为对我国知识产权实际保护状况作出客观评判, 以近年来我国各级法院审理的4768件知识产权侵权案件司法判例为统计对象, 重点围绕权利人维权成本和侵权人侵权代价进行实证分析。结果显示, 知识产权维权“(经济)成本高”问题并不显著, 但维权“周期长”问题确实存在, 且多由确权程序引发诉讼中止所致。在侵权代价方面, 知识产权侵权“赔偿低”问题十分突出, 法院过多适用“法定赔偿”标准确定赔偿额, 使权利人常常得不偿失, 而“举证难”是导致这一问题的关键原因。建议我国加大对知识产权侵权行为的惩罚力度以提高侵权者侵权代价, 并从解决“举证难”入手, 破解“赔偿低”问题。同时, 完善我国知识产权确权机制, 以根治知识产权维权“周期长”之痼疾。
Abstract
In order to make an objective judgment on the actual situation of IPR protection in China, this article investigates 4,768 judicatory cases of IPR infringement in recent years and focus on the cost of IPR protection and IPR infringement. The results showed that the problem of “high (monetary) cost” of IPR protection is not significant, but the problem of “long cycle length” do exist, which is mostly owing to the too long procedure of IPR confirmation. As to the cost of IPR infringement, the problem of “low compensation” is very prominent. The courts always adopt the rule of pre-established damages when determining compensation, which usually results in the fact that the amount of compensation cannot make up the protection cost of right holders. Its key cause is the problem of “difficult to prove”. This paper suggests to increase the penalties for infringement of IPR and enhance the payout of infringers, while solving the problem of “difficult to prove” to increase the compensation for right holders. In addition, China should improve the procedure of IPR re-examination in order to thoroughly resolve the problem of “long cycle”.
关键词
知识产权 /
维权成本 /
侵权代价 /
司法判例
Key words
IPR /
cost of IPR protection /
cost of IPR infringement /
judicatory cases
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 吴汉东.中国知识产权法制建设的评价与反思[J].中国法学,2009(1):51-68.Wu Handong. The review and consideration of the chinese intellectual property law [J]. China Legal Science, 2009(1):51-68.
[2] 詹映.我国知识产权保护水平的实证研究——国际比较与适度性评判[J].科学学研究, 2013(9):1347-1354.Zhan Ying.Empirical research on the protection level of intellectual property right in China—International compare and the appropriateness evaluation [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2013(9):1347-1354.
[3] USITC. China: Effects of intellectual property infringement and indigenous innovation policies on the U.S. economy[R], May,2011,http://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4226.pdf.
[4] 王利明.美国惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J]. 比较法研究,2003(5):1-15.Wang Liming. Study on the regime of punitive damage in the united states [J]. Journal of Comparative Law, 2003(5):1-15.
[5] 和育东.专利侵权损害赔偿计算制度:变迁、比较与借鉴[J]. 知识产权,2009(5):7-18. He Yudong. The regime ofpatent infringement damages calculation: Change, comparison and reference [J]. Intellectual Property, 2009(5):7-18.
[6] 李明德.关于《专利法修订草案(送审稿)》的几点思考[J].知识产权, 2013(9):3-8.Li Mingde. Some considerations on the draft of patent law amendment [J]. Intellectual Property, 2013(9):3-8.
[7] 李晓秋.专利侵权惩罚性赔偿制度:引入抑或摒弃[J].法商研究,2013(4):136-144.Li Xiaoqiu. Punitive damage in the patent infringement: Introduce or abandon [J].Studies in Law and Business, 2013(4):136-144.
[8] 董雪兵, 朱慧, 康继军, 宋顺风. 转型期知识产权保护制度的增长效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2012(8):4-17.Dong Xuebing, Zhu Hui, Kang Jijun and Song Shunfeng, The effect of intellectual property rights protection system on Chinese economic growth during transition period[J]. Economic Research, 2012(8):4-17.
[9] 贺宁馨,袁晓东. 我国专利侵权损害赔偿制度有效性的实证研究[J].科研管理,2012(4):124-130.He Ningxin, Yuan Xiaodong. The effectiveness about the compensation system for the patent infringement damage in China [J]. Science Research Management, 2012(4):124-130.
基金
国家社科基金项目:反假冒贸易协定对我国的潜在影响及其对策研究(11BFX144),2011-2014;司法部国家法治与法学理论研究有项目:我国知识产权合理保护水平的证实研究——定量测度、理想水平与现实选择(09SFB3024),2009-2014;国家知识产权局软科学研究项目(SS14-A-01),2014-2015。
PDF(1 KB)
