知识型团队专业技能认知一致性对创新的影响

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8) : 68-76.

论文

龙静, 程德俊

作者信息 +

Influence of cognitive consistency of team-members' professional skills on innovation

Long Jing, Cheng Dejun

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

本研究基于江苏省内42家高科技企业的知识型研发团队,采取问卷调查的方式,利用回归分析和结构方程模型的实证检验,探索团队成员专业技能认知一致性对创新氛围和创新绩效的影响机制以及团队成员公平感知在其中起何种作用。结果发现,知识型团队成员专业技能认知一致性对团队创新绩效和创新氛围均具有正向影响,且团队成员分配公平感知在该正向影响过程中起中介作用,而团队成员程序公平感知对上述影响过程起调节作用,团队成员的程序公平感知越强烈,则其专业技能认知一致性对创新绩效和创新氛围的正向影响作用越显著。

Abstract

This research used a questionnaire investigation based on 42 high-tech enterprises in Jiangsu Province, to test the effect mechanism of cognitive consistency of team-members' professional skills on innovation atmosphere and innovation performance with the analysis tool of regression and SEM . The results showed that, cognitive consistency of professional skills among members in knowledge-teams has a positive effect on both team innovation performance and innovation atmosphere, and the members' perception of distributive justice plays a mediating role in the process of this positive effect, while the members' perceived procedural justice plays a moderating role in the above impact process, and the more intense team members perceive the procedural justice, the more significant the positive effect of their cognitive consistency of professional skills on innovation performance and innovation atmosphere.

导出引用

龙静, 程德俊. 知识型团队专业技能认知一致性对创新的影响[J]. 科研管理. 2015, 36(8): 68-76

Long Jing, Cheng Dejun. Influence of cognitive consistency of team-members' professional skills on innovation[J]. Science Research Management. 2015, 36(8): 68-76

中图分类号： F273.1

参考文献

[1] Bunderson, J. S. Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(4), 557-591. [2] Jehn, K. A., Rispens, S., & Thatcher, S. M. B. The effects of conflict asymmetry on work group and individual outcomes[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2010, 53(3), 596-616. [3] Wageman R, Gardner H, Mortensen M. The changing ecology of teams: New directions for teams research[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2012, 33:301-315. DOI:10.1002/job.1775. [4] Dineen, B. R., Noe, R. A., Shaw, J. D., Duffy, M. K., & Wiethoff, C. Level and dispersion of satisfaction in teams: Using foci and social context to explain teh satisfaction-absenteeism relationship[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(3), 623-643. [5] Gardner, H. K., & Kwan, L. B.Expertise dissensus: A multi-level model of teams' differing perceptions about member expertise [C]. Harvard Business School working paper, 2012. [6] Hollingshead, A. B. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001, 81(6), 1080-1089. [7] Wageman R. How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching[J].Organization Science, 2001, (5):559-577. [8] Wilke, H. A. M., & Meertens, R. W. Group performance[M]. Routledge, London, New York, 1994. [9] McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. The study of small groups, past, present, and future[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2000, 4(1), 95-105. [10] Edmondson, A. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(2), 350-383. [11] Adams, J. S. Inequity in social exchange.In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology [M], 1965, 267-299. [12] Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., & Dutton, J. E. Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981, 26(4), 501-524. [13] Thibaut, J., & Walter, L. Procedural justice: A psychological analysis[M].Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ., 1975. [14] Leventhal, G. S. What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to study of fairness in social relationships. In: Gergen, K. J., Greenberg, M. S. & Wills, R. H. (Eds.), social exchange: Advance in theory and research. [M] New York, NY: Plenum, 1980, 27-55. [15] Austin, J. R. Transactive memory in organizational groups: The effects of content, consensus, specialization, and accuracy ongroup performance [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 2003, 866-878. [16] Kendall, M. G. Rank correlation methods[M]. New York: Hafner Publishing Co, 1995. [17] Farmer, S. M., Tiemey, P., & Kate Kung-Mcintyre. Employee creativity in Taiwan: An application ofthe role identity theory [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2003, 46(5), [618-630. [18] Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behaviors[J].Academy of Management Journal, 1993, 36(3), 527-556. [19] Hitt, M. A., Bierman, L., Uhlenbruck, K., & Shimizu, K. The importance of resources in the internationalization of professional service firms: The good, the bad, and the ugly[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2006, 49(6), 1137-1157. [20] Amason A C. Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams [J]. The Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39:123-148. [21] James, L. R., Demaree R. G., & Wolf, G. Rwg: An assessment of within group interrater agreement[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1993, 78(2), 306-309. [22] Hair, J . F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed. )[M], Prentice Hall International : UK, 1998. [23] Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions [M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1991. [24] Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., & Staats, B. R. Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(4), 998-1022. [25] 侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. 结构方程模型及其应用[M]. 北京教育科学出版社,2002. Kit-Tai Hau, Zhonglin Wen, Zijuan Cheng. Structral equation model and its applications[M]. Educational Science Publishing House,2002. [26] 李秀娟, 魏峰. 组织公正和交易型领导对组织承诺的影响方式研究[J]. 南开管理评论, 2007(5):82-88. Jean Lee, Feng Wei. The effect of organizational justice on commitment: Transactional leadership as moderator[J]. Nankai Business Review, 2007(5):82-88. [27] 林帼儿, 陈子光, 钟建安. 组织公平文献综述及未来的研究方向[J]. 心理科学, 2006(4). Lam Wing, Ziguang Chen, Jianan Zhong. The preliminery literature review and future research directions of organizational justice[J]. Phychological Science, 2006(4). [28] 刘衡, 李西垚. 研发团队公平感、领导方式对创新的影响研究[J]. 科研管理, 2010 (S1). Heng Liu, Xiyao Li. Justice perception in R&D teams, leadership style, and their effects on the innovation[J]. Science Research Management, 2010 (S1). [29] 孟太生, 刘璞, 井润田. 基于组织公平的变革型领导行为与组织公民权行为关系的实证研究[J]. 科研管理, 2007(6):123-129. Taisheng Meng, Pu Liu, Runtian Jing. The empirical research on the relation between the transformational leadership conduct and the organizational citizenship behavior based on the organizational justice[J]. Science Research Management, 2007, (6):123-129.

基金

国家自然科学基金项目"创业团队内、外社会网络特征影响团队创造力的互动机制研究"(编号:71072041, 2011－2013)、"创业团队社会网络和团队动态机制对创新绩效的影响:基于创业演化阶段的纵向研究"(编号:71272096, 2013－2016)、江苏省教育厅校外研究基地项目"江苏创新创业人才研究"的阶段性研究成果。