科研管理

科研管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 64-73.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

集群内网络关系对企业技术创业的影响：基于浙江的实证研究

郑健壮1,靳雨涵2,段匡哲3   

  1. 1.浙江大学城市学院,浙江 杭州310015; 2浙江大学管理学院,浙江 杭州310058; 3振石控股集团有限公司,浙江 桐乡314500
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-13 修回日期:2017-05-16 出版日期:2018-01-20 发布日期:2018-01-12
  • 通讯作者: 郑健壮
  • 基金资助:

    浙江省软科学研究重点项目“浙江制造业集群创新特征的内在形成机理研究——基于‘地理-产业-网络’三重变迁的视角”(批准号2016C25026),2016.1-2017.12。

An empirical study of the influence of cluster network tie on technological entrepreneurship based on the industries in Zhejiang

Zheng Jianzhuang1, Jin Yuhan2, Duan Kuangzhe3   

  1. 1. City College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310015, Zhejiang, China; 
    2. School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, Zhejiang, China;
    3. Zhenshi Holding Group Co., Ltd., Tongxiang 314500, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2016-12-13 Revised:2017-05-16 Online:2018-01-20 Published:2018-01-12

摘要： 集群内企业通过集群内部商业和政治网络获取信息类和资产类资源进行技术创业。本研究围绕以下三个问题探究集群内网络关系对企业技术创业的影响机理: 集群内网络关系对企业技术创业是否存在影响，如何产生影响，以及恶性竞争的调节作用。基于浙江省6个集群的实证研究显示：第一，集群内商业和政治网络均对企业技术创业有显著的正向影响，且前者比后者的影响更大。其中：商业网络仅有助于信息类资源的获取，政治网络仅有助于资产类资源获取；第二，信息类资源获取在商业网络对企业技术创业的影响中起部分中介作用，资产类资源获取在政治网络对企业技术创业的影响中起完全中介作用；第三，恶性竞争在商业网络对企业技术创业的影响中起负向调节作用，而在政治网络对企业技术创业的影响中的调节作用并不显著。

关键词: 技术创业, 网络关系, 资源获取, 产业集群, 恶性竞争

Abstract: The firms in cluster acquire information and assets through the business and political network tie to carry on the technological entrepreneurship. The paper focuses on the following three points to explain the influencing mechanism of cluster network tie on technological entrepreneurship: Whether and how the network tie in the cluster influences on technological entrepreneurship, and the adjusting role of the dysfunctional competition between them. Based on the empirical study of six clusters in Zhejiang province, the results reveal that: Firstly, firms’ business and political network ties have significantly positive effects on firms’ technological entrepreneurship with the former’s influence greater than the latter. Business network tie facilitates the acquisition of information resources, while the political network tie reinforces the acquisition of assets. Secondly, the relationship between business network tie and firms’ technological entrepreneurship is partly mediated by information resource acquisition; the relationship between political network tie and firms’ technological entrepreneurship is fully mediated by assets resource acquisition. Thirdly, dysfunctional competition plays a negative moderating role between business network tie in the cluster and firms’ technological entrepreneurship, but not a significant moderating role between political network tie in the cluster and firms’ technological entrepreneurship.

Key words: technological entrepreneurship, network tie, resources acquisition, industrial cluster, dysfunctional competition