基于中国2013-2018年的省级面板数据,构建模型讨论了区域创新网络、高技术企业技术流动对区域创新能力的作用机制,进一步分析了不同创新网络水平地区,高技术企业技术流动对区域创新发展的作用力,利用门槛回归探究了随着区域网络水平的演进,技术市场中高技术企业技术输出和吸纳的变化态势。实证结果表明:(1)区域创新网络、高技术企业技术输出和技术吸纳均有助于区域创新能力的提升,但作用机制和强度不同;(2)相对创新网络欠发达地区,在创新网络发达地区的高技术企业的技术创新具有正向的自我强化机制,但创新网络的作用力稍弱;(3)无论创新网络发达/欠发达地区,高技术企业技术吸纳对区域创新能力的促进作用均大于技术输出;(4)随着创新网络水平的提升,高技术企业技术流动对区域创新能力的影响作用逐渐减弱。
Abstract
With the deepening of open innovation, global technology cooperation methods have become diversified, resource flow patterns have become networked, and the scientific and technological innovation capabilities of countries have gradually increased. However, there is still a large gap in the innovation level of high-tech industries among various regions of our country, and most regions are still in the state of "technical catch-up". At the same time, the "island phenomenon" in our country′s scientific and technological innovation have interrupted the knowledge transmission chain between various innovation subjects, which in turn led to inadequate capabilities in various regions to acquire, diffuse and apply knowledge. Therefore, it has become an important theoretical issue that determines the rapid development of the region to clarify how to break through the obstacles to innovation and cooperation in each region, and solve the problems of insufficient regional development resources and scattered information resources. Based on the provincial panel data of China from 2013 to 2018, this paper constructs a model to discuss the mechanism of regional innovation networks and technology flows of high-tech enterprises on regional innovation capability. Furthermore, this study analyzes the impact of high-tech enterprise technology flow on regional innovation development in regions with different innovation network levels, and then uses a threshold model to analyze the changing trend of technology output and technology absorption of high-tech enterprises in the technology market with the improvement of the level of regional innovation network. The empirical results show that:Firstly, regional innovation networks, high-tech enterprise′s technology output and technology absorption contribute to the improvement of regional innovation capabilities, but their mechanisms and intensities of the impact are different. The innovation network achieves the improvement of regional innovation capabilities by making up for the shortcomings of resource shortages among various innovation subjects. The strength is the strongest. The technology absorption of high-tech enterprises relies on the effects of "endogenous growth of technology" and "optimized resource allocation" to promote the improvement of regional innovation capabilities, with the intensity followed. The technology output of high-tech enterprises relies on the effects of "market competition" and "optimized resource allocation" to enhance regional innovation capabilities, with the weakest intensity. Secondly, compared with regions having underdeveloped innovation networks, high-tech enterprises in regions with developed innovation networks have positive self-reinforcing mechanisms for technological innovation, but the power of innovation networks is slightly weaker. In areas with developed innovation networks, high-tech enterprises need to transfer valuable technologies to activate positive feedback that high-tech enterprises enhance regional innovation capabilities, and then maintain the competitive advantages they have obtained. In regions with underdeveloped innovation networks, innovative members promote the improvement of innovation capabilities by building a collaborative network structure. In regions with developed innovation networks, innovative members rely on joining the multi-interactive cooperative network to maintain innovation advantages. Thirdly, whether the innovation network is developed or underdeveloped, the impact of technology absorption on regional innovation capabilities is greater than technology output. Technology absorption of high-tech enterprises actively seeks out their own technological deficiencies, precisely introduces and absorbs heterogeneous technologies, finally breaks through the dilemma of insufficient innovation. The technology output of high-tech enterprises is usually based on the economic benefits of technology applications to passively select technologies with profitable prospects, and tend to repeatedly provide technologies that they are good at to the technology market. Therefore, the passive innovation of technology output of high-tech enterprises plays a weaker role in promoting regional innovation capabilities.Finally, with the evolution of the level of regional innovation network, the technology flow of high-tech enterprises has an increasingly weak impact on regional innovation capability. Compared with the high cost of technology transaction, the closely interactive network relationship makes each innovation subject choose to carry out adaptive cooperative innovation with other innovation subjects based on their interest demands, obtain complementary innovation resources, and solve the innovation gap caused by information stickiness, which has the absolute advantage of low cost.
关键词
区域创新网络 /
高技术企业 /
技术输出 /
技术吸纳 /
区域创新能力
Key words
regional innovation network /
high-tech enterprise /
technology output /
technology absorption /
regional innovation capability
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]黄先海,宋学印.准前沿经济体的技术进步路径及动力转换-从“追赶导向”到“竞争导向”[J].中国社会科学,2017(6) : 60-79.
[2]魏江,应瑛,刘洋.研发网络分散化,组织学习顺序与创新绩效:比较案例研究[J].管理世界,2014(02):137-151+188.
[3]于明洁,郭鹏,张果.区域创新网络结构对区域创新效率的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(08):56-63.
[4]Freeman, C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues[J].Research Policy, 1991,20( 5) : 499-514
[5]何晓清.创新网络演化视角下的区域创新机制研究——以高技术产业和中低技术产业为例[J].研究与发展管理,2017,29(01):22-31
[6]何帅,陈良华.新型科研机构创新绩效的影响机理研究[J].科学学研究,2019,37(07):1306-1315
[7]吴晓云,王建平.网络关系强度对技术创新绩效的影响——不同创新模式的双重中介模型[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(07):155-166.
[8]陈培祯,曾德明.网络位置、知识基础对企业新产品开发绩效的影响[J].管理评论,2019,31(11):128-138.
[9]唐书林,肖振红,苑婧婷.网络模仿、集群结构和产学研区域协同创新研究:来自中国三大海洋装备制造业集群的经验证据[J].管理工程学报,2016,30(04):34-44.
[10]Cooke P, Morgan K. The Associational Economy: Firms, Regions, and Innovation[J]. Research Policy, 1998, 32(6):51-62.
[11]陈暮紫,秦玉莹,李楠.跨区域知识流动和创新合作网络动态演化分析[J].科学学研究,2019,37(12):2252-2264.
[12]谢其军,冯楚建,宋伟.合作网络、知识产权能力与区域自主创新程度:一个有调节的中介模型[J].科研管理,2019,40(11):85-94.
[13]魏江,徐蕾.知识网络双重嵌入、知识整合与集群企业创新能力[J].管理科学学报,2014,17(02):34-47.
[14]Jaffe A B, Fogarty M S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors[J]. American Economic Review, 2000,90(2):215-218.
[15]卓乘风,邓峰.创新要素流动与区域创新绩效——空间视角下政府调节作用的非线性检验[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(07):15-26.
[16]蒋仁爱,冯根福.贸易、FDI、无形技术外溢与中国技术进步[J].管理世界,2012(09):49-60.
[17]庞兰心,官建成,高峰.国际技术知识溢出效应及其影响因素研究[J].管理评论,2019,31(01):81-89.
[18]Blalock G , Simon D H . Do all firms benefit equally from downstream FDI? The moderating effect of local suppliers' capabilities on productivity gains[J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2009, 40(7):1095-1112.
[19]Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth[J].Bell Journal of Economics, 1979,10(1):92-116.
[20]林原,马荣康,刘凤朝.技术流动对区域技术专业化的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2018,39(07):13-23.
[21]许庆瑞,李杨,吴画斌.市场机制与非市场机制下的技术转移,哪种有利于提升创新能力?[J/OL].管理工程学报:1-11[2020-08-17]
[22]潘雄锋,艾博薇,明杨.中国区域间技术创新的空间溢出效应研究[J].运筹与管理,2019,28(07):118-124.
[23]李海林,徐建宾,林春培,张振刚.合作网络结构特征对创新绩效影响研究[J].科学学研究,2020,38(08):1498-1508.
[24]李健,余悦.合作网络结构洞、知识网络凝聚性与探索式创新绩效:基于我国汽车产业的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2018,21(06):121-130.
[25]陈伟,杨早立,张永超.网络结构与企业核心能力关系实证研究:基于知识共享与知识整合中介效应视角[J].管理评论,2014,26(06):74-82.
[26]曾诗鸿,姜雪,蔡明明.外商直接投资对多维度创新产出的影响[J].管理评论,2014,26(11):28-38.
技术流动
[27]Liu X , Wang C . Does foreign direct investment facilitate technological progress?: Evidence from Chinese industries[J]. Research Policy, 2004, 32(6):945-953.
[28]魏守华,顾佳佳,姜悦.多维视角下知识溢出机制与测度的研究述评[J].研究与发展管理,2019,31(03):121-133.
[29]蔡虹,张永林.我国区域间外溢技术知识存量的测度及其经济效果研究[J].管理学报,2008(04):568-575+590.
[30]Acs Z J , Anselin L , Varga A . Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(7):1069-1085.
[31]高霞,其格其,曹洁琼.产学研合作创新网络开放度对企业创新绩效的影响[J].科研管理,2019,40(09):231-240
[32]杨友才,耿璐璐,史倩姿.我国高技术产业间技术创新效率溢出效应——基于GVAR模型的研究[J].管理评论,2020,32(06):138-149.
[33]方敏,杨胜刚,周建军,雷雨亮.高质量发展背景下长江经济带产业集聚创新发展路径研究[J].中国软科学,2019(05):137-150.
[34]李婧,产海兰.空间相关视角下R&D人员流动对区域创新绩效的影响[J].管理学报,2018,15(03):399-409.
基金
国家社科基金重点项目:“黑龙江老工业基地创新驱动发展与结构调整问题研究”(16AZD006,2016.11—2021.06)。