专利合作网络影响科技型中小企业创新绩效的机理研究

王黎萤, 吴瑛, 朱子钦, 宋秀玲

科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 57-66.

PDF(773 KB)
PDF(773 KB)
科研管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (1) : 57-66.
论文

专利合作网络影响科技型中小企业创新绩效的机理研究

  • 王黎萤1,吴瑛1,朱子钦2,宋秀玲1
作者信息 +

A research on the influence mechanism of patent cooperation networks on innovation performance of technology-based SMEs

  • Wang Liying1, Wu Ying1, Zhu Ziqin2, Song Xiuling1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

研究结合ICT产业及制药产业上市科技型中小企业专利合作数据,基于网络特征差异及多元回归分析来探索和验证专利合作网络对企业创新绩效的影响。研究发现基于合作广度和深度不同组合的四种专利合作网络模式中,虽然高合作广度低合作深度、低合作广度高合作深度以及高合作广度高合作深度三种专利合作网络模式均正向影响企业创新绩效,但存在不同程度的曲线效应作用差异。企业网络能力在不同模式专利合作网络和企业创新绩效之间发挥完全中介效应,企业吸收能力在不同模式专利合作网络通过网络能力影响企业创新绩效过程中存在调节效应的作用差异。提出科技型中小企业通过优化专利合作行为来动态调整专利合作网络进而提升企业创新绩效的突破路径。

Abstract

Technology-based SMEs are important carriers of strategic emerging industries and core strength of modern industrial systems. Increasing the cultivation and support of technology-based SMEs are an important starting point for going deep into the implementation of innovation-driven development strategies. In the context of patents surging, technology-based SMEs still face bottlenecks of the lack of innovative resources. Although enterprises actively seek to cooperate with other organizations through applying for patents to establish a patent cooperation network, for integrating innovative resources, however, there are some problems. There is a hollow of internal technological innovation caused by excessive dependence on external technologies. On the other hand, there is a dilemma that it is difficult to sustain innovation due to technical rigidity. How much of the rich patent cooperation resources really transfer into a core competitive advantage that promotes the improvement of enterprises′ innovation performance? In an open network competition environment, enterprises must transform from traditional growth methods that rely on its internal accumulation to collaborative development methods that integrate external resources. So it is very important to select and embed a patent cooperation network that is compatible with the development of the enterprises, in this way it can truly promote the improvement of innovation performance. How to build a patent cooperation network that adapts to the growth of the enterprises? How to cultivate the key capabilities to achieve the transformation of patent cooperation resources to internal core competitiveness? How to adjust the evolution path of the patent cooperation network dynamically to achieve a breakthrough in the growth bottleneck? These are the key issues that need to be discussed and solved in the study of the use of patent cooperation networks to promote the sustainable growth of technology-based SMEs. But the unsatisfactory situation is, the existing researches are not deep enough on some aspects, such as how to choose different modes of enterprise patent cooperation networks, and how to establish a coordination mechanism between cooperative enterprises to improve the innovation performance of enterprises. 
     This research used 5,169 effective cooperative invention patent data from 485 listed technology-based SMEs in the ICT industry and the pharmaceutical industry, constructing four patent cooperation networks modes by different combinations of patent cooperation breadth and depth, which are: "compact type" (high-breadth & high-depth), "exploration type" (high-breadth & low-depth), "utilization type" (low-breadth & high-depth) and "loose type" (low-breadth & low-depth). Based on network characteristics differences and multiple regression analysis, this study explores and verifies the impact of patent cooperation networks on corporate innovation performance. 
       This study draws some important research results. The study found that in the four patent cooperation network modes based on different cooperation breadth and depth, the "compact type" mode patent cooperation network affects innovation performance of enterprises positively without curve effect; the "exploration type" mode affects innovation performance of enterprises positively, and has "U" shape curve influence effect; the "utilization type" mode affects innovation performance of enterprises positively, with an "inverted U" shape curve effect; the "loose type" mode affects innovation performance of enterprises negatively. 
The study further explores the influence mechanism of different modes patent cooperation networks on enterprise innovation performance by analyzing enterprise network capability and absorptive capability. Enterprise network capability plays a full mediating effect between three modes and enterprise innovation performance, the three modes are: "compact type", "exploration type" and "utilization type". Enterprise absorption capacity has different effects on moderating in the process of different modes of patent cooperation networks affecting innovation performance through network capability. 
     The research proposes a breakthrough path for technology-based SMEs to dynamically adjust the patent cooperation network and improve the innovation performance by optimizing the patent cooperation behavior: The first is to optimize the patent cooperation network mode. Technology-based SMEs should focus on strengthening their links with other entities from the view of breadth and depth of cooperation. Priority should be given to selecting effective cooperation entities, and actively constructing a "utilization type" patent cooperation network by increasing the frequency of cooperation and deepening the use of resources. Moreover, on the basic of fully possessing an excellent cooperation mechanism, the scope and frequency of cooperation should be expanded in two directions, and the model will be transformed into a "compact type" patent cooperation network mode. For other enterprises, the transformation from the "exploration type" to the "compact type" patent cooperation network can also be considered under some conditions, such as the government′s cultivation and support. 
    The second is to focus on cultivating the dynamic network capability of enterprises. Technology-based SMEs need to use key capabilities to balance the degree of embedding different types of patent cooperation subnets. At the same time as patent cooperation develops, it is necessary to form a dynamic network capability that matches the organizational changes and adjusts to the changes of the external network environment. By actively embedding to occupy the optimal position in the network, and strengthening interaction through effective communication, technology-based SMEs should effectively identify and integrate the information possessed by the external network, and jointly promote the establishment of cooperation. 
      The third is to enhance the absorption capacity by enterprises investing according to external resources. Enterprises should enhance their absorptive capacity by cultivating and introducing high-end talents, strengthening internal research and development capabilities, promoting the effective flow of knowledge within the organizations and building a learning culture. When the depth of cooperation between enterprises is low, we should focus on the ability to coordinate and match. While developing the absorptive capacity, attention should be paid to moderate openness, which makes the organic combination of enterprise resource openness and external knowledge absorption. So as to promote the core competitive advantage, we need to work on both inside and outside. 
    The fourth is to build an efficient patent cooperation network collaborative innovation sharing platform. The sharing platform should be built and cultivated from the government level. The government should introduce sharing cooperation policies and mobilize various innovation entities for resource sharing. In this way, the effective flow of knowledge, technology and information is promoted. Also, it helps to achieve the value-added knowledge and enhance the innovation performance of technology-based SMEs through more efficient patent cooperation networks. 

关键词

专利合作网络 / 网络能力 / 吸收能力 / 创新绩效 / 科技型中小企业

Key words

patent cooperation network / network capability / absorption capacity / innovation performance / technology-based SMEs

引用本文

导出引用
王黎萤, 吴瑛, 朱子钦, 宋秀玲. 专利合作网络影响科技型中小企业创新绩效的机理研究[J]. 科研管理. 2021, 42(1): 57-66
Wang Liying, Wu Ying, Zhu Ziqin, Song Xiuling. A research on the influence mechanism of patent cooperation networks on innovation performance of technology-based SMEs[J]. Science Research Management. 2021, 42(1): 57-66

参考文献

[1]王黎萤,池仁勇.专利合作网络研究前沿探析与展望[J]科学学研究2015,33(1)73-80.

Wang Liying,Chi RenyongThe frontier analysis and prospect of patent cooperation network research[J].Studies in Science of Science,2015,33(1):73-80.

[2] Tom Broekel,Ron Boschma.Knowledge networks in the Dutch aviation industry: the proximity paradox[J].Journal of Economic Geography,2012,12(2):409-433.

[3]付韬,杨志慧,秦震.京津冀区域医药产业专利合作网络结构及其对医药企业专利产出的影响[J].科技管理研究,201737(22)177-183

Fu Tao,Yang Zhihui,Qin zhenResearch on medical industrial patent cooperation network structure in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region and its effects on patent output of medical firms[J]Science and Technology Management Research,2017, 37(22)177-183

[4] Lam A.Organizational learning in multinationals: R&D networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK[J].Journal of Management Studies,2003,40(3)673-703.

[5] Nishimura, Junichi, Okamuro, Hiroyuki. R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: an empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan [J].Journal of Technology Transfer,2011,36(2):117-144.

[6]陈子凤官建成合作网络的小世界性对创新绩效的影响[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(3):115-120. 

Chen Zifeng , Guan Jiancheng.The impacts of small worlds on innovation[J]Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009,17(3):115-120. 

[7]Ozbugday Fatih Cemil,Brouwer Erik.Competition law, networks and innovation[J].Applied Economics Letters,2012,19(8):775-778

[8]Beaudry Catherine, Schiffauerova Andrea.Impacts of collaboration and network indicators on patent quality: The case of Canadian nanotechnology innovation[J].European Management Journal,2011,29(5):362-376. 

[9]Laursen K,Salter A.Open for lnnovation: The hole of Openness in Explaining lnnovation Performance among UK Manufacturing firms[J]Strategic Management Journal,2006, 27 (2):131-150.

[10]Hagedoorn J,Roijakkers N, Kranenburg H.Interfirm R&D Networks: The Importance of Strategic Network Capabilities for High-tech Partnership Formation[J].British Journal of Management, 2006, 17 (1):39-53

[11] Corsaro D.The impact of network configurations on value constellations in business markets-The case of an innovation network[J].Industrial Marketing Management,2012,41(1):54-67.

[12] John Hagedoorn,Hans Frankort,Letterie WilkoKnowledge flows in inter-firm R&D networks[C].Atlanta Competitive Advantage Conference Paper, Feb 2008:1-45

[13]Youngim Bae,Hyunjoon Chang.Efficiency and effectiveness between open and closed innovation: empirical evidence in South Korean manufacturers[J].Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,2012,24(10)967-980.

[14] 张振刚,李云健等.企业家社会资本、产学研合作与专利产出——合作创新意愿的调节作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (7):54-64.

Zhang zhengang,Li YunjianStudy on the relationship between entrepreneurial social capital, Industry-University-Research cooperation and patent output: The moderating role of intention to cooperative innovation[J].Science of Science and Management of S.& T,2016,37 (7) :54-64.

[15] Ralph Heidl, Corey PhelpsThe influence of inter organizational embeddedness on multi partner alliance stability[J].Academy of Management Proceedings,2010(1):1-6.

[16] Yuan Shi,JianCheng Guan.Small-world network effects on innovation: evidences from nanotechnology patenting[J].Journal of Nanoparticle Research,2016,18 (11) :329-345

[17]马文甲,高良谋.开放度与创新绩效的关系研究——动态能力的调节作用[J].科研管理,2016,37 (2):47-54.

Ma Wenjia,Gao LiangmouA research on the relationship between openness and innovation performance:The moderating role of dynamic capabilities[J].Science Research Management,2016,37 (2) :47-54.

[18] 钱锡红,杨永福,徐万里.网络位置、吸收能力与集群企业创新[J].经济管理,200931(07)21-27

 Qian Xihong,Yang Yongfu,Xu WanliNetwork Position,absorptive capacity and innovativenes of cluster firms[J]Economic Mangement Journal, 2009,31(07):21-27

[19] Granovetter M S.The strength of weak ties[J].American Journal of Sociology,1973,78 (6) :1360-1380.

[20] Erik Døving,Paul N. Gooderham.Dynamic capabilities as antecedents of the scope of related diversification: The case of small firm accountancy practices[J].Strategic Management Journal,2008,29 ( 8) : 841- 857.

[21]李纲,陈静静,杨雪.网络能力、知识获取与企业服务创新绩效的关系研究——网络规模的调节作用[J].管理评论,2017,29 (2):59-68.

 Li Gang,Chen Jingjing,Yang XueThe effects of  network competence and knowledge acquisition on a firm's service innovation performan :The moderating influence of network size[J].Management Review, 2017,29 (2) :59-68.

[22孙骞, 欧光军.双重网络嵌入与企业创新绩效——基于吸收能力的机制研究[J].科研管理,201839 (05)67-76

  Sun Qian,Ou GuangjunDouble network embeddedness and enterprise innovation performance——A mechanism study based on on absorptive capacity[J].Science Research Management, 2018,39 (05)67-76

[23] GCD Zubielqui,J Jones,L Lester.Knowledge Inflows From Market- and science-based Actors, Absorptive Capacity,Innovation And Performance: A Study of SMEs[J].International Journal of Innovation Management,2016,20 (06) :1-34

[24]  李显君,钟领,王京伦,王巍.开放式创新与吸收能力对创新绩效影响——基于我国汽车企业的实证[J].科研管理,201839 (01):45-52.

Li Xianjun,Zhong Ling, Wang Jinglun, WangweiImpact of open innovation and absorptive capacity on innovation performance:An empirical analysis of China's auto firms[J].Science Research Management,2018,39 (01):45-52.

基金

国家社科基金重大项目“技术标准与知识产权协同推进数字产业创新的机理与路径研究”(19ZDA078,2019.12—2024.12); 浙江省新型重点专业智库浙江工业大学中国中小企业研究院、浙江省中小微企业转型升级协同创新中心资助。

PDF(773 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/