对国外专利池反垄断政策的宏观影响因素研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (9): 134-140.

对国外专利池反垄断政策的宏观影响因素研究

朱相宇, 乔小勇

北京工业大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100124

收稿日期:2013-09-07 修回日期:2015-03-27 出版日期:2015-09-25 发布日期:2015-09-18
通讯作者: 朱相宇
作者简介:朱相宇(1980-),男(汉),辽宁沈阳人,北京工业大学经济与管理学院(讲师,管理学博士),研究方向:创新管理与竞争政策。
乔小勇(1983-),男(汉),河南新郑人,北京工业大学经济与管理学院(副研究员,管理学博士),研究方向:贸易政策与产业救济。
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金"我国科技服务业自主创新体系国际化发展模式与政策选择研究"(14CGL003,2014.06-2016.12);国家社会科学基金"我国反补贴政策产业救济效果评估体系与方法研究"(12CGL088,2012.06-2015.06)。

A research on macroscopic factors of antitrust policyagainst foreign patent pool

Zhu Xiangyu, Qiao Xiaoyong

School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received:2013-09-07 Revised:2015-03-27 Online:2015-09-25 Published:2015-09-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 专利池一直是各国反垄断机构审查的重点对象。构建由二元选择模型和滞后变量模型组成的组合模型,选取美国、欧盟和日本发起的24起专利池反垄断案件及其国内宏观经济发展相关数据,实证研究对国外专利池反垄断政策实施的宏观影响因素。研究结果显示,是否具有成熟的反垄断法律体系的影响方向并不确定,经济增长率具有显著负影响,失业率、贸易逆差和进口渗透率具有显著正影响。进一步选取2004年我国企业在美国起诉DVD 3C专利池案件进行案例分析,在此基础上,得出相应结论与启示。

关键词: 专利池, 反垄断政策, 宏观影响因素

Abstract: Patent pool is always the focus of review by anti-trust regulators. This paper constructs a composition model composed of the binary choice model and the lagged variable model, selects some data related to 24 anti-monopoly cases of patent pool of the United States, European Union and Japan and to China's macroeconomic development, and makes an empirical research on the macroscopic factors of anti-monopoly for foreign patent pool. The result shows that whether the antitrust law system is mature, its impact direction is uncertain, the economic growth rate has a significant negative effect, the unemployment rate, trade deficit and import penetration rate has significant positive effects, and then it further selects the case in which Chinese enterprises prosecute DVD 3C patent pool in the United States in 2004 to analyze as a case study. On this basis, some conclusions and enlightenments are obtained from this paper.

Key words: patent pool, antitrust policy, macroscopic factors

中图分类号:

F062.9

朱相宇, 乔小勇. 对国外专利池反垄断政策的宏观影响因素研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(9): 134-140.

Zhu Xiangyu, Qiao Xiaoyong. A research on macroscopic factors of antitrust policyagainst foreign patent pool[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(9): 134-140.

参考文献

[1] 宁立志, 胡贞珍.从美国法例看专利联营的反垄断法规制[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(6):469-477.Ning Lizhi,Hu Zhenzhen.Antitrust law regulation of patent pool base on the cases in the U.S.[J].Global Law Review,2006,28(6):469-477. [2] 詹映. 美国专利池反垄断政策的新发展及其对我国的影响[J].科研管理,2011,32(11):77-83.Zhan Yin.The new development of U.S.antitrust policy on patent pool and its impacts on China[J].Science Research Management,2011,32(11):77-83. [3] Bekkers R.,Iversen,E.,Blind,K..Patent pools and non-assertion agreements:Coordination mechanisms for multi-party IPR holders in standardization[C].Paper for the EASST 2006 Conference,2006. [4] Posner Richard.A statistical study of antitrust enforcement[J].Journal of Law & Economics,1970,13(12):365-420. [5] Long William F.,Schramm Richard,Tollison Robert.The economic determinants of antitrust activity[J].Journal of Law & Economics,1973,16(2):351-364. [6] Amacher Ryan,Higgins Richard,Shughart William,Tollison Robert.The bechavior of regulatory activity over the business cycle:an empirical test[J].Economic Inquiry,1985,33(1):7-19. [7] Coate Malcom,Higgins Richard,McChesney Fred.Bureaucracy and politics in FTC merger challenges[J].Journal of Law & Economics,1990,33(2):463-482. [8] Feinberg Robert,Reynolds Kara.The determinants of state-level antitrust activity[J].Review of Industrial Organization,2010,37(3):179-196. [9] 白雪洁. 当代竞争政策的影响因素及其对我国反垄断法的启示[J].云南社会科学,2008(1):118-122.Bai Xuejie.Affecting factors of contemporary competition policy and its revelation for Chinese antitrust law[J] Social Sciences in Yunnan,2008(1):118-122. [10] 沈芳. 经济理论对美国反垄断政策的影响[J].上海师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,37(2):12-17.Shen Fang.Influence of the theory of economic upon America's anti-monopoly policies[J].Journal of Shanghai Nomal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition),2008,37(2):12-17. [11] 高晋康. 构建符合现代高科技产业特点的垄断评价与规制机构——从微软垄断案谈起[J].财贸经济,2000,21(11):60-63.Gao Jinkang.Build the organization of monopoly assessment and regulation in accord with modern high-tech industry characteristic——Start with the case of monopoly against microsoft[J].Finance & Trade Economics,2000,21(11):60-63. [12] Ekenger R.The rationale for patent pools and their effect on competition[J].Faculty of Law University of Lund,2003(3):154-179. [13] 万长松. 产业哲学引论[M].沈阳:东北大学出版社,2008.Wan Changsong.Introduction of industry philosophy[M].Shenyang:Northeastern University Press,2008. [14] 陈美章. 专利保护与产业国际竞争的策略[J].电子知识产权,2011(10):87-91.Chen Meizhang.Patent protection and the tactics of industry international competition[J].Electronics Intellectual Property,2011(10):87-91. [15] 张平. 论知识产权制度的"产业政策原则"[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,49(5):121-132.Zhang Ping.On the "industrial policy perspective" of the intellectual property system[J].Journal of Peking University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),2012,49(5):121-132. [16] 詹姆斯. 布兰德.战略性贸易和产业政策的依据[A].保罗.克鲁格曼.战略性贸易政策与新国际经济学[M].北京:中信出版社,2010. James.Brand.The basis of strategic trade and industrial policies[A].Paul.Krugman.Strategic trade policy with the new international economics[M].Beijing:China CITIC Press,2010. [17] 保罗. 克鲁格曼.战略性贸易政策与新国际经济学[M].北京:中信出版社,2010.Paul.Krugman.Strategic trade policy with the new international economics[M].Beijing:China CITIC Press,2010. [18] Alan A.Fisher and Robert H.Lande.Efficiency considerations in merger enforcement[J].California Law Review,1983,71 (6):1582-1610.