化的语义+人机交互技术[J].计算机学报, 2015, 38(12):2488-2498
[20]丁俊武, 杨东涛, 曹亚东, 王林.情感化设计的主要理论、方法及研究趋势[J].工程设计学报, 2010, 17(01):12-18
[21]肖人彬, 周济, 查建中.智能设计——先进设计技术的核心[J].机械设计, 1997, (04):2-4
[22]刘世豪, 杜彦斌, 郭志忠.基于人机工程学的数控机床耦合仿生优化设计方法研究进展[J].河北科技大学学报, 2015, 36(03):232-239
[23]梁永霞, 刘则渊, 杨中楷.引文分析学的知识流动理论探析[J].科学学研究, 2010, 28(05):668-674
[24] 冯培恩, 朱爱华, 陈泳, 张帅, 何斌.产品基因及其在能量转换功能求解中的应用[J].工程设计学报, 2004, (03):113-118
[25] 冯培恩, 陈泳, 张帅, 潘双夏.基于产品基因的概念设计[J].机械工程学报, 2002, (10):1-6
[26] 何斌, 冯培恩, 潘双夏.分布式概念设计知识资源的共享策略和方法[J].浙江大学学报(工学版), 2007, (08):1383-1388
[27]Su JCY, Chen SJ, Lin L.A structured approach to measuring functional dependency and sequencing of coupled tasks in engineering design[J],Pergamon Press,Inc[J].Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2003, 45(1):195-214
[28] Chiou SJ, Kota S.Automated conceptual design of mechanisms[J].Mechanism & Machine Theory, 1999, 34(3):476-495
[29] 唐敦兵, 钱晓明, 王晓勇, 楼佩煌.公理化设计矩阵与设计结构矩阵同步演化机制研究[J].计算机集成制造系统, 2007, (08):1465-1475
[30]苏建宁, 王鹏, 张书涛, 赵雪松, 周爱民.产品意象造型设计关键技术研究进展[J].机械设计, 2013, 30(01):97-100
[31]罗仕鉴, 潘云鹤.产品设计中的感性意象理论、技术与应用研究进展[J].机械工程学报, 2007, (03):8-13
[32]于巧稚.夯实基础 深入创新——访河北工业大学副校长 檀润华[J].中国制造业信息化, 2009, 38(20):65-66
[33]Nigan Bayazit.Investigating Design: A Review of Forty Years of Design Research[J].Design Issues, 2004, 20(1):16-30

基金

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51675382,51575158);上海市设计学IV 类高峰学科资助项目(DA17001, DB18106);同济大学研究生教育改革与研究项目(2018GH27003)。

PDF(408 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/