科研管理

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于QCA方法的创新资源诅咒治理模式研究

郭元源1,贺易宁2,邓晓慧3   

  1. 1.浙江工业大学中小企业研究院,浙江 杭州310023;
    2.浙江工业大学经贸管理学院,浙江 杭州310023;
    3.浙江大学光华法学院,浙江 杭州310008
  • 出版日期:2019-04-20 发布日期:2019-04-23

Governance model of innovation resources curse based on the QCA method

Guo Yuanyuan1, He Yining2, Deng Xiaohui3   

  1. 1. China Institute for Small and Medium Enterprise, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China;
    2. College of Economics and Management, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310023, Zhejiang, China;
    3. Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University,Hangzhou 310008, Zhejiang, China
  • Online:2019-04-20 Published:2019-04-23

摘要: 创新资源是开展研发活动、获得创新产出的物质基础,但研究发现在部分情境下充沛的创新资源反而会导致创新绩效下滑,引发“资源诅咒”现象。通过收集31个省级行政区的创新资源与治理环境数据,采用定性比较分析方法对创新资源和治理环境组合对创新产出的效用进行分析,研究发现,创新产出效用较高的组合形式可以分为体系化法律支持模式、竞争性市场驱动模式和管理型政府驱动模式三种类型。研究结果为进一步优化创新资源配置、提升创新治理水平提供借鉴和参考。

Abstract:  Innovation resources are the material basis for carrying out R&D activities and obtaining innovation output. However, researchers have found that in some contextualization, abundant innovation resources lead to the decline of innovation performance and the phenomenon of “resource curse”. And appropriate governance environment can alleviate the curse which brought by innovation resources. Therefore, the governance environment variables are brought into the research field, so as to further clarify the ways of Governance and approaches to cope with the innovation resource curse though exploring the interaction mechanism between the governance environment, innovation resources and innovation performance.Through collecting data of innovation resources and governance environment in 31 province, innovation resources include R&D personnel (PI), R&D funds (FI) and external technology introduction (IET), and governance environment includes market-oriented process (MAR), government intervention (GI) and legal environment (LE). With qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method, develop its advantage on the research of asymmetric relations and the lower limit of sample size. Analyzes the utility of innovation resources and governance environment combination on innovation output, explores the antecedent conditions of innovation output input caused by innovation resource input in different government governance environments, and finally obtains five antecedent conditional configurations. By combination of configurations, find that combinations with higher utility output efficiency can be divided into three types include systematic legal support (including research and development personnel and the rule of law environment as core existence condition), competitive market driven model (including research and development personnel, research and development funds input and the marketization process as core existence condition) and the type of drive mode (including the marketization process and the degree of government as core existence condition, the rule of law and the external environment as core non-existence condition).The results show that in the governance environment, government intervention is an important condition for obtaining innovative output. Based on the development status of China's innovation activities, innovative enterprises need the government's macro-control of innovation activities, and guide the input of personnel and funds through government policies. Achieve the purpose of supporting innovation activities. The degree of marketization plays a key role in overcoming the curse of innovation resources. In an environment with a high degree of marketization, both personnel input and capital investment can improve the efficiency of resource allocation and increase innovation output by freely flowing in the market. Legal system construction can create a good environment for innovation, but it needs to take into account the development status of regional innovation. The strict legal environment is suitable for innovation leading areas, while the backward areas can gradually improve the legal system in a gradual way, so that innovation ability and governance environment can becoordinated. The introduction of external technology is likely to cause a decline in the ability of enterprises to innovate. Among the three innovative resources, researcher input and research funding are important foundations for innovation activities, and the introduction of external technology is likely to lead to crowding out effects and external dependence, resulting in a decline in corporate innovation capabilities. The results of research provide an effective reference for the further optimization of the allocation of innovative resources and improving the level of innovation governance.

Key words:  innovation resources, governance environment, qualitative comparative analysis