华人企业的家长式领导对创新行为的作用路径研究

科研管理 ›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (7): 105-112.

华人企业的家长式领导对创新行为的作用路径研究

王双龙

西南大学经济管理学院, 重庆 400715

收稿日期:2013-05-21 修回日期:2015-01-23 出版日期:2015-07-25 发布日期:2015-07-08
作者简介:王双龙(1980－),男(汉),甘肃静宁人,博士,西南大学经济管理学院讲师,研究方向:职业流动管理、组织创新。
基金资助:
全国教育科学规划项目(EHA120373,2012.12);国家社会科学基金项目(11BGL017,2011.01)。

A study on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and individual innovative behaviors in Chinese firms

Wang Shuanglong

School of Economics and Management, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received:2013-05-21 Revised:2015-01-23 Online:2015-07-25 Published:2015-07-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 如何提高员工在工作场所的创新行为, 是知识经济时代中国企业管理者面临的一个重要问题, 以往研究很少关注华人企业组织中的家长式领导风格对创新行为的影响机制。本文基于对中国企业员工的实地调查, 研究结论发现家长式威权领导对创新行为具有负向影响, 而家长式仁慈领导对创新行为具有正向影响。此外, 家长式领导还会通过创新自我效能感间接影响创新行为, 中国传统性在家长式领导与创新行为之间具有调节作用。

关键词: 家长式领导, 个人创新行为, 创新自我效能感, 中国传统性

Abstract: How to improve employees' innovative behaviors is an important issue for the managers of the Chinese enterprises in the era of knowledge-based economy. However, current researches paid little attention on the influential mechanisms of paternalistic leadership to individual innovative behaviors in the Chinese context. Based on a survey of Chinese employees, the conclusion is that authoritarian leadership has a negative effect on individual innovative behaviors, and benevolent-moral leadership has a positive effect on the behaviors. Meanwhile, creative self-efficacy and Chinesetraditionality has a mediating and moderating effects on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and individual innovative behaviors respectively.

Key words: paternalistic leadership, individual innovative behaviors, creative self-efficacy, Chinese traditionality

中图分类号:

F273.3

王双龙. 华人企业的家长式领导对创新行为的作用路径研究[J]. 科研管理, 2015, 36(7): 105-112.

Wang Shuanglong. A study on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and individual innovative behaviors in Chinese firms[J]. Science Research Management, 2015, 36(7): 105-112.

参考文献

[1] Oldham, G. R., Cummings, A. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39: 607-634. [2] Shalley, C.E. Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity[J], Academy of Management Journal, 1995, 38(2): 483-503. [3] Anderson, N.R., King, N. Innovation in organizations. In C. L. Cooper I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology [M] (8:1-33). Chichester: Wiley. 1993. [4] Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. Acultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organization. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon, Management of organizations in the Chinese context[M]. London: Macmillan. 2000. [5] Redding, G. (1990), The spirit of Chinese capitalism[M], Walter de Gruyter, New York, NY. [6] Westwood, R. I. (Ed.) (1992). Organizational behaviour: A southeast asian perspective [M]. Hong Kong: Longman Group. [7] 郑伯埙. 家长权威与领导行为之关系:一个台湾民营企业主持人的个案研究[J], 中央研究院民族学研究所集刊, 1995(79):119-173.Cheng, B.S. Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a taiwanese CEO [J]. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academic Sinica, 1995(79): 119-173. [8] Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. Self-determination in a work organization [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(4): 580-590. [9] Schriesheim C A, Neider L L, Scandura T A. Delegation and leader-member exchange: Main effects, moderators, and measurement issues [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41(3):298-318. [10] Burress, M. A. The relationship between team leader behaviors and team performance and satisfaction[C]. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton, TX. 1996. [11] Ford, C.. A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1996, 21: 1112-1142. [12] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [13] Settoon R P, Bennett N, Liden R C. Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organization support, leader-member exchange, and employee reciprocity [J].Journal of applied psychology, 1996, 81(3): 219. [14] Ashforth, B. Petty tyranny in organizations[J]. Human Relations, 1994, 47: 755-778. [15] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [16] Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1988, 13(3), 471-481. [17] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [18] 郑伯埙, 谢佩鸳, 周丽芳. 校长领导作风, 上下关系品质及教师角色外行为:转型式与家长式领导的效果[J]. 本土心理学研究, 2002(17): 105-161.Cheng, B.S., Shieh, P.Y., & Chou, L.F. The principal's leadership, leader-member exchange quality, and the teacher's extra-role behavior: The effects of transformational and paternalistic leadership [J]. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 2002, 17: 105-161. [19] Amabile, T.M. A model of creativity and innovation in organizations [J]. In B.M. Shaw &Cummings (Eds.). Research in Organizational Behavior, 1988, 10: 123-167. [20] Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control[M]. New York: W.H. Freeman & Company. 1997. [21] Major, D.A., Kozlowski, S.W.J. Newcomer information seeking: Individual and contextual influences [J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1997, 5: 16-28. [22] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [23] Farth, J. L., Earley, P. C., & Lin, S. C. Impetus for action: Actual analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42:421-444. [24] 郑伯埙, 周丽芳, 黄敏萍, 樊景立, 彭泗清, 家长式领导的三元模式:中国大陆企业组织的证据[J], 本土心理学(台湾), 2003(20):209-250.Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F. Huang, M. P., Farh, J. L., & Peng S.P. A triad model of paternalistic leadership: Evidence from business organizations in mainland China [J].Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies (Taiwan), 2003(20): 209-250. [25] Scott, S.G., Bruce, R.A. Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1994, 37: 580-607. [26] Tierney, P., Farmer, S.M. Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45:1137-1148. [27] Farth, J. L., Earley, P.C., & Lin, S. C. Impetus for action: A cultural analysis of justice and organizational citizenship behavior in Chinese society [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42: 421-444. [28] Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M.S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review [J]. Journal of Management, 2005, 31: 874-900.